Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
00–25K
125–50K
450–75K
1075–100K
8100–150K
2150K+
25 reports with mileage · 13 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Suspension. Review the 20 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Structure. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 3 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
1 crash reports0 fire reports1 injury reports
What owners actually said
38 reports
Mileage unknown · Nov 22, 2006
Structure
SPRING PERCHES ON THE FRONT SUSPENSION HAS RUSTED AND ARE FALLING APART. THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY THREAT AND IF THE PERCHES BREAK WHILE DRIVING, PEOPLE CAN GET KILLED. LOCAL MERCEDES DEALERSHIP IS REFUSING TO REPAIR OR EVEN INSPECT THE PROBLEM AND IS TELLING ME THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO. RUST ON THE FRAME WELD IN ANY CAR IS N…
Read full complaint
SPRING PERCHES ON THE FRONT SUSPENSION HAS RUSTED AND ARE FALLING APART. THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY THREAT AND IF THE PERCHES BREAK WHILE DRIVING, PEOPLE CAN GET KILLED. LOCAL MERCEDES DEALERSHIP IS REFUSING TO REPAIR OR EVEN INSPECT THE PROBLEM AND IS TELLING ME THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO. RUST ON THE FRAME WELD IN ANY CAR IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, I AM DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED BY THE LACK OF QUALITY AND LACK OF SUPPORT FROM MERCEDES-BENZ!!!*JB
NHTSA ODI #10174087
129,600 miles · Oct 11, 2006
Suspension
DRIVING STRAIGHT AT ABOUT 25 MPH WHEN THE LEFT FRONT SPRING PERCH BROKE. I WAS ABLE TO STOP CAR WITH NO INJURY OR DAMAGE TO THE CAR. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10170549
78,000 miles · Sep 5, 2006
Suspension
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS, THE VEHICLE'S FRONT END STARTED SHAKING. THE PROBLEM WAS GETTING WORST. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP FOR INSPECTION WHO NOTIFIED THE PERCH, WHICH SUPPORTED THE COILS SPRINGS, WERE SEPARATED FROM THE STRUCTURE. THE MANUFACTURER REFE…
Read full complaint
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS, THE VEHICLE'S FRONT END STARTED SHAKING. THE PROBLEM WAS GETTING WORST. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP FOR INSPECTION WHO NOTIFIED THE PERCH, WHICH SUPPORTED THE COILS SPRINGS, WERE SEPARATED FROM THE STRUCTURE. THE MANUFACTURER REFERRED THE CONTACT TO A DEALERSHIP WHO ACKNOWLEDGED THE DEFECT AND NOTIFIED THE COST WOULD BE COVERED BY THE CONTACT.
NHTSA ODI #10167390
62,000 miles · Jul 10, 2006
Visibility
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, WHEN THE REAR PASSENGER WINDOW WAS OPENED, THERE WAS A RATTLING SOUND, AND A SOUND OF GLASS BREAKING. AFTER THESE INCIDENCES THE WINDOW WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO CLOSE, EVEN THOUGH THE WINDOW MOTOR WAS STILL FUNCTIONING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A SERVICE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DETE…
Read full complaint
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, WHEN THE REAR PASSENGER WINDOW WAS OPENED, THERE WAS A RATTLING SOUND, AND A SOUND OF GLASS BREAKING. AFTER THESE INCIDENCES THE WINDOW WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO CLOSE, EVEN THOUGH THE WINDOW MOTOR WAS STILL FUNCTIONING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A SERVICE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE WINDOW REGULATOR HAD FAILED, AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REPLACED.
NHTSA ODI #10161970
79,000 miles · Mar 13, 2006
Suspension
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED IN THE GARAGE, THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE COIL SPRING FELL OFF. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN SEEN BY A MECHANIC.
NHTSA ODI #10152568
115,200 miles · Jan 26, 2006
Suspension
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE WAS MAKING A NOISE IN THE FRONT END. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE CONTACT'S REPAIR SHOP AND DETERMINED THE UPPER SPRING SUPPORT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE BROKE. THE CONTACT WELDED IN A NEW UPPER SPRING SUPPORT.
NHTSA ODI #10148764
77,635 miles · Oct 25, 2005
Suspension
WHILE DRIVING AT 35 MPH DOWN A SMALL HILL THE FRONT PASSENGER SPRING MOUNT (PERCH) ON MY 1997 E 300 DIESEL (W210) BROKE OFF CAUSING THE COIL SPRING TO FALL OFF OF THE CAR. THIS WAS AN UNBELIEVABLY DANGEROUS OCCURRANCE AND LUCKILY IT DID NOT HAPPEN WHEN I WAS GOING 65 MPH. I HAVE BROUGHT THE CAR MY AUTOBODY SHOP AND WE ARE STILL …
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING AT 35 MPH DOWN A SMALL HILL THE FRONT PASSENGER SPRING MOUNT (PERCH) ON MY 1997 E 300 DIESEL (W210) BROKE OFF CAUSING THE COIL SPRING TO FALL OFF OF THE CAR. THIS WAS AN UNBELIEVABLY DANGEROUS OCCURRANCE AND LUCKILY IT DID NOT HAPPEN WHEN I WAS GOING 65 MPH. I HAVE BROUGHT THE CAR MY AUTOBODY SHOP AND WE ARE STILL WORKING ON WHO WILL COVER THE COST OF MY REPAIRS (INSURANCE OR MB)
NHTSA ODI #10140792
104,000 miles · Sep 29, 2005
Suspension
DT: THE CONSUMER FOUND OUT THIS MORNING THAT THE SPRING HOUSING WAS CORRODED. THE FRONT COIL SPRING HOUSING CORRODED AND BROKE AWAY FROM THE BODY ON FRONT PASSENGER'S SIDE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED BY THE CONSUMER WHILE HE WAS ROTATING HIS TIRES. HE FELT THE SPRING COULD COME OUT AND CAUSE THE LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL. THERE HAS BEEN …
Read full complaint
DT: THE CONSUMER FOUND OUT THIS MORNING THAT THE SPRING HOUSING WAS CORRODED. THE FRONT COIL SPRING HOUSING CORRODED AND BROKE AWAY FROM THE BODY ON FRONT PASSENGER'S SIDE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED BY THE CONSUMER WHILE HE WAS ROTATING HIS TIRES. HE FELT THE SPRING COULD COME OUT AND CAUSE THE LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL. THERE HAS BEEN NO REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT AT THIS TIME. THE CONSUMER PLANNED TO CONTACT THE DEALER THIS AFTERNOON. THERE WERE OTHER COMPLAINTS LISTED ON THE NHTSA WEBSITE AND OTHER WEBSITES AS WELL. THE MERCEDES OWNER WEBSITE HAD A NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS LISTED. THE VEHICLE IS AN E420. THE CHASSIS NUMBER W210.*AK
NHTSA ODI #10138106
100,100 miles · Sep 26, 2005
Suspension
SPRING PERCH IS CHEAPLY WELDED TO THE WHEEL WELL ON THE MERCEDES 210 CHASSIS (1997 E420). ALL OTHER CARDS HAVE IT ATTACHED TO A SOLID BAR. MERCEDES WELDED IT TO VERY THIN SHEET METAL WHICH MERCEDES KNOWS HAS BEEN FAILING AT AN ALARMING RATE (DEALER ADMITTED THIS TO ME - THEY SEE THIS PROBLEM EVERY WEEK). 18 INCH LONG SUSPENSION…
Read full complaint
SPRING PERCH IS CHEAPLY WELDED TO THE WHEEL WELL ON THE MERCEDES 210 CHASSIS (1997 E420). ALL OTHER CARDS HAVE IT ATTACHED TO A SOLID BAR. MERCEDES WELDED IT TO VERY THIN SHEET METAL WHICH MERCEDES KNOWS HAS BEEN FAILING AT AN ALARMING RATE (DEALER ADMITTED THIS TO ME - THEY SEE THIS PROBLEM EVERY WEEK). 18 INCH LONG SUSPENSION SPRING POPPED OUT OF MY CAR WHILE MOVING. I COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED AS CAR IS UNCONTROLLABLE AFTER SUSPENSION GIVES OUT. INEXCUSABLE DESIGN FLAW THAT MERCEDES KNOWS IS A DAILY PROBLEM FOR ANYONE WITH THE 210 CHASSIS (AND THE HEAVIER ENGINES (420, 430 ETC.) WHERE THERE IS ADDITIONAL WEIGHT ON THE FRONT SUSPENSION). SERVICE REP AT DEALER EVEN TOLD ME THAT HE HAS SEEN IT HAPPEN ON THE HIGHWAY AND KNEW EXACTLY WHAT WAS GOING ON B/C HE SEES IT SO OFTEN. LUCKILY, THE CAR HE WITNESSED WAS ABLE TO GET TO THE BREAK-DOWN LANE/SHOULDER FOR SAFETY. THIS IS A POTENTIALLY DEADLY FAILURE OF THE SUSPENSION ON THE MERCEDES 210 CHASSIS. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10137699
57,000 miles · Apr 7, 2005
Suspension
LOUD POP AND CAR BECAME DIFFICULT TO DRIVE. FRONT SPRING SUPPORT (PERCH) CAME LOOSE FROM THE FRAME RAIL. FRONT SUSPENSION WAS REMOVED, NEW SUPPORT WAS WELDED TO THE FRAME AND SUSPENSION REPLACED. AFTER READING OWNERS FORUMS ON THE INTERNET, IT HAS BECOME QUITE OBVIOUS THAT MANY MERCEDES BENZ W210 CHASSIS CARS (E CLASS) HAVE H…
Read full complaint
LOUD POP AND CAR BECAME DIFFICULT TO DRIVE. FRONT SPRING SUPPORT (PERCH) CAME LOOSE FROM THE FRAME RAIL. FRONT SUSPENSION WAS REMOVED, NEW SUPPORT WAS WELDED TO THE FRAME AND SUSPENSION REPLACED. AFTER READING OWNERS FORUMS ON THE INTERNET, IT HAS BECOME QUITE OBVIOUS THAT MANY MERCEDES BENZ W210 CHASSIS CARS (E CLASS) HAVE HAD THIS PROBLEM. APPARENTLY IT HAS TO DO WITH A SEALANT FAILING THAT ALLOWS WATER TO SIT IN THE JOINT WHERE THE SUPPORT IS WELDED TO THE FRAME.*AK
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE EXPERIENCED SIDE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENTS IN THE ABSENCE OF A CRASH.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: INADVERTENT SIDE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT COULD CAUSE PERSONAL INJURY TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER DOOR MOUNTED SIDE AIR BAG MODULES. AT THE SAME TIME, DEALERS WILL ALSO INSPECT THE CONDITION OF THE SIDE AIR BAG MODULE WIRING WITHIN THE DOORS AND REPLACE THAT WIRING IF THERE IS ANY EVIDENCE OF DAMAGE.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2
PE07021 · Front Suspension Coil Spring Ejection
Opened Apr 19, 2007 · Closed Aug 9, 2007
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs
ODI HAS FOCUSED THIS INVESTIGATION ON ASSESSING THE RISKS POSED BY A SEPARATED SPRING AS (1) A ROAD HAZARD AND (2) THE POTENTIAL FOR VEHICLE CONTROL TO BE COMPROMISED AFTER THE FRONT COIL SPRING HAS BEEN EJECTED FROM ITS INTENDED POSITION IN THE VEHICLE.BOTH RISKS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH CORROSION, FLEXING, AND FRACTURE OF THE UPPER FRONT SUSPENSION MOUNTING BRACKET.TIME-IN-SERVICE FAILURE RATES ARE NOTABLY HIGHER IN SALT BELT STATES SINCE CORROSION IS A PRIMARY CONTRIBUTOR TO THE FAILURE MODE.SINCE A NUMBER OF INCIDENTS HAVE OCCURRED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS BEING OPERATED, ODI IS SKEPTICAL THAT OWNERS CAN ALWAYS DETECT THE SUBTLE SIDE TO SIDE DIFFERENCE IN RIDE HEIGHT AND/OR INSPECT OR NOTICE THAT THE UPPER SUSPENSION BRACKET HAS BEEN COMPROMISED BY CORROSION.(1) ROAD HAZARD - ALTHOUGH THE (APPROX. 7 LB.) FRONT SUSPENSION SPRING THAT MAY BE EJECTED AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS COULD POSE A SERIOUS ROAD HAZARD TO PEDESTRIANS AND OTHER VEHICLES, THE OCCURRENCE RATE HAS BEEN LOW (.03% BASED ON 51 REPORTED INCIDENTS OCCURRING AND AN INITIAL POPULATION OF 172,781 VEHICLES AFTER 9 - 12 YEARS OF USE / EXPOSURE) AND THERE ARE NO KNOWN INJURIES, FATALITIES, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE REPORTS DUE TO AN EJECTED SPRING.ALSO, MANY OF THE 51 INCIDENTS OCCURRED AT LOW SPEED OR WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS STOPPED OR PARKED.(2) VEHICLE CONTROL - VEHICLE HANDLING AND CONTROL COULD BE AFFECTED BY THE FRACTURE OF THE UPPER SUSPENSION MOUNT AND/OR THE ASSOCIATED SPRING EJECTION.ODI FIRST IDENTIFIED ITS CONCERN ABOUT CORROSION IN THE UPPER SUSPENSION BRACKET OF SUBJECT VEHICLES IN 2002, AT WHICH TIME MERCEDES PROVIDED A VIDEO THAT SHOWED THAT A VEHICLE COULD BE STEERED, STOPPED, AND CONTROLLED THROUGH VARIOUS MANEUVERS AT HIGH SPEEDS WITH A FRONT COIL SPRING COMPLETELY MISSING FROM THE VEHICLE. DURING PE07-021, IN ADDITION TO REVIEWING THE 2002 VIDEO-TAPE, ODI ENGINEERS DROVE AN EXEMPLAR VEHICLE WITH THE SPRING REMOVED AND SIMULATED VARIOUS COMBINATIONS OF STEERING ANGLES TO ASSESS WHETHER THERE WERE ANY POSSIBLE CONDITIONS / DISPLACEMENTS IN WHICH THE SEPARATED SPRING MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE WHEELS. IN A VEHICLE WITH THE FRONT SPRING REMOVED, THE TOP OF THE WHEEL CAN LIGHTLY CONTACT THE BOTTOM AREA OF THE WHEEL FENDER DURING HIGH ANGLE TURNS TYPICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SLOWER SPEED MANEUVERS SUCH AS CITY DRIVING. THE LIGHT TIRE CONTACT GENERATED AN OBVIOUS GRINDING NOISE AND WOULD LIKELY ABRADE OR BEND THE EDGE OF THE FENDER WITH CONTINUED USE.HOWEVER, THE EXTENT OF THE INTERFERENCE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT TO AFFECT VEHICLE STEERING AND DOES NOT OCCUR AT SMALLER TURNING ANGLES ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHWAY DRIVING.ODI HAS NOT IDENTIFIED A SAFETY RELATED DEFECT TREND AT THIS TIME.FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING THAT A SAFETY RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF FUTURE CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANT.
RQ00013 · Inadvertent Side Impact Airbag Deploymen
Opened Jun 2, 2000 · Closed Jul 20, 2001
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:side/window
There is no summary currently available
Additional source detail variants (3)
Air Bags:side/window
There is no summary currently available
Air Bags:side/window
There is no summary currently available
Air Bags:side/window
There is no summary currently available
1997 Mercedes Benz E Class Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year