← New search

1997 Mercedes Benz E Class

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all E Class years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

25 reports with mileage · 13 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Suspension. Review the 20 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 3 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

1 crash reports0 fire reports1 injury reports

What owners actually said

38 reports
80,000 miles · Dec 1, 2004
Suspension

LEFT FRONT SPRING MOUNT FAILED WHILE CAR BEING DRIVEN APPROX. 45 MPH FAILURE DUE TO POOR WELD. DEALER REIMBURSED ONLY 50% OF COST. THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 14 OF THESE SAME FAILURES ON YOUR SITE. PLEASE INVESTIGATE.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10100886

Mileage unknown · Sep 10, 2004
StructureSuspension

REMOVED LEFT FRONT WHEEL AND FOUND UPPER SUSPENSION SPRING PERCH BREAKING AWAY FROM BODY, COULD SEE POSSIBLE LOSS OF STEERING. NO INCIDENT YET BUT AN ACCIDENT AVOIDED. DEALER HAS THIS PARTICULAR PART IN STOCK AND ASKED IF IT HAD COME APART "YET" BECAUSE THEY HAD SEEN IT BEFORE.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10090763

49,000 miles · Mar 28, 2004
Visibility

I HAVE HAD TO REPLACE THE REAR WINDOW REGULATOR ASSEMBLIES 4 TIMES. TWICE ON THE PASSENGER REAR & TWICE ON THE DRIVERS SIDE REAR WINDOW. KEY PIECES LIKE PULLEYS AND THE ACTUAL PARTS THAT SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE GLASS, IN THESE ASSEMBLIES ARE MADE WITH CHEAP PLASTIC COMPONENTS THAT BREAK UNDER NORMAL USE. ALSO THE MOTORS DO NOT…

Read full complaint

I HAVE HAD TO REPLACE THE REAR WINDOW REGULATOR ASSEMBLIES 4 TIMES. TWICE ON THE PASSENGER REAR & TWICE ON THE DRIVERS SIDE REAR WINDOW. KEY PIECES LIKE PULLEYS AND THE ACTUAL PARTS THAT SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE GLASS, IN THESE ASSEMBLIES ARE MADE WITH CHEAP PLASTIC COMPONENTS THAT BREAK UNDER NORMAL USE. ALSO THE MOTORS DO NOT AUTOMATICALLY SHUT OFF OR STOP WHEN THE WINDOW IS ALL THE WAY UP OR DOWN, AND CAN CAUSE STRESS THAT IS SUFFICIENT TO BREAK THE PLASTIC COMPONENTS AND DAMAGE THE DEVICE. THE REGULATORS ARE SOLD AS ONE WITH THE MOTOR AND CAN COST $165.00- $300.00.. CONSUMER INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT REGULATORS IS DIFFICULT DUE TO RIVETS HOLDING UNITS IN PLACE.. THUS CAUSING LABOR CHARGES OF 100.00+ FOR REPAIRS. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10064034

Mileage unknown · Jan 22, 2004
Seats

THE SEAT TRACK FOR THE CAR CONTINUES TO BE DEFECTIVE. CAR SEAT "ROCKS" EXCESSIVELY - CAUSING SIGNIFICANT DISTRACTION IN HEAVY/EMERGENCY BRAKING. THE FRONT SEAT TRACK WAS REPLACED ONCE UNDER WARRANTY. THIS IS A FREQUENT PROBLEM WITH THIS MODEL CAR (1996-2003). MANUFACTURER SHOULD BE ASKED TO REPLACE OR REPAIR THE SEAT TRACKS …

Read full complaint

THE SEAT TRACK FOR THE CAR CONTINUES TO BE DEFECTIVE. CAR SEAT "ROCKS" EXCESSIVELY - CAUSING SIGNIFICANT DISTRACTION IN HEAVY/EMERGENCY BRAKING. THE FRONT SEAT TRACK WAS REPLACED ONCE UNDER WARRANTY. THIS IS A FREQUENT PROBLEM WITH THIS MODEL CAR (1996-2003). MANUFACTURER SHOULD BE ASKED TO REPLACE OR REPAIR THE SEAT TRACKS TO ALLOW DRIVERS TO MAINTAIN CONTROL IN CRITICAL SITUATIONS.

NHTSA ODI #10054661

90,000 miles · Oct 29, 2003
Suspension

I AM A MERCEDES BENZ TECHNICIAN OF 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE AND HAVE BECOME AWARE OF AN OUTRAGEOUSLY DANGEROUS SITUATION THAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION. ON CERTAIN MODELS OF MERCEDES BENZ "210" BODIES THE SUPPORT THAT HOLDS THE UPPER PORTION OF THE COIL SPRING IN PLACE IS RUSTING OFF OF THE FRAME. IF IT BREAKS ALL OF THE WAY THE …

Read full complaint

I AM A MERCEDES BENZ TECHNICIAN OF 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE AND HAVE BECOME AWARE OF AN OUTRAGEOUSLY DANGEROUS SITUATION THAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION. ON CERTAIN MODELS OF MERCEDES BENZ "210" BODIES THE SUPPORT THAT HOLDS THE UPPER PORTION OF THE COIL SPRING IN PLACE IS RUSTING OFF OF THE FRAME. IF IT BREAKS ALL OF THE WAY THE ENTIRE FRONT SUSPENSION WILL COLLAPSE. IT IS ONLY HAPPENING TO THE RIGHT FROM AND NOT THE LEFT BELIEF IS AN IMPROPER WELD OR DEFECTIVE METAL IN THE MOUNT ITSELF. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT EFFECTS 96-98 CARS SO FAR. THE DEALERS ARE NOT COVERING THIS UNDER WARRANTY. YOU CAN CONFIRM HOW MANY CARS ARE BEING AFFECTED BY SIMPLY ASKING MERCEDES HOW MANY OF THE RIGHT SIDE SUPPORTS THEY HAVE SOLD IN THE LAST 18 MONTHS AS OPPOSED TO THE LEFT SIDE. MY GUESS IS THAT IT WILL BE BETTER THAN A 100 TO 1 RATIO ONLY TIME A PART LIKE THIS SHOULD EVER NEED REPLACEMENT IS ACCIDENT DAMAGE. THEY ARE TELLING CUSTOMERS THAT THEY MUST HAVE HIT A POTHOLE AND SO YOU WILL MOST LIKELY NOT GET MANY CONSUMER COMPLAINTS DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT TAKES TO TRIGGER AN INVESTIGATION BUT I HOPE THAT MY YEARS OF EXCLUSIVE MB EXPERIENCE WILL CARRY AT LEAST SOME WEIGHT TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT AS WORTH A PHONE CALL TO MERCEDES ABOUT THE NUMBER OF MOUNTS THEY HAVE SOLD.I AM HAPPY TO TALK TO YOU BUT NEED TO BE PROTECTED FROM REPERCUSSIONS FROM MERCEDES FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. IF YOU NEED AN ACTUAL CAR LET ME KNOW AND I WILL SUPPLY YOU WITH THAT INFO RMATION. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10043901

93,000 miles · Sep 2, 2003
Suspension

FAX FM TOM AND HELEN SILVER (NJ) RE THE DEFECTIVE FRONT COIL SPRINGS ON THEIR 1997 E 420 MERECEDES BENZ. *MR WHILE THE VEHICLE SAT IDLING, THE RIGHT FRONT COIL SPRING DETACHED (PROBABLE PARTIAL DETACHMENT) FROM ITS WELDED POSITION AND CAUSED THE RIGHT FRONT ABILITY TO SUPPORT THAT PORTION OF THE VEHICLE. THE DEALER STATED TH…

Read full complaint

FAX FM TOM AND HELEN SILVER (NJ) RE THE DEFECTIVE FRONT COIL SPRINGS ON THEIR 1997 E 420 MERECEDES BENZ. *MR WHILE THE VEHICLE SAT IDLING, THE RIGHT FRONT COIL SPRING DETACHED (PROBABLE PARTIAL DETACHMENT) FROM ITS WELDED POSITION AND CAUSED THE RIGHT FRONT ABILITY TO SUPPORT THAT PORTION OF THE VEHICLE. THE DEALER STATED THAT THE LEFT FRONT COIL SPRING WAS ABOUT TO GIVE AWAY. (E 420) *SCC *JB

NHTSA ODI #10037983

70,000 miles · Aug 10, 2003
Structure

DASHBOARD CRACKS ON MY 1997 MERCEDES E420 SEDAN. CRACKS HAVE BEEN APPARENT FOR 18 MONTHS; DEALER AND REGIONAL SERVICE REP DECLINE TO REPLACE/REPAIR. SIMILAR CRACKS HAVE BEEN WIDELY REPORTED IN MERCEDES E-CLASS SEDANS IN MODEL YEARS 96-00. CRACKS ARE AROUND PASSENGER AIRBAG DOOR. WONDER IF THIS COMPROMISES THE AIRBAG SYSTEM…

Read full complaint

DASHBOARD CRACKS ON MY 1997 MERCEDES E420 SEDAN. CRACKS HAVE BEEN APPARENT FOR 18 MONTHS; DEALER AND REGIONAL SERVICE REP DECLINE TO REPLACE/REPAIR. SIMILAR CRACKS HAVE BEEN WIDELY REPORTED IN MERCEDES E-CLASS SEDANS IN MODEL YEARS 96-00. CRACKS ARE AROUND PASSENGER AIRBAG DOOR. WONDER IF THIS COMPROMISES THE AIRBAG SYSTEM IN ANY WAY? *NLM

NHTSA ODI #10031222

Mileage unknown · May 20, 2003
Suspension

FRONT DRIVERS SIDE SPRING FLEW OFF CAR WHILE DRIVING AND TOOK A LARGE CHUNK OF THE TIRE WITH IT. *NLM

NHTSA ODI #10018982

64,000 miles · Jan 8, 2003
StructureSuspension

SEVERE RUST DAMAGE TO FRONT PASSENGER SUSPENSION COMPONENT AND FRONT FRAME RAIL. RUST HOLE BIG ENOUGH TO PUT A HUMAN FIST INTO. APPROXIMATELY $3000 IN RUST REPAIRS, ON A CAR WITH LESS THAN 67,000 MILES ON IT. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10000808

Mileage unknown · Nov 27, 2002
Fuel System, Gasoline

MY CAR IS PRESENTLY IN THE SHOP FOR THE THIRD TIME WITH A MAJOR FUEL LEAK. EACH TIME HAS BEEN FOR A DIFFERENT LEAK. THE REPAIRS HAVE NOT BEEN DONE BY A MERCEDES HOWEVER REPLACEMENT PART HAVE BEEN PURCHASE FROM MERCEDES AND MY REPAIRER HAS BEEN TOLD THAT DIESEL LEAKS ARE NOT UNCOMMON IN THESE MODELS. THIS IS MY THIRD MERCEDES …

Read full complaint

MY CAR IS PRESENTLY IN THE SHOP FOR THE THIRD TIME WITH A MAJOR FUEL LEAK. EACH TIME HAS BEEN FOR A DIFFERENT LEAK. THE REPAIRS HAVE NOT BEEN DONE BY A MERCEDES HOWEVER REPLACEMENT PART HAVE BEEN PURCHASE FROM MERCEDES AND MY REPAIRER HAS BEEN TOLD THAT DIESEL LEAKS ARE NOT UNCOMMON IN THESE MODELS. THIS IS MY THIRD MERCEDES DIESEL AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE EVER HAD THIS PROBLEM. CERTAINLY THIS SEEMS TO BE TO BE A FIRE HAZARD. DT

NHTSA ODI #770199

Official recalls

1

00V388000 · Air Bags:side/window

Nov 28, 2000

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE EXPERIENCED SIDE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENTS IN THE ABSENCE OF A CRASH.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: INADVERTENT SIDE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT COULD CAUSE PERSONAL INJURY TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER DOOR MOUNTED SIDE AIR BAG MODULES. AT THE SAME TIME, DEALERS WILL ALSO INSPECT THE CONDITION OF THE SIDE AIR BAG MODULE WIRING WITHIN THE DOORS AND REPLACE THAT WIRING IF THERE IS ANY EVIDENCE OF DAMAGE.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

PE07021 · Front Suspension Coil Spring Ejection

Opened Apr 19, 2007 · Closed Aug 9, 2007

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

ODI HAS FOCUSED THIS INVESTIGATION ON ASSESSING THE RISKS POSED BY A SEPARATED SPRING AS (1) A ROAD HAZARD AND (2) THE POTENTIAL FOR VEHICLE CONTROL TO BE COMPROMISED AFTER THE FRONT COIL SPRING HAS BEEN EJECTED FROM ITS INTENDED POSITION IN THE VEHICLE.BOTH RISKS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH CORROSION, FLEXING, AND FRACTURE OF THE UPPER FRONT SUSPENSION MOUNTING BRACKET.TIME-IN-SERVICE FAILURE RATES ARE NOTABLY HIGHER IN SALT BELT STATES SINCE CORROSION IS A PRIMARY CONTRIBUTOR TO THE FAILURE MODE.SINCE A NUMBER OF INCIDENTS HAVE OCCURRED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS BEING OPERATED, ODI IS SKEPTICAL THAT OWNERS CAN ALWAYS DETECT THE SUBTLE SIDE TO SIDE DIFFERENCE IN RIDE HEIGHT AND/OR INSPECT OR NOTICE THAT THE UPPER SUSPENSION BRACKET HAS BEEN COMPROMISED BY CORROSION.(1) ROAD HAZARD - ALTHOUGH THE (APPROX. 7 LB.) FRONT SUSPENSION SPRING THAT MAY BE EJECTED AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS COULD POSE A SERIOUS ROAD HAZARD TO PEDESTRIANS AND OTHER VEHICLES, THE OCCURRENCE RATE HAS BEEN LOW (.03% BASED ON 51 REPORTED INCIDENTS OCCURRING AND AN INITIAL POPULATION OF 172,781 VEHICLES AFTER 9 - 12 YEARS OF USE / EXPOSURE) AND THERE ARE NO KNOWN INJURIES, FATALITIES, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE REPORTS DUE TO AN EJECTED SPRING.ALSO, MANY OF THE 51 INCIDENTS OCCURRED AT LOW SPEED OR WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS STOPPED OR PARKED.(2) VEHICLE CONTROL - VEHICLE HANDLING AND CONTROL COULD BE AFFECTED BY THE FRACTURE OF THE UPPER SUSPENSION MOUNT AND/OR THE ASSOCIATED SPRING EJECTION.ODI FIRST IDENTIFIED ITS CONCERN ABOUT CORROSION IN THE UPPER SUSPENSION BRACKET OF SUBJECT VEHICLES IN 2002, AT WHICH TIME MERCEDES PROVIDED A VIDEO THAT SHOWED THAT A VEHICLE COULD BE STEERED, STOPPED, AND CONTROLLED THROUGH VARIOUS MANEUVERS AT HIGH SPEEDS WITH A FRONT COIL SPRING COMPLETELY MISSING FROM THE VEHICLE. DURING PE07-021, IN ADDITION TO REVIEWING THE 2002 VIDEO-TAPE, ODI ENGINEERS DROVE AN EXEMPLAR VEHICLE WITH THE SPRING REMOVED AND SIMULATED VARIOUS COMBINATIONS OF STEERING ANGLES TO ASSESS WHETHER THERE WERE ANY POSSIBLE CONDITIONS / DISPLACEMENTS IN WHICH THE SEPARATED SPRING MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE WHEELS. IN A VEHICLE WITH THE FRONT SPRING REMOVED, THE TOP OF THE WHEEL CAN LIGHTLY CONTACT THE BOTTOM AREA OF THE WHEEL FENDER DURING HIGH ANGLE TURNS TYPICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SLOWER SPEED MANEUVERS SUCH AS CITY DRIVING. THE LIGHT TIRE CONTACT GENERATED AN OBVIOUS GRINDING NOISE AND WOULD LIKELY ABRADE OR BEND THE EDGE OF THE FENDER WITH CONTINUED USE.HOWEVER, THE EXTENT OF THE INTERFERENCE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT TO AFFECT VEHICLE STEERING AND DOES NOT OCCUR AT SMALLER TURNING ANGLES ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHWAY DRIVING.ODI HAS NOT IDENTIFIED A SAFETY RELATED DEFECT TREND AT THIS TIME.FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING THAT A SAFETY RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF FUTURE CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANT.

RQ00013 · Inadvertent Side Impact Airbag Deploymen

Opened Jun 2, 2000 · Closed Jul 20, 2001

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:side/window

There is no summary currently available

Additional source detail variants (3)

Air Bags:side/window

There is no summary currently available

Air Bags:side/window

There is no summary currently available

Air Bags:side/window

There is no summary currently available