← New search

2009 Toyota Matrix

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Matrix years

Owner complaints for the 2009 Toyota Matrix are substantially higher than the model-year median of 70.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Matrix years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

114 reports with mileage · 78 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Air Bags. Review the 78 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 45 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Steering. Review the 22 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

34 crash reports1 fire reports18 injury reports

What owners actually said

192 reports
6,000 miles · Feb 11, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS STUCK THREE TIMES WHICH CAUSED UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. HE KICKED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL THE FIRST TIME AND IT RELEASED. HE ALSO ENGAGED THE BRAKE PEDAL WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED TO PREVENT AN ACCIDENT. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER WHO STATED THAT MAY ONLY N…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS STUCK THREE TIMES WHICH CAUSED UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. HE KICKED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL THE FIRST TIME AND IT RELEASED. HE ALSO ENGAGED THE BRAKE PEDAL WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED TO PREVENT AN ACCIDENT. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER WHO STATED THAT MAY ONLY NEED A LUBRICANT ON THE PEDAL AFTER THE SECOND FAILURE OCCURRED. WHEN THE THIRD FAILURE OCCURRED, THE DEALER REPAIRED THE VEHICLE PER RECALL 10V017000, VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL, ACCELERATOR PEDAL. THE CONTACT WAS NOT CONFIDENT WITH THE REMEDY. THE CONTACT WROTE A LETTER TO THE MANUFACTURER AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO FILE A DISPUTE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 22,626. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 6,000.

NHTSA ODI #10308781

8,300 miles · Feb 11, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

ABOUT 4 WEEKS AGO (AND AGAIN, THIS MORNING, TWICE!), I EXPERIENCED PROBLEMS WHEN BRAKING: THE PEDAL WOULD GO MORE THEN USUAL, BUT THE CAR WOULD NOT SLOW DOWN AT THE SAME TIME AS IT WAS PRODUCING TERRIBLE GRINDING/SCRATCHING NOISES AS IF PARTS WERE COMING OFF. IT IS NOT DOING THIS CONSISTENTLY, BUT SINCE IT HAPPENED TWICE THIS MO…

Read full complaint

ABOUT 4 WEEKS AGO (AND AGAIN, THIS MORNING, TWICE!), I EXPERIENCED PROBLEMS WHEN BRAKING: THE PEDAL WOULD GO MORE THEN USUAL, BUT THE CAR WOULD NOT SLOW DOWN AT THE SAME TIME AS IT WAS PRODUCING TERRIBLE GRINDING/SCRATCHING NOISES AS IF PARTS WERE COMING OFF. IT IS NOT DOING THIS CONSISTENTLY, BUT SINCE IT HAPPENED TWICE THIS MORNING, I AM CONCERNED. I DID FIND A RECALL NOTICE DATED AUGUST 2009 ON THE BRAKE SYSTEM FOR 12 MORE NORTHERN STATES THAT EXPERIENCED BRAKE PROBLEMS ON 09 AND 10 MATRIX AND COROLLA VEHICLES WITH 1.8 ENGINES DUE TO EXTREME COLD. I LIVE IN THE MOUNTAINS IF NW N-CAROLINA, AND OUR WEATHER IS VERY MUCH LIKE THAT IN MORE NORTHERN STATES. PRESENT, WE HAVE 4-5 INCHES OF SNOW ON THE GROUND, AND TEMPS WERE ABOUT 35-36 THIS MORNING (AWAITING ANOTHER WINTER STORM). WHEN IT HAPPENED LAST MONTH, IT WAS MUCH COLDER, BUT THERE ALSO WAS LOTS OF SNOW ON THE GROUND. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10308773

30,000 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MATRIX. WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, SHE DECREASED SPEED AND PLACED HER FOOT ON THE BRAKES; HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED AND CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE EVEN AFTER THE CRASH OCCURRED UNTIL THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO NEUTRAL GEAR AND CAME TO A STOP. THERE WERE NO INJURIE…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MATRIX. WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, SHE DECREASED SPEED AND PLACED HER FOOT ON THE BRAKES; HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED AND CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE EVEN AFTER THE CRASH OCCURRED UNTIL THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO NEUTRAL GEAR AND CAME TO A STOP. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. A POLICE REPORT IS AVAILABLE IF NEEDED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A DEALER TO BE INSPECTED BY A TECHNICIAN. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 30,000.

NHTSA ODI #10305257

22,320 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

THE FIRST THING I NOTICED WAS THAT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WOULD NOT ACCELERATE WHEN I STEPPED ON IT GOING ONTO THE ON-RAMP, ABOUT A MONTH AGO. ON TUESDAY, I WENT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE PARTS YET, THAT THEY WOULD CALL ME, AND THAT THEY DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH THE PARTS WHEN THEY GOT HERE. THEY SA…

Read full complaint

THE FIRST THING I NOTICED WAS THAT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WOULD NOT ACCELERATE WHEN I STEPPED ON IT GOING ONTO THE ON-RAMP, ABOUT A MONTH AGO. ON TUESDAY, I WENT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE PARTS YET, THAT THEY WOULD CALL ME, AND THAT THEY DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH THE PARTS WHEN THEY GOT HERE. THEY SAID THEY HAD ONE OF THOSE COURSES TWO WEEKS AGO, BUT WHAT THEY LEARNED THERE DOES NOT REALLY APPLY TO THE PROBLEMS THAT ARE COMING ON NOW. SO EVEN WHEN THEY GOT THE PARTS, THEY WOULD HAVE TO FIGURE OUT WHAT TO DO WITH THEM. I TRIED TO ASK FOR A REPLACEMENT OR SOMETHING OF THE SORT, AND THEY SAID THAT THEY DIDN'T EVEN HAVE ANY CARS TO PROVIDE ME BECAUSE ALL THE MODELS ON THE LOT WERE INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE NEXT DAY (YESTERDAY), I TRIED TO STOP AT A STOP SIGN AND IT DIMINISHED THE SPEED BUT IT DID NOT STOP COMPLETELY. IT DIDN'T STOP UNTIL THE MIDDLE OF THE INTERSECTION AND I GOT A TICKET. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305138

8,250 miles · Feb 3, 2010
Service Brakes, HydraulicVehicle Speed Control

I WOULD LIKE TO REPRT SERIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE ACCELERATOR (UNINTENDED ACCELERATION) AND BRAKE PROBLEMS (DON'T STOP WELL) OF MY TOYOTA MATRIX MODEL 2009. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10304778

100 miles · Feb 2, 2010
Electrical System

2009 LOW MILEAGE TOYOTA MATRIX STALLS SUDDENLY IN TRAFFIC, COMPLETE STALL, MUST RESTART. OCCURRED SEVERAL TIMES IN ALL SORTS OF WEATHER, BUT MOSTLY IN HUMID CONDITIONS. RESTART CLEARED ENGINE COMPUTER DEALERSHIP HAD DIFFICULT TIME REPLICATING FAILURE. FINALLY REMEDIED WITH REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRONICS PART IN JUNE 2009. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10303826

11,000 miles · Jan 27, 2010
Unknown Or Other

ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS I NOTICE MY ACCELERAR /GAS PEDAL STICKING. ALSO AT TIMES HARD TO PRESS THE ACCELERATOR ALSO.AT 1 TIMES I ALMOST HAD AN ACCIDENT HAD I NOT BEEN ABLE TO PUT THE CAR IN NUETRAL AND STOP,ALMOST GETTING HIT DOING IT.I DIDN'T REALISE WHAT IT UNTIL I READ ABOUT THIS RECALL AND WAS NEVER CONTACTED TO THIS DAY ABOUT …

Read full complaint

ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS I NOTICE MY ACCELERAR /GAS PEDAL STICKING. ALSO AT TIMES HARD TO PRESS THE ACCELERATOR ALSO.AT 1 TIMES I ALMOST HAD AN ACCIDENT HAD I NOT BEEN ABLE TO PUT THE CAR IN NUETRAL AND STOP,ALMOST GETTING HIT DOING IT.I DIDN'T REALISE WHAT IT UNTIL I READ ABOUT THIS RECALL AND WAS NEVER CONTACTED TO THIS DAY ABOUT IT FROM TOYOTA OR ITS DEALER. *CN

NHTSA ODI #10302637

40 miles · Jan 25, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

I PURCHASED A 09 TOYOTA MATRIX 5DR, 2WD, CUV ON 1/24/09. DURING THE FIRST WEEK IN MARCH 2009 I WAS DRIVING ON A 45 MPH CITY STREET GOING A LITTLE LESS THAN THE SPEED LIMIT WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN MY CAR SPED UP. I GAVE THE GAS PEDAL A TAP THINKING IT HAD JUST STUCK, BUT THE MOTOR KEPT RACING AS I PICKED UP SPEED. I TOOK MY FOOT …

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED A 09 TOYOTA MATRIX 5DR, 2WD, CUV ON 1/24/09. DURING THE FIRST WEEK IN MARCH 2009 I WAS DRIVING ON A 45 MPH CITY STREET GOING A LITTLE LESS THAN THE SPEED LIMIT WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN MY CAR SPED UP. I GAVE THE GAS PEDAL A TAP THINKING IT HAD JUST STUCK, BUT THE MOTOR KEPT RACING AS I PICKED UP SPEED. I TOOK MY FOOT OFF THE GAS PEDAL AND PUT MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT THE CAR WOULD NOT SLOW DOWN. I NEVER LOOKED TO SEE HOW FAST I WAS GOING, I WAS TOO BUSY, TRYING TO SLOW DOWN AND FIND A PLACE TO PULL OVER BEFORE I CAUGHT UP TO THE CAR AHEAD OF ME AND RAMMED INTO IT. LUCKILY THE TRAFFIC WAS LIGHT AND THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME A WAYS OFF, AND I WAS IN AN OUTER LANE AND FOUND A PLACE TO PULL IN, CONTINUING TO PRESS DOWN ON THE BRAKE PEDAL AS HARD AS I COULD. I IMMEDIATELY TURNED OFF THE KEY AND PUT THE CAR IN PARK. I TRIED TO START IT UP AGAIN AFTER A FEW MINUTES, BUT THE MOTOR CONTINUED TO RACE IN PARK. I TUNED THE IGNITION OFF, AND I THEN DISCOVERED THAT A FLOOR MAT HAD SLIPPED UNDER THE GAS PEDAL, SO I PULLED IT OUT AND STARTED THE CAR AGAIN. I STARTED NORMALLY. MY HEART WAS RACING AND IT TOOK ME MORE THAN AN HOUR TO GET MY EMOTIONS UNDER CONTROL BECAUSE I KNEW WHAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED HAD I BEEN DRIVING ON NEARBY RT. 95 WHERE TRAFFIC MOVES AT A FAST CLIP AND THERE IS REALLY NOWHERE TO PULL OVER. A FEW MONTHS LATER I SAW ON TV ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE HAVING THE SAME PROBLEM, BUT WITH HEART WRENCHING RESULTS. I CALLED TOYOTA HEADQUARTERS AND HAD THE INCIDENT DOCUMENTED. IT HAS ONLY BEEN A FEW DAYS THAT I SAW THE RECALL IN THE NEWSPAPER, SO I AM WAITING TO HEAR FROM TOYOTA. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10302187

6,128 miles · Jan 14, 2010
Service Brakes, Electric

IN VERY COLD WEATHER, WHICH WE HAVE HAD PLENTY OF RECENTLY, AND I MAKE A GRADUAL STOP FROM A SPEED OF 45+ MPH, THERE IS A SPLIT-SECOND SURGE FORWARD FOLLOWED BY A HARD STOP "BUMP" WHEN THE CAR COMES TO A FINAL STOP THAT IS THE BEST WAY TO DESCRIBE IT, THE ROAD SURFACE IS NOT SLICK, NOR AM I MAKING A SUDDEN STOP. THE PROBLEM DOES…

Read full complaint

IN VERY COLD WEATHER, WHICH WE HAVE HAD PLENTY OF RECENTLY, AND I MAKE A GRADUAL STOP FROM A SPEED OF 45+ MPH, THERE IS A SPLIT-SECOND SURGE FORWARD FOLLOWED BY A HARD STOP "BUMP" WHEN THE CAR COMES TO A FINAL STOP THAT IS THE BEST WAY TO DESCRIBE IT, THE ROAD SURFACE IS NOT SLICK, NOR AM I MAKING A SUDDEN STOP. THE PROBLEM DOES NOT HAPPEN IN TEMPS ABOVE FREEZING, NOR DOES BRAKING SEEM IMPAIRED. I AM SOMEWHAT UNNERVED BY THE MOMENTARY SURGE FORWARD FOLLOWED BY THE SUDDEN BUMP THAT FEELS LIKE I HIT A CURB. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10299753

3,000 miles · Dec 17, 2009
Engine And Engine Cooling

THE CONTACT THAT THE 2009 TOYOTA COROLLA MATRIX STALLS EVERY TIME THE CONTACT STOPS AT AN ENTER SECTION. AND WHEN THE CONTACT TURNS THE CAR BACK THE VEHICLE HAS NO POWER. THE CALLER HAS OWNED THE VEHICLE FOR 5 MONTHS. THIS HAS ALSO HAPPENED WHEN THE CONTACT TRIES TO PULL OFF FROM THE INTERSECTION. PROBLEM STARTED AT 3000 MILES …

Read full complaint

THE CONTACT THAT THE 2009 TOYOTA COROLLA MATRIX STALLS EVERY TIME THE CONTACT STOPS AT AN ENTER SECTION. AND WHEN THE CONTACT TURNS THE CAR BACK THE VEHICLE HAS NO POWER. THE CALLER HAS OWNED THE VEHICLE FOR 5 MONTHS. THIS HAS ALSO HAPPENED WHEN THE CONTACT TRIES TO PULL OFF FROM THE INTERSECTION. PROBLEM STARTED AT 3000 MILES CURRENT MILES IS 9000. UPDATED 12/30/09 *BF THE CONSUMER STATED THE STALLING WOULD OCCUR AFTER PULLING INTO AN INTERSECTION AFTER IDLING AT A RED LIGHT. THE DEALER STATED THEY DID NOT KNOW HOW TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM, BUT THEY RESET THE ENGINE CONTROL MODULE, HOWEVER THE STALLING CONTINUED. UPDATED 12/30/09.*JB

NHTSA ODI #10296261

Official recalls

3

16V340000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

May 23, 2016

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2008-2011 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2009-2011 Toyota Corolla and Corolla Matrix, 2006-2011 Toyota Yaris, Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350, 2010-2011 Toyota 4Runner, Lexus IS250C, Lexus IS350C and Lexus GX460, 2011 Sienna, 2007-2011 Lexus ES350, and 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2007-2008 Toyota Yaris, 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350 and 2007-2008 Lexus ES350 vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Vehicles of these model years and models that were not originally sold or ever registered in either Zones A or B are not subject to this safety recall. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules, and used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the front air bags, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on December 6, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for interim notification for this campaign are G1P (Toyota Zone A), G1R (Toyota Zone B), G2G (Lexus Zone A), and G2H (Lexus Zone B). Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), GLG (Lexus Zone A), and GLH (Lexus Zone B).

10V035000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

GULF STATES TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2010 VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 AND JUNE 2, 2008 WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. DEALERS WILL ALSO CORRECT THE OWNER'S MANUAL. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT GULF STATES TOYOTA AT 713-580-3300.

10V023000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Jan 27, 2010

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008-2010 HIGHLANDER, MODEL YEAR 2009-2010 COROLLA, VENZA AND MATRIX PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT. THIS RECALL IS AN EXPANSION OF A CAMPAIGN OF 3.8 MILLION OTHER TOYOTA VEHICLES ANNOUNCED IN 2009 FOR THE SAME ISSUE (SEE 09V-388).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA WILL MODIFY OR REPLACE THE ACCELERATOR PEDALS ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES. FLOOR SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ARE ALSO BEING CONSIDERED AND WILL BE INCLUDED FOR ANY MODEL FOR WHICH IT IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. INITIALLY, DEALERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED ON HOW TO RESHAPE THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL FOR THE REPAIR. AS REPLACEMENT PARTS WITH THE SAME SHAPE AS THE MODIFIED PEDAL BECOME AVAILABLE, THEY WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE DEALERS FOR THE REPAIR. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD THE PEDAL RESHAPE REMEDY COMPLETED WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE A NEW PEDAL IF THEY DESIRE, AFTER REPLACEMENT PEDALS BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ADDITION, TOYOTA WILL REPLACE ANY TOYOTA ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT IN A SUBJECT VEHICLE WITH A NEWLY DESIGNED MAT, FREE OF CHARGE. FOR THOSE CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT BUT DO NOT NEED OR WANT THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT, TOYOTA WILL RECOVER THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT AND REIMBURSE ITS PRICE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN MARCH 30, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.