← New search

2009 Toyota Matrix

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Matrix years

Owner complaints for the 2009 Toyota Matrix are substantially higher than the model-year median of 70.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Matrix years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

114 reports with mileage · 78 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Air Bags. Review the 78 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 45 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Steering. Review the 22 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

34 crash reports1 fire reports18 injury reports

What owners actually said

192 reports
4,000 miles · Mar 8, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

I RECENTLY BOUGHT A 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY AND WAS NEVER CONTACTED BY THE DEALERSHIP OR TOYOTA ABOUT THE TWO RECALLS ON MY CAR. WHEN I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO FIX MY CAR, I WAS TOLD BY THE SERVICE PERSON THAT WHY DID I NEED TO FIX IT FOR, HE ACTED LIKE HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT THE RECALLS. THEY MADE ME WAIT…

Read full complaint

I RECENTLY BOUGHT A 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY AND WAS NEVER CONTACTED BY THE DEALERSHIP OR TOYOTA ABOUT THE TWO RECALLS ON MY CAR. WHEN I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO FIX MY CAR, I WAS TOLD BY THE SERVICE PERSON THAT WHY DID I NEED TO FIX IT FOR, HE ACTED LIKE HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT THE RECALLS. THEY MADE ME WAIT TWO WEEKS FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND THEN HAD TO KEEP MY CAR FOR A WHOLE DAY. BEFORE THE 2010 CAMRY I HAD BOUGHT A 2009 MATRIX THROUGH ANOTHER DEALERSHIP AND I FINALLY THIS PAST WEEK RECEIVED A SAFETY RECALL ON THAT VEHICLE, WELL UNFORTUNATELY I DON'T HAVE THE CAR ANYMORE SINCE I HAD A CAR ACCIDENT IN MARCH OF 2009, WHERE I ALMOST LOST MY LIFE. HAD I KNOWN THE VEHICLE HAD ISSUES I WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY RETURNED THE CAR. I WENT THROUGH MONTHS OF PHYSICAL AGONY AND MEDICAL APPOINTMENTS AND TODAY I AM STILL NOT BETTER A YEAR LATER. I FEEL THAT I WAS BETRAYED BY TOYOTA NOT ONCE BUT TWICE. I WOULD NEVER BUY ANOTHER VEHICLE FROM TOYOTA. I FEEL THAT THE WAY THEY HANDLED THIS WHOLE RECALL SITUATION IS UNETHICAL. I COULD HAVE LOST MY LIFE AND NEVER KNOWN ABOUT THE CAR PROBLEMS. THEN I WATCH THE NEWS AND SEE THAT THERE HAS BEEN MANY DEATHS BECAUSE OF THIS AND I COULD HAVE BEEN ANOTHER STATISTIC. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10317819

Mileage unknown · Mar 8, 2010
Unknown Or Other

2009 MATRIX CONSUMER HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING SUDDEN ACCELERATION RECALL.. *CW SO FAR THE CONSUMER HAS NOT EXPERIENCED ANY PROBLEMS. HOWEVER, SHE WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT SHE WOULD RECEIVE A RECALL NOTICE REGARDING UNWANTED ACCELERATION. FROM WHAT SHE HAS READ, IT APPEARED THAT THE GAS PEDAL MAY NOT BE THE ONLY, OR EVEN THE…

Read full complaint

2009 MATRIX CONSUMER HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING SUDDEN ACCELERATION RECALL.. *CW SO FAR THE CONSUMER HAS NOT EXPERIENCED ANY PROBLEMS. HOWEVER, SHE WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT SHE WOULD RECEIVE A RECALL NOTICE REGARDING UNWANTED ACCELERATION. FROM WHAT SHE HAS READ, IT APPEARED THAT THE GAS PEDAL MAY NOT BE THE ONLY, OR EVEN THE PROBLEM FOR THE REPORTED UNWANTED ACCELERATION, BUT ALSO AN ELECTRONIC THROTTLE CONTROL SYSTEM PROBLEM. THE CONSUMER WANTED TO KNOW CAN THE ELECTRONIC THROTTLE CONTROL SYSTEM BE CHECKED AND TESTED AND EVEN UPON REPLACEMENT, HOW CAN SHE BE REASSURED THAT THE ELECTRONIC CONTROL SYSTEM IS PROPERLY WORKING? *JB

NHTSA ODI #10317581

20,000 miles · Mar 7, 2010
Electrical SystemSteering

BOUGHT 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX S NEW. I COMMUTE APPROXIMATELY 45 MILES ONE WAY TO WORK ON FREEWAY, NORMALLY WITH CRUISE CONTROL ON. I HAVE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL OCCASIONS OF ACCELERATION "SURGE"(RELATIVELY MINOR INCREASES IN ACCELERATION WITHOUT TOUCHING ACCELERATOR). MY WIFE ALSO EXPERIENCED UNINTENDED ACCELERATION WHILE TAKING OUR SO…

Read full complaint

BOUGHT 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX S NEW. I COMMUTE APPROXIMATELY 45 MILES ONE WAY TO WORK ON FREEWAY, NORMALLY WITH CRUISE CONTROL ON. I HAVE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL OCCASIONS OF ACCELERATION "SURGE"(RELATIVELY MINOR INCREASES IN ACCELERATION WITHOUT TOUCHING ACCELERATOR). MY WIFE ALSO EXPERIENCED UNINTENDED ACCELERATION WHILE TAKING OUR SON TO SCHOOL UNDER NORMAL STREET SPEED. I WOULD ALSO EXPERIENCE SEVERAL SITUATIONS OF DIFFICULT VEHICLE CONTROL ON FREEWAY DUE TO STEERING ISSUES. I THOUGHT AT THE TIME IT WAS JUST WIND PUSHING AGAINST THE CAR UNTIL I READ OTHER DRIVERS EXPERIENCING THE SAME THING. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10317498

28,213 miles · Mar 5, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THEY NEVER HAD AN ACCELERATION PROBLEM UNTIL AFTER HAVING THE VEHICLE REPAIRED. WHILE PULLING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE, AND DRIVING 10 MPH, THE VEHICLE JERKED FORWARD AND THEN SETTLED DOWN. THE RPM JUMPED UP AND THEN WENT BACK DOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28213 A…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THEY NEVER HAD AN ACCELERATION PROBLEM UNTIL AFTER HAVING THE VEHICLE REPAIRED. WHILE PULLING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE, AND DRIVING 10 MPH, THE VEHICLE JERKED FORWARD AND THEN SETTLED DOWN. THE RPM JUMPED UP AND THEN WENT BACK DOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28213 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 28500.

NHTSA ODI #10317088

18,914 miles · Mar 4, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

MY 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX WAS ON THE RECALL LIST FOR GAS PEDALS THAT MAY STICK OR ACCELERATE WITHOUT CAUSE. I TOOK THE CAR INTO RICE TOYOTA IN GREENSBORO NC WHERE IT WAS PURCHASED. THEY PERFORMED THE RECOMMENDED REPAIR ON FEB. 13, 2010. ON FEB. 22, I STARTED MY CAR AND IT ACCELERATED WITHOUT CAUSE. THE FLOOR MAT WAS IN ITS PROPER PO…

Read full complaint

MY 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX WAS ON THE RECALL LIST FOR GAS PEDALS THAT MAY STICK OR ACCELERATE WITHOUT CAUSE. I TOOK THE CAR INTO RICE TOYOTA IN GREENSBORO NC WHERE IT WAS PURCHASED. THEY PERFORMED THE RECOMMENDED REPAIR ON FEB. 13, 2010. ON FEB. 22, I STARTED MY CAR AND IT ACCELERATED WITHOUT CAUSE. THE FLOOR MAT WAS IN ITS PROPER POSITION. I TAPPED THE GAS PEDAL LIGHTLY TO "UNSTICK" IT. THIS DID NOT WORK. I TURNED OFF THE ENGINE AND WAITED A FEW MINUTES AND RESTARTED IT WITHOUT INCIDENT. I HAD NOT HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS CAR PRIOR TO THE "FIX" AND HAVEN'T HAD ANY SINCE THE FEB. 22 INCIDENT. NOW WHAT DO I DO?? I'VE CONTACTED THE DEALERSHIP. THEY ARE WILLING TO LOOK AT IT BUT HAVE SAID THERE ISN'T ANYTHING THEY KNOW THAT IS CAUSING THIS AND TOLD ME TO CONTACT TOYOTA. I WILL DO THAT TODAY IF I CAN GET THROUGH. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10316852

1 miles · Mar 4, 2010
Service Brakes, Electric

I HAD MY 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX FIXED FOR THE RECALL AND JUST LAST WEEKEND EXPERIENCED A BRAKING INCIDENT THAT SCARED ME HALF TO DEATH. I WAS APPROACHING A TRAFFIC LIGHT AND STEPPED ON MY BRAKES BUT MY CAR SPED UP AND NEARLY HIT THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME. LUCKILY I MOVED TO THE NEXT LANE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10316675

13,787 miles · Mar 3, 2010
Air BagsVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

ON FEBRUARY 11, I TOOK MY 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX TO MOTORCARS TOYOTA OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO, TO HAVE THE CAR REPAIRED IN THE GAS PEDAL RECALL. WHILE THERE, I WAS INFORMED OF ANOTHER RECALL ON THE CAR, ON ITS BRAKES. BOTH OF THESE ISSUES WERE ADDRESS AND I PICKED THE CAR UP ON FEBRUARY 13TH. ON FEBRUARY 24 AT 7:45AM, I WAS DRI…

Read full complaint

ON FEBRUARY 11, I TOOK MY 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX TO MOTORCARS TOYOTA OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO, TO HAVE THE CAR REPAIRED IN THE GAS PEDAL RECALL. WHILE THERE, I WAS INFORMED OF ANOTHER RECALL ON THE CAR, ON ITS BRAKES. BOTH OF THESE ISSUES WERE ADDRESS AND I PICKED THE CAR UP ON FEBRUARY 13TH. ON FEBRUARY 24 AT 7:45AM, I WAS DRIVING WESTBOUND ON I-90 IN WESTLAKE, OHIO; IT WAS SNOWING AND THE ROADS WERE WET, UNSALTED. AS I WAS ROUNDING A CORNER NEAR THE CROCKER BASSETT EXIT, MY CAR BEGAN TO SKID. I IMMEDIATELY BEGAN TO PUMP THE BRAKES AND ATTEMPT TO STRAIGHTEN MY CAR OUT, BUT THE BRAKES DID NOT ENGAGE. I FIRMLY PRESSED DOWN ON THE BRAKES AND NOTHING HAPPENED; I THEN TRIED THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND THE CAR STILL DID NOT SLOW DOWN. I WAS UNABLE TO REGAIN CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND IT BEGAN TO SPIN OUT AND TO THE LEFT. I PUMPED THE BRAKES AS HARD AND FAST AS I COULD, BUT THE BRAKES NEVER ENGAGED AND MY CAR HIT THE CEMENT MEDIAN AT 55MPH. DUE TO A BUILD UP OF SNOW AND ICE AGAINST THE MEDIAN, MY CAR WAS PROPELLED INTO THE AIR AND LANDED ON ITS ROOF. MY AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY IN THE CRASH. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10316409

12,000 miles · Mar 3, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

BRAKE FAILURE--ROLLED INTO PARKING SPOT, STEPPED ON BRAKE AND CAR DIDN'T STOP. PRE-RECALL FIX ON TOYOTA MATRIX. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10316147

13,100 miles · Mar 3, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

HAD THE RECALL ISSUE WITH THE GAS PEDAL FIXED - HOWEVER WHEN TRYING TO MAKE A TURN IN TRAFFIC THERE IS A HESITATION BEFORE THE CAR GOES! IT IS ONLY A FEW SECONDS OF A DELAY, HOWEVER DANGEROUS WHEN YOU NEED THE CAR TO GO. ON GOING ISSUE - DOES NOT DO IT EVERY TIME SO IT REALLY CATCHES YOU OFF GUARD. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10316142

43 miles · Mar 2, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

2009 TOYOTA MATRIX SINCE PURCHASE HAS HAD A THROTTLE/BRAKE/TRANSMISSION ANOMALY THE CAR ACCELERATES SUDDENLY WHEN GOING DOWN A BIG HILL OR WHENEVER I BRAKE APPROACHING A RED LIGHT. ADDITIONAL BRAKE PRESSURE - SO FAR - HAS STOPPED THE CAR..BUT I EXPECT A VEHICLE TO SLOW DOWN NOT ACCELERATE WHEN I USE THE BRAKE PEDAL. THE REC…

Read full complaint

2009 TOYOTA MATRIX SINCE PURCHASE HAS HAD A THROTTLE/BRAKE/TRANSMISSION ANOMALY THE CAR ACCELERATES SUDDENLY WHEN GOING DOWN A BIG HILL OR WHENEVER I BRAKE APPROACHING A RED LIGHT. ADDITIONAL BRAKE PRESSURE - SO FAR - HAS STOPPED THE CAR..BUT I EXPECT A VEHICLE TO SLOW DOWN NOT ACCELERATE WHEN I USE THE BRAKE PEDAL. THE RECALL FIX HAS BEEN APPLIED - SAME ACTION. I AM CONCERNED I AM DRIVING A VEHICLE THAT MAY SUDDENLY CAUSE A LIFE THREATENING PROBLEM, FOR ME OR SOMEONE IN FRONT OF MY VEHICLE. DEALER SHRUGGED - EXPECTED THE RECALL TO WORK. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10315794

Official recalls

3

16V340000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

May 23, 2016

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2008-2011 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2009-2011 Toyota Corolla and Corolla Matrix, 2006-2011 Toyota Yaris, Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350, 2010-2011 Toyota 4Runner, Lexus IS250C, Lexus IS350C and Lexus GX460, 2011 Sienna, 2007-2011 Lexus ES350, and 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2007-2008 Toyota Yaris, 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350 and 2007-2008 Lexus ES350 vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Vehicles of these model years and models that were not originally sold or ever registered in either Zones A or B are not subject to this safety recall. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules, and used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the front air bags, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on December 6, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for interim notification for this campaign are G1P (Toyota Zone A), G1R (Toyota Zone B), G2G (Lexus Zone A), and G2H (Lexus Zone B). Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), GLG (Lexus Zone A), and GLH (Lexus Zone B).

10V035000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

GULF STATES TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2010 VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 AND JUNE 2, 2008 WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. DEALERS WILL ALSO CORRECT THE OWNER'S MANUAL. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT GULF STATES TOYOTA AT 713-580-3300.

10V023000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Jan 27, 2010

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008-2010 HIGHLANDER, MODEL YEAR 2009-2010 COROLLA, VENZA AND MATRIX PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT. THIS RECALL IS AN EXPANSION OF A CAMPAIGN OF 3.8 MILLION OTHER TOYOTA VEHICLES ANNOUNCED IN 2009 FOR THE SAME ISSUE (SEE 09V-388).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA WILL MODIFY OR REPLACE THE ACCELERATOR PEDALS ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES. FLOOR SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ARE ALSO BEING CONSIDERED AND WILL BE INCLUDED FOR ANY MODEL FOR WHICH IT IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. INITIALLY, DEALERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED ON HOW TO RESHAPE THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL FOR THE REPAIR. AS REPLACEMENT PARTS WITH THE SAME SHAPE AS THE MODIFIED PEDAL BECOME AVAILABLE, THEY WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE DEALERS FOR THE REPAIR. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD THE PEDAL RESHAPE REMEDY COMPLETED WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE A NEW PEDAL IF THEY DESIRE, AFTER REPLACEMENT PEDALS BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ADDITION, TOYOTA WILL REPLACE ANY TOYOTA ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT IN A SUBJECT VEHICLE WITH A NEWLY DESIGNED MAT, FREE OF CHARGE. FOR THOSE CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT BUT DO NOT NEED OR WANT THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT, TOYOTA WILL RECOVER THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT AND REIMBURSE ITS PRICE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN MARCH 30, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.