I WAS COMING HOME FROM WORK WHEN MY CAR STARTED ACCELERATING FASTER. I TRIED TO STOP BUT IT JUST KEPT GOING. I THREW IT INTO NEUTRAL AND THEN PARK. I WAS FINALLY ABLE TO A TO GET IT TO STOP. *TR
1995 Toyota Camry
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 1995 Toyota Camry do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 295.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Camry years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 56 of 303 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 52 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Air Bags. Review the 41 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 34 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
303 reportsI HAVE A 1995 TOYOTA CAMRY THAT WILL GO ON ITS OWN. NO NEED TO PUSH THE GAS PEDAL. I CAN STOP IT USING THE BRAKE BUT IT WILL THEN GO ON ITS OWN WHEN I RELEASE THE BRAKE. I HAVE TO REALLY PUSH THE BRAKE AT STOP LIGHTS. I HAVE TO SHIFT INTO NEUTRAL TO STOP THE CAR. *TR
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 TOYOTA CAMRY. WHILE THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING OUT OF A CAR WASH THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING AND CAUSED THE CONTACT TO CRASH INTO A HOUSE. NO ONE WAS INJURED DURING THE CRASH. THE FAILURE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 52000.
1995 TOYOTA CAMRY. CONSUMER STATES SUDDEN ACCELERATION WAS THE CAUSE OF AN ACCIDENT. *TGW THE CONSUMERS WIFE WAS DRIVING THE VEHICLE WHEN IT SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND CRASHED INTO A TREE AND A WALL. THE CONSUMER'S WIFE WAS SERIOUSLY INJURED. *JB
UNASSISTED AND UNSAFE ACCELERATION ON FOUR OCCASIONS WITH MY 1995 TOYOTA CAMRY AND A COMPLETE ENGINE STALL-OUT WHILE DOING 15 MPH WITH MY 2009 TOYOTA CAMRY. *TR
THROTTLE SURGING PERIODIC 95 TOYOTA CAMRY. *TR
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 TOYOTA CAMRY. HE STATED THAT WHEN HE APPLIED THE BRAKE PEDAL AT AN INTERSECTION HE HEARD A LOUD WINDING NOISE. THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT COME STOP UNTIL HE WAS FORCED TO SHIFT GEARS INTO THE PARK POSITION. THE FAILURE OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY APPROXIMATELY EVERY FOUR TO SIX WEEKS. HE STATED THAT THE ENGINE …
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 TOYOTA CAMRY. HE STATED THAT WHEN HE APPLIED THE BRAKE PEDAL AT AN INTERSECTION HE HEARD A LOUD WINDING NOISE. THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT COME STOP UNTIL HE WAS FORCED TO SHIFT GEARS INTO THE PARK POSITION. THE FAILURE OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY APPROXIMATELY EVERY FOUR TO SIX WEEKS. HE STATED THAT THE ENGINE ACTED AS IF IT WAS TRYING TO OVERRIDE THE BRAKING SYSTEM. THE DEALER STATED THAT IT WAS AN IDLING PROBLEM AND THEY COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE FAILURE. HE ALSO STATED THAT IN 2004 HE EXPERIENCED SUDDEN ACCELERATION WHILE DRIVING IN REVERSE AND THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY CRASHED INTO THE RESTAURANT. HE DIDN'T SUFFER ANY INJURIES. THE PORTSMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT NUMBER IS 04-020448. THE FAILURE MILEAGE IN 2004 WAS 20,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 161,800. UPDATED 02/23/10. *LJ THE CONSUMER STATED THE FIRST TIME THE SUDDEN ACCELERATION OCCURRED, HE SHIFTED INTO REVERSE WITH HIS FOOT ON THE BRAKE, AND THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED QUICKLY AND THE CONSUMER HIT A BUILDING. THE CONSUMER STATED THE SUDDEN ACCELERATION HAS HAPPENED SEVERAL TIMES. UPDATED 08/11/10*JB
WHEN THE CRUISE CONTROL IS ENGAGED IN MY 1995 6-CYLINDER CAMRY, IT CAN SUDDENLY AND FORCEFULLY APPLY THE ACCELERATOR, JERKING THE VEHICLE FORWARD AND BACKWARD BEFORE DISENGAGING AND NOT REENGAGING UNTIL THE IGNITION IS TURNED OFF. IT WAS VERY FRIGHTENING SO I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER WHO READ THE ERROR CODE AND ASSURED ME IT WAS NO…
Read full complaint
WHEN THE CRUISE CONTROL IS ENGAGED IN MY 1995 6-CYLINDER CAMRY, IT CAN SUDDENLY AND FORCEFULLY APPLY THE ACCELERATOR, JERKING THE VEHICLE FORWARD AND BACKWARD BEFORE DISENGAGING AND NOT REENGAGING UNTIL THE IGNITION IS TURNED OFF. IT WAS VERY FRIGHTENING SO I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER WHO READ THE ERROR CODE AND ASSURED ME IT WAS NOT DANGEROUS AND REFUSED TO REPAIR IT UNDER WARRANTY. I SPOKE TO THE TOYOTA REPRESENTATIVE AND HE TOO REFUSED TO AUTHORIZE WARRANTY WORK. I HAVE NOT USED THE CRUISE CONTROL SINCE AND HAVE ASKED TOYOTA TO RECONSIDER A WARRANTY REPAIR BASED ON RECENT DISCLOSURES OF CONCEALMENT OF UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. *TR
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 TOYOTA CAMRY. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS AND APPLYING PRESSURE TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL, UNEXPECTEDLY, THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL BEGAN TO STICK. THE VEHICLES SPEED INCREASED TO 90 MPH. IN AN ATTEMPT TO ENGAGE THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE PARKING BRAKE, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO SLO…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 TOYOTA CAMRY. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS AND APPLYING PRESSURE TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL, UNEXPECTEDLY, THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL BEGAN TO STICK. THE VEHICLES SPEED INCREASED TO 90 MPH. IN AN ATTEMPT TO ENGAGE THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE PARKING BRAKE, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO SLOW DOWN. THE VEHICLE CAME TO A COMPLETE STOP ONLY AFTER THE GEAR SHIFT WAS FORCED INTO PARK WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS MOVING. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE TO HER RESIDENCE WITH EXTREME CAUTION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR INSPECTION. THE CONTACT HAS CONCERNS OF THE SIGNIFICANT SAFETY HAZARD. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE UNKNOWN.
AUTOMATIC GEAR SHIFT DOES NOT ALWAYS RESPOND TO GEAR SHIFT. FOR EXAMPLE SOMETIMES WHEN IT IS PLACED IN THE PARK POSITION, ON OCCASION IT HAS SLIPPED BACK INTO NEUTRAL COMMAND. THUS ON OCCASION IT HAS BEEN PLACED IN PARK COMMAND PARKED WIT THE KEY TAKEN OUT OF THE IGNITION AND IT HAS ROLLED OR MOVED CONSIDERABLY OUT OF ITS PARKE…
Read full complaint
AUTOMATIC GEAR SHIFT DOES NOT ALWAYS RESPOND TO GEAR SHIFT. FOR EXAMPLE SOMETIMES WHEN IT IS PLACED IN THE PARK POSITION, ON OCCASION IT HAS SLIPPED BACK INTO NEUTRAL COMMAND. THUS ON OCCASION IT HAS BEEN PLACED IN PARK COMMAND PARKED WIT THE KEY TAKEN OUT OF THE IGNITION AND IT HAS ROLLED OR MOVED CONSIDERABLY OUT OF ITS PARKED PLACED. THIS CAN CAUSE POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO THE CAR AND OTHER VEHICLES. *TR
Official recalls
199V307000 · Steering: Steering Wheel/handle Bar
Nov 1, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE STEERING WHEEL SET NUT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENTLY TIGHTENED CAUSING STEERING VIBRATION AND LOOSENESS.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS CAN RESULT IN A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TIGHTEN THE STEERING WHEEL SET NUT.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1RQ99020 · Steering Wheel Detachment
Opened Oct 6, 1999 · No close date supplied
Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Steering
OBATINED RECALL 99V-307
Illustration