← New search

2000 Jaguar S-TYPE

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most S-TYPE years

Owner complaints for the 2000 Jaguar S-TYPE are substantially higher than the model-year median of 25.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

82 reports with mileage · 59 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Power Train. Review the 41 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Visibility. Review the 23 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 21 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

8 crash reports1 fire reports8 injury reports

Suspension complaints

17 reports
Clear category filter
42,600 miles · Dec 30, 2005
Engine And Engine CoolingEquipmentSuspension

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 00V359002 CONCERNING THE SUSPENSION, HOWEVER, THE RECALL DID NOT CORRECT THE PROBLEM. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED, AND THEY EXPLAINED THE RECALL REPAIRS HAD ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED ONCE. *AK THE DRIVERS SIDE WINDOW REGULATOR AND MOTOR NEEDED TO BE REPLACED, THE ENGINE OVERHEA…

Read full complaint

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 00V359002 CONCERNING THE SUSPENSION, HOWEVER, THE RECALL DID NOT CORRECT THE PROBLEM. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED, AND THEY EXPLAINED THE RECALL REPAIRS HAD ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED ONCE. *AK THE DRIVERS SIDE WINDOW REGULATOR AND MOTOR NEEDED TO BE REPLACED, THE ENGINE OVERHEATED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE AIR CONDITIONER DID NOT WORK.. UPDATED 01/19/06. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10146549

43,600 miles · Dec 28, 2005
Electrical SystemEngine And Engine CoolingEquipment

A JAGUAR 2000 WAS PURCHASED ON DEC 2003. IT HAD 39000 MILES. I HAVE ONLY PUT ON 4000 MILES ON THIS CAR AND THE BALL JOINT BROKE THE OTHER DAY AND I WAS ALMOST KILLED. THE CAR WAS TOWED TO A LOCAL FOREIGN AUTO PLACE AND JAGUAR REFUSES TO REPAIR THE BALL JOINT. CLAIMING THEY WILL ONLY TAKE THE CLAIM FROM A REGISTERED JAGUAR DEALER…

Read full complaint

A JAGUAR 2000 WAS PURCHASED ON DEC 2003. IT HAD 39000 MILES. I HAVE ONLY PUT ON 4000 MILES ON THIS CAR AND THE BALL JOINT BROKE THE OTHER DAY AND I WAS ALMOST KILLED. THE CAR WAS TOWED TO A LOCAL FOREIGN AUTO PLACE AND JAGUAR REFUSES TO REPAIR THE BALL JOINT. CLAIMING THEY WILL ONLY TAKE THE CLAIM FROM A REGISTERED JAGUAR DEALER. SO THE CAR WAS TOWED TODAY TO MOMENTUM JAGUAR ON THE SW FREEWAY AND I WAS TOLD THAT THE BALL JOINT WAS REPLACED ON THE DRIVERS SIDE IN APRIL 2001 AND IT BROKE AGAIN???IN LESS THAT 43000 MILES WE HAVE HAD 2 DEFECTIVE BALL JOINTS?? AND THE PASSENGER SIDE IS DEFECTIVE AS WELL AND NEEDS TO BE CHANGED!! THIS IS A SERIOUS DEFECT AND JAGUAR IS DISCLAIMING ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY...IT ALSO HAS A/C PROBLEMS AND ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS. THE SENSORS DO NOT WORK AND WERE REPLACED LAST YEAR. THE WINDOW REGULATORS BROKE AND WERE CHARGED TO ME.. THE REAR PASSENGER SIDE OF THE CAR IS FALLING OFF ....IT IS ALWAYS OVERHEATING . IT IS UNBELIEVABLE AND I ONLY DROVE IT 4000 MILES IN THE LAST 2 YEARS THAT I OWN IT!!!!!!SURELY THIS IS A LEMON IN THE FIRST DEGREE!!!! *JB

NHTSA ODI #10146269

65,000 miles · Nov 17, 2005
Suspension

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL 00V359000/MANUFACTURER'S RECALL R-1-356 FOR THE LOWER BALL JOINT. THE PREVIOUS OWNER HAD RECALL REPAIRS DONE IN 2001. THE CONTACT VEHICLE WAS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM AS INDICATED ON THE RECALL. THE MANUFACTURER WAS UNWILLING TO FIX THE RECALL AT THEIR EXPENSE. *AK …

Read full complaint

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL 00V359000/MANUFACTURER'S RECALL R-1-356 FOR THE LOWER BALL JOINT. THE PREVIOUS OWNER HAD RECALL REPAIRS DONE IN 2001. THE CONTACT VEHICLE WAS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM AS INDICATED ON THE RECALL. THE MANUFACTURER WAS UNWILLING TO FIX THE RECALL AT THEIR EXPENSE. *AK UPDATED 12/7/2005. *NM

NHTSA ODI #10142988

Mileage unknown · Jun 13, 2005
Power TrainSuspension

COMPLAINT REGARDING SERVICES RENDERED BY JAGUAR OF TACOMA.*MR THE CONSUMER STATED THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT COME OUT OF PARK EASILY. THE DEALER CHANGED A CABLE, IT THEN WOULD COME OUT OF PARK, BUT NOT AS SMOOTH. THE CONSUMER THEN STATED IT ALMOST BECAME IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE GEAR TO COME OUT OF PARK. WHEN THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHIC…

Read full complaint

COMPLAINT REGARDING SERVICES RENDERED BY JAGUAR OF TACOMA.*MR THE CONSUMER STATED THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT COME OUT OF PARK EASILY. THE DEALER CHANGED A CABLE, IT THEN WOULD COME OUT OF PARK, BUT NOT AS SMOOTH. THE CONSUMER THEN STATED IT ALMOST BECAME IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE GEAR TO COME OUT OF PARK. WHEN THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER, HE WAS TOLD THERE WAS A TRANSMISSION PROBLEM THAT WOULD COST 1300.00. THE CONSUMER WAS TOLD THE MANUFACTURER WAS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM SINCE 2002. (JAGUAR S-TYPE). THE VEHICLE ALSO HAD FRONT END PROBLEMS. *JB *NM

NHTSA ODI #10117770

Mileage unknown · May 9, 2005
Suspension

DT: THE CONTACT TOOK HER VEHCILE INTO THE MECHANIC FOR AN ALIGNMENT BECAUSE HER CAR WAS MOVING ALL OVER THE ROAD, AND THE MECHANIC NOTICED THE PROBLEM WITH THE BALL JOINTS THEN. THE CONTACT SAYS THAT LAST TUESDAY SHE TOOK HER VEHCILE TO HAVE IT SERVICED AND THE MECHANIC NOTICED THAT HER PASSENGER LOWER BALL JOINT ON THE FRONT W…

Read full complaint

DT: THE CONTACT TOOK HER VEHCILE INTO THE MECHANIC FOR AN ALIGNMENT BECAUSE HER CAR WAS MOVING ALL OVER THE ROAD, AND THE MECHANIC NOTICED THE PROBLEM WITH THE BALL JOINTS THEN. THE CONTACT SAYS THAT LAST TUESDAY SHE TOOK HER VEHCILE TO HAVE IT SERVICED AND THE MECHANIC NOTICED THAT HER PASSENGER LOWER BALL JOINT ON THE FRONT WAS LOOSE SO HE TIGHTENED IT FOR HER ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATION AND TOLD HER THAT IT WAS A MANUFACTURER PROBLEM. AT THE TIME ON TUESDAY SHE WAS UNAWARE OF THE RECALL OF THE VEHCILE UNTIL SATURDAY MAY 7TH. ON SATURDAY THE BALL JOINT BROKE AND THE DRIVERS SIDE BALL JOINT IS LOOSE NOW. THE BALL JOINT BROKE WHILE SHE WAS DRIVING AND HER TIRE CAME A LOOSE AND CAUSED THE FRONT END TO FALL DOWN CAUSING HER TO LOOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND DONE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE. SHE HAS CONTACTED THE MILLENIUM DEALERSHIP AND THEY TOLD HER THAT THEY COULD NOT FIX THE PART BECAUSE THE BALL JOINT WAS REPLACED IN 2001 BECAUSE OF A RECALL ON THE BALL JOINT AND THE DEALERSHIP TOLD HER THAT THE MANUFACTURER WILL NOT REPLACE THE BALL JOINT BUT THE DEALERSHIP WILL NOT GIVE HER ANYTIME OF SERVICE RECORD STATING THAT THE RECALL DID TAKE PLACE. DEALERSHIP FURTHUR STATED THAT THERE WASN'T A RECALL.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10120470

Mileage unknown · Mar 28, 2005
SuspensionWheels

WHILE DRIVING A LOUD NOISE CAME FROM THE FRONT THE RIGHT FRONT PASSENGER SIDE WHEEL SHEARED OFF. DRIVER WAS ABLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE, AND PULLED OVER TO THE SHOULDER. VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER, AND MECHANIC DETERMINED THAT THE LEFT AND RIGHT UPPER AND LOWER BALL JOINTS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10117001

30,000 miles · Apr 19, 2004
Suspension

WHEN MAKING A TURN WHEELS HESITATED BEFORE TURNING IN THE DIRECTION THE VEHICLE WAS DRIVING. THIS OCCURRED BECAUSE A BOLT IN THE LOWER BALL JOINT FELL OFF. THIS RESULTED IN THE LOWER BALL JOINT BECOMING LOOSE BECAUSE IT WAS FRACTURED.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10067358

Official recalls

2

00V359002 · Suspension:front:control Arm:lower Ball Joint

Nov 6, 2000

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE FRONT SUSPENSION LOWER BALL JOINTS WERE NOT TIGHTENED TO SPECIFICATIONS WHEN THEY WERE ATTACHED TO THE LOWER CONTROL ARMS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IF THE BALL JOINT ATTACHING NUTS ARE NOT ADEQUATELY TIGHTENED, THEY CAN LOOSEN AND ULTIMATELY, RESULT IN FRACTURE OF THE BALL JOINT STUD. IF THE BALL JOINT FRACTURES, CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE COULD BE AFFECTED, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE TORQUE ON THE TWO BALL JOINT ATTACHING NUTS. VEHICLES WITH LOOSE BALL JOINT ATTACHING NUTS WILL EITHER HAVE THE FASTENERS TIGHTENED TO SPECIFICATION, OR IF NECESSARY, THE BALL JOINTS WILL BE REPLACED.

00V228004 · Seat Belts

Aug 25, 2000

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH TRW SEAT BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLIES. THE BUCKLE BASE OF THESE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES WERE NOT PROPERLY HEAT TREATED AND THEREFORE DO NOT PASS THE LOAD BEARING REQUIREMENT OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES."

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND CHANGE, IF NECESSARY, THE SEAT BELT BUCKLES.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.