Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
1470–25K
63025–50K
50950–75K
24575–100K
206100–150K
56150K+
1,793 reports with mileage · 651 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Electrical System. Review the 854 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Service Brakes. Review the 529 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Structure. Review the 300 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
33 crash reports7 fire reports24 injury reports
What owners actually said
2,444 reports
53,129 miles · May 23, 2019
Power Train
2013 EDGE WITH 53,000 MILES - 3-4 MONTHS OUT OF THE POWER TRAIN WARRANTY. EXPERIENCED INTERMITTENT NOISES WHEN VEHICLE IS COLD (I.E. GRINDING NOISE, ENGINE RUNNING IRREGULAR, AND FAINT HUMMING AT ENGINE/TRANSMISSION). THIS ONLY HAPPENED APPROXIMATELY 3-4 TIMES TOTAL WITH MANY DAYS IN BETWEEN WHILE THE VEHICLE IS MOVING. VERY …
Read full complaint
2013 EDGE WITH 53,000 MILES - 3-4 MONTHS OUT OF THE POWER TRAIN WARRANTY. EXPERIENCED INTERMITTENT NOISES WHEN VEHICLE IS COLD (I.E. GRINDING NOISE, ENGINE RUNNING IRREGULAR, AND FAINT HUMMING AT ENGINE/TRANSMISSION). THIS ONLY HAPPENED APPROXIMATELY 3-4 TIMES TOTAL WITH MANY DAYS IN BETWEEN WHILE THE VEHICLE IS MOVING. VERY SLIGHT AT FIRST AND PROGRESSED AND BECAME LITTLE MORE PRONOUNCED. WHEN I WOULD STOP, THE ENGINE WAS CALM AND STILL. I WOULD WONDER IF IT WAS EVEN STILL RUNNING. IT TOOK THE DEALERSHIP OVER A WEEK TO DIAGNOSE BECAUSE IT WAS INTERMITTENT AND THE MECHANIC HAD TO CONTINUE TO DRIVE IT BEFORE IT HAPPENED AGAIN. FINALLY, FORMALLY DIAGNOSED 5/22/19 AS A FAILED PTU. NO FLUID LEAKS AND ALL SEALS INTACT. VERY LITTLE PRICE BREAK ON LABOR AND/OR PARTS. THE DEALERSHIP REFERS YOU TO CORPORATE FORD FOR ANY PART AND/OR WARRANTY COMPLAINTS. SINCE THERE WAS NO CORE CHARGE, I DID REQUEST THAT THE FAILED PART BE RETURNED AFTER REPLACEMENT. WITHOUT INTERVENTION TO FORCE FORD TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS PROBLEM, THIS PART WILL CONTINUE TO BE PRODUCED AND INSTALLED ON VEHICLES. LASTLY, WITH THE FOREKNOWLEDGE MENTIONED ABOVE ABOUT THIS VEHICLES' PTU ISSUES. I WOULD CERTAINLY HESITATE TO BUY ANY FORD EDGE OR FLEX BECAUSE OF THIS SUBSTANDARD PART THAT SHOULD BE RECALLED FOR CONSUMER SAFETY REASONS. KEEP IN MIND THAT THE FIX IS ONLY TO PUT THIS SAME POORLY DESIGNED REPLACEMENT PART BACK ON THE VEHICLE - ONLY TO WAIT FOR IT TO POSSIBLY FAIL AGAIN.
NHTSA ODI #11209462
49,000 miles · May 20, 2019
Fuel/propulsion System
DRIVING 45 MPH WHEN THE ENGINE LOST POWER AND A WRENCH ICON LIGHT CAME ON. ENGINE WAS IDLING ROUGHLY AND ACCELERATOR WOULD NOT WORK. VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A DEALER AND SERVICE DEPARTMENT COULD FIND NO TROUBLE CODES AND COULD NOT REPLICATE THE PROBLEM. THE NEXT DAY THIS SAME ISSUE HAPPENED AGAIN AT AROUND 45 MPH ON A HIGHWAY.
NHTSA ODI #11208716
91,000 miles · May 20, 2019
Fuel/propulsion System
CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON. TOOK IT TO VEHICLE SERVICE STATION AND CODE P0299 CAME UP. THAT IS THE CODE TO REPLACE TURBOCHARGER ASSEMBLY. THE VEHICLE IS ONLY 6 YEARS OLD AND UNDER 100K MILES. THIS ISSUE SHOULD NOT BE COMING UP ON A VEHICLE THAT IS NOT THAT OLD
NHTSA ODI #11208633
76,000 miles · May 20, 2019
Service Brakes
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED, BUT WAS STIFF AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO RESPOND. ADDITIONALLY, WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS ON AN INCLINE, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED AND THE VEHICLE ROLLED. THERE WAS ALSO AN ABNORMAL HISSING NOISE EMERGING FROM THE VEHICLE. THERE WERE NO WARN…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED, BUT WAS STIFF AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO RESPOND. ADDITIONALLY, WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS ON AN INCLINE, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED AND THE VEHICLE ROLLED. THERE WAS ALSO AN ABNORMAL HISSING NOISE EMERGING FROM THE VEHICLE. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT CALLED BOB TOMES FORD (950 S CENTRAL EXPY, MCKINNEY, TX 75071, (888) 485-3971) AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND PROVIDED CASE NUMBER: CAS 21714536. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT COVERED UNDER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM NUMBER: 13N02. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 76,000.
NHTSA ODI #11208621
119,000 miles · May 15, 2019
Service Brakes
2013 FORD EDGE BRAKE BOOSTER ISSUE. MILEAGE 119,000. STARTING HEARING A HISSING SOUND COMING FROM THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE BRAKES BECAME VERY RESISTANT. AFTER HAVING IT LOOKED AT, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BRAKE BOOSTER WAS BAD AND THAT THIS WAS A KNOWN PROBLEM WITH THIS YEAR VEHICLE. AFTER CHECKING FURTHER I DISCOVERED THERE WA…
Read full complaint
2013 FORD EDGE BRAKE BOOSTER ISSUE. MILEAGE 119,000. STARTING HEARING A HISSING SOUND COMING FROM THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE BRAKES BECAME VERY RESISTANT. AFTER HAVING IT LOOKED AT, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BRAKE BOOSTER WAS BAD AND THAT THIS WAS A KNOWN PROBLEM WITH THIS YEAR VEHICLE. AFTER CHECKING FURTHER I DISCOVERED THERE WAS A RECALL FOR MY MAKE/MODEL/YEAR VEHICLE BUT THAT ONLY CARS MADE AT CERTAIN ASSEMBLY PLANTS WERE INCLUDED IN THIS RECALL AND MY CAR WASN'T ONE OF THEM. I CALLED FORD CUSTOMER CARE WHO CREATED A CASE # FOR ME AND SET ME UP WITH THE SERVICE MANAGER AT MY DEALERSHIP TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THE ISSUE WITH MY CAR WAS IDENTICAL AS THOSE THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY RECALLED AND SUBMITTED THIS CLAIM BACK TO FORD CUSTOMER CARE AS BEING A VALID ISSUE TO BE REPAIRED. FORD CUSTOMER CARE SENT A RESPONSE BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP STATING THAT SINCE MY VEHICLE WASN'T INCLUDED IN THE RECALL THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO OFFER ANY HELP THROUGH FORD LOYALTY OR FORD ASSISTANCE ON MY REPAIRS. THE DEALERSHIP HAD TOLD ME THAT FORD HAD IN THE PAST AGREED TO PAY SOME THAT WEREN'T ON THE RECALL LIST BUT DENIED OTHERS AND THEY WEREN'T SURE WHY. THAT IS REALLY UPSETTING....WHO DETERMINES WHO THEY SAY YES TO AND WHO THEY TURN AWAY? WHY EVEN ASSIGN A CASE # AND SET YOU UP WITH A DEALERSHIP FOR REPAIR IF THEY ARE KNOWINGLY GOING TO DENY YOU? MY FAMILY IS A HUGE FORD FAMILY. THAT IS THE ONLY TYPE OF VEHICLE WE EVER PURCHASE. WE'VE SHOWN DECADES OF CUSTOMER LOYALTY TO THEIR BRAND AND MY HUSBAND HAS BEEN LOOKING TO PURCHASE ANOTHER VEHICLE AS WE SPEAK...BUT THIS ISSUE AND BEING DENIED ASSISTANCE FOR AN ISSUE THAT IS WELL DOCUMENTED ALL OVER THE COUNTRY IS GIVING US NO CHOICE BUT TO LOOK OUTSIDE OF FORD AT OTHER MANUFACTURERS FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER. THIS HAS DISAPPOINTED OUR ENTIRE FAMILY AND COST FORD A LOT MORE THAN THE COST OF THIS REPAIR!!!
NHTSA ODI #11207891
55,000 miles · May 15, 2019
Service Brakes
VEHICLE HAS BEEN IN FOR BRAKE REPAIR NUMEROUS TIMES. LAST WAS MASTER CYLINDER. MOST RECENT IS BRAKES GOING TO FLOOR WITH AIR SOUND COMING FROM INSIDE. LOCAL DEALER IS ALWAYS BOOKED 2 WEEKS. I DO HAVE EXTENDED WARRANTY & HAVE SPENT A FORTUNE ON DEDUCTIBLES FOR BRAKE ISSUES. I TRAVEL FOR WORK IN ALL TYPES OF MOUNTAINOUS CONDI…
Read full complaint
VEHICLE HAS BEEN IN FOR BRAKE REPAIR NUMEROUS TIMES. LAST WAS MASTER CYLINDER. MOST RECENT IS BRAKES GOING TO FLOOR WITH AIR SOUND COMING FROM INSIDE. LOCAL DEALER IS ALWAYS BOOKED 2 WEEKS. I DO HAVE EXTENDED WARRANTY & HAVE SPENT A FORTUNE ON DEDUCTIBLES FOR BRAKE ISSUES. I TRAVEL FOR WORK IN ALL TYPES OF MOUNTAINOUS CONDITIONS. AFTER READING THERE ARE 144 COMPLAINTS ON 2013 MODEL THIS IS DEFINITELY A DANGEROUS ISSUE. NEEDS RECALL.
NHTSA ODI #11207882
49,250 miles · May 14, 2019
Power Train
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE GEARS FAILED TO PROPERLY SHIFT AND THERE WAS A REDUCTION OF SPEED. THE CONTACT HAD TO MANEUVER THE GEAR SHIFTER, SHUT THE VEHICLE OFF AND BACK ON TO GET THE GEAR TO SHIFT INTO PARK. THE DEALER (BELK FORD IN BALTIMORE MD 410-766-3600) HAD BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE FAIL…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE GEARS FAILED TO PROPERLY SHIFT AND THERE WAS A REDUCTION OF SPEED. THE CONTACT HAD TO MANEUVER THE GEAR SHIFTER, SHUT THE VEHICLE OFF AND BACK ON TO GET THE GEAR TO SHIFT INTO PARK. THE DEALER (BELK FORD IN BALTIMORE MD 410-766-3600) HAD BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE SEVERAL TIMES. THE DEALER DIAGNOSED THAT THE TORQUE SHAFT BOOS FAILED AND THAT THE TRANSMISSION FLUID WAS A QUART LOW AND BLACK. THE DEALER LATER INDICATED THAT THE TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 14V393000 (POWER TRAIN) WHICH WAS FOR THE 2014 MODEL. THE MANUFACTURER ISSUED 10 POWER TRAIN TSB BUT WITH NO RECALL CAMPAIGN, NO WARRANTY COVERAGE THEY EXPECTED THE OWNER TO HAVE THE DEALER REPLACE THE TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 49,250.
NHTSA ODI #11207541
Mileage unknown · May 13, 2019
Service Brakes
THE "SERVICE ADVANCE TRACK" WARNING LIGHT CAME ON DISPLAY. FORD DEALERSHIP DIAGNOSED THAT THE ABS MODULE HAD TO BE REPLACED AND REPROGRAMMED. THEY SAID THE VEHICLE IS DANGEROUS TO DRIVE UNTIL SERVICED. THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE REPLACEMENT PART WAS NOT AVAILABLE AND WOULD TAKE MONTHS TO ARRIVE. THEY SAID SEVERAL OTHER VEHICLES…
Read full complaint
THE "SERVICE ADVANCE TRACK" WARNING LIGHT CAME ON DISPLAY. FORD DEALERSHIP DIAGNOSED THAT THE ABS MODULE HAD TO BE REPLACED AND REPROGRAMMED. THEY SAID THE VEHICLE IS DANGEROUS TO DRIVE UNTIL SERVICED. THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE REPLACEMENT PART WAS NOT AVAILABLE AND WOULD TAKE MONTHS TO ARRIVE. THEY SAID SEVERAL OTHER VEHICLES (IN THAT AND IN OTHER DEALERSHIPS) WERE AWAITING FOR THE SAME ABS MODULE REPLACEMENT.
NHTSA ODI #11207249
98,562 miles · May 11, 2019
Service Brakes
DEFECTIVE BRAKE BOOSTER RECALL. BRAKE PETAL STARTED GOING TO THE FLOOR MAKING IT HARD TO STOP
NHTSA ODI #11206961
Mileage unknown · May 10, 2019
Power Train
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A CONSTANT FAILURE WITH THE TRANSMISSION GEAR SLIPPING OUT OF DRIVE. THE CONTACT WAS UNCERTAIN IF THE FAILURE MAY PROGRESS TO THE OTHER GEARS RENDERING THE RISK OF A POTENTIAL CATASTROPHIC CRASH. THE PROBLEM WAS GETTING WORSE TO THE POINT THAT THERE WAS A R…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A CONSTANT FAILURE WITH THE TRANSMISSION GEAR SLIPPING OUT OF DRIVE. THE CONTACT WAS UNCERTAIN IF THE FAILURE MAY PROGRESS TO THE OTHER GEARS RENDERING THE RISK OF A POTENTIAL CATASTROPHIC CRASH. THE PROBLEM WAS GETTING WORSE TO THE POINT THAT THERE WAS A REDUCTION IN SPEED WHEN NEEDING TO PICK UP SPEED DUE TO A DELAY IN THE GEARS CHANGING OVER. THE VEHICLE WAS INSPECTED BY THREE DIFFERENT REPAIR FACILITY INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED MECHANICS FOR A TECHNICAL DIAGNOSIS AS TRANSMISSION SPECIALISTS. THE DEALER BORGMAN FORD (3150 28TH ST SW, GRANDVILLE, MI 49418, (616) 534-7651) WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER INDICATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 14V393000 (POWER TRAIN) FOR THIS YEAR MODEL VEHICLE. THE DEALER WAS NOT AUTHORIZED TO DIAGNOSE THE VEHICLE YET UNTIL FURTHER GUIDANCE WAS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS NOT AVAILABLE.
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Additional source detail variants (3)
Interior Lighting
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
2013 Ford Edge Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year