RECALL REQUIRED THAT THE TRANSFER CASE BE REPAIRED, IT WAS REPLACED WITH A DEFECTIVE ONE. THE ELECTRONIC CLUTCH IN THE NEW TRANSFER CASE STARTED MAKING POPPING SOUNDS AT APPROX. 8057 MILES. PROBLEM REPORTED WHILE UNDER RECALL PART WARRANTEE BUT I WAS TOLD THE TRANSFER CASE WOULD NOT MAKE THAT SOUND. IT DID AND LATER FAILED CA…
Read full complaint
RECALL REQUIRED THAT THE TRANSFER CASE BE REPAIRED, IT WAS REPLACED WITH A DEFECTIVE ONE. THE ELECTRONIC CLUTCH IN THE NEW TRANSFER CASE STARTED MAKING POPPING SOUNDS AT APPROX. 8057 MILES. PROBLEM REPORTED WHILE UNDER RECALL PART WARRANTEE BUT I WAS TOLD THE TRANSFER CASE WOULD NOT MAKE THAT SOUND. IT DID AND LATER FAILED CATASTROPHICALLY. IT WAS DANGEROUS TO DRIVE VEHICLE UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, FORD SHOULD REPLACE DEFECTIVE UNIT WITH A GOOD ONE BUT REFUSE TO DO SO. *AK
NHTSA ODI #726602
Mileage unknown · Jul 18, 2000
Engine And Engine CoolingPower Train
TRANSFER CASE PROBLEMS BEGAN WHEN FLUID WAS LEAKING. TOOK TO MECHANIC, WHO REPLACED THE GASKETS. ABOUT A MONTH LATER THE TRANSMISSION WENT OUT, AND WAS REBUILT BY DIFFERENT MECHANIC. FLUID CONTINUED TO LEAK, GASKETS WERE REPLACED A SECOND TIME. FLUID SPEWED DURING DRIVING, WHICH MECHANIC SAID WAS DUE TO CATALYTIC CONVERTER B…
Read full complaint
TRANSFER CASE PROBLEMS BEGAN WHEN FLUID WAS LEAKING. TOOK TO MECHANIC, WHO REPLACED THE GASKETS. ABOUT A MONTH LATER THE TRANSMISSION WENT OUT, AND WAS REBUILT BY DIFFERENT MECHANIC. FLUID CONTINUED TO LEAK, GASKETS WERE REPLACED A SECOND TIME. FLUID SPEWED DURING DRIVING, WHICH MECHANIC SAID WAS DUE TO CATALYTIC CONVERTER BLOWING HOT AIR ON TRANSMISSION FLUID, CAUSING ITS RELEASE. REPLACED CATALYTIC CONVERTER. FLUID STILL CONTINUED TO SPEW, ALL OVER THE UNDERSIDE OF THE VEHICLE. IT WAS DRIVEN 120 MILES, A QT. OF TRANSMISSION FLUID ADDED, AND BACK 120 MILES, WITH ANOTHER QT. ADDED. MECHANIC TAKES TRANSFER CASE APART, FINDING THE BEARINGS WORN TO A NON-ROUND SHAPE, AND THE SHAFT END WORN DOWN. CHECKED FOR RECALL, AND THERE IS ONE, 99V094000 BUT FORD SAYS OUR VAN DOESN'T FALL INTO THIS RECALL AND REFUSES TO HELP.
NHTSA ODI #725657
Mileage unknown · May 22, 2000
Power Train
VEHICLE WOULD NOT TRAVEL OVER 35 MPH. TRANSMISSION HAS BEEN REBUILT TWO TIMES.HOWEVER, PROBLEM RETURNED AFTER REPAIRS. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION. *AK
NHTSA ODI #862247
Mileage unknown · Apr 11, 2000
Power Train
WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE HESITATED FOR ABOUT 40 SECONDS. DEALER FLUSHED OUT FLUID AND IT GOT WORSE. CONSUMER SAID IT WAS THE EXACT RECALL LISTED ON WEB. *AK
NHTSA ODI #860072
Mileage unknown · Jan 20, 2000
Power Train
THIS AEROSTAR VAN HAS BEEN AN EXTREMELY GOOD VEHICLE UNTIL WE RECENTLY STARTED HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE FRONT TRANSFER CASE. WE RECEIVED A RECALL IN 1998 FOR THE TRANSFER CASE, ALTHOUGH ALL THAT WAS REPLACED WAS THE REAR CASE. ABOUT 1 YEAR LATER WE STARTED HAVING LEAKAGE FROM THE FRONT TRANSFER CASE. WE RETURNED THE TRUCK TO…
Read full complaint
THIS AEROSTAR VAN HAS BEEN AN EXTREMELY GOOD VEHICLE UNTIL WE RECENTLY STARTED HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE FRONT TRANSFER CASE. WE RECEIVED A RECALL IN 1998 FOR THE TRANSFER CASE, ALTHOUGH ALL THAT WAS REPLACED WAS THE REAR CASE. ABOUT 1 YEAR LATER WE STARTED HAVING LEAKAGE FROM THE FRONT TRANSFER CASE. WE RETURNED THE TRUCK TO THE DEALER AND THEY STATED THAT THIS WAS NOT PART OF THE RECALL, BUT WE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE THIS CRACK REPAIRED. WE WENT TO SEVERAL TRANSMISSION REPAIR FACILITIES AND THEY INDICATED THAT THEY SEE THIS CRACK IN THE FRONT CASE FREQUENTLY IN THE AEROSTAR VAN. WE HAVE HAD IT WELDED, BUT WILL NOT TAKE THE VAN OUT ON THE HIGHWAY. WE WANT IT REPLACED AND IF IT IS HAPPENING AS FREQUENTLY AS THEY SAY, IT IS CERTAINLY A SAFETY ISSUE. *AK
NHTSA ODI #717622
Mileage unknown · Jan 10, 2000
Power Train
TRANSFER CASE FAILED PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE (97V-204)LEAVING CONSUMER AND FAMILY STRANDED. DRIVESHAFT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CHANGED TO AN ALUMINUM ONE AT TIME OF RECALL REPAIR OF THE TRANSFER CASE TO FULLY REMEDY THE TRANSMISSION PROBLEM. CONSUMER IS HEARING TRANSMISSON NOISES AGAIN. NLM
NHTSA ODI #550308
Mileage unknown · Jan 5, 2000
Power Train
THIS VAN RELEASES AUTOMATIC TRANS. FLUID FROM THE SEAL BETWEEN THE TORQUE CONVERTER AND THE TRANSMISSION BODY. IT DOES THIS WHEN HOT (BUT NOT OVERHEATING), IN THE SUMMER, WHILE TOWING A LIGHT WEIGHT CAMPING TRAILER (LOAD WITHIN FORD TOWING LIMITS). THIS OCCURS TYPICALLY WHILE CLIMBING, BUT ALSO ON A FLAT GRADE AT HIGH SPEEDS (…
Read full complaint
THIS VAN RELEASES AUTOMATIC TRANS. FLUID FROM THE SEAL BETWEEN THE TORQUE CONVERTER AND THE TRANSMISSION BODY. IT DOES THIS WHEN HOT (BUT NOT OVERHEATING), IN THE SUMMER, WHILE TOWING A LIGHT WEIGHT CAMPING TRAILER (LOAD WITHIN FORD TOWING LIMITS). THIS OCCURS TYPICALLY WHILE CLIMBING, BUT ALSO ON A FLAT GRADE AT HIGH SPEEDS (65-70 MPH) IN HOT TEMPERATURES (85F +). THE FLUID SQUIRTS ONTO THE EXHAUST PIPE, RELEASING LARGE AMOUNTS OF SMOKE. THERE WAS A PREVIOUS RECALL ON THIS VAN FOR A SIMILAR PROBLEM WITH RELEASING TRANS. FLUID ONTO THE EXHAUST PIPE, AND I HAD THE RECALL WORK DONE, BUT IT INVOLVED THE TRANSFER CASE AND DRIVESHAFT, NOT THE TORQUE CONVERTER TO TRANSMISSION SEAL. I HAVE HAD A LARGE AFTERMARKET TRANS. COOLER INSTALLED AS WELL AS A TRANS. FLUID TEMP. GUAGE. THE ENGINE COOLANT AND TRANS. FLUID ARE WITHIN NORMAL TEMP. LIMITS WHEN THESE INCIDENTS OCCUR. THE DEALER SERVICE DEPT. HAS TOLD ME THAT THIS PROBLEM WOULD NOT BE FIXED BY REPLACING THE SEAL; THAT IT WOULD CONTINUE BECAUSE OF COMPONENT LIMITATIONS. ALTHOUGH THE DRIVETRAIN COMPONENTS HAVE NOT BEEN DETECTABLY MECHANICALLY DAMAGED BY THESE INCIDENTS, THE INCIDENTS ARE A CLEAR SAFETY HAZARD BECAUSE OF THE FIRE HAZARD AS WELL AS THE POSSIBLE LOSS OF CONTROL IF THE DRIVTRAIN COMPONENTS WERE TO FAIL PRECIPITOUSLY. WHEN THESE INCIDENTS OCCUR, I HAVE TO PULL OVER IMMEDIATELY AND SHUT OFF THE ENGINE AND LET THE TRANS. COOL FOR A TIME, AND THIS IS ANOTHER SAFETY HAZARD BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ALWAYS A SAFE PLACE TO PULL OVER. I BELIEVE THAT THE PREVIOUS RECALL FOR THIS (OR A SIMILAR) PROBLEM DID NOT RESULT IN AN ADEQUATE FIX AND THAT THE ISSUE SHOULD BE RE-EXAMINED. THE DATE OF THE INCIDENT NOTED ON THIS REPORT WAS THE FIRST OCCURRENCE.
NHTSA ODI #716941
Mileage unknown · Sep 15, 1999
Power Train
IN MARCH OF 1995 I TOOK CUSTODY OF MY THREE NIECES, DUE TO THEIR MOTHER'S ADDICTION TO METH. AT THAT POINT WE OWNED A FORD EXCORT, WHICH WE TRADED IN ON THE FORD AEROSTAR IN MAY OF THAT YEAR, WITH APPROXIMATELY 18,000 MILES. WHEN THE VAN REACHED APPROX. 55,000 MILES MY WIFE WAS DRIVING IN PHOENIX AND THE TRANSFER CASE WENT OUT…
Read full complaint
IN MARCH OF 1995 I TOOK CUSTODY OF MY THREE NIECES, DUE TO THEIR MOTHER'S ADDICTION TO METH. AT THAT POINT WE OWNED A FORD EXCORT, WHICH WE TRADED IN ON THE FORD AEROSTAR IN MAY OF THAT YEAR, WITH APPROXIMATELY 18,000 MILES. WHEN THE VAN REACHED APPROX. 55,000 MILES MY WIFE WAS DRIVING IN PHOENIX AND THE TRANSFER CASE WENT OUT, WHILE SHE WAS DRIVING AROUND 35 MPH. SINCE THE COMPONENT WAS UNDER WARRANTY PIONEER FORD REPLACED THE COMPONENT, AND THIS ONLY TOOK THEM 5 TO 6 WEEKS. IN AUGUST OF 1998 THE TRANSFER CASE WENT OUT AGAIN, WITH APPROX. 108,000 MILES, AND THIS TIME THE FORD DEALER IN BLYTHE REPLACED THE COMPONENT AND DRIVE SHAFT UNDER A RECALL NOTICE. LESS THAN 12 MONTHS LATER, ON AUGUST 13, 1999, THE TRANSFER CASE WENT OUT AGAIN. WE TOOK IT TO FIRESTONE AND THEY THOUGHT THE PROBLEM WAS A CV JOINT, WHICH THEY REPLACED. THE PROBLEM CONTINUED AND THEY SENT US TO BOB TURNER'S FORD IN ALBUQUERQUE, NM. EVEN THOUGH FIRESTONE HAD INFORMED THEM OF THE PROBLEM, THEY PROCEEDED TO SAY IT WAS BAD CV JOINTS (INCLUDING THE NEW ONE) AND REPLACED THESE AND OTHER MISC. AT A COST OF $900.00 AND THE PROBLEM STILL EXIST. THEY NOW INFORM ME THAT IT IS THE TRANSFER CASE AND IT WILL COST $2500.00 TO FIX. I CONTACTED FORD ABOUT THIS PROBLEM AND THE FACT THAT 3 TRANSFER CASES IN 3 YEARS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, BUT THEY REFUSE TO HELP IN THIS MATTER. WHEN I TALKED TO A PERSON AT CUSTOMER SERVICE, HE SAID FORD WOULD REPLACE THE PART IF DEFECTIVE, I THEN ASKED PAUL AT BOB TURNER'S FORD IF THE PART WAS DEFECTIVE, AND HE SAID "YES" BUT FORD NOW SAYS THAT SINCE IT HAS OVER 12,000 MILES THEY WILL DO NOTHING. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT A VEHICLE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN IN 4-WHEEL DRIVE SHOULD HAVE GONE THROUGH 3 TRANSFER CASES IN 3 YEARS, THIS IS A DEFECT TO ME AND THE MANY MECHANICS THAT I HAVE TALKED TO. PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS MATTER AND LET ME KNOW WHAT CAN BE DONE, FOR I CAN NOT BE THE ONLY PERSON IN THIS SITUATION.
NHTSA ODI #711394
Mileage unknown · Jul 23, 1999
Power Train
01-JUL-97 TRANSFER CASE FAILED PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE (97V204000) DURING 1ST REPAIR DEALERSHIP REPLACED TRANSMISSION FLUID W/ ENGINE OIL RESULTING IN COMPLETE TRANSMISSION REPAIR. RECALL REPLACEMENT ON 7-01-98 ( ATTORNEY FOR CONSUMER ). *YC
NHTSA ODI #547540
Mileage unknown · May 25, 1999
Electrical SystemEngine And Engine CoolingPower Train
IGNITION SWITCH SHORT CAUSING OVERHEATING AND FIRE IN THE STEERING COLUMN PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE, AFTER RECALL WORK PERFORMED SEVERAL DAMAGED COMPONENTS CONTINUED TO FAIL (WIPERS, LIGHTING, ETC.) (99V-029). MJS
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: MINI VANS. HEAT GENERATION IN THE WIRING HARNESS TO THE FUEL PUMP/SENDER ASSEMBLY CAN CAUSE AN ELECTRICAL SHORT. THE VEHICLE COULD EXPERIENCE A LOSS OF POWER AND BECOME IMMOBILIZED AND THE FUEL GAUGE MAY BE ERRATIC.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: HEAT DAMAGE, INCLUDING MELTING OR CHARRING OF THE FUEL PUMP AND SENDER ASSEMBLY WIRE HARNESS AND ASSOCIATED WIRING HARNESSES CAN ALSO RESULT. THE SHORT CIRCUIT COULD ALSO HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A FUSED JUMPER HARNESS IN THE FUEL PUMP GROUND CIRCUIT THAT WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE FUEL PUMP INERTIA SHUT-OFF SWITCH.
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: MINI VANS. THESE VEHICLES WERE PRODUCED WITH A HIGHER THAN SPECIFIED ELECTRICAL LOAD THROUGH THE ACCESSORY POWER FEED CIRCUIT. THE POTENTIAL FOR CONTACT BETWEEN THE B2 (BATTERY), A2 (ACCESSORY), AND P1 (PROOF) CIRCUITS CAN OCCUR, CREATING A SHORT CIRCUIT, ALLOWING CURRENT TO FLOW THROUGH THE GROUND WIRE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS CAN CAUSE OVER HEATING AND THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A JUMPER HARNESS WITH A RELAY WHICH WILL RE-ROUTE AND ACTIVATE ALL A2 ACCESSORIES THROUGH THE RELAY.
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: ALL WHEEL DRIVE PASSENGER MINIVANS. THESE VEHICLES CAN DEVELOP POWERTRAIN BENDING RESONANCE OR TRANSFER CASE OUTPUT SHAFT BUSHING DISPLACEMENT. THE POWERTRAIN BENDING RESONANCE OR THE OUTPUT SHAFT BUSHING DISPLACEMENT CAN RESULT IN STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE TRANSMISSION AND/OR TRANSFER CASE. FLUID EXPLUSION, DRIVESHAFT SEPARATION OR LOSS OF VEHICLE DRIVE CAN RESULT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS CONDITION CAN CAUSE A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, AND, IF THE EXPELLED FLUID CONTACTS THE EXHAUST SYSTEM, A VEHICLE FIRE COULD OCCUR.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A NEW TRANSFER CASE REAR OUTPUT SHAFT BUSHING AND AN ALUMINUM DRIVESHAFT WILL BE INSTALLED.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
5
PE02076 · Luggage Compartment Door Drops Abruptly
Opened Oct 10, 2002 · Closed Mar 10, 2003
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Structure:body:hatchback/liftgate:support Device/strut
ODI HAS IDENTIFIED 30 INCIDENTS RESULTING IN MINOR TO MODERATE PERSONAL INJURIES THAT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY ABRUPT DOOR DROPS OVER THE APPROXIMATELY EIGHT - TWELVE YEAR PERIOD OF PRODUCT USAGE AND EXPOSURE (1991-1995 TO 2003).MOST OF THE INJURY INCIDENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY A FRACTURE OF THE GAS FILLED LIFT ASSIST CYLINDER MOUNTING STUD.STUD FRACTURES HAVE OCCURRED RANDOMLY OVER TIME AND DO NOT EXHIBIT ANY APPARENT TREND RELATING TO DATE OF VEHICLE PRODUCTION OR TIME-IN-SERVICE (EXPOSURE).THE ODI CLOSING REPORT SUMMARIZES THE DETAILS OF THIS INVESTIGATION.
EA99002 · Transfer Cases And Rear Drive Shaft
Opened Jan 7, 1999 · Closed Nov 14, 2000
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Power Train
There is no summary currently available
RQ98012 · Transfer Cases And Rear Driveshaft
Opened Jul 31, 1998 · Closed Jan 7, 1999
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Power Train:transfer Case (4-WHEEL Drive)
There is no summary currently available
EA98016 · Fuel Sender Assembly Fires
Opened Jul 14, 1998 · Closed Feb 12, 1999
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
There is no summary currently available
Additional source detail variants (2)
Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
There is no summary currently available
Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
There is no summary currently available
PE98010 · Fuel Sender Assembly Fires
Opened Feb 13, 1998 · Closed Jul 14, 1998
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
OWNERS ALLEGE THAT FAILURE OF THE FUEL PUMP/SENDER CONNECTOR RESULTS IN SHORT CIRCUIT THAT HAS RESULTED IN VEHICLE FIRES.SYMPTOMS INCLUDE ERRATIC FUEL GAUGE OPERATION, , SMOKE FROM THE DASH ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE NEAR THE STEERING COLUMN (FUEL PUMP FUSIBLE LINK) AND PASSENGER SIDE (FUEL PUMP INERTIA CUTOFF SWITCH), INTERMITTENT STALL AND NO START CONCERNS, AND A BURNING ODOR. SEVERAL INCIDENTS HAVE RESULTED IN DAMAGE TO PLASTIC FUEL TUBES AND/OR FUEL SUPPLY/RETURN TUBES.
1994 Ford Aerostar Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year