TOOK VEHICLE IN FOR REGULAR MAINT. AND WAS TOLD BRAKES ARE METAL ON METAL. THIS WITH ONLY 20000 OF HIGHWAY MILES. I HAD NO EXPECTATION THAT BRAKES WOULD BE SO BAD SO EARLY WITH SUCH LIGHT DUTY. POTENTAIL DISASTER! *TR
2008 Dodge Caravan
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 2008 Dodge Caravan do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 182.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Caravan years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
222 reports with mileage · 80 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Electrical System. Review the 162 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Air Bags. Review the 42 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 41 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
302 reports2008 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN. CONSUMER STATES WHEN HE USES CRUISE CONTROL AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS OR ANY SPEED AT 35 MPH THE VEHICLE STARTS TO DOWNGRADE AND DOWNSHIFT THREE SPEED RANGES AND CAUSE EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SPEED AND THEN THE ENGINE'S RPM WOULD RISE TO 5000 RPM. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN THE INCIDENT HAPPENED, HE WAS UNABLE TO…
Read full complaint
2008 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN. CONSUMER STATES WHEN HE USES CRUISE CONTROL AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS OR ANY SPEED AT 35 MPH THE VEHICLE STARTS TO DOWNGRADE AND DOWNSHIFT THREE SPEED RANGES AND CAUSE EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SPEED AND THEN THE ENGINE'S RPM WOULD RISE TO 5000 RPM. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN THE INCIDENT HAPPENED, HE WAS UNABLE TO SHUT OFF THE CRUISE CONTROL OR APPLY THE BRAKES TO BRING THE VEHICLE TO A STOP. THE VEHICLE WOULD CONTINUE TO MOVE. THE DEALER INFORMED THE CONSUMER THE PROBLEM WAS A CHARACTERISTIC OF THE VEHICLE DUE TO SOFTWARE PROBLEMS. *JB
THE TPMS STEMS HAVE BROKEN OFF THE WHEELS ON MY CAR WHILE DRIVING TIRE WENT FLAT AND I HAPPENED TO BE PARKING AT THE TIME SO THANK GOD I WAS NOT ON THE HIGHWAY AT THE TIME. *TR
2008 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN BRAKE WEAR. ON 10/01/09 MY 2008 DODGE CARAVAN WITH 13901 MILES ON THE SPEEDOMETER REQUIRED THE FRONT AND REAR BRAKE PADS BE REPLACED AND FRONT AND REAR ROTORS BE TURNED. IN AUGUST OF 2010 CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, THE MANUFACTURER OF DODGE CARAVAN, SENT ME A LIMITED WARRANTY EXTENSION FOR 2008 DODGE CARAVANS…
Read full complaint
2008 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN BRAKE WEAR. ON 10/01/09 MY 2008 DODGE CARAVAN WITH 13901 MILES ON THE SPEEDOMETER REQUIRED THE FRONT AND REAR BRAKE PADS BE REPLACED AND FRONT AND REAR ROTORS BE TURNED. IN AUGUST OF 2010 CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, THE MANUFACTURER OF DODGE CARAVAN, SENT ME A LIMITED WARRANTY EXTENSION FOR 2008 DODGE CARAVANS FRONT BRAKES.THE LETTER STATES IN PART THAT "SHOULD THE FRONT BRAKE COMPONENTS ON YOUR VEHICLE NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO A DEFECT IN MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP OR FACTORY PREPARATION", "CHRYSLER WILL PAY FOR THE COST OF PARTS AND LABOR","LESS A $50 DEDUCTIBLE". ON 08/23/10 MY 2008 DODGE CARAVAN WITH 25494 REQUIRED THAT FRONT AND REAR BRAKE PADS AND FRONT AND REAR ROTORS BE SERVICED AGAIN. CHRYSLER AUTHORIZED THE REPLACEMENT OF THE FRONT BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS BUT WOULD NOT AUTHORIZE THE REPLACEMENT OF THE REAR BRAKE PADS OR ROTORS. CHRYSLERS CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE REPRESENTATIVE "BRITNEY" STATED THAT CHRYSLER WAS WORKING ON AN EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR THE REAR BRAKES. I BELIEVE THAT BY ISSUING THE EXTENDED WARRANTY ON THE FRONT BRAKES CHRYSLER IS WELL AWARE OF A PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM ON THE 2008 DODGE CARAVAN. CHRYSLER, I BELIEVE, HAS INITIATED A SILENT RECALL, IF YOU WILL, DUE TO A FLAW IN THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF IT'S BRAKING SYSTEM. *TR
I PURCHASED A BRAND NEW 2008 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN IN OCT. 2008.AT 22,226 MILES THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED FRONT BRAKE PADS AND MACHINED FRONT ROTORS. AT 29,595 THEY MACHINED THE FRONT BRAKE ROTORS AGAIN. THERE WAS STILL SHIMMING IN THE BRAKES SO AT 29,847 I TOOK THE CAR BACK TO DEALERSHIP. THEY REPLACED FRONT BRAKE ROTORS, MACHIN…
Read full complaint
I PURCHASED A BRAND NEW 2008 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN IN OCT. 2008.AT 22,226 MILES THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED FRONT BRAKE PADS AND MACHINED FRONT ROTORS. AT 29,595 THEY MACHINED THE FRONT BRAKE ROTORS AGAIN. THERE WAS STILL SHIMMING IN THE BRAKES SO AT 29,847 I TOOK THE CAR BACK TO DEALERSHIP. THEY REPLACED FRONT BRAKE ROTORS, MACHINES REAR BRAKE ROTORS AND REPLACED REAR BRAKE PADS. AT 31,854 MY BRAKES WERE CONSTANTLY SQUEAKING. DEALERSHIP INSPECTION BRAKES AND SAID "NORMAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS MODEL/BRAKE. UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS DUE TO MATERIAL TYPE AND GLAZING BRAKE LIFE IS APPROXIMATELY 90% LIFE REMAINING FRONT AND REAR." THEN AT 35,665 I BROUGHT BACK TO DEALERSHIP FOR ANOTHER INSPECTION. I REPORTED "EXCESSIVE BRAKE NOISE." THEIR RESPONSE WAS "BRAKES OK. APPROXIMATELY 65% LIFE REMAINING. NOISE DETECTED WAS CHARACTERISTIC. NO ABNORMAL CONDITIONS DETECTED AT THIS TIME." SO BASICALLY IN JUST 3,800 MILES I WENT THROUGH 30% OF THE BRAKES LIFE. THIS IS AFTER HAVING FRONT AND REAR PADS AND ROTORS REPLACED. I HAVE RECEIVED A LETTER STATING CHRYSLER IS EXTENDING WARRANTY OF FRONT BRAKES TO 36,000 MILES. MY PROBLEM IS THAT WHAT HAPPENS AFTER 36,000 MILES AND WHAT ABOUT THE REAR BRAKES? HOW DO I KNOW I AM DRIVING WITH SAFE BRAKES? THE DEALERS RESPONSE WAS TO BRING THE VEHICLE IN FOR INSPECTIONS. I CALLED AND SPOKE TO THE "CHRYSLER RECALL TEAM" AND WAS TOLD THERE ARE UPGRADED PARTS FOR THE BRAKES ON MY VEHICLE BUT THE DEALERSHIP SAYS THAT BECAUSE I'M PAST THE 36,000 MILES THEY WILL NOT CORRECT THE PROBLEM WITH THE UPGRADED PARTS. *TR
I WAS ABOUT TO ADD AIR TO THE FRONT TIRE AND WAS REMOVING THE CAP WHEN THE VALVE BLEW APART ABOUT HALFWAY DOWN THE STEM. THE TIRE WENT FLAT IMMEDIATELY. WE HAD THE DEALER REPLACE THE TPM VALVE STEM BUT THEY HAD TO ORDER IT AND IT TOOK A WEEK TO GET THE PART. I ASKED THEM TO CHANGE THE OTHER 3, BUT THEY SAID THEY WILL ONLY REPLAC…
Read full complaint
I WAS ABOUT TO ADD AIR TO THE FRONT TIRE AND WAS REMOVING THE CAP WHEN THE VALVE BLEW APART ABOUT HALFWAY DOWN THE STEM. THE TIRE WENT FLAT IMMEDIATELY. WE HAD THE DEALER REPLACE THE TPM VALVE STEM BUT THEY HAD TO ORDER IT AND IT TOOK A WEEK TO GET THE PART. I ASKED THEM TO CHANGE THE OTHER 3, BUT THEY SAID THEY WILL ONLY REPLACE ONE VALVE AT A TIME AS THEY FAIL. MY WIFE WAS 9 MONTHS PREGNANT AT THE TIME AND THIS IS OUR ONLY CAR, SO I WAS CONCERNED THAT IT WOULD HAPPEN AGAIN, POSSIBLY WHILE DRIVING SINCE IT HAD BROKEN SO EASILY. SURE ENOUGH, TWO WEEKS LATER A SECOND VALVE STEM FAILED AND THE TIRE WENT FLAT VERY FAST. LUCKILY I WAS JUST ON MY WAY BACK TO THE HOSPITAL TO BRING HER A FEW THINGS AND DRIVING SLOWLY ON A RESIDENTIAL STREET. AGAIN, I'M TOLD THEY WILL JUST ORDER ONE VALVE AND REPLACE THEM AS THEY FAIL. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A PROBLEM THEY KNOW ABOUT BUT DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH. HOPEFULLY NO ONE IS INJURED OR KILLED IN AN ACCIDENT FROM ONE OF THESE FAILING. *TR
INCIDENT WE TOOK OUR 2008 DODGE CARAVAN IT IN A MONTH AGO ONE OF THE PROBLEMS WE WERE HAVING WAS THE DRIVER SIDE REAR SLIDING DOOR WASN'T CLOSING PROPERLY SO WE HAD THEM ADJUST IT. WE TOOK IT IN A MONTH LATER TO FIX OTHER PROBLEMS AND THE DOOR THEY ADJUSTED ON THE DRIVERS SIDE JUST FELL OFF IN MY DRIVEWAY AND I AM AGAIN WITHOUT…
Read full complaint
INCIDENT WE TOOK OUR 2008 DODGE CARAVAN IT IN A MONTH AGO ONE OF THE PROBLEMS WE WERE HAVING WAS THE DRIVER SIDE REAR SLIDING DOOR WASN'T CLOSING PROPERLY SO WE HAD THEM ADJUST IT. WE TOOK IT IN A MONTH LATER TO FIX OTHER PROBLEMS AND THE DOOR THEY ADJUSTED ON THE DRIVERS SIDE JUST FELL OFF IN MY DRIVEWAY AND I AM AGAIN WITHOUT AN AUTOMOBILE. THE VAN DOOR WORKS IN TWO WAYS. ONE, YOU CAN PUSH A BUTTON AND CLOSE THE DOOR, OR TWO, YOU CAN CLICK THE INSIDE HANDLE AND SLIDE THE DOOR OVER UNTIL THE MOTOR GRABS IT AND CLOSES IT. THE WAY THE DOOR IS MOUNTED IN THE REAR TRACK IS VERY INADEQUATE. THERE ARE TWO SMALL HORIZONTAL LOAD RUNNERS AND ONE VERTICAL LOAD RUNNER. THE TRACK IS MADE FROM STEEL BUT WHEN ADJUSTED IMPROPERLY CAN BE STRETCHED OUT OF SHAPE. WHEN THE FRONT DOOR LOCK IS ENGAGED AND THE REAR LOCK IS ENGAGED THE REAR TRACK CAN GET PULL OUT OF SHAPE AND THE WHEELS ON THE SLIDE CAN FALL OUT. I AM AN ENGINEER WHO WORKS CONSTANTLY WITH THE EQUIPMENT THAT BUILDS THESE VEHICLES IN THE AUTO PLANTS. I DESIGN MACHINES THAT COULD CYCLE A MILLION TIMES. THIS IS AN INADEQUATE DESIGN. *TR
BRAKE SYSTEM ISSUES AND POSSIBLE FRONT-END ISSUES IN GENERAL, ELECTRICAL ISSUES. HAD TO REPLACE FRONT TIRES AT 18729 MILES. BRAKES PADS AND ROTORS NEEDED REPLACED AT 24130 MILES. DEALER ONLY AGREED TO COVER ROTORS AFTER MUCH DISAGREEMENT. STATED EVERYTHING ELSE WAS NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR. CHECK ENGINE LIGHT BEEN COMING ON SINCE LA…
Read full complaint
BRAKE SYSTEM ISSUES AND POSSIBLE FRONT-END ISSUES IN GENERAL, ELECTRICAL ISSUES. HAD TO REPLACE FRONT TIRES AT 18729 MILES. BRAKES PADS AND ROTORS NEEDED REPLACED AT 24130 MILES. DEALER ONLY AGREED TO COVER ROTORS AFTER MUCH DISAGREEMENT. STATED EVERYTHING ELSE WAS NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR. CHECK ENGINE LIGHT BEEN COMING ON SINCE LATE 2009, KEEP TAKING IT IN- STATED PROBLEMS WITH O2 SENSORS. PROBLEM STILL NOT FIXED. DEALER STATES WE MUST NEED NEW COMPUTER, AND THAT WILL BE COVERED BY WARRANTY. BRAKES HAVE BEEN MAKING SCREECHING/RATTLING NOISES AGAIN, AND MILEAGE IS NOW AT 29000 MILES. DEALER STATES NOTHING WRONG WITH BRAKES, THAT IT MUST BE BRAKE DUST. DEALER JUST DOES NOT WANT TO TAKE OWNERSHIP OR PAY TO COVER- THERE IS ABSOLUTELY AN ISSUE THAT THEY WILL NOT ADMIT. INSTRUMENT PANEL HAS FAILED 4 TIMES WHILE DRIVING, INCLUDING LOSS OF POWER STEERING. THERE IS SOMETHING VERY WRONG WITH THIS VAN. *TR
I HAVE AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS WITH MY VAN. ALL WARNING-LIGHT-INDICATORS IN MY INSTRUMENT PANEL WOULD TURN "ON" WHILE I'M DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY OR STREET. ALSO, I HAVE INTERMITTENT PROBLEM WITH MY HEADLIGHTS THAT FLICKER "ON" AND "OFF" BY ITSELF WHILE I'M DRIVING. THIS IS VERY UNSAFE, SPECIALLY AT NIGHT. MY DEALERSHIP HAVE FAILE…
Read full complaint
I HAVE AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS WITH MY VAN. ALL WARNING-LIGHT-INDICATORS IN MY INSTRUMENT PANEL WOULD TURN "ON" WHILE I'M DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY OR STREET. ALSO, I HAVE INTERMITTENT PROBLEM WITH MY HEADLIGHTS THAT FLICKER "ON" AND "OFF" BY ITSELF WHILE I'M DRIVING. THIS IS VERY UNSAFE, SPECIALLY AT NIGHT. MY DEALERSHIP HAVE FAILED TO HELP DIAGNOSE THE ELECTRICAL PROBLEM. *TR
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 DODGE CARAVAN. WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH WITH THE BRAKES DEPRESSED THERE WAS A LOUD NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR BRAKES. HE NOTICED THAT THE ROTORS WERE WORN. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED AND STATED THAT SINCE THERE WERE NO RECALLS OR WARRANTIES HE WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR COST. THE MANUFACTURER CONFIR…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 DODGE CARAVAN. WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH WITH THE BRAKES DEPRESSED THERE WAS A LOUD NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR BRAKES. HE NOTICED THAT THE ROTORS WERE WORN. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED AND STATED THAT SINCE THERE WERE NO RECALLS OR WARRANTIES HE WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR COST. THE MANUFACTURER CONFIRMED THAT THERE WERE NO RECALLS OR VALID WARRANTIES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 19,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 33,000.
Official recalls
210V164000 · Suspension:rear
Apr 23, 2010
THE BRAUN CORPORATION IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008 THROUGH 2010 CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY AND DODGE CARAVAN MOBILITY CONVERSIONS WHICH WERE ALTERED BY BRAUN BETWEEN JANUARY 21, 2009 AND MARCH 19, 2010. DURING CONVERSION, THE CHASSIS WAS RAISED AND THE FLOOR WAS LOWERED TO ACCOMMODATE WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBILITY FEATURES. IN RAISING THE CHASSIS, THE REAR SPRING HATS COME INTO CLOSER PROXIMITY TO THE REAR TIRES. IN ROUGH OR AGGRESSIVE DRIVING SITUATIONS THE TIRES MAY INTERMITTENTLY CONTACT THE REAR SPRING HATS.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: CONTACT BETWEEN THE TIRE SPRING HAT MAY WEAR A HOLE IN THE TIRE OVER TIME. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL IN THE EVENT OF TIRE PRESSURE LOSS INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: BRAUN WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPAIR THE VEHICLES FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JUNE 4, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT BRAUN TOLL-FREE AT 1-800-488-0359.
10V148000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:filler Pipe And Cap
Apr 13, 2010
THE BRAUN CORPORATION IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008 THROUGH 2010 CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY AND DODGE CARAVAN COMMERCIAL ENTERVANS WHICH WERE ALTERED BY BRAUN BETWEEN JANUARY 21, 2009 AND MARCH 19, 2010. DURING CONVERSION, THE CHASSIS WAS RAISED AND THE FLOOR WAS LOWERED TO ACCOMMODATE WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBILITY FEATURES. IN RAISING THE CHASSIS, THE FUEL FILL PIPE COMES INTO CLOSER PROXIMITY TO THE LEFT REAR TIRE. IN ROUGH OR AGGRESSIVE DRIVING SITUATIONS, THE TIRE MAY INTERMITTENTLY CONTACT THE FUEL FILL PIPE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: CONTACT BETWEEN THE TIRE AND FUEL FILL PIPE MAY WEAR A HOLE IN ONE OR THE OTHER COMPONENTS OVER TIME. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL IN THE EVENT OF TIRE PRESSURE LOSS, OR A VEHICLE FIRE IN THE EVENT THE FUEL PIPE IS COMPROMISED.
Remedy: BRAUN WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPAIR THE VEHICLES FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JUNE 4, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT BRAUN TOLL-FREE AT 1-800-488-0359.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1DP14004 · Totally Integrated Power Module Failure
Opened Sep 25, 2014 · Closed Jul 24, 2015
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System
In a letter dated August 21, 2014, the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged failures associated with the Totally Integrated Power Module (TIPM) installed in Chrysler SUV?s, trucks, and vans beginning in the 2007 model year. The petitioner alleges that TIPM defects may result in engine stall, airbag non-deployment, failure of fuel pump shutoff resulting in unintended acceleration, fire, and other symptoms. On September 25, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP14-004 to evaluate the petition for a grant or deny decision. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by CAS as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, there were 296 complaints submitted by the petitioner in the original petition and five supplements, including 271 complaints related to the subject vehicles equipped with TIPM-7. Approximately 3 percent of CAS complaints are related to vehicles equipped with TIPM-6 and ODI?s review of these complaints did not identify any safety defect trends. ODI conducted a detailed review of complaints narratives submitted by CAS and consumers including careful analysis of vehicle repair histories, warranty claims obtained from the manufacturer and any available Customer Assistance Inquiry reports (CAIR). Analysis of the field data indicated that MY2011-2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles exhibited significantly higher complaint rates related to fuel pump relay (FPR) failures than other subject vehicles. In a September 3, 2014 letter to NHTSA, Chrysler submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a defect in the FPR within the TIPM-7 which can result in a no start or stall condition in approximately 188,723 model year (MY) 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK) and Dodge Durango (WD) vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2010 through July 20, 2011 (14V-530).In a February 24, 2015 letter, Chrysler submitted a second DIR expanding the scope of the FPR defect condition to include an additional 338,216 MY 2012 through 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured from September 17, 2010 through August 19, 2013 and MY 2012 through 2013 Dodge Durango vehicles manufactured from January 18, 2011 through August 19, 2013 (15V-115).ODI analysis of the CAS allegations of TIPM defects resulting in stall while driving, airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, fire and other faults identified a single defect condition related to 1 of over 60 different circuits in the TIPM assembly. The most common effect of this defect condition, related to the fuel pump relay, was a no-start concern, but it could also result in stall while driving (76 complaints). No valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components.Except insofar as the petitioner's contentions relate to the defect condition addressed by the Chrysler recalls, the factual bases of the petitioner's contentions that any further investigation is necessary are unsupported. In our view, additional investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists or a NHTSA order for the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect as alleged by the petitioner at the conclusion of the requested investigation. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is den
Illustration