PHOTOS TO ADD TO NHTSA ID# 10948113
2009 Victory Vision
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Limited comparison data
There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Vision years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 9 of 10 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Electrical System. Review the 3 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 2 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Fuel System, Gasoline. Review the 2 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
10 reportsI BROUGHT VEHICLE IN FOR 30K SERVICE ON 01/20/17. THE TECH FOUND THAT THE GAS TANK WAS ENERGIZED BY ELECTRICITY. UPON DIAGNOSIS THEY FOUND THE SHARP SEAM ON THE BOTTOM OF THE TANK CUT THROUGH THE MAIN WIRING HARNESS INSULATION TO THE BARE WIRES ENERGIZING THE TANK AND CREATING A POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD THAT COULD HAVE BEEN CATASTR…
Read full complaint
I BROUGHT VEHICLE IN FOR 30K SERVICE ON 01/20/17. THE TECH FOUND THAT THE GAS TANK WAS ENERGIZED BY ELECTRICITY. UPON DIAGNOSIS THEY FOUND THE SHARP SEAM ON THE BOTTOM OF THE TANK CUT THROUGH THE MAIN WIRING HARNESS INSULATION TO THE BARE WIRES ENERGIZING THE TANK AND CREATING A POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD THAT COULD HAVE BEEN CATASTROPHIC.
I AM WRITING TO FORMALLY FILE A COMPLAINT. NO INCIDENT HAS HAPPENED TO ME YET. BUT THERE IS A WHOLE LOT OF VICTORY VISION RIDERS WHO HAVE HAD A FAILURE OF THE FRONT FENDER CRACKING AND WEDGING BEHIND THEIR FRONT WHEEL CAUSING STEERING FAILURE. ALL OF THE VISION RIDERS ARE ULTIMATELY CONCERNED AND WE HAVE PETITIONED VICTORY TO CO…
Read full complaint
I AM WRITING TO FORMALLY FILE A COMPLAINT. NO INCIDENT HAS HAPPENED TO ME YET. BUT THERE IS A WHOLE LOT OF VICTORY VISION RIDERS WHO HAVE HAD A FAILURE OF THE FRONT FENDER CRACKING AND WEDGING BEHIND THEIR FRONT WHEEL CAUSING STEERING FAILURE. ALL OF THE VISION RIDERS ARE ULTIMATELY CONCERNED AND WE HAVE PETITIONED VICTORY TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. THEY HAVE DENIED. DOES A DEATH HAVE TO OCCUR FOR ANYONE TO NOTICE? HERE ARE A FEW LINKS OF LENGTHY DISCUSSIONS. HTTP://WWW.THEVOG.NET/FORUM/THREAD/20731/REAR-PLASTIC-FRONT-FENDER-DESIGN-FLAW-FACTORY-RECALL-DENIED/ HTTP://FORUMS.THEVMC.COM/BB/FORUMS/THREAD-VIEW.ASP?TID=133992&POSTS=67 HTTP://WWW.VISION-RIDERS.COM/BB/FORUMS/THREAD-VIEW.ASP?TID=14303&POSTS=50&MID=143364&HIGHLIGHT=FRONT+FENDER&HIGHLIGHTMODE=1&ACTION=SEARCH#M143364 HERE IS PART OF A LETTER I SENT TO VICTORY'S FACEBOOK PAGE: DEAR VICTORY, I AM WRITING TODAY ABOUT THE VICTORY VISION FRONT FENDER. YOU ARE WELL AWARE THAT MANY OF US HAVE EXPERIENCED CRACKING OF THE FRONT FENDER REAR PORTION. MANY HAVE FACED VERY SCARY SITUATIONS WHEN THE REAR PORTION ACTUALLY BREAKS OFF AND WEDGES BETWEEN THE FRONT WHEEL AND THE BATTERY CASING AND/OR FRAME, CAUSING A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL. THESE ARE JUST A SAMPLING OF THE UNDESIRABLE POSTS REGARDING YOUR VISION FRONT FENDER DESIGN IN THE PROMINENT VICTORY FORUMS. IS A CRACKED AND THEN BROKEN FENDER A COSMETIC ITEM AND THUS DEEMED 'WEAR AND TEAR' DISPOSABLE? OR IS IT A SAFETY HAZARD? IS A WRONGFUL DEATH SUIT DUE TO GROSS NEGLIGENCE EVENTUALLY GOING TO BE VICTORY'S WAKEUP CALL? THIS WOULD BE A VERY UNFORTUNATE EVENT. I WONDER IF YOU DECIDED TO PLACE A STEEL FENDER ON THE CROSS COUNTRY/CROSS ROAD BIKES DUE TO THE HISTORY OF FENDER FAILURE ON THE VISION IS VICTORY SO HUNGRY FOR THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR THAT THEY REFUSE TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT BY THEIR CUSTOMERS? THINGS THAT MAKE YOU SAY, 'HMMMM'*TT
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 VICTORY VISION. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE MOTORCYCLE FAILED TO RESPOND TO DECELERATION ATTEMPTS. THE MOTORCYCLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS AND THE BRAKE LINES WERE BLED. THE MOTORCYCLE WAS REPAIRED BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FAILURE RECURRED …
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 VICTORY VISION. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE MOTORCYCLE FAILED TO RESPOND TO DECELERATION ATTEMPTS. THE MOTORCYCLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS AND THE BRAKE LINES WERE BLED. THE MOTORCYCLE WAS REPAIRED BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FAILURE RECURRED MULTIPLE TIMES AND THE MASTER CYLINDER WAS REPLACED SEVERAL TIMES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 2,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 9,000. UPDATED 07/02/13*LJ
BROUGHT BIKE OUT OF WINTER STORAGE, REAR BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO FLOOR AND DOESN'T STOP BIKE. SPOKE TO DEALER, SAID NOT COVERED UNDER EXTENDED WARRANTY AND BRAKES NEEDED BLEEDING. BLED BRAKES AND THEY WORKED FINE FOR 1 MONTH, THEN PEDAL WENT TO FLOOR AGAIN. BLED BRAKES AND THEY WORKED AGAIN FOR ABOUT A MONTH. NOW BRAKES HAVE TO …
Read full complaint
BROUGHT BIKE OUT OF WINTER STORAGE, REAR BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO FLOOR AND DOESN'T STOP BIKE. SPOKE TO DEALER, SAID NOT COVERED UNDER EXTENDED WARRANTY AND BRAKES NEEDED BLEEDING. BLED BRAKES AND THEY WORKED FINE FOR 1 MONTH, THEN PEDAL WENT TO FLOOR AGAIN. BLED BRAKES AND THEY WORKED AGAIN FOR ABOUT A MONTH. NOW BRAKES HAVE TO BE BLED ABOUT EVERY THIRD TIME IT'S RIDDEN. DID ONLINE RESEARCH AND DISCOVERED SEVERAL PEOPLE WERE HAVING SAME ISSUE AND APPEARS TO BE A DEFECTIVE BRAKE LINE LETTING AIR IN TO THE SYSTEM AS THAT FIXED THEIR PROBLEM. REVIEWED EXTENDED WARRANTY AND CAN'T FIND ANYWHERE IN IT WHERE IT EXCLUDES BRAKE LINES. *TR
DEFECTIVE GAS CAP MY ISSUE IS THAT I SMELLED GAS WHEN THE TANK WAS HALF A TANK OR FULLER. I BOUGHT THE 2009 VICTORY VISION TOUR NEW IN 2010. I COULD SOMETIMES SEE GAS AROUND THE CAP ON THE OUTSIDE DUE TO THE PRESSURE IN THE TANK. I'VE FOUND OTHERS HAVE HAD THIS ISSUE DUE AND RESOLVED BY: *REENGINEERING THE GAS TANK VENT LINES…
Read full complaint
DEFECTIVE GAS CAP MY ISSUE IS THAT I SMELLED GAS WHEN THE TANK WAS HALF A TANK OR FULLER. I BOUGHT THE 2009 VICTORY VISION TOUR NEW IN 2010. I COULD SOMETIMES SEE GAS AROUND THE CAP ON THE OUTSIDE DUE TO THE PRESSURE IN THE TANK. I'VE FOUND OTHERS HAVE HAD THIS ISSUE DUE AND RESOLVED BY: *REENGINEERING THE GAS TANK VENT LINES *BENT GAS TANK FILLER NECK DUE TO THE GAS NOZZLE BENDING IT. RESOLVED BY STRAIGHTENING OUT AND REPLACING GAS CAP. * REPLACING GAS CAP BECAUSE OF GAS TANK NECK BEING STAMPED TOO THIN AND THE GAS CAP NOT SEALING CORRECTLY. I WENT TO MOMS SOUTH YESTERDAY EXPLAINING THIS ISSUE. IN FACT SEVERAL MONTHS AGO ONE OF THEIR TECH'S REMOVED A GAS CAP FROM ANOTHER BIKE AND GAVE IT TO ME. I WENT BACK TO ACQUIRED ABOUT A GAS CAP UPGRADE THAT VICTORY MAKES. I WAS TOLD THEY DO HAVE AN UPGRADED CAP BUT THERE IS NO RECALL ON THE STOCK ONE. I FOUND THIS ODD SINCE THERE HAVE BEEN SO MANY COMPLAINTS WITH THIS ISSUE. I FOLDED AND OPTED TO BUY ONE FOR 41.95 WHICH IS BASICALLY A STOCK CAP WITH A SCREW ADDED INSIDE IN THE MIDDLE. THE NEW GAS CAP HAS SOLVED MY PROBLEM. I WOULD THINK THAT THE OLD CAPS SHOULD BE RECALLED SINCE THIS COULD LEAD TO A FIRE IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENT NEVER MIND THE ONGOING SMELL OF FUEL. *TR
2009 VICTORY VISION TOUR. CONSUMER STATES MOTORCYCLE WILL NOT SLOW DOWN BELOW 1500 RPM *TGW THE ECU WAS REPROGRAMMED AND THE BATTERY WAS REPLACED. HOWEVER, THE CONSUMER CONTINUED TO EXPERIENCE THE HIGH IDLING . THE MECHANIC WAS UNABLE TO FIND ANY ABNORMAL READINGS. *JB
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 VICTORY VISION. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MOTORCYCLE DID NOT ACCELERATE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE ACCELERATION WOULD COME AND GO AND THE RPMS WOULD NOT DECREASE LESS THAN 1500. THE DEALER WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE WHAT CAUSED THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 15 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 3091.…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 VICTORY VISION. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MOTORCYCLE DID NOT ACCELERATE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE ACCELERATION WOULD COME AND GO AND THE RPMS WOULD NOT DECREASE LESS THAN 1500. THE DEALER WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE WHAT CAUSED THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 15 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 3091. UPDATED 12/01/10. *LJ THE CONSUMER STATED THE MOTORCYCLE DID NOT SLOW DOWN BELOW 1500 RPM. UPDATED 12/09/10
2009 VICTORY VISION MOTORCYCLE. DFU JULY 09 SINCE DAY ONE, HEAVY FUEL SMELL, VAPORS. FOUND LOTS OF OTHERS ON THE INTERNET MAKING THE SAME COMPLAINT. FINALLY, THE SERVICING DEALER AGREED TO ORDER A NEW DESIGNED FUEL CAP FOR ME. I FOUND THIS TO BE A COMMON REMEDY ON THE INTERNET AND TOLD THEM. NOW 90 DAYS LATER, NO FUEL CAP.…
Read full complaint
2009 VICTORY VISION MOTORCYCLE. DFU JULY 09 SINCE DAY ONE, HEAVY FUEL SMELL, VAPORS. FOUND LOTS OF OTHERS ON THE INTERNET MAKING THE SAME COMPLAINT. FINALLY, THE SERVICING DEALER AGREED TO ORDER A NEW DESIGNED FUEL CAP FOR ME. I FOUND THIS TO BE A COMMON REMEDY ON THE INTERNET AND TOLD THEM. NOW 90 DAYS LATER, NO FUEL CAP. HE SAID HE CAN'T GET IT. I CALLED POLARIS CUSTOMER SERVICE, AND THEY ACTED TOTALLY UNINFORMED, AND GAVE ME THE RUN AROUND, SENDING ME BACK TO THE DEALER FOR RESOLUTION. THEY KEPT WANTING TO GET OFF THE PHONE AND HAVE ME RESEARCH THE NEW FUEL CAP PART NUMBER. I THOUGHT THEY SHOULD KNOW THIS. THEY SAID THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING TO HELP BUT STEER ME BACK TO THE HELPLESS DEALER. I INSISTED THEY DO THE RESEARCH, GET THEIR OWN PART NUMBER AND CALL ME BACK WITH A RESOLUTION. I TOLD THEM I WOULD NOTIFY NHTSA EITHER WAY. THERE ARE HUNDREDS/THOUSANDS OF OWNERS OUT THERE WITH THIS PROBLEM AND VICTORY CHOSE TO EVADE RESPONSIBILITY AND REMEDY. *TR
ENGINE STALLS WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ACCELERATE FROM A STOP, THIS HAS HAPPENED AT LEAST 20 TIMES DEALER STATES THERE IS NO RECALL FOR STALLING, ALTHOUGH THERE IS A RECALL FOR THE SAME MODEL FOR THE 2008 YEAR FOR STALLING. *TR
Official recalls
0No recalls in this snapshot.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1PE14006 · Motorcycle Steering Lockup
Opened Mar 10, 2014 · Closed May 22, 2015
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Structure
This Preliminary Evaluation (PE14006) was opened after NHTSA became aware of alleged steering lockup involving Victory Vision motorcycles built by Polaris Industries, Inc. (Polaris).This issue has been the subject of numerous online forum posts by the filer of VOQ 10534733.Both the VOQs and forum posts (from all sources) formed the foundation of our investigation. The subject motorcycles are equipped with a two-piece, plastic, front fender.The back half (the all-black portion in the photo below) is secured to the fork with a single fastener on each side.It is secured to the front half of the fender with two plastic pushpins.The back half of the subject 2-piece fender is alleged to cause steering lockup when it partially separates and becomes wedged in the lower faring.We have expanded the PE's original scope to include the MY2014 and 2015 Visions because (1) these bikes came on-line after we opened this investigation and (2) the subject fender remains unchanged.Since its introduction in May, 2007, Polaris has produced 7,337 Visions (and trim derivatives).In the 8 years since, we are aware of 35 incidents of partial fender separation wherein the fender wedged in the lower fairing opening.None of the incidents involved a crash.During testing, with the fender both wedged in the lower fairing and with it pinned in the seam joining the right and left lower fairing halves, we noted a ?notchy? steering feel but no steering lock-up.At no time was steering control lost in either circumstance (wedged and/or pinned).When the front forks were rotated at angles greater than 10 degrees, and vehicle speed was, by necessity, below 10mph we noted an increase in steering effort that was easily manageable.This is consistent with the results of Polaris? testing where steering effort increased at steering angles beyond ten degrees.Such steering angles were only reasonably obtainable at speeds below ten mph.Polaris concluded that a fender separation of the type owners allege, does not represent an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety, but does compromise owner satisfaction.Consequently, on April 28, 2015, Polaris advised the agency that it decided to undertake a consumer satisfaction campaign to improve fender durability on all MY 2008-15 Victory Vision motorcycles regardless of mileage, time in service, or ownership status.Owners will receive notification of this campaign by June 20, 2015.A copy of Polaris' April 28, 2015 letter to us about this program is in the public file for this PE.In light of the low risk to motor vehicle safety as a result of displaced fenders, and Polaris?s actions to reduce the likelihood of fender interference through a consumer satisfaction campaign, further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that no safety-related defect exists.The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For additional detailed information on this investigation, see the attached closing report.The ODI complaints cited above can be reviewed at www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchNHTSAID under the following (ODI) numbers: 10534913, 10535066, 10430546, 10469285, 10468997, 10592181, 10585428, 10534743, 10597031, 10535938, 10594160, 10594161, 10606364
Illustration