IllustrationNOTED BOLT HOLDING THE FRONT BRAKE ROTOR ON FAILED AND DROPPED OUT WHILE DRIVING. INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE REMAINING 5 BOLTS WERE STRETCHED OUT AND DEFORMED DUE TO POOR QUALITY BOLTS. A FAILURE WOULD RESULT IN LOSS OF BRAKING ABILITY AND LIKELY LOCKING THE FRONT WHEEL CAUSING INJURY.
2006 Ural Retro
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Limited comparison data
There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Retro years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 2 of 2 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
0 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports
What owners actually said
2 reportsFINAL DRIVE FAILED LOCKING THE REAR WHEEL. I WAS SENT A DEALER NOTICE ON RING GEAR BOLT FAILURE DUE TO LOW GRADE BOLTS DATED IN 2010. THE OTHER URAL OF THIS VINTAGE I KNOW OF IN KANSAS CITY ALSO EXPERIENCED THIS PROBLEM IN JUNE OF 2013 AT AROUND 12,000 KM.
Official recalls
0No recalls in this snapshot.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
0No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.