← New search

2014 Toyota Sienna

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2014 Toyota Sienna do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 183.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

104 reports with mileage · 59 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Structure. Review the 44 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 16 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 13 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

6 crash reports2 fire reports3 injury reports

Engine complaints

11 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Jul 6, 2026
Electrical SystemEngineFuel/propulsion System

Sluggish start when hot - fuel pump leak into engine when hot, causing starter issues, wears out starter, causes other stress on engine. Common issue in Toyota Siennas. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA ODI #11748426

99,500 miles · Sep 5, 2025
EngineStructure

The contact owns a 2014 Toyota Sienna. The contact stated that while driving 70 MPH, there was an audible alarm coming from the vehicle, alerting the contact that the door was ajar. The passenger’s side slide door opened independently while the vehicle was in motion. The vehicle was modified to accommodate a ramp for the contact…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2014 Toyota Sienna. The contact stated that while driving 70 MPH, there was an audible alarm coming from the vehicle, alerting the contact that the door was ajar. The passenger’s side slide door opened independently while the vehicle was in motion. The vehicle was modified to accommodate a ramp for the contact's two wheel-bound children. The contact pulled over to the side of the road and closed the sliding door. The contact's husband tied the door to prevent it from opening independently again. The check engine warning light was intermittently illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, where it was inspected. The contact was informed that two latches had corroded and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. Upon further investigation, the contact related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 16V858000 (STRUCTURE). However, the VIN was not included. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 99,500.

NHTSA ODI #11685365

Mileage unknown · Apr 30, 2025
Engine

Timing chain cover leaking oil. This is known issue on 3.5L V6 model years 2011 -2022

NHTSA ODI #11657897

Mileage unknown · Feb 23, 2024
Engine

I have 2014 Toyota sienna head gasket problem with less than 100,000 k

NHTSA ODI #11573524

Mileage unknown · Jun 9, 2022
EngineFireInjury

Was driving my sienna down he highway, as I was passing someone I lightly accelerated and I heard a loud bang sound. Seconds later I see smoke coming out of the hood so I pull over, about 30 seconds before I pulled over the engine bursted into flames. When the vehicle came to a stop it would not unlock and me and my 2 kids were …

Read full complaint

Was driving my sienna down he highway, as I was passing someone I lightly accelerated and I heard a loud bang sound. Seconds later I see smoke coming out of the hood so I pull over, about 30 seconds before I pulled over the engine bursted into flames. When the vehicle came to a stop it would not unlock and me and my 2 kids were stuck in a burning vehicle, we barley made it out and my arm got burnt from it, this is the 4th time I’ve had a problem with the engine and 6th time the transmission has had problems. I’ve heard this happen on many other siennas yet it’s not recalled…

NHTSA ODI #11468517

Mileage unknown · May 23, 2022
Engine

The Toyota 2GR-FE 3.5L V6 engine have a verry comoon complaint of Blown Head Gasket under 100K miles. i own a 2014 sinenna and currently experiencing same issue at 89K miles. i looked online and found that so many people had the same issue and there was no action from the side of the company, they just waited for the 60K miles/5…

Read full complaint

The Toyota 2GR-FE 3.5L V6 engine have a verry comoon complaint of Blown Head Gasket under 100K miles. i own a 2014 sinenna and currently experiencing same issue at 89K miles. i looked online and found that so many people had the same issue and there was no action from the side of the company, they just waited for the 60K miles/5 year to be over so that they can deny the claim. the funny thing is that my vehicles's previous owner purchased an extended warranty which is still valid till September 2022 and the Company doesn't want to honor it. with this issue in mind i cannot take my vehicle for a long with my family, it puts life of my family at risk.

NHTSA ODI #11465782

Mileage unknown · Apr 14, 2022
EngineUnknown Or OtherFire

AFTER A SHORT 10-MIN DRIVE, PARKED THE VAN IN MY HOUSE'S DRIVEWAY. wHEN I STOPPED, SMOKE STARTED COMING OUT OF THE HOOD. WHICH DEVELOPED INTO FLAMES AND THE FRONT OF THE VAN WAS ENGULFED IN FLAMES. iMMEDIATELY CALLED THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO PUT THE FIRE OUT. VAN IS TOTALY BURNT. MANAGED TO MOVE TWO OTHER VEHICLES AWAY FROM THE …

Read full complaint

AFTER A SHORT 10-MIN DRIVE, PARKED THE VAN IN MY HOUSE'S DRIVEWAY. wHEN I STOPPED, SMOKE STARTED COMING OUT OF THE HOOD. WHICH DEVELOPED INTO FLAMES AND THE FRONT OF THE VAN WAS ENGULFED IN FLAMES. iMMEDIATELY CALLED THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO PUT THE FIRE OUT. VAN IS TOTALY BURNT. MANAGED TO MOVE TWO OTHER VEHICLES AWAY FROM THE BURNING VAN. ALUMINUM SIDING NEXT TO THE GARAGE SUSTAINED HEAT DAMAGE.

NHTSA ODI #11460735

60,000 miles · Jan 28, 2020
EnginePower TrainService Brakes

AFTER ABOUT 60,000 MILES MY CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ILLUMINATES WITH CODE P0012 EVERY 1,000 MILES AND WHEN I TAKE IT TO TECHNICIAN THEY FIND NOTHING WRONG AFTER RESETTING. THEN AGAIN IT RANDOMLY APPEARS AND HAS BEEN DOING SUCH FOR THE LAST 10,000 MILES. FRUSTRATING. ALSO THE FRONT BRAKES SQUEAL EVERYTIME I TOUCH THE BRAKE PEDAL …

Read full complaint

AFTER ABOUT 60,000 MILES MY CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ILLUMINATES WITH CODE P0012 EVERY 1,000 MILES AND WHEN I TAKE IT TO TECHNICIAN THEY FIND NOTHING WRONG AFTER RESETTING. THEN AGAIN IT RANDOMLY APPEARS AND HAS BEEN DOING SUCH FOR THE LAST 10,000 MILES. FRUSTRATING. ALSO THE FRONT BRAKES SQUEAL EVERYTIME I TOUCH THE BRAKE PEDAL REGARDLESS OF WHICH PADS I USE OR IF THEY ARE NEW OR USED.

NHTSA ODI #11302625

46,000 miles · Dec 17, 2018
EnginePower Train

VEHICLE STOPPED ABRUPTLY WITH A SHAKE WHILE REDUCING SPEED AT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. I WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD. A MILD BURNING SMELL CAME OUT FROM THE HOOD. THE CAR WAS SERVICED ONE MONTH BACK AND AS PART OF IT THEY DID 128 POINT( DO NOT REMEMBER EXACT NUMBER ) AND ALL REPORTED ISSUES WERE FIXED. AROUND $1000/- WAS SPENT ON THE…

Read full complaint

VEHICLE STOPPED ABRUPTLY WITH A SHAKE WHILE REDUCING SPEED AT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. I WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD. A MILD BURNING SMELL CAME OUT FROM THE HOOD. THE CAR WAS SERVICED ONE MONTH BACK AND AS PART OF IT THEY DID 128 POINT( DO NOT REMEMBER EXACT NUMBER ) AND ALL REPORTED ISSUES WERE FIXED. AROUND $1000/- WAS SPENT ON THE CAR. SINCE BATTERY WAS JUST 1 YEAR OLD, I DID NOT EXPECT A PROBLEM WITH THE BATTERY AS WELL. STILL I SWITCHED OFF ALL LIGHTS AND TRIED TO RESTART. THERE WAS NO FURTHER RESPONSE FROM THE VEHICLE. I WAS BLOCKING TRAFFIC FROM BEHIND AND POLICE CAME TO CONTROL TRAFFIC. ONLY OPTION WAS TO TOW THE VEHICLE. I TOOK IT TO THE SAME TOYOTA AUTHORIZED SERVICE CENTER WHERE I DID THE PREVIOUS SERVICE ( I HAD PURCHASED THE CAR FROM THE SAME DEALER ). NEXT DAY TOYOTA SERVICE STAFF CALLED ME AND ASKED DETAILS OF WHAT HAPPENED. BY EVENING THEY SAID THAT SOME SPRING BREAK IN CYLINDER 4 WHICH CLOGGED AT SOME OTHER PART WITHIN THE ENGINE. IN THE PROCESS, THERE ARE SCRATCHES IN OTHER PARTS AND THE ENGINE OIL WAS FILLED WITH METAL PARTS. SENIOR TECHNICIAN SAID THIS IS A MAJOR ISSUE AND THEY HAVE INVITED TOYOTA FIELD ENGINEER TO COME AND INSPECT THE ENGINE AND ASSOCIATED ISSUES. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT IS THAT THE ENGINE MIGHT NEED A REPLACEMENT AS CHANGING FEW PARTS MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO KEEP THE VEHICLE SAFE BACK ON STREET. INCIDENT HAPPENED IN CITY STREET AND WHEN THE SPEED WAS LOWERED TO 20. TODAY IS MONDAY, BUT TOYOTA DEALER WHO IS DOING THE SERVICE HAS NOT UPDATED ME YET WITH THE MAGNITUDE OF COMPLETE PROBLEM NOR THE TIME THEY NEED. I AM HEART BROKEN TO HEAR THAT THE ROUGH ORDER MAGNITUDE COST TO FIX THE CAR IS BETWEEN $18K TO $20K.

NHTSA ODI #11162105

500 miles · Aug 30, 2018
Engine

AS CITY STREET BRAKING DECELERATION IS ENDING, THE ENGINE SUDDENLY SURGES AND ACCELERATES RPM. I MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY HARD PRESSURE ON BRAKE PEDAL TO PREVENT VAN FROM SURGING AHEAD AND ALSO IMMEDIATELY MOVE AUTOMATIC SHIFT LEVER TO NEUTRAL TO DISENGAGE POWER TRAIN. AFTER ABOUT 2 SECONDS THE RPM ACCELERATION WILL STOP AND RETUR…

Read full complaint

AS CITY STREET BRAKING DECELERATION IS ENDING, THE ENGINE SUDDENLY SURGES AND ACCELERATES RPM. I MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY HARD PRESSURE ON BRAKE PEDAL TO PREVENT VAN FROM SURGING AHEAD AND ALSO IMMEDIATELY MOVE AUTOMATIC SHIFT LEVER TO NEUTRAL TO DISENGAGE POWER TRAIN. AFTER ABOUT 2 SECONDS THE RPM ACCELERATION WILL STOP AND RETURN TO NORMAL. TOYOTA DEALER CHECKED ISSUE MULTIPLE TIMES, FINDING NO ISSUES. THIS IS A RANDOM OCCURRENCE THAT STARTED SHORTLY AFTER PURCHASE AND CONTINUES TO THIS DAY AND I'VE COME WITHIN INCHES OF SMASHING INTO VEHICLES IN FRONT OF ME. I REPORTED TO TOYOTA CORPORATION BUT THE OMBUDSMAN BLEW ME OFF SAYING THERE IS NO KNOWN SUDDEN ACCELERATION ISSUES. NO OFFERS TO RESOLVE FROM TOYOTA. THIS HAS HAPPENED SO MANY TIMES, I CAN NO LONGER REMEMBER THE INITIAL DATE AND EXACT MILEAGE THIS ISSUE STARTED TO OCCUR OTHER THAN WITHIN THE FIRST 4 TO 6 MONTHS OF PURCHASE. ADDITIONALLY THE SPEED CONTROL WAS NEVER ACTIVATED WHEN ISSUE OCCURRED.

NHTSA ODI #11123424

Official recalls

6

19V553000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings

Jul 25, 2019

Vantage Mobility International, LLC (Vantage) is recalling certain 2012-2018 AMS Genesis wheelchair vans, built on a Toyota Sienna vehicles. The rubber brake hoses that attach to the rear wheel assembly may be too short, causing them to rub against the rear axle trailing arm.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The contact may cause failure of the rear brake hoses, resulting in a loss of vehicle control and reduced braking ability, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Vantage will notify owners, and dealers will install a set of rear brake hoses that will provide the proper clearance, free of charge. The recall began December 16, 2019. Owners may contact Vantage customer service at 1-800-488-9082.

19V410000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings

Jun 4, 2019

Braun Corporation (Braun) is recalling certain 2014-2019 Toyota Sienna mobility van conversions. The brake lines may have incorrect tube nut fittings installed, which may cause a pressure drop within the braking system.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The reduction in the braking system pressure may cause a loss of braking power in the rear braking system, increasing the risk of crash.

Remedy: Braun has notified owners, and dealers will install an adaptor to correct the issue, free of charge. The recall began June 25, 2019. Owners may contact Braun customer service at 1-800-488-0359.

19V005000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

Jan 9, 2019

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2014-2016 Toyota 4Runner, 2014-2015 Scion xB, Lexus IS350C, IS250C, 2014 Toyota Sienna, Lexus IS-F, and 2014-2017 Lexus GX460 vehicles sold, or ever registered in the states of Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands or "Zone A." Toyota is also recalling certain 2011-2013 Toyota Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Lexus IS250, IS350, 2011-2016 4Runner, 2011-2015 Scion xB, Lexus IS350C, IS250C, 2011-2014 Toyota Sienna, Lexus IS-F, 2011-2017 Lexus GX460, and 2011-2012 Lexus ES350 vehicles ever registered in the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia or "Zone B." Toyota is also recalling certain 2010-2013 Toyota Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Lexus IS350, 2010-2016 4Runner, 2010-2013 Lexus IS250, 2010-2015 Scion xB, Lexus IS350C, IS250C, 2010-2017 Lexus GX460, 2010-2014 Lexus IS-F, and 2010-2012 Lexus ES350 vehicles ever registered in the states of Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming or "Zone C." These vehicles are equipped with air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules, used as original equipment or replacement equipment (such as after a vehicle crash necessitating replacement of the original air bags), that may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front passenger air bag inflator, or replace the air bag assembly. The recall began February 15, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for this recall are "Zone A" Toyota: G0P, Lexus: GLG; "Zone B" Toyota: G0R, Lexus GLH; "Zone C" Toyota: H0A, and Lexus: HLA.

16V858000 · Structure:body:door

Nov 29, 2016

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2011-2016 Toyota Sienna minivans manufactured January 4, 2010, to August 12, 2016. If the power sliding door is unable to be opened when commanded, such as if the door is frozen shut, the door may subsequently open unexpectedly, possibly while the vehicle is moving.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If door opens while the vehicle is moving, there would be an increased risk of injury to the vehicle occupants.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will replace the junction block, rear sliding door wire harnesses, and install two sub wire harnesses, free of charge. The recall began on July 28, 2017. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's number for this recall is G04.

14V576000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings

Sep 19, 2014

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2014 Toyota Avalon, Camry, Sienna, and Highlander and model year 2015 Lexus RX350 vehicles. Fuel may leak from the one of the fuel delivery pipes in the engine compartment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source increases the risk of a fire.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will replace any of the suspect fuel delivery pipes free of charge. The recall began November 17, 2014. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331.

14V414000 · Power Train:automatic Transmission:gear Position Indication (prndl)

Jul 8, 2014

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2014 Sienna vehicles manufactured June 17, 2014, through June 24, 2014. The affected vehicles have a transmission shift control cable whose protective cable sleeve may have been damaged during assembly. This could cause the control cable to bind or separate during gear shift operation causing incorrect gear selection. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 102, "Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect."

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the transmission shift cable separates while the vehicle is being driven, the transmission gear selection may not match the indicated gear and the vehicle may move in an unintended or unexpected direction, increasing the risk of a crash. Furthermore, when the driver goes to stop and park the vehicle, despite selecting the 'PARK' position, the transmission may not be in 'PARK.' If the vehicle is not in the 'PARK' position there is a risk the vehicle will roll away as the driver and other occupants exit the vehicle or anytime thereafter. A vehicle rollaway increases the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace the transmission shift control cable, as necessary, free of charge. The recall began in early August 2014. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.