← New search

2014 Shasta Flite

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Flite years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 1 of 1 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Structure. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

Structure complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
3,000 miles · Nov 16, 2016
Structure

I PURCHASED A NEW 2014 SHASTA FRST IN FALL OF 2013 FROM CAMPING WORLD IN EDMOND OKLAHOMA, VIN [XXX]. I DISCOVERED MAJOR DELAMINATION ON THE REAR OF MY CAMPER ON 6 OCTOBER 2016. I IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED SHASTA TO REPORT THE PROBLEM. [XXX]. INSTRUCTED ME TO TAKE THE UNIT TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR INSPECTION AND TO TAKE PICTURES OF …

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED A NEW 2014 SHASTA FRST IN FALL OF 2013 FROM CAMPING WORLD IN EDMOND OKLAHOMA, VIN [XXX]. I DISCOVERED MAJOR DELAMINATION ON THE REAR OF MY CAMPER ON 6 OCTOBER 2016. I IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED SHASTA TO REPORT THE PROBLEM. [XXX]. INSTRUCTED ME TO TAKE THE UNIT TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR INSPECTION AND TO TAKE PICTURES OF THE UNIT TO SEND TO SHASTA, WHICH I DID. CAMPING WORLD INSPECTED THE UNIT AND SENT PICTURES TO [XXX]. . . STATED INITIALLY THE UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTIED AND SHASTA COULD NOT ASSIST AS THE ROOF SEALS WERE THE CAUSE OF THE DELAMINATION. IT WAS DETERMINED BY THE CAMPING WORD FACTORY AUTHORIZED AND CERTIFIED PAINT AND BODY TECHNICIAN THAT THE DELAMINATION WAS CAUSED BY INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE FILON, NOT ROOF SEALS OR ANY OTHER EXTERNAL FACTORS [XXX]. STATED THEN STATED HE HAD "GONE TO MANAGEMENT" AND SHASTA WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ASSIST IN THE REPAIR DUE TO ?LACK OF MAINTENANCE AND THE UNIT IS 2 YEARS PAST THE WARRANTY?. I THEN REMINDED [XXX]. THAT THE INSPECTION OF THE ROOF SEALS (AKA MAINTENANCE) WOULD NOT HAVE DETECTED THE INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE FILON I BELIEVE THERE IS A STRUCTURAL FACTORY DEFECT IN THIS CAMPER MODEL WORTHY OF A FULL FACTORY RECALL AND INVESTIGATION BY THE NHTSA. FURTHERMORE, I BELIEVE THIS MODEL YEAR TO BE A REAL AND DISTINCT DANGER TO THE PUBLIC UNTIL A FULL INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTORY STRUCTURAL FAILURE IS COMPLETE. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10926350

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.