← New search

2007 Nissan Quest

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Quest years

Owner complaints for the 2007 Nissan Quest are substantially higher than the model-year median of 66.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

199 reports with mileage · 29 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 78 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 39 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 33 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

3 crash reports1 fire reports2 injury reports

What owners actually said

228 reports
21,255 miles · Mar 26, 2011
Tires

VEHICLE WILL BOTTOM OUT BECAUSE OF POOR DESIGN UTILIZING THE MICHELIN PAX TIRE CAUSING SCRAPING OF THE EXHAUST SYSTEM. INCREASING THE LEVEL OF THE EXHAUST SYSTEM BURNS A HOLE IN THE EXHAUST PIPE THAT THEN HAS TO BE REPLACED WHICH AGAIN CAUSES A BOTTOMING OUT AND SCRAPING OF THE EXHAUST SYSTEM.. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10392961

45,000 miles · Mar 22, 2011
Service Brakes, HydraulicCrash

2007 NISSAN QUEST BRAKE/ROTOR ISSUES. BRAKES AND ROTORS ARE WEARING RAPIDLY AT VERY LOW MILES. IT HAPPENED AT 45,000 MILES AND AGAIN EVERY YEAR SINCE. EVEN AFTER HAVING BRAKES AND ROTORS RESURFACED A FEW TIMES. CONTINUING PROBLEM. DEALER THINKS MAY BE DRIVING HABITS, BUT DEVICE PLACED ON CAR TO TRACK DRIVING BEHAVIOR BY INSURANC…

Read full complaint

2007 NISSAN QUEST BRAKE/ROTOR ISSUES. BRAKES AND ROTORS ARE WEARING RAPIDLY AT VERY LOW MILES. IT HAPPENED AT 45,000 MILES AND AGAIN EVERY YEAR SINCE. EVEN AFTER HAVING BRAKES AND ROTORS RESURFACED A FEW TIMES. CONTINUING PROBLEM. DEALER THINKS MAY BE DRIVING HABITS, BUT DEVICE PLACED ON CAR TO TRACK DRIVING BEHAVIOR BY INSURANCE COMPANY SHOWS NO HARD BRAKING. POSSIBILITY THAT THIS VEHICLE HAS SIMILAR ROTOR/BRAKE PROBLEM DUE TO WEIGHT OF VEHICLE OR IMPROPER COOLING LIKE TITAN TRUCK DID EARLY ON. A REAR END COLLISION MY WIFE HAD IN LATE 2009 MAY HAVE BEEN RELATED TO THE THIS PROBLEM. SEVERAL HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE HAVE SAME TYPE OF PROBLEM ON INTERNET VEHICLE PROBLEM SITES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10392480

32,000 miles · Jul 29, 2010
Structure

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 NISSAN QUEST. THE CONTACT NOTICED THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DESIGNED TO STORE A SPARE TIRE WHEN SHE HAD TO REPLACE THE VEHICLE FLAT RUNNING TIRES WITH NORMAL DESIGNED TIRES. SHE HAD TO PLACE THE SPARE TIRE BEHIND THE REAR SEAT WHICH SHE BELIEVED WAS A SAFETY HAZARD. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND THEY…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 NISSAN QUEST. THE CONTACT NOTICED THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DESIGNED TO STORE A SPARE TIRE WHEN SHE HAD TO REPLACE THE VEHICLE FLAT RUNNING TIRES WITH NORMAL DESIGNED TIRES. SHE HAD TO PLACE THE SPARE TIRE BEHIND THE REAR SEAT WHICH SHE BELIEVED WAS A SAFETY HAZARD. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND THEY ADVISED THAT AS A DESIGN DEFECT, THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DESIGNED TO HOLD A SPARE TIRE. THE MANUFACTURER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY FURTHER ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 32,000.

NHTSA ODI #10346184

30,000 miles · Jun 25, 2010
StructureVisibility

I HAVE A 2007 NISSAN QUEST I BOUGHT NEW. IT HAS REAR SONAR AS ONE OF THE OPTIONS AND DUE TO THE SIZE, SHAPE AND BLIND SPOTS IT IS NEEDED. I NOTICED WITH 35000 MILES THAT THE REAR SONAR WAS INOP- SINCE I BOUGHT IT FOR MY WIFE, I WAS UNAWARE IT WAS INOP FOR A WHILE. IT WAS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY BECAUSE I HAVE OWNED IT FOR 37 …

Read full complaint

I HAVE A 2007 NISSAN QUEST I BOUGHT NEW. IT HAS REAR SONAR AS ONE OF THE OPTIONS AND DUE TO THE SIZE, SHAPE AND BLIND SPOTS IT IS NEEDED. I NOTICED WITH 35000 MILES THAT THE REAR SONAR WAS INOP- SINCE I BOUGHT IT FOR MY WIFE, I WAS UNAWARE IT WAS INOP FOR A WHILE. IT WAS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY BECAUSE I HAVE OWNED IT FOR 37 MOS. AFTER SOME RESEARCH IT APPEARS IT IS NOT ONLY COMMON IN ALL YEARS OF THE QUEST BUT THE TITAN AS WELL. THE PROBLEM IS A DEFECTIVE AURAL BUZZER. WHEN YOU HAVE A FAULT SOMEWHERE IN THE SYSTEM THE OFF LIGHT SHOULD COME ON LETTING YOU KNOW THE SYSTEM IS OFF- HOWEVER, IT ILLUMINATES SPORADICALLY AND WHAT YOU THINK IS A WORKING SYSTEM IS REALLY NOT- I HAVE TALKED WITH PEOPLE WHO WERE UNAWARE THE SYSTEM WAS OFF UNTIL THEY BACKED INTO SOMETHING CAUSING MINIMAL BUT EXPENSIVE DAMAGE. I AM AN AIRCRAFT MECHANIC AND CANNOT SEE HOW THERE IS NOT A RECALL ON THE BUZZER- WHEN BACKING UP LOOKING BEHIND YOU AND USING YOUR MIRRORS THERE IS A HUGE BLIND AREA IN THE BACK OF THE VAN THAT IS CAUSED BY THE GRADUAL INCREASE IN THE SLOPE OF THE BODY PANELS. MY CONCERN IS THAT IT IS A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE SOMEONE GETS INJURED. THE PROBLEM IS THAT NISSAN USES A DEFECTIVE BUZZER THAT THEY KNOW WILL FAIL- IT IS A CHEAP FIX FOR THE DEALERS HOWEVER FOR THE CONSUMER IT WOULD COST UPWARDS OF 400 DOLLARS FOR A BUZZER THAT CAN BE PURCHASED AT RADIO SHACK FOR 5 DOLLARS. I REPLACED MINE WITH THE ORIGINAL NISSAN PART THAT COST 60 DOLLARS AND FIND IT OFFENSIVE THEY HAVE NOT VOLUNTARILY FIXED A PROBLEM THEY KNOW EXISTS- IT IS SAFETY RELATED AND AS SOMEONE WHO FIXES JETS FOR A MAJOR AIRLINE, SAFETY IS FIRST AND FOREMOST ALONG WITH A RELIABLE, DEPENDABLE PRODUCT. THIS SHOULD BE A RECALL. THANK YOU *TR

NHTSA ODI #10340173

26,000 miles · May 17, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 NISSAN QUEST. WHILE DRIVING AT 30 MPH, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY BEGAN TO ACCELERATE. THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO NEUTRAL TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALERSHIP BUT THE DEALER STATED THAT NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND FILED A COMPLAI…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 NISSAN QUEST. WHILE DRIVING AT 30 MPH, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY BEGAN TO ACCELERATE. THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO NEUTRAL TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALERSHIP BUT THE DEALER STATED THAT NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND FILED A COMPLAINT. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED AT THE TIME OF THE COMPLAINT. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE APPROXIMATELY 26,000.

NHTSA ODI #10330764

7,100 miles · Apr 27, 2010
Electrical System

2007 NISSAN QUEST ALTERNATOR DEFECTIVE ONLY 7,100 MILES BATTERY JUST DIED OUT AND THE DEALER DIAGNOSED IT AS DEFECTIVE BUT NOT UNDER WARRANTY BECAUSE MORE THAN 3 YEARS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10327666

Mileage unknown · Apr 8, 2010
Tires

I PURCHASED NEW A 2007 NISSAN QUEST SE WITH THE MICHELIN PAX RUN-FLAT SYSTEM IN DECEMBER 2007. THIS CAR'S STICKER PRICE WAS OVER $41,000. IT NOW NEEDS NEW TIRES AT 32,000 MILES.WITH THIS SYSTEM, THERE IS ONLY ONE TIRE THAT CAN BE USED, AND VERY FEW DEALERS CARRY IT. ONLY ONE SHOP IN MY CITY CAN WORK ON THIS RIM/TIRE COMBO--TH…

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED NEW A 2007 NISSAN QUEST SE WITH THE MICHELIN PAX RUN-FLAT SYSTEM IN DECEMBER 2007. THIS CAR'S STICKER PRICE WAS OVER $41,000. IT NOW NEEDS NEW TIRES AT 32,000 MILES.WITH THIS SYSTEM, THERE IS ONLY ONE TIRE THAT CAN BE USED, AND VERY FEW DEALERS CARRY IT. ONLY ONE SHOP IN MY CITY CAN WORK ON THIS RIM/TIRE COMBO--THE HONDA STORE THEY REFUSE TO HELP BECAUSE THEY WORK ONLY ON HONDAS. I WAS ADVISED BY MICHELIN I NEED TO TRAVEL TO ALLIANCE, OH TO HAVE NEW TIRES INSTALLED ON MY VAN, A TRIP OF 70 MILES OR ONE HOUR. I WAS TOLD BY THIS SHOP THAT THE TIRES NEED TO BE ORDERED, THEY TAKE 5 WEEKS TO GET IN, AND THEY WOULD COST $1,550 FOR A SET OF FOUR INSTALLED. WHILE I FEEL THE PRICE IS TERRIBLE, MY REAL CONCERN IS THE 5 WEEK DELIVERY DELAY. WHAT DO I DO IF I AM 700 MILES FROM HOME AND SUFFER A BLOWOUT WITH MY FAMILY IN THE CAR? DO I LEAVE THE CAR ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD OR AT THE REPAIR SHOP FOR 5 WEEKS WAITING FOR A TIRE TO BE SHIPPED IN? I HAVE ASKED NISSAN NORTH AMERICA TO PROVIDE 4 REGULAR RIMS, A SPARE, AND A JACK SO THAT I CAN CONVERT THE CAR BACK TO REGULAR TIRES AS I NO LONGER FEEL WAITING 5 WEEKS FOR A TIRE TO BE SHIPPED IN IS A SAFE ALTERNATIVE FOR MY FAMILY. THEY REFUSED. I THEN SENT A LETTER AND ASKED THEM TO ANSWER MY QUESTION AS TO WHAT I AM TO DO WHEN STRANDED BY A BLOWN PAX TIRE 700 MILES FROM HOME. THEY AGAIN REITERATED THEIR POSITION THAT THEY COULD NOT HELP WITH THE "REPAIRS" TO MY VEHICLE, AND THEY FAILED TO ANSWER MY QUESTION--IGNORING IT ENTIRELY. I AM CURRENTLY CONVERTING THE VAN OVER TO REGULAR TIRES AND RIMS AT MY EXPENSE, BUT I STILL WILL NOT HAVE A JACK OR SPARE TIRE/RIM. NISSAN MISREPRESENTED THIS SYSTEM WHEN I PURCHASED THIS CAR. THEY EXTOLLED THE VIRTUES OF SAFETY AND RELIABILITY FOR MY FAMILY. THIS IS SIMPLY UNTRUE. THIS SYSTEM IS A NIGHTMARE, AND THEY HAVE REFUSED TO HELP THEIR CUSTOMERS WHO PURCHASED WHAT AMOUNTS TO A VERY HIGH-END VEHICLE--ONE OF THEIR MOST EXPENSIVE, IN FACT. THEY NEED TO OWN UP TO THEIR MISTAKE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10324536

17,435 miles · Mar 3, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

I WAS TRAVELING DOWN A 6% DOWNGRADE ON A FREEWAY IN MY 2007 NISSAN QUEST. AT THE TIME (JAN 2008), THE VEHICLE HAD ABOUT 15,000 MILES ON IT. I WAS CONTINUOUSLY BRAKING TO KEEP THE VEHICLE AT A SAFE SPEED. AS I WAS BRAKING, THE BRAKES BEGAN TO PULSATE. THE PULSATIONS GOT LOUDER AND MORE AGGRESSIVE AS WE CONTINUED DOWN THE DOWNGRAD…

Read full complaint

I WAS TRAVELING DOWN A 6% DOWNGRADE ON A FREEWAY IN MY 2007 NISSAN QUEST. AT THE TIME (JAN 2008), THE VEHICLE HAD ABOUT 15,000 MILES ON IT. I WAS CONTINUOUSLY BRAKING TO KEEP THE VEHICLE AT A SAFE SPEED. AS I WAS BRAKING, THE BRAKES BEGAN TO PULSATE. THE PULSATIONS GOT LOUDER AND MORE AGGRESSIVE AS WE CONTINUED DOWN THE DOWNGRADE, TO THE POINT LIKE IF FELT THE BRAKES WERE ABOUT TO FAIL. SOON AFTER, IN JANUARY 2008, I BROUGHT THE VEHICLE TO THE NISSAN DEALERSHIP IN BELLEVUE, WA. THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THE PROBLEM WITH THE FRONT PASSENGER BRAKE ROTOR WAS WARPED. THEY RESURFACED THE ROTOR. AT 9 MONTHS LATER, AND AT 25,000 MILES (OCT 2008), THE PULSATIONS STARTED TO REOCCUR. I BROUGHT THE VAN TO THE SAME DEALERSHIP, AND THIS TIME THEY REPLACED THE SAME ROTOR THEY RESURFACED 9 MONTHS EARLIER. AGAIN AT 35,000 MILES IN JULY 2009, THE PULSATION PROBLEM RETURNED AGAIN. I BROUGHT IT TO UNITED NISSAN IN LAS VEGAS, BUT THEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM, CITING NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR ON THE BRAKES. FINALLY, IN OCTOBER 2009, I BROUGHT THE BRAKES TO A BRAKE SPECIALIST. THE SPECIALIST STATED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER BRAKE, THE SAME BRAKE THAT HAD CONTINUOUS ROTOR WARPING, WAS DEFECTIVE DUE TO A FAULTY BRAKE PIN CAUSING STICKING BETWEEN THE CALIPER AND PAD, WHICH WAS THE ROOT CAUSE OF ALL THE WARPING AND PULSATIONS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10316167

31,000 miles · Feb 25, 2010
Unknown Or Other

WAS COMING UP TO A TRAFFIC LIGHT GOING APPROXIMATELY 45 DOWN TO 0 PER MILES AN HOUR AND WAS SLOWING DOWN AND HAD FOOT ON BRAKE AND THE THE ACCELERATOR WAS STILL ENGAGED AND HAD TO PUT MY 2007 NISSAN QUEST TO NEUTRAL THEN INTO PARK IN ORDER TO STOP VEHICLE. THE NEXT DAY WE TOOK TO THE NISSAN DEALERSHIP AND THEY SAID THEY CHECKED …

Read full complaint

WAS COMING UP TO A TRAFFIC LIGHT GOING APPROXIMATELY 45 DOWN TO 0 PER MILES AN HOUR AND WAS SLOWING DOWN AND HAD FOOT ON BRAKE AND THE THE ACCELERATOR WAS STILL ENGAGED AND HAD TO PUT MY 2007 NISSAN QUEST TO NEUTRAL THEN INTO PARK IN ORDER TO STOP VEHICLE. THE NEXT DAY WE TOOK TO THE NISSAN DEALERSHIP AND THEY SAID THEY CHECKED EVERYTHING BUT COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM THEREFOR NOTHING WAS DONE. PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS PROBLEM THIS IS A HUGE SAFETY ISSUE.

NHTSA ODI #10314058

20,000 miles · Feb 1, 2010
Electrical SystemSuspension

THERE IS A RATTLING NOISE SOMEWHERE IN THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE (APPARENTLY IN THE WHEELS). ALSO, I NOTICED SOME VIBRATION IN THE STEERING WHEEL. THERE SEEM TO BE SOME ELECTRIC FAILURE AS SOMETIMES THE A/C DON'T WORK (WHEN THAT HAPPENS YOU HAVE TO TURN OFF THE VEHICLE AND THEN TURN IT ON AGAIN FOR IT TO WORK). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10303726

Official recalls

1

07V248000 · Suspension:front

Jun 7, 2007

DURING PRODUCTION, A SELECT NUMBER OF VEHICLES UNDERWENT AN OFFLINE INSPECTION AT THE ASSEMBLY PLANT WHERE A BOLT IN THE FRONT SUSPENSION ASSEMBLY WAS REMOVED. ON SOME OF THESE VEHICLES, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS BOLT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN TIGHTENED TO SPECIFICATION WHEN IT WAS REINSTALLED.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IF THE BOLT IS LOOSE, THE DRIVER WILL HEAR A RATTLING NOISE AND NOTICE VIBRATION. IF THE BOLT COMES OFF COMPLETELY, THE DRIVER CAN EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTY IN CONTROLLING THE DIRECTION OF THE VEHICLE WHICH COULD RESULT IN A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE ATTACHMENT BOLTS AND TIGHTEN THEM TO THE SPECIFIED VALUE. THIS RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 2, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE14012 · Fuel Level Gauge System Failure

Opened May 8, 2014 · Closed Jan 13, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Fuel System, Other:storage:fuel Gauge System

On May 8, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigations (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation PE14-012 to investigate allegations of inaccurate fuel tank fill level while driving resulting in the vehicle running out of fuel in model year (MY) 2007 Nissan Quest vehicles.During this investigation, Nissan identified a condition in the subject vehicles that may result in the fuel gauge falsely indicating more than the actual amount of fuel remaining in the gas tank. According to Nissan, the combination meter voltage divider circuit for the sender unit may have one of two resistors open or lifted resulting in a fuel gauge malfunction and inaccurate fuel level reading.When this condition occurs, the fuel gauge in the combination meter will continue to track the actual amount of fuel in the gas tank down to approximately one quarter of a tank.However, the fuel gauge will not go any lower which may cause drivers to run out of fuel unexpectedly.Additionally, ODI analyzed complaint data provided by Nissan as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, ODI identified 136 unique complaints indicating an inaccurate fuel level reading while driving in the subject vehicles. Seventy (70) fuel gauge related stalls were identified, resulting in a complaint rate of 1.85 incidents per thousand vehicles after approximately 8 years in service. In addition, analysis of warranty and combination meter part sales data provided by Nissan indicate a claim rate of less than 1% for all part replacements involving fuel gauge malfunctions.During PE14-012, Nissan developed a remedy procedure and issued Service Campaign PC 335 on approximately 68,003 MY 2007 through 2009 Nissan Quest vehicles.Owners of the affected vehicles will receive preliminary notification by mail recommending owners to keep fuel level above ? tank at all times until repair parts become available.Once the remedy kits become available, Nissan plans to send another letter to affected customers to take their vehicle to a Nissan dealer who will install an external amplifier box with jumper harness in the combination meter to bypass the electric circuit and ensure accurate fuel level indication.The bulletin was sent to dealers on December 19th, 2014 and the owner letter mailing began on December 31st, 2014. See the investigative file for copies of Nissan's dealer communication and owner letter. Based on the relatively low rate of engine stall incidents for vehicles that have been in service for 8-9 years, this investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect and take further action in the future if warranted.The following VOQ numbers are associated with the issues discussed in this closing resume:10503555, 10505390, 10513356, 10525325, 10549839, 10551187, 10552937, 10559300, 10565794, 10567557, 10568302, 10574869, 10575303, 10588121, 10588843, 10594370, 10595029, 10597201, 10598275, 10608182, 10610671, 10615104, 10615697, 10617309, 10618457, 10621549, 10622551, 10627963, 10632742, 10633833, 10637512, 10638279, 10640959, 10641050, 10643726, 10643791, 10643933, 10644085, 10649107, 10649598, 10652109, 10660231, 10661351, 10662656, 10662666.