IllustrationWE HAD OUR TIRES ROTATED AND BALANCED ON A FRIDAY. ON SATURDAY MORNING WE ATTEMPTED TO TRAVEL 110 MILES NORTH OF OUR CITY. TRAVELING AT 75 MPH OUR FRONT LEFT BRIDGESTONE TIRE BLEW OUT. WE HAD NO INDICATION OF DRIVING OVER ANYTHING AT THE TIME. WE HAD TRAVELED ABOUT 8 MILES FROM OUR HOME WHEN THIS OCCURRED. *NM
2000 Nissan Quest
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 2000 Nissan Quest do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 66.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Quest years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
60–25K
1525–50K
750–75K
775–100K
5100–150K
1150K+
41 reports with mileage · 46 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Exterior Lighting. Review the 20 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 19 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Structure. Review the 11 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
11 crash reports3 fire reports10 injury reports
Tires complaints
5 reportsNISSAN REFUSED TO PERFORM INVESTIGATION ON THIS FIRST INCIDENT WHEN THIS TIRE BLEW UP. THE SECOND INCIDENT WAS MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE FIRST ONE WHEN WE WERE DRIVING ACROSS THE BRIDGE. ON. *AK (TIRESIZE: P215-70R15)
WHILE DRIVING 60MPH STEERING WHEEL WOULD SHAKE.IT WOULD BE HARD TO CONTROL VEHICLE. HAD TAKEN TO DEALERSHIP, AND WAS INFORMED BY MECHANIC THAT IT WAS A TIRE PROBLEM. HAD TIRES ROTATED AND BALANCED. *AK
I NOTICED THIS MORNING THAT THE MIDDLE THREAD ON BOTH DRIVER SIDE TIRES WAS WORN TO A SHINY BLACK SURFACE. THE OTHER TWO TIRES WERE NOTICEABLY WORN. NISSAN DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THAT SEVERAL QUEST OWNERS HAVE HAD SAME PROBLEM, BUT OTHERWISE DID NOT ASSIST ME. GENERAL TIRE PROVIDE IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE AND I NOW HAVE REPLACEMENT T…
Read full complaint
I NOTICED THIS MORNING THAT THE MIDDLE THREAD ON BOTH DRIVER SIDE TIRES WAS WORN TO A SHINY BLACK SURFACE. THE OTHER TWO TIRES WERE NOTICEABLY WORN. NISSAN DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THAT SEVERAL QUEST OWNERS HAVE HAD SAME PROBLEM, BUT OTHERWISE DID NOT ASSIST ME. GENERAL TIRE PROVIDE IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE AND I NOW HAVE REPLACEMENT TIRES. I AM CONCERNED AS MY TIRES HAVE BEEN PROPERLY MAINTAINED (ROTATED EVERY SIX THOUSAND MILES) AND SHOULD NOT HAVE THIS TYPE OF WEAR.*AK (TIRESIZE: P215/70R15)
CONSUMER HAS EXPERIENCED TWO FLAT TIRES ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS, WHILE DRIVING IN HOT WEATHER, THE DEALERSHIP AND THE TIRE MANUFACTURER ARE NOT WILLING TO TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TIRES.( GENERAL TIRES P215/70 R15)*JB
Official recalls
200V292002 · Steering:rack And Pinion
Oct 2, 2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: MINI VANS. ONE OR MORE OF THE FIVE BOLTS THAT MOUNT THE RACK AND PINION STEERING GEAR TO THE VEHICLE MAY HAVE BEEN INCORRECTLY TIGHTENED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THERE COULD BE A LOOSENESS IN THE STEERING, WHICH MAY BE ACCOMPANIED BY NOISE OR VIBRATION.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE VEHICLES AND, IF THE BOLTS ARE MISSING, WILL REPLACE THE STEERING GEAR MOUNTING BOLTS. ALL BOLTS WILL BE TIGHTENED TO THE SPECIFIED TORQUE.
00V228005 · Seat Belts
Sep 7, 2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH TRW SEAT BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLIES. THE BUCKLE BASE OF THESE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES WERE NOT PROPERLY HEAT TREATED AND THEREFORE DO NOT PASS THE LOAD BEARING REQUIREMENT OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE DATE CODE ON CERTAIN SEAT BELT BUCKLES OF YOUR VEHICLE AND REPLACE ALL SEAT BELT BUCKLES THAT FALL WITHIN THE SUSPECT DATE CODE RANGE.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1PE04020 · Failing Headlights
Opened Feb 26, 2004 · Closed Jun 24, 2004
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:headlights
NISSAN AND FORD FOUND THAT THE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT HEADLIGHT STAINLESS STEEL BULB TERMINALS MAY OVER TIME CAUSE ELEVATED CONTACT RESISTANCE AND OVERHEAT THE ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HOUSING.THIS CAN RESULT IN A HEADLIGHT FLICKERING, BULB OUTAGE AND HEAT DEFORMATION TO THE HEADLIGHT CONNECTOR.IN APRIL 1999, THE SUPPLIER OF THE HEADLIGHT FOR NISSAN AND FORD CHANGED TO A BULB USING THE STAINLESS STEEL TERMINALS THAT DID NOT MEET ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS.ON JULY 17, 2000, THE SUPPLIER BEGAN USING A BULB MEETING THE VEHICLE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.THIS PROBLEM CAN AFFECT INDEPENDENTLY EITHER HEADLIGHT BUT DOES NOT CAUSE SIMULTANEOUS FAILURE OF BOTH HEADLIGHTS. THE PROBLEM ALSO DOES NOT AFFECT FRONT PARKING LAMPS.AS A RESULT, THE COMPLAINTS TYPICAL REPORT SINGLE FAILURE OF ONE HEADLIGHT.THERE ARE NO CRASHES OR LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL REPORTED.A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT TREND HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AT THIS TIME AND FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.