FRONT BRAKES MADE A LOUD GRINDING NOISE WHEN THEY WERE DEPRESSED. WHEN THIS OCCURRED THE BRAKES ATE THE ROTORS. THIS WAS CAUSED BY THE CALIPER STICKING AND NOT RELEASING. DEALERSHIP REPLACED ROTORS/CALIPERS, BUT THE PROBLEM RECURRED. TSB 613461 DEALT WITH THIS PROBLEM.*AK
1999 Nissan Quest
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 1999 Nissan Quest do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 66.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Quest years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
36 reports with mileage · 82 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 39 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 23 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Visibility. Review the 11 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
118 reportsTWO SAFETY ISSUES: I LOOKED UP MY 1999 QUEST MINIVAN INFORMATION AND SAW 4 RECALLS. I HAVE NEVER TAKEN MY QUEST IN FOR A RECALL -- BECAUSE I NEVER RECEIVED ANY INFORMATION ON THEM. I HOPE THAT MEANS THAT MINE WAS NOT AFFECTED? SECOND, WE HAVE AN ONGOING ISSUE WITH THE ACCELERATOR STICKING, DUE TO CARBON BUILDUP. I HAVE GOTTEN…
Read full complaint
TWO SAFETY ISSUES: I LOOKED UP MY 1999 QUEST MINIVAN INFORMATION AND SAW 4 RECALLS. I HAVE NEVER TAKEN MY QUEST IN FOR A RECALL -- BECAUSE I NEVER RECEIVED ANY INFORMATION ON THEM. I HOPE THAT MEANS THAT MINE WAS NOT AFFECTED? SECOND, WE HAVE AN ONGOING ISSUE WITH THE ACCELERATOR STICKING, DUE TO CARBON BUILDUP. I HAVE GOTTEN THE INFORMATION FOR THE LAWSUIT TO REIMBURSE ME FOR THE EXPENSES -- BUT THE ISSUE STILL REMAINS. AT THIS POINT, WE HAVE HAD THE THROTTLE CLEANED AT LEAST 4 TIMES (I'M ASSEMBLING MY RECEIPTS) AND NEED TO HAVE IT CLEANED AGAIN NOW. IT SEEMS LIKE NISSAN OUGHT TO RECALL THE PART AND CORRECT THE ISSUE. IT IS UNREASONABLE THAT IT KEEPS HAPPENING. PLUS, THE REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM FORM ONLY ALLOWS A $45 REIMBURSEMENT; I JUST GOT AN AD FROM NISSAN FOR A "DISCOUNT" PRICE OF $89.95 TO CLEAN THE THROTTLE. WHY WOULD THE REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT AND THE AD PRICE BE SO OUT OF LINE. THE ACCELERATOR STICKING IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE THAT I HOPE NHTSA WILL INVESTIGATE SINCE NISSAN HAS NOT TAKEN THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE SAFETY IS A PART OF ITS NORMAL PROCESS. IF YOU MAKE A BAD PART, OWN UP TO IT AND DO NOT ENDANGER LIVES.*AK
ACCELERATOR PEDAL CONSTANTLY STICKING! THERE IS IS A MAJOR PROBLEM AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION. I KNOW THAT THERE IS A CLASS ACTION SUIT INVOLVING THE THROTTLE-BODY CLEANING BUT MY VEHICLE DOES NOT QUALIFY BECAUSE THE WARRANTY HAS EXPIRED. THE PROBLEM HAS EXISTED SINCE THE V…
Read full complaint
ACCELERATOR PEDAL CONSTANTLY STICKING! THERE IS IS A MAJOR PROBLEM AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION. I KNOW THAT THERE IS A CLASS ACTION SUIT INVOLVING THE THROTTLE-BODY CLEANING BUT MY VEHICLE DOES NOT QUALIFY BECAUSE THE WARRANTY HAS EXPIRED. THE PROBLEM HAS EXISTED SINCE THE VEHICLE WAS NEW BUT THE DEALERSHIP SAID THAT THEY COULD NOT FIND A PROBLEM WITH IT. I HAVE ALL OF THIS DOCUMENTED IN SERVICE RECEIPTS AND PAPERWORK. WHY WOULD I WANT TO BE A PART OF A SETTLEMENT THAT REVOKES ALL MY RIGHTS JUST BECAUSE MY WARRANTY HAS EXPIRED? THIS SHOULD NOT BE BASED ON THE ISSUE OF IF YOUR CAR IS STILL UNDER WARRANTY OR NOT. THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS ISSUE AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A RECALL FROM NISSAN NORTH AMERICA OR BY THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION NOW!!!! BEFORE FAMILIES ARE KILLED BECAUSE OF AN KNOWN ACCELERATOR STICKING PROBLEM.*AK
WITHOUT ANY WARNING, THE VAN WOULD FAIL TO ACCELERATE. THIS CAUSED THE CONSUMER TO PULL OFF THE ROAD. THE OWNER HAS MADE CONTACT WITH THE DEALER. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER DETAILS. *PH
I RECEIVED THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT REGARDING THE THROTTLE BODY CLEANING. I CALLED MY LOCAL DEALER AND 1-800-NISSAN1 TO REQUEST A THROTTLE BODY CLEANING. MY VAN CURRENTLY HAS 80,000 MILES ON IT. I HAVE IN MY POSSESSION 2 INVOICES (1 AT 52,000 MILES AND 1 AT 70,000 MILES) FROM THE DEALER SHOWING WHERE I TOOK THE VE…
Read full complaint
I RECEIVED THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT REGARDING THE THROTTLE BODY CLEANING. I CALLED MY LOCAL DEALER AND 1-800-NISSAN1 TO REQUEST A THROTTLE BODY CLEANING. MY VAN CURRENTLY HAS 80,000 MILES ON IT. I HAVE IN MY POSSESSION 2 INVOICES (1 AT 52,000 MILES AND 1 AT 70,000 MILES) FROM THE DEALER SHOWING WHERE I TOOK THE VEHICLE IN FOR SERVICE REGARDING THIS PROBLEM (AND OTHER THINGS) AND THEY DID NOTHING ABOUT IT. I WAS TOLD (AS OTHERS WERE) THAT IT IS MAINTENANCE AND I CHOSE NOT TO HAVE IT DONE (OR NOT TO SPEND $150). I PURCHASED THE EXTENDED SERVICE AGREEMENT FROM THE LOCAL DEALER. AT THIS POINT, I HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT THEY WILL NOT PERFORM A THROTTLE BODY CLEANING ON MY VEHICLE BECAUSE IT IS OUT OF WARRANTY--EVEN THOUGH I HAVE PROOF FROM THE DEALER THAT I WAS HAVING THIS PROBLEM AND EVEN THOUGH I BOUGHT THE EXTENDED SERVICE AGREEMENT. MY HUSBAND AND I HAVE OWNED 4 NISSANS--WE WILL NEVER OWN ANOTHER! *LA
THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL "STICKS". REQUIRES EXCESSIVE PRESSURE TO PUSH DOWN. THE FULL BODY THROTTLE HAS BEEN CLEANED BUT I STILL HAVE A PROBLEM. THERE IS A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GOING ON THAT WOULD ALLOW ME TO BE REIMBURSED FOR THE CHARGES PAID FOR THE CLEANING BUT THE PROBLEM IS DANGEROUS. THE PEDAL WILL STICK WHILE GOING DO…
Read full complaint
THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL "STICKS". REQUIRES EXCESSIVE PRESSURE TO PUSH DOWN. THE FULL BODY THROTTLE HAS BEEN CLEANED BUT I STILL HAVE A PROBLEM. THERE IS A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GOING ON THAT WOULD ALLOW ME TO BE REIMBURSED FOR THE CHARGES PAID FOR THE CLEANING BUT THE PROBLEM IS DANGEROUS. THE PEDAL WILL STICK WHILE GOING DOWN THE ROAD AND/OR CROSSING A BUSY INTERSECTION. I HAVE TWO CHILDREN I HAVE TO TRANSPORT IN THAT VEHICLE DAILY. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL 1999 NISSAN QUEST MODELS HAVE THIS PROBLEM AND I DON'T THINK I SHOULD HAVE TO PAY TO FIX THEIR PROBLEM.
ACCELERATOR PEDAL STICKING. THIS HAS HAPPENED ON TWO OR MORE OCCASIONS. I HAVE NOT BEEN BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP YET BECAUSE I DON'T WANT THEM WASTING MY TIME WITH TELLING ME THAT THIS IS A MAINTENANCE PROBLEM AS THEY HAVE TOLD SO MANY OTHERS HERE IN THIS COLUMN. THIS IS DEFINETLY A DEFECT AND REQUIRES AN INVESTIGATION.*AK
WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE AT 30 MPH CONSUMER PRESSED BRAKE PEDAL AND HEARD A LOUD POPPING SOUND. BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, BUT VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP UNTIL IT CAME TO REST ON ANOTHER VEHICLE. DEALER INFORMED THE CONSUMER THAT THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER BLEW OFF THE BRAKE BOOSTER. *AK
1999 NISSAN QUEST SE - I CHANGED THE SPARK PLUGS AFTER HEARING A TAPPING/CLACKING COMING FROM THE ENGINE & HAVING THE VAN HESITATE AT TIMES. THE OEM PLATINUM PLUGS ARE RATED FOR 100K MILES & THE VAN HAS 82K MILES. I HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING ONE OF THE PLUGS. AFTER THE PLUG JAMMED I LOOKED IN THE "TUBE" WHERE YOU INSERT THE PLUG L…
Read full complaint
1999 NISSAN QUEST SE - I CHANGED THE SPARK PLUGS AFTER HEARING A TAPPING/CLACKING COMING FROM THE ENGINE & HAVING THE VAN HESITATE AT TIMES. THE OEM PLATINUM PLUGS ARE RATED FOR 100K MILES & THE VAN HAS 82K MILES. I HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING ONE OF THE PLUGS. AFTER THE PLUG JAMMED I LOOKED IN THE "TUBE" WHERE YOU INSERT THE PLUG LOOKING FOR ANYTHING BLOCKING THE PLUG EXTRACTION. AFTER I REMOVED THE PLUG THE THREADS SHOWED NO SIGNS OF STRIPPING. I LOOKED IN THE "TUBE" AGAIN & STILL COULD NOT SEE ANYTHING. THE AREA OF THE PLUG BELOW THE "NUT PART" & ABOVE THE THREADS LOOKED MANGLED. AFTER INSERTING THE NEW PLUGS I TESTED THE ENGINE & HEARD A MUCH LOUDER NOISE. I TOWED IT TO THE DEALERSHIP TO MAKE ANY REPAIRS UNDER MY EXTENDED SERVICE PLAN (ESP). THE SERVICE WRITER CALLED & I APPROVED A $200 TEAR DOWN FEE THAT WOULD APPLY TO ANY REPAIRS NEEDED OR COVERED UNDER THE ESP. LATER THEY TOLD ME THEY WOULD NOT DO THE REPAIRS UNDER THE ESP AS A FOREIGN OBJECT DAMAGED THE PISTON/CYLINDER. THEY COULD NOT IDENTIFY THE OBJECT BUT SAID THAT SINCE NISSAN DID NOT MAKE THE REPAIRS THE ESP WOULD NOT COVER IT. I SPENT 3 DAYS FIGHTING WITH NISSAN'S CONSUMER RELATIONS DEPT & AN EXECUTIVE ASST. THIS LADY SAID NISSAN WOULD NOT COVER THE REPAIR. THE GENERAL MANAGER AT THE DEALERSHIP AGREED THAT HAD HIS TECH CHANGED THE PLUGS HE WOULD HAVE JUST AS LIKELY AS NOT HAD THE SAME PROBLEMS WITH THE SAME RESULTS. NOW SINCE I EXERCISED MY RIGHTS & APPEALED TO THE CORPORATE OFFICES OF NISSAN THE DEALERSHIP WILL NOT COMPLETE ANY REPAIRS. THEY WANT ME TO TOW MY VEHICLE ELSEWHERE AT MY EXPENSE & STILL PAY THEM THE $200 TEAR DOWN FEE THAT WAS TO BE APPLIED TOWARDS THE REPAIR. ALSO MY DISASSEMBLED ENGINE LIES ON THE GARAGE FLOOR AT THE DEALERSHIP. I HAVE MORE INFO & WELCOME ANY CONTACT OR SUGGESTIONS AT WMDRUMMOND@AOL.COM. THERE IS MORE INFORMATION AT WWW.NOTAGZ.COM/NISSAN INCLUDING CALL LOGS WITH BOTH NISSAN & THE DEALERSHIP. THERE ARE ALSO PICTURES OF THE DISASSEMBLED ENGINE & THE DAMAGE AT WWW.NOTAGZ.COM/ENGINE. *NLM
LOW QUALITY MATERIALS CAUSING A FIRE HAZARD THAT WERE NOTICED BY INSPECTING EQUIPMENT. THE PASSENGER HEADLIGHT MALFUNCTIONED AND THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM WENT OUT AND CAME BACK ON INCLUDING ALL DASH ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT WHILE THE VAN WAS IN MOTION. THE RIGHT HEADLIGHT WAS NOT OPERATING EVERY TIME IT WAS NEEDED. I PURCHASED THE VAN …
Read full complaint
LOW QUALITY MATERIALS CAUSING A FIRE HAZARD THAT WERE NOTICED BY INSPECTING EQUIPMENT. THE PASSENGER HEADLIGHT MALFUNCTIONED AND THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM WENT OUT AND CAME BACK ON INCLUDING ALL DASH ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT WHILE THE VAN WAS IN MOTION. THE RIGHT HEADLIGHT WAS NOT OPERATING EVERY TIME IT WAS NEEDED. I PURCHASED THE VAN AND I NOTICED THE HEADLIGHT WAS COMING ON AND GOING OFF. I INSPECTED THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY AND NOTICED THAT THE CONNECTOR THAT SNAPS THE HARNESS TO THE BULB HAD MELTED WIRES. THE CONNECTOR HAS THREE WIRES (LOW BEAM POSITIVE,HIGH BEAM POSITIVE, AND GROUND.) THE CONNECTOR IS MADE OF MOLDED PLASTIC AND THE WIRES TRAVEL THROUGH THE CONNECTOR AND CLIP ON THE BULB ASSEMBLY. THE VAN IS 3 YEARS OLD AND THE CENTER GROUND WIRE HAS MELTED THE CONNECTORS SO BAD THAT IS HAS COME INTO CONTACT WITH THE OTHER POSITIVE LEADS CASING A SYSTEM SHORT AND A FIRE HAZARD. I INSPECTED THE OTHER HEADLIGHT WIRING HARNESS AND FOUND THE CENTER GROUND TO BE BADLY MELTED AS WELL. THE VEHICLE IS A 1999 NISSAN QUEST AND IT ONLY HAS 32,000 MILES. THE LOAD ON THE HARNESS AND WIRES IS TOO MUCH. THE HEADLIGHTS WERE FACTORY INSTALLED AND WERE NEVER REPLACED SO THIS IS A PROBLEM FORM THE DESIGN. I HAVE REMOVED THE DEFECTIVE CONNECTOR AND REPLACED IT WITH A BETTER DESIGNED ONE FROM ANOTHER VEHICLE MANUFACTURER. THE DEFECTIVE CONNECTOR IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION. *NOLM
Official recalls
400V292002 · Steering:rack And Pinion
Oct 2, 2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: MINI VANS. ONE OR MORE OF THE FIVE BOLTS THAT MOUNT THE RACK AND PINION STEERING GEAR TO THE VEHICLE MAY HAVE BEEN INCORRECTLY TIGHTENED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THERE COULD BE A LOOSENESS IN THE STEERING, WHICH MAY BE ACCOMPANIED BY NOISE OR VIBRATION.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE VEHICLES AND, IF THE BOLTS ARE MISSING, WILL REPLACE THE STEERING GEAR MOUNTING BOLTS. ALL BOLTS WILL BE TIGHTENED TO THE SPECIFIED TORQUE.
99V347002 · Exterior Lighting:tail Lights
Dec 20, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: MINIVANS AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS. THE TAIL LIGHT SOCKET MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY MOLDED, RESULTING IN THE LOCKING TAB HAVING INSUFFICIENT FORCE TO RETAIN THE BULB.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THE BULB FALLS OUT OF THE SOCKET, THE BRAKE OR TAIL LAMP FUNCTION CANNOT OCCUR.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE TAIL LAMP SOCKETS.
99V205002 · Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:mounting
Aug 5, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: MINI VANS. THE FUEL TANK RETENTION STRAP (TWO STRAPS PER VEHICLE) CAN BREAK AT THE SPOT WELDS CAUSING AN UNDERBODY RATTLE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THERE IS ALSO A POTENTIAL FOR FUEL TANK SEPARATION OR FUEL LEAK, INCREASING THE RISK OF A FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE FUEL TANK RETENTION STRAPS.
99V056002 · Seats:mid/rear Assembly
Mar 25, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: MINI VANS EQUIPPED WITH E-Z ENTRY SEATS. THE AFFECTED VEHICLES MAY HAVE A SECOND ROW RIGHT HAND SIDE CAPTAIN CHAIR THAT HAS INADEQUATE LUBRICATION OF THE EASY ENTRY AND EXIT LATCH SYSTEM. IN SOME CASES, THE ACTUATOR SPRING IN THE LATCH COULD DEFORM AFTER REPEATED USE, CAUSING THE LATCH TO REMAIN IN THE UNLATCHED POSITION. IF THIS OCCURS, THE SEAT WILL SLIDE FREELY ON THE SEAT TRACK AND THE SPRINGS ON THE TRACK WILL MOVE THE SEAT TO THE EASY ENTRY POSITION TOWARD THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: AN UNLATCHED SEAT TRACK COULD RESULT IN AN INCREASED RISK OF INJURY IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE SEAT TRACK FOR THE SECOND ROW RIGHT HAND SIDE CAPTAIN'S CHAIR, WHICH INCLUDES THE EASY ENTRY AND EXIT LATCH MECHANISM.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1PE04020 · Failing Headlights
Opened Feb 26, 2004 · Closed Jun 24, 2004
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:headlights
NISSAN AND FORD FOUND THAT THE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT HEADLIGHT STAINLESS STEEL BULB TERMINALS MAY OVER TIME CAUSE ELEVATED CONTACT RESISTANCE AND OVERHEAT THE ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HOUSING.THIS CAN RESULT IN A HEADLIGHT FLICKERING, BULB OUTAGE AND HEAT DEFORMATION TO THE HEADLIGHT CONNECTOR.IN APRIL 1999, THE SUPPLIER OF THE HEADLIGHT FOR NISSAN AND FORD CHANGED TO A BULB USING THE STAINLESS STEEL TERMINALS THAT DID NOT MEET ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS.ON JULY 17, 2000, THE SUPPLIER BEGAN USING A BULB MEETING THE VEHICLE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.THIS PROBLEM CAN AFFECT INDEPENDENTLY EITHER HEADLIGHT BUT DOES NOT CAUSE SIMULTANEOUS FAILURE OF BOTH HEADLIGHTS. THE PROBLEM ALSO DOES NOT AFFECT FRONT PARKING LAMPS.AS A RESULT, THE COMPLAINTS TYPICAL REPORT SINGLE FAILURE OF ONE HEADLIGHT.THERE ARE NO CRASHES OR LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL REPORTED.A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT TREND HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AT THIS TIME AND FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
Illustration