2007 Nissan Murano

The contact owns a 2007 Nissan Murano. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the vehicle lost motive power, with the engine coolant, fuel level, and check engine warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who diagnosed that an unknown part needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 152,000.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 NISSAN MURANO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS AN ABNORMAL NOISE COMING FROM THE ENGINE AND EXHAUST FUMES WERE PRESENT INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, WHO DIAGNOSED THAT THE REAR EXHAUST MANIFOLD HAD CRACKED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 96,000.

ON 2/23/14, I NOTICE THERE WAS WHAT APPEARED TO BE OIL LEAKING FROM MY TRUCK. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER ON 2/26/14, IT WAS THE IT WAS THE PRESSURE HOLES LEAKING WHICH HAVE CAUSED OTHER PROBLEMS. RACK AND PINION (R) SIDE, REPLACE FUEL SENDER TWO PARTS. SEPTEMBER OF 2013, I HAD TO HAVE BOTH RIGHT AND LEFT CONTROL ARM REPAIR. THIS SHOULD BE A RECALL AND THE CUSTOMER SHOULD NOT HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EXPENSE. *TR

THIS VEHICLE IS ONLY FOUR YEARS OLD WITH ONLY 84000 MILES, WHILE DRIVING I HEARD A LOUD SOUND COMING FROM UNDER THE VEHICLE. I TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO FIVE TOWNS NISSAN THEY TOLD ME THAT I HAVE A BIG PROBLEM, MY TRANSFER CASE IS NOT GOOD. THE TRANSFER CASE, SEAL-OIL AND SEAL- OIL RING WOULD BE $2750.82. LABOR AND TAX WOULD BE BRING IT TO $4074.33. NOW WE ALL KNOW OWNERS OF THIS VERY CUTE VEHICLE THAT IT HAS A FACTORY DEFECT AND WE NEED MORE PEOPLE LIKE MYSELF TO COME FORTH SO THE WOULD HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO RECALL THESE VEHICLES. *TR

FALIURE OF COOLANT RESERVE TANK. NOTICED A LEAK UNDER THE CAR AND AT FIRST IT COULD NOT BE TRACED. BUT ON THE LAST OIL CHANGE A CRACK ON THE EDGE OF THE COOLANT TANK WAS NOTICED. DEALERSHIP HAD THIS PART READILY AVAILABLE IN STOCK, WHICH LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE AWARE THAT THERE IS A DESIGN FLAW ON THIS TANK. THE TANK WAS NOT DAMAGED OR SHOWING ANY SIGNS OF WHERE AND TEAR. THE POSITION OF THE CRACK LEADS ME TO CONCLUDE A DESIGN FLAW.

SEAL ON NISSAN MURANO 2007 WITH 77,000 MILES MALFUNCTIONED/EXPLODED CAUSING OIL TO LEAK DAMAGING THE TRANSFER CASE. BOTH MY MECHANIC AND THE SERVICE AREA OF THE DEALERSHIP MENTIONED THAT THEY HAD NOT SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS. DEALERSHIP CAME BACK WITH A QUOTE OF ABOUT $4,500; CAR IS NOT UNDER WARRANTY. I TOLD THEM NOT TO SERVICE IT AT THIS TIME; THAT WAS UNACCEPTABLE AND SHOULD NOT HAPPEN ON A 3 YEAR CAR DESPITE THE MILEAGE; NISSAN GUARANTEES 100,000. I TOOK MY CASE TO THE COOPERATE OFFICE IN TENNESSEE WHERE THEY SET UP FILE. VALERIE, THE REGIONAL SPECIALIST CONTACTED ME WITHIN ABOUT A WEEK AND EXPLAINED THAT SINCE IT WAS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY THEY WOULD NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE WITH THE COST. I EXPLAINED THAT WHETHER IT WAS UNDER WARRANTY OR NOT WAS NOT THE ISSUE; THE PROBLEM IS THAT NISSAN HAS KNOW ABOUT THIS FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND DECIDED NOT TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT; I.E. RECALL THE CAR. VALERIE WAS EXTREMELY RUDE AND UNPROFESSIONAL AND QUITE BELLIGERENT. AS I TRIED TO GET A MANAGER SHE WOULD NOT COOPERATE. I HAVE RETAINED A LAWYER AND I AM ALSO CONSIDERING FILING UNDER THE LEMON LAW. NISSAN KNEW ABOUT THE PROBLEM; HAS NO CONCERN OF THE SAFETY OF THEIR VEHICLE AND/OR THE CONSUMER. I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD RESEARCH. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS THAT I HAVE ALREADY FOUND RELATED TO THE TRANSFER CASE. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE. *TR

THE BATTERY HAS BEEN REPLACED TWICE IN THE VEHICLE AND IT HAS LESS THAN 35,000 MILES ON IT. THE FIRST REPLACEMENT WAS DONE WHEN THE CAR WAS ONLY ABOUT 6 MONTHS OLD AND I JUST RECENTLY HAD TO HAVE THE BATTERY REPLACED AGAIN. THE SECOND BATTERY WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN 84,000 MILE BATTERY AND WAS UNDER WARRANTY. HOWEVER, WHEN I WAS DRIVING IT, THE CAR DIED ON ME AND WOULD NOT START AGAIN. THE BATTERY HAD LESS THAN 26,000 MILES ON IT. NISSAN FOUGHT US ON THE REPLACEMENT EVEN THOUGH IT WAS UNDER WARRANTY, BUT WE FINALLY GOT ANOTHER ONE PUT IN. WE ARE ON OUR 3RD BATTERY IN LESS THAN 3 YEARS. THIS SAME VEHICLE HAD AN ENGINE MOUNT CRACK AT 32,000 MILES AND HAS ALSO HAD THE RADIATOR REPLACED AT 34,000 MILES. IT HAS BEEN IN THE SHOP 4 TIMES NOW IN THE LAST 2 1/2 MONTHS. WHEN THE RADIATOR WENT OUT, THE GAUGES DID NOT EVEN SAY THAT THE CAR WAS RUNNING HOT. I DISCOVERED THE ISSUE WHEN MY CAR STARTED SMOKING EVERYWHERE AND COOLANT WAS ALL OVER MY VEHICLE. NISSAN INSISTS THAT IT IS NOT AN ELECTRICAL ISSUE OF ANY KIND AND THAT THE GAUGE CAN STILL READ COOL IF THE RADIATOR GOES OUT AND THE CAR IS SMOKING. ALL IN ALL, I NOW HAVE THE 3RD NEW BATTERY, A NEW RADIATOR, AND A NEW ENGINE MOUNT. THE DRIVE BELTS HAVE ALSO CRACKED, BUT NISSAN REFUSED TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THAT. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 NISSAN MURANO. WHILE DRIVING AT 50 MPH, THE SERVICE ENGINE WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND THE VEHICLE IMMEDIATELY STALLED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER WHERE THE FAILURE WAS DIAGNOSED AS A DEFECTIVE CRANKSHAFT POSITION SENSOR. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER ADVISED THAT THE CRANK SHAFT SENSOR REPAIRS WOULD BE COVERED UNDER FACTORY WARRANTY. THE CONTACT WAS AWAITING REPAIRS. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 50,000.