NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
678 reports45,000 miles · Jul 6, 2006
Electrical System
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE STALLED INTERMITTENTLY. A NHTSA RECALL, #05V319000 WAS PERFORMED ON THE VEHICLE ON MARCH 28, 2005 CONCERNING THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ALTERNATOR/ GENERATOR/ REGULATOR HOWEVER, THE RECALL DID NOT REMEDY THE PROBLEM. THE DEALERSHIP WOULD NOT OFFER A SECOND REPAIR WITHOUT CHARGE UNDER THE RECALL…
Read full complaint
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE STALLED INTERMITTENTLY. A NHTSA RECALL, #05V319000 WAS PERFORMED ON THE VEHICLE ON MARCH 28, 2005 CONCERNING THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ALTERNATOR/ GENERATOR/ REGULATOR HOWEVER, THE RECALL DID NOT REMEDY THE PROBLEM. THE DEALERSHIP WOULD NOT OFFER A SECOND REPAIR WITHOUT CHARGE UNDER THE RECALL.
NHTSA ODI #10161624
Mileage unknown · Jun 29, 2006
Fuel System, Gasoline
ABOUT ONE YEAR AGO I FILED A COMPLAINT WITH BOTH NISSAN AND THE NHTSA CONCERNING A PUNCTURED FUEL TANK. NISSAN INFORMED ME THAT IN THE EVENT NHTSA REQUIRED A RECALL WITH RESPECT TO THE FUEL DELIVERY SYSTEM, NISSAN WOULD CONTACT ME TO REFUND THE COST OF MY REPAIR. ON JUNE 29, 2006, I LEARNED THAT NHTSA HAD CLOSED THE MATTER ON …
Read full complaint
ABOUT ONE YEAR AGO I FILED A COMPLAINT WITH BOTH NISSAN AND THE NHTSA CONCERNING A PUNCTURED FUEL TANK. NISSAN INFORMED ME THAT IN THE EVENT NHTSA REQUIRED A RECALL WITH RESPECT TO THE FUEL DELIVERY SYSTEM, NISSAN WOULD CONTACT ME TO REFUND THE COST OF MY REPAIR. ON JUNE 29, 2006, I LEARNED THAT NHTSA HAD CLOSED THE MATTER ON JANUARY 31, 2006, WITH A REQUIREMENT THAT NISSAN CORRECT THE DEFICIENCY THROUGH A RECALL CAMPAIGN. I CONFIRMED WITH A NHTSA REPRESENTATIVE THAT SUCH A CAMPAIGN HAD BEEN INITIATED BY NISSAN. I NEVER RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FROM NISSAN. NOR DID I RECEIVE A COMMUNICATION FROM NISSAN THAT THEY WOULD LIVE UP TO THEIR PROMISE OF REIMBURSEMENT. (THEY HAVE NOW SAID THEY WILL DO SO WITH PROOF OF REPAIR WHICH CAN ONLY BE CONFIRMED BY A NISSAN DEALER.) I CALLED NISSAN AND THEY ASKED WHETHER I HAD MOVED OR CHANGED THE REGISTRATION ON THE VEHICLE. I RESPONDED NO, NOTHING HAD CHANGED SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE NEW AT LUTHER NISSAN IN INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA. THE NISSAN REPRESENTATIVE (GRACE) IN HYDERABAD, INDIA, WHO DID AN EXCELLENT JOB OF TAKING MY INFORMATION, INFORMED ME THAT THERE WERE NOT ONE, BUT TWO RECALLS ON THE VEHICLE. THE SECOND ONE CONCERNS THE SEAT BELTS. I NEVER RECEIVED NOTICE OF THIS RECALL EITHER. HERE WE HAVE NOT ONE BUT TWO SAFETY-RELATED NHTSA RECALLS THAT THIS NISSAN CUSTOMER (THIS IS MY FOURTH NISSAN AUTOMOBILE) HAS FAILED TO RECEIVE THE RECALL NOTICES ON. INTERESTINGLY, NISSAN HAS NO PROBLEM WITH SENDING MY MONTHLY BILL FOR NISSAN FINANCING THROUGH APPROXIMATELY 25 MONTHS TO GET MY BILLS TO ME. THIS IS HIGHLY TROUBLING AND REQUIRES IMMEDIATE CORRECTION ON NISSAN'S PART. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10161082
Mileage unknown · Jun 24, 2006
Structure
EVERY TIME I GET OUT OF MY CAR, PLACE MY FEET ON THE GROUND, AND THEN TOUCH METAL THAT BEING THE CAR FRAME OR CAR DOOR, I GET SHOCKED. THE ONLY WAY I DO NOT GET SHOCKED IS BY TOUCHING THE METAL CONTINUOUSLY AS I PLACE MY FEET ON THE GROUND AND THEN I AM ABLE TO CLOSE THE DOOR WITHOUT GETTING SHOCKED. THE ONLY OTHER TIME I DO N…
Read full complaint
EVERY TIME I GET OUT OF MY CAR, PLACE MY FEET ON THE GROUND, AND THEN TOUCH METAL THAT BEING THE CAR FRAME OR CAR DOOR, I GET SHOCKED. THE ONLY WAY I DO NOT GET SHOCKED IS BY TOUCHING THE METAL CONTINUOUSLY AS I PLACE MY FEET ON THE GROUND AND THEN I AM ABLE TO CLOSE THE DOOR WITHOUT GETTING SHOCKED. THE ONLY OTHER TIME I DO NOT GET SHOCKED IS WHEN IT IS RAINING. THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN WHEN I GET OUT OF ANY OTHER CAR. I AM BEGINNING TO HATE MY CAR BECAUSE OF THIS. WHY IS IT DOING THIS. I HAVE TOLD THE PEOPLE AT THE DEALERSHIP WHEN I GET MY OIL CHANGED AND THEY HAVE NO ANSWERS AND DO NOT SEEM INTERESTED IN CHECKING INTO THIS. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10160678
Mileage unknown · Jun 14, 2006
Fuel System, Gasoline
I RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE FUEL TANK RECALL FOR MY 2004 NISSAN MURANO,HOWEVER, NEW CITY NISSAN IS NOT PROVIDING THE RECALL SERVICE SATISFACTORILY. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10159864
25,003 miles · Jun 14, 2006
Power Train
2004 NISSAN MURANO SL 2WD MODEL JUST CAME TO A STOP WHILE DRIVING,RESTARTED THE ENGINE THEN PUT THE CAR IN DRIVE AND ENGINE STALLS OUT,TRIED THIS OVER & OVER AGAIN BUT IT CONTINUES TO STALL. I IMMEDIATELY HAD THE CAR TOWED TO THE DEALER AND THREE DAYS LATER THEY INFORMED ME THAT THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FAILED (ONLY 25003 MILE…
Read full complaint
2004 NISSAN MURANO SL 2WD MODEL JUST CAME TO A STOP WHILE DRIVING,RESTARTED THE ENGINE THEN PUT THE CAR IN DRIVE AND ENGINE STALLS OUT,TRIED THIS OVER & OVER AGAIN BUT IT CONTINUES TO STALL. I IMMEDIATELY HAD THE CAR TOWED TO THE DEALER AND THREE DAYS LATER THEY INFORMED ME THAT THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FAILED (ONLY 25003 MILES). THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION WAS REPLACED BUT NO ONE AT NISSAN EVER TOLD ME WHAT CAUSED THE FAILURE OR GAVE ME ANY CONFIDENCE THAT THIS PROBLEM WILL NOT OCCUR AGAIN SOON. THIS WAS MY WIFE'S CAR AND JUST STOPPING WITHOUT ANY WARNING ON A BUSY FREEWAY COULD HAVE RESULTED IN SOMEONE RUNNING INTO HER BEING UNAWARE THAT HER CAR HAS BROKEN DOWN. UNFORTUNATELY NISSAN DOESN'T MAKE THESE CVT TRANSMISSION SO THEIR MECHANICS I'M TOLD DO ONLY REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT (JATCO MAKES THE MURANO TRANSMISSION). *JB
NHTSA ODI #10159776
7,000 miles · May 30, 2006
Air BagsSeat BeltsCrashInjury
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 40 TO 45 MPH ON A GRAVEL ROAD DOWN A STEEP DECLINE, BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE WAS LOST CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO ROLL SEVERAL TIMES. THE VEHICLE LANDED ON THE PASSENGER SIDE AND THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. SEAT BELTS WERE IN USE HOWEVER A THORACIC DISC FRACTURE AND A SE…
Read full complaint
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 40 TO 45 MPH ON A GRAVEL ROAD DOWN A STEEP DECLINE, BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE WAS LOST CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO ROLL SEVERAL TIMES. THE VEHICLE LANDED ON THE PASSENGER SIDE AND THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. SEAT BELTS WERE IN USE HOWEVER A THORACIC DISC FRACTURE AND A SEVER CUT ABOVE THE EYE WERE SUSTAINED BY THE OCCUPANTS. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED AT THE SCENE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DEEMED TOTALED. UPDATED 10/30/2006 - THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10158587
24,000 miles · Apr 24, 2006
Fuel System, Gasoline
SOMETHING ON THE ROAD PUNCTURED GAS TANK. NOTICED GAS SMELL IN DRIVEWAY & SAW THE DAMAGE. REPLACED GAS TANK AT NISSAN DEALERSHIP LOOKING FOR COMPENSATION DUE TO RECALL ALSO STILL NEEDS SHIELD PUT IN. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10155991
Mileage unknown · Apr 18, 2006
Electrical SystemPower Train
HAD THE ALTERNATOR REPLACED ON A RECALL - SUBSEQUENT THE VEHICLE STOPPED 3 TIMES WITHOUT WARNING IN TRAFFIC - TRANSMISSION NOT ENGAGED AND NO POWER - ROLLED TO STOP ON HIGHWAY AND BATTERY IS DEAD SO CANNOT RESTART - RETURNED TO DEALER TWICE AND FIRST SAID THEY HAD FORGOT TO REFLASH THE ENGINE AFTER THE RECALL INSTALLATION OF THE…
Read full complaint
HAD THE ALTERNATOR REPLACED ON A RECALL - SUBSEQUENT THE VEHICLE STOPPED 3 TIMES WITHOUT WARNING IN TRAFFIC - TRANSMISSION NOT ENGAGED AND NO POWER - ROLLED TO STOP ON HIGHWAY AND BATTERY IS DEAD SO CANNOT RESTART - RETURNED TO DEALER TWICE AND FIRST SAID THEY HAD FORGOT TO REFLASH THE ENGINE AFTER THE RECALL INSTALLATION OF THE ALTERNATOR - AFTER THAT IT STOPPED AGAIN IN TRAFFIC WITHOUT WARNING FOR THE THIRD TIME - RETURNED TO DEALER AND THEY SAID THIS TIME THE ALTERNATOR CABLE WAS LOOSE - SINCE I FELT THE VEHICLE UNSAFE TO DRIVE, I ASKED THEY CONTACT NISSAN AT LEAST FOR A NEW ALTERNATOR AND WAS WILLING TO TRY ONE LAST TIME - NISSAN SERVICE REFUSED TO HELP AND THEN I CONSIDERED THE VEHICLE UNSAFE TO DRIVE - UNFORTUNATELY I AM ABLE VIA OUR LEASE COMPANY TO DISPOSE OF THIS VEHICLE AND GET ANOTHER - PLEASE CHECK YOUR RECORDS BECAUSE IN MY CASE, THE PROBLEMS STARTED AFTER THE ALTERNATOR CHANGE AND IT IS VERY DANGEROUS TO STALL UNEXPECTEDLY IN FREEWAY TRAFFIC - ALL HAPPENED IN FIRST QUARTER 2006 - SERVICE DETAILS AVAILABLE IF REQUESTED. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10155574
40,000 miles · Apr 4, 2006
Engine And Engine Cooling
HEARD NOISE FROM ENGINE COMPARTMENT. UPON INVESTIGATION NOTICED IDLE PULLEY WAS VIBRATING AND MAKE THE SOUND. I INVESTIGATED ONLINE AT WWW.NISSANMURANO.ORG FOR SIMILAR PROBLEMS. I FOUND A SERIES OF REPORTS THAT THE BRACKET THAT HOLDS THE IDLE PULLEY WAS BROKEN. I DISASSEMBLE THE PULLEY AND FOUND THE BRACKET BROKEN. UPON EXAMI…
Read full complaint
HEARD NOISE FROM ENGINE COMPARTMENT. UPON INVESTIGATION NOTICED IDLE PULLEY WAS VIBRATING AND MAKE THE SOUND. I INVESTIGATED ONLINE AT WWW.NISSANMURANO.ORG FOR SIMILAR PROBLEMS. I FOUND A SERIES OF REPORTS THAT THE BRACKET THAT HOLDS THE IDLE PULLEY WAS BROKEN. I DISASSEMBLE THE PULLEY AND FOUND THE BRACKET BROKEN. UPON EXAMINATION OF HOW THE BRACKET BROKE SEEM THAT THE BRACKET IS UNDERDESIGNED. THE CRACK SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT THE BRACKET BROKE BY BENDING FATIGUE. I SAVED ALL THE BRACKET PIECES AND I GOING TO EVALUATE UNDER A MICROSCOPE. THE FAILURE TO THIS IDLE PULLEY COULD LEAD TO AN ALTERNATOR NOT PROVIDING ENERGY TO THE CAR AND A MORE SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10154563
31,000 miles · Dec 22, 2005
Electrical System
DT: THE CONTACT STATED THE CHARGER WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. HE IMMEDIATELY TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALERSHIP. HE SPOKE WITH HALF A DOZEN PEOPLE IN THE DEALERSHIP, WHO STATED THEY WERE UNAWARE OF ANY PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE IN REGARD TO THE LIGHTS. THE NEXT MORNING HE CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO MAKE AN AP…
Read full complaint
DT: THE CONTACT STATED THE CHARGER WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. HE IMMEDIATELY TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALERSHIP. HE SPOKE WITH HALF A DOZEN PEOPLE IN THE DEALERSHIP, WHO STATED THEY WERE UNAWARE OF ANY PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE IN REGARD TO THE LIGHTS. THE NEXT MORNING HE CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR SERVICE. UPON LOOKING UP THE VIN,THEY FOUND THERE WAS RECALL 05V319000 CONCERNING THE ALTERNATOR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THE WORK WAS PERFORMED. APPROXIMATELY 24 DAYS LATER HE RECEIVED THE RECALL LETTER CONCERNING THE ALTERNATOR. THE CONTACT WAS CONCERNED THAT HE DID NOT RECEIVE THE LETTER IN A TIMELY MANNER, AND THEY ONLY SENT IT BECAUSE OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER HAS NOT BEEN CONTACTED . *AK UPDATED 3/17/2006 - THE RECALL LETTER WAS RECEIVED FOUR MONTH AFTER THE FAILURE OCCURRED. WHEN THE ALTERNATOR FAILED THE VEHICLE WENT INTO SAFE MODE AND COULD NOT BE DRIVE FORWARD, ONLY IN REVERSE. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10145905
Official recalls
4May 19, 2009
NISSAN IS RECALLING 362,891 MY 2003-2007 MURANO VEHICLES. THE INTAKE AIR DUCTS, WHICH ARE CONNECTED TO THE INTERMEDIATE RESONATOR IN THE AIR INTAKE SYSTEM OF THE ENGINE, MAY SEPARATE FROM THE RESONATOR WITH ENGINE MOVEMENT. THIS SEPARATION OCCURS DUE TO THE PREMATURE AGING OF THE MATERIAL USED IN THE INTAKE AIR DUCTS WHICH CAUSES EXCESSIVE SHRINKING.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: ENGINE MAY STALL INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE/REPAIR THE APPROPRIATE COMPONENTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Feb 13, 2006
ON SOME SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, IN CERTAIN HIGH SPEED FRONTAL CRASHES, THE WEBBING OF A REAR OUTBOARD SEAT BELT MAY CONTACT THE REAR SEAT BACK HINGE WHERE IT CAN BE CUT BY THE SHARP EDGE OF THE METAL PORTION OF THE HINGE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THE WEBBING IS COMPLETELY SEPARATED, IT CAN INCREASE THE RISK OF INJURY TO AN OCCUPANT IN A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL PROTECTORS OVER THE WEBBING OF THE REAR SEAT BELTS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 20, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Jan 10, 2006
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE FORWARD EDGE OF THE FUEL TANK, IN THE EVENT THAT A VEHICLE FRONT TIRE RUNS OVER A SMALL, SHARP OBJECT IN THE ROAD, CATCHES IT AND PROPELS IT TOWARDS THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE, IT MAY STRIKE AND PUNCTURE THE FUEL TANK.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A PUNCTURED TANK COULD INCREASE THE RISK OF A FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL PROTECTORS IN FRONT OF THE TANK FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 20, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Jul 14, 2005
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT A WIRE BREAKING INSIDE THE ALTERNATOR COULD STOP THE BATTERY FROM CHARGING.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGER WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL IMMEDIATELY COME ON AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE. AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL GO INTO A "FALL SAFE" CONDITION WHICH WILL LIMIT VEHICLE SPEED. THE ENGINE WILL STOP RUNNING WHICH COULD RESULT IN A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE THE ALTERNATOR WITH A NEW VERSION WHICH HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF THE COIL. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 1, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
4PE08065 · Driver Seat Anchor Failure
Opened Nov 18, 2008 · Closed Jul 2, 2009
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seats
THIS INVESTIGATION CONCERNS STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE ANCHOR/BRACKET ON THE LEFT REAR SIDE OF THE DRIVER'S SEAT.THE CONCERN IS THAT SUCH FAILURES MAY ALTER THE DRIVER'S SEATED POSITION SO AS TO REDUCE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OCCUPANT PROTECTION SYSTEM OR POTENTIALLY COMPROMISE VEHICLE CONTROL.FAILURE OF THE SUBJECT ANCHOR BRACKET RESULTS FROM METAL FATIGUE AND CAUSES REARWARD TILTING OF THE DRIVER'S SEAT.THESE FAILURES USUALLY OCCUR DURING DRIVER INGRESS BUT MAY ALSO OCCUR WHILE THE VEHICLE IS BEING OPERATED.THE SAFETY RELATED CONCERNS DURING ACTUAL VEHICLE USE WERE NOT VALIDATED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.WHILE THE NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS OF THIS PROBLEM IS RELATIVELY HIGH, ONLY THREE VERY MINOR, UNDOCUMENTED INJURIES WERE REPORTED.THE REPORTED INJURIES OCCURRED DURING DRIVER INGRESS, NOT WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION.INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED THAT THE APPARENT RISK OF COMPROMISE TO VEHICLE CONTROL HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED.INVESTIGATION ALSO DISCLOSED THAT THE APPARENT RISK OF COLLAPSE OF THE DRIVER'S SEAT BACK HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATEDA SAFETY RELATED DEFECT TREND WAS NOT IDENTIFIED AND THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
PE05050 · Fuel Tank Punctures From Road Debris
Opened Sep 13, 2005 · Closed Jan 31, 2006
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly; Fuel System, Other:storage:tank Assembly
ODI OPENED A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION BASED ON FOUR VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES (VOQ'S) INDICATING THAT THE FUEL TANKS WEREPUNCTURED BY ROAD DEBRIS UNDER NORMAL, NON OFF-ROAD DRIVING CONDITIONS.AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2005, THE COMPLAINT TOTAL INCREASED TO 12.NISSAN SUPPLIED ODI WITH 31 COMPLAINTS OF FUEL TANK PUNCTURES, INCLUDING 26 NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO ODI FROM THE VOQ RECORDS. IN A LETTER DATED JANUARY 9, 2006, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. NOTIFIED ODI OF ITS PLAN TO RECALL APPROXIMATELY 209,000 MODEL YEAR 2003 - 2006 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES BUILT FROM APRIL 24, 2002 (START OF PRODUCTION OF MY 2003) THROUGH NOVEMBER 24, 2005 (INCLUDING A PORTION OF MY 2006 VEHICLES) TO CORRECT A DEFICIENCY IN FUEL TANK SHIELDING FROM ROAD DEBRIS.THIS RECALL HAS BEEN DESIGNATED NHTSA NO. 06V-003.RECALLED VEHICLES WILL BE FITTED WITH PROTECTIVE SHIELDING FOR THE FRONTAL PORTION OF THE FUEL TANK TO REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF PUNCTURE BY PROJECTILES FROM THE FRONT WHEELS.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly
ODI OPENED A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION BASED ON FOUR VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES (VOQ'S) INDICATING THAT THE FUEL TANKS WEREPUNCTURED BY ROAD DEBRIS UNDER NORMAL, NON OFF-ROAD DRIVING CONDITIONS.AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2005, THE COMPLAINT TOTAL INCREASED TO 12.NISSAN SUPPLIED ODI WITH 31 COMPLAINTS OF FUEL TANK PUNCTURES, INCLUDING 26 NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO ODI FROM THE VOQ RECORDS. IN A LETTER DATED JANUARY 9, 2006, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. NOTIFIED ODI OF ITS PLAN TO RECALL APPROXIMATELY 209,000 MODEL YEAR 2003 - 2006 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES BUILT FROM APRIL 24, 2002 (START OF PRODUCTION OF MY 2003) THROUGH NOVEMBER 24, 2005 (INCLUDING A PORTION OF MY 2006 VEHICLES) TO CORRECT A DEFICIENCY IN FUEL TANK SHIELDING FROM ROAD DEBRIS.THIS RECALL HAS BEEN DESIGNATED NHTSA NO. 06V-003.RECALLED VEHICLES WILL BE FITTED WITH PROTECTIVE SHIELDING FOR THE FRONTAL PORTION OF THE FUEL TANK TO REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF PUNCTURE BY PROJECTILES FROM THE FRONT WHEELS.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
Fuel System, Other:storage:tank Assembly
ODI OPENED A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION BASED ON FOUR VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES (VOQ'S) INDICATING THAT THE FUEL TANKS WEREPUNCTURED BY ROAD DEBRIS UNDER NORMAL, NON OFF-ROAD DRIVING CONDITIONS.AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2005, THE COMPLAINT TOTAL INCREASED TO 12.NISSAN SUPPLIED ODI WITH 31 COMPLAINTS OF FUEL TANK PUNCTURES, INCLUDING 26 NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO ODI FROM THE VOQ RECORDS. IN A LETTER DATED JANUARY 9, 2006, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. NOTIFIED ODI OF ITS PLAN TO RECALL APPROXIMATELY 209,000 MODEL YEAR 2003 - 2006 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES BUILT FROM APRIL 24, 2002 (START OF PRODUCTION OF MY 2003) THROUGH NOVEMBER 24, 2005 (INCLUDING A PORTION OF MY 2006 VEHICLES) TO CORRECT A DEFICIENCY IN FUEL TANK SHIELDING FROM ROAD DEBRIS.THIS RECALL HAS BEEN DESIGNATED NHTSA NO. 06V-003.RECALLED VEHICLES WILL BE FITTED WITH PROTECTIVE SHIELDING FOR THE FRONTAL PORTION OF THE FUEL TANK TO REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF PUNCTURE BY PROJECTILES FROM THE FRONT WHEELS.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
EA05006 · Alternator Failure / Engine Stalling
Opened Mar 25, 2005 · Closed Aug 17, 2005
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System; Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator
ODI RECEIVED 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE ON MY 2003-2004 MURANO (SUBJECT) VEHICLES.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.BASED ON THESE COMPLAINTS, ODI OPENED PE04-077 AND LATER UPGRADED TO EA05-006 FOR THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.DURING EA05-006, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WERE IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE.ON JULY 12, 2005, NISSAN NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SAFETY DEFECT ON MY 2003-2005 MURANO VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM APRIL 8, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 (RECALL 05V-319).THE NOTIFICATION STATED THAT AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ALTERNATOR CAN OCCUR DUE TO WIRE FATIGUE CAUSED BY MOVEMENT OF THE ROTOR COIL DURING RAPID CHANGES IN ENGINE SPEED IN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION (CVT).HIGHER ENGINE COMPARTMENT TEMPERATURE IN THE MURANO COMPARED TO OTHER NISSAN MODELS MAY ALSO BE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE WIRE FATIGUE.NISSAN ALSO REPORTED THAT WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGE WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL ILLUMINATE AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE.AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL THEN ENTER A FAIL SAFE MODE THAT LIMITS VEHICLE SPEED.VERY SHORTLY AFTER REACHING THIS CONDITION, THE ENGINE WILL STOP.NHTSA'S TESTING, HOWEVER, SHOWED THAT ALTHOUGH THE WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATE, THE VEHICLE SPEED IS LIMITED TO ONLY 4-7 MPH RATHER THAN WHAT NHTSA CONSIDERS A FAIL SAFE MODE. NISSAN WILL INSTRUCT OWNERS TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO ANY NISSAN DEALER FOR AN ALTERNATOR INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT, IF REQUIRED.NOTE:SOME VEHICLES MAY HAVE HAD THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALTERNATOR PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED UNDER WARRANTY.CONSEQUENTLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.ODI WILL MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator
ODI RECEIVED 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE ON MY 2003-2004 MURANO (SUBJECT) VEHICLES.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.BASED ON THESE COMPLAINTS, ODI OPENED PE04-077 AND LATER UPGRADED TO EA05-006 FOR THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.DURING EA05-006, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WERE IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE.ON JULY 12, 2005, NISSAN NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SAFETY DEFECT ON MY 2003-2005 MURANO VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM APRIL 8, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 (RECALL 05V-319).THE NOTIFICATION STATED THAT AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ALTERNATOR CAN OCCUR DUE TO WIRE FATIGUE CAUSED BY MOVEMENT OF THE ROTOR COIL DURING RAPID CHANGES IN ENGINE SPEED IN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION (CVT).HIGHER ENGINE COMPARTMENT TEMPERATURE IN THE MURANO COMPARED TO OTHER NISSAN MODELS MAY ALSO BE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE WIRE FATIGUE.NISSAN ALSO REPORTED THAT WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGE WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL ILLUMINATE AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE.AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL THEN ENTER A FAIL SAFE MODE THAT LIMITS VEHICLE SPEED.VERY SHORTLY AFTER REACHING THIS CONDITION, THE ENGINE WILL STOP.NHTSA'S TESTING, HOWEVER, SHOWED THAT ALTHOUGH THE WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATE, THE VEHICLE SPEED IS LIMITED TO ONLY 4-7 MPH RATHER THAN WHAT NHTSA CONSIDERS A FAIL SAFE MODE. NISSAN WILL INSTRUCT OWNERS TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO ANY NISSAN DEALER FOR AN ALTERNATOR INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT, IF REQUIRED.NOTE:SOME VEHICLES MAY HAVE HAD THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALTERNATOR PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED UNDER WARRANTY.CONSEQUENTLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.ODI WILL MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED.
Electrical System
ODI RECEIVED 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE ON MY 2003-2004 MURANO (SUBJECT) VEHICLES.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.BASED ON THESE COMPLAINTS, ODI OPENED PE04-077 AND LATER UPGRADED TO EA05-006 FOR THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.DURING EA05-006, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WERE IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE.ON JULY 12, 2005, NISSAN NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SAFETY DEFECT ON MY 2003-2005 MURANO VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM APRIL 8, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 (RECALL 05V-319).THE NOTIFICATION STATED THAT AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ALTERNATOR CAN OCCUR DUE TO WIRE FATIGUE CAUSED BY MOVEMENT OF THE ROTOR COIL DURING RAPID CHANGES IN ENGINE SPEED IN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION (CVT).HIGHER ENGINE COMPARTMENT TEMPERATURE IN THE MURANO COMPARED TO OTHER NISSAN MODELS MAY ALSO BE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE WIRE FATIGUE.NISSAN ALSO REPORTED THAT WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGE WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL ILLUMINATE AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE.AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL THEN ENTER A FAIL SAFE MODE THAT LIMITS VEHICLE SPEED.VERY SHORTLY AFTER REACHING THIS CONDITION, THE ENGINE WILL STOP.NHTSA'S TESTING, HOWEVER, SHOWED THAT ALTHOUGH THE WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATE, THE VEHICLE SPEED IS LIMITED TO ONLY 4-7 MPH RATHER THAN WHAT NHTSA CONSIDERS A FAIL SAFE MODE. NISSAN WILL INSTRUCT OWNERS TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO ANY NISSAN DEALER FOR AN ALTERNATOR INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT, IF REQUIRED.NOTE:SOME VEHICLES MAY HAVE HAD THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALTERNATOR PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED UNDER WARRANTY.CONSEQUENTLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.ODI WILL MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED.
PE04077 · Alternator Failure/ Engine Stalling
Opened Nov 19, 2004 · Closed Mar 25, 2005
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System; Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator
ODI OPENED PE04-077 BASED ON 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.DURING PE04-077, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WAS IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE . DURING THE INVESTIGATION, NISSAN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE HAD BEEN ALTERNATOR WARRANTY REPLACEMENTS DUE TO AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ROTOR COIL CAUSED BY WIRE FATIGUE. ODI?S ANALYSIS SHOWS FAILURE RATES THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO ODI AND INDICATES THAT THE ALLEGED DEFECT IS CONTINUING TO OCCUR IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.ODI'S ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE ALTERNATOR WARRANTY CLAIMS SUBMITTED RESULTED IN ENGINE STALLS AND AT LEAST 25% OF THE ENGINE STALLS RESULTED IN A NO RESTART CONDITION.HOWEVER, IN 71% OF THE WARRANTY DATA SUBMITTED, ODI HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE CONSUMER COULD RESTART THE VEHICLE.THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS CONCERN, TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL SAFETY-RELATED CONSEQUENCES, AND TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE AFFECTED POPULATION.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator
ODI OPENED PE04-077 BASED ON 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.DURING PE04-077, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WAS IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE . DURING THE INVESTIGATION, NISSAN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE HAD BEEN ALTERNATOR WARRANTY REPLACEMENTS DUE TO AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ROTOR COIL CAUSED BY WIRE FATIGUE. ODI?S ANALYSIS SHOWS FAILURE RATES THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO ODI AND INDICATES THAT THE ALLEGED DEFECT IS CONTINUING TO OCCUR IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.ODI'S ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE ALTERNATOR WARRANTY CLAIMS SUBMITTED RESULTED IN ENGINE STALLS AND AT LEAST 25% OF THE ENGINE STALLS RESULTED IN A NO RESTART CONDITION.HOWEVER, IN 71% OF THE WARRANTY DATA SUBMITTED, ODI HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE CONSUMER COULD RESTART THE VEHICLE.THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS CONCERN, TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL SAFETY-RELATED CONSEQUENCES, AND TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE AFFECTED POPULATION.
Electrical System
ODI OPENED PE04-077 BASED ON 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.DURING PE04-077, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WAS IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE . DURING THE INVESTIGATION, NISSAN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE HAD BEEN ALTERNATOR WARRANTY REPLACEMENTS DUE TO AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ROTOR COIL CAUSED BY WIRE FATIGUE. ODI?S ANALYSIS SHOWS FAILURE RATES THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO ODI AND INDICATES THAT THE ALLEGED DEFECT IS CONTINUING TO OCCUR IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.ODI'S ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE ALTERNATOR WARRANTY CLAIMS SUBMITTED RESULTED IN ENGINE STALLS AND AT LEAST 25% OF THE ENGINE STALLS RESULTED IN A NO RESTART CONDITION.HOWEVER, IN 71% OF THE WARRANTY DATA SUBMITTED, ODI HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE CONSUMER COULD RESTART THE VEHICLE.THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS CONCERN, TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL SAFETY-RELATED CONSEQUENCES, AND TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE AFFECTED POPULATION.
Illustration