FAILURE OF DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK ACTUATOR AND GAS CAP DOOR LOCK ACTUATOR ON A 2004 NISSAN MURANO. THE FAILURE OF MY GAS CAP DOOR ACTUATOR MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO REFUEL THE VEHICLE WHICH COULD HAVE LEFT ME STRANDED. THE FAILURE OF MY DRIVER DOOR LOCK ACTUATOR CAUSED ME TO BELIEVE MY DOOR WAS LOCKED WHEN IN FACT IT WAS UNLOCKED.…
Read full complaint
FAILURE OF DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK ACTUATOR AND GAS CAP DOOR LOCK ACTUATOR ON A 2004 NISSAN MURANO. THE FAILURE OF MY GAS CAP DOOR ACTUATOR MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO REFUEL THE VEHICLE WHICH COULD HAVE LEFT ME STRANDED. THE FAILURE OF MY DRIVER DOOR LOCK ACTUATOR CAUSED ME TO BELIEVE MY DOOR WAS LOCKED WHEN IN FACT IT WAS UNLOCKED...THIS FAILURE EXPOSED ME TO A PERSONAL SAFETY BREACH. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10241039
25,000 miles · Aug 25, 2008
Latches/locks/linkages
POWER LOCKS FAIL ON THE DRIVERS DOOR FOR NISSAN MURANO 2004 MODEL. THIS IS BECOMING A COMMON PROBLEM BASED ON DRIVER REPORTS. IT PRESENTS A SAFETY AND SECURITY RISK WHEN THE LOCK SWITCH FAILS TO ACTIVATE ONE OF THE DOORS. NISSAN NEEDS TO RECOGNIZE IT AND RECALL IT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10239727
62,000 miles · Aug 24, 2008
Latches/locks/linkages
WITHIN A FEW DAYS ALL FOUR DOOR LOCK STOPPED LOCKING OR UNLOCKING AUTOMATICALLY USING THE REMOTE OR THE DOOR SWITCH. THE ONLY WAY TO LOCK OR UNLOCK THE DOORS WAS MANUALLY. I TOOK IT INTO THE DEALERSHIP FOR DIAGNOSIS AND THEY SAID THAT ALL FOUR ACTUATORS WENT OUT AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AT A COST OF $1600. THEY SAID THEY REP…
Read full complaint
WITHIN A FEW DAYS ALL FOUR DOOR LOCK STOPPED LOCKING OR UNLOCKING AUTOMATICALLY USING THE REMOTE OR THE DOOR SWITCH. THE ONLY WAY TO LOCK OR UNLOCK THE DOORS WAS MANUALLY. I TOOK IT INTO THE DEALERSHIP FOR DIAGNOSIS AND THEY SAID THAT ALL FOUR ACTUATORS WENT OUT AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AT A COST OF $1600. THEY SAID THEY REPLACE FUEL LOCK ACTUATORS ALMOST WEEKLY AND DOOR LOCK ACTUATORS VERY FREQUENTLY BUT USUALLY NOT ALL FOUR A THE SAME TIME. I FOUND IT REALLY HARD TO BELIEVE THAT FOUR INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS WOULD GO OUT ALL WITHIN THE SAME WEEK. I PLACED A POSTING ON A FORUM AND WAS AMAZED AT THE RESPONSE OF THE SAME PROBLEM. IT IS A DEFINIATE SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUE WHEN YOU IN THE CAR BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF ALL DOORS ARE LOCKED UNTIL YOU LOOK AT EVERYONE OF THEM AND THEN YOU AREN'T REALLY SURE. IT ALSO IS A SAFETY/SECURITY ISSUE WHEN YOU ARE OUTSIDE THE VEHICLE BECAUSE THE MURANO ONLY HAS ONE EXTERNAL KEY LOCK. IT IS ALSO VERY INCONVENIENT. NISSAN KNOWING THERE IS A SECURITY PROBLEM WITH THEIR LOCKING MECHANISM AND NOT RECALLING THEM FOR SAFETY CONCERN IS NEGLIGENT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10239506
61,000 miles · Aug 23, 2008
Latches/locks/linkages
DOOR LOCKS, REAR HATCH LOCK AND GAS CAP LOCK WILL NOT LOCK OR UNLOCK ON A REGULAR BASIS. I HAVE SPOKE TO MANY OTHERS HAVING THE SAME FAILURE WITH THE SOLENOIDS IN THE LOCK MECHANISM NOT FUNCTIONING RELIABLY. THIS IS A HUGE SAFETY FACTOR, NOT HAVING THE SECURITY OF A LOCKED DOOR, ALLOWING ANYONE ACCESS AT WILL. I CAN'T BELIEVE…
Read full complaint
DOOR LOCKS, REAR HATCH LOCK AND GAS CAP LOCK WILL NOT LOCK OR UNLOCK ON A REGULAR BASIS. I HAVE SPOKE TO MANY OTHERS HAVING THE SAME FAILURE WITH THE SOLENOIDS IN THE LOCK MECHANISM NOT FUNCTIONING RELIABLY. THIS IS A HUGE SAFETY FACTOR, NOT HAVING THE SECURITY OF A LOCKED DOOR, ALLOWING ANYONE ACCESS AT WILL. I CAN'T BELIEVE NISSAN CONTINUES TO DENY THERE IS A SAFETY PROBLEM WITH THESE LOCKS WITH SO MANY HAVING IDENTICAL PROBLEMS. IT'S ONLY A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE SOMEONE WILL LOSE THEIR LIFE OR BE INJURED FROM THIS LACK OF SECURITY FROM THE DOOR LOCKS MALFUNCTIONING. I FILE THIS COMPLIANT TO LET THE NHTSA KNOW OF THE PROBLEM AND SHARE THIS WITH NISSAN TO HOPEFULLY CONVINCE THEM TO TAKE THIS MORE SERIOUSLY AND RECALL THE CARS TO MAKE THE SAFE AND SECURE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10239487
Mileage unknown · Jan 6, 2008
Latches/locks/linkages
THE DRIVER'S DOOR WILL LOCK INTERMITTENTLY ON ITS OWN. NO OTHER DOORS SO THIS. IT CAUSES A LOT OF INCONVENIENCE AND HAS BEEN A SAFETY ISSUE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. SEVERAL TIMES THE CAR WAS NOT LOCKED WHEN I THOUGHT IT WAS BECAUSE I TESTED THE SELF-LOCKED DRIVER'S DOOR. MY NIECE HAS THE EXACT SAME VEHICLE WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. BO…
Read full complaint
THE DRIVER'S DOOR WILL LOCK INTERMITTENTLY ON ITS OWN. NO OTHER DOORS SO THIS. IT CAUSES A LOT OF INCONVENIENCE AND HAS BEEN A SAFETY ISSUE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. SEVERAL TIMES THE CAR WAS NOT LOCKED WHEN I THOUGHT IT WAS BECAUSE I TESTED THE SELF-LOCKED DRIVER'S DOOR. MY NIECE HAS THE EXACT SAME VEHICLE WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. BOTH HER DEALER AND MINE HAVE EACH DENIED THERE IS ANY PROBLEM OR SERVICE BULLETIN WITH THIS ISSUE. I ALSO NOTE THAT ANOTHER PARTY HAS REPORTED THE SAME PROBLEM. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10213834
41,854 miles · Sep 4, 2007
EquipmentLatches/locks/linkages
2004 NISSAN MURANO FRONT DOOR LOCKED WHEN CONSUMER OPENED IT. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DOOR STAYED LOCKED WHEN SHE OPENED THE DOOR AND REMAINED LOCKED UPON EXITING THE VEHICLE. *KB THE CONSUMER STATED ON A 95 DEGREE DAY, SHE HAD HER 5 MONTH OLD INFANT IN THE VEHICLE WHEN HER. HER INFANT STARTED TO CRY SO SHE PULLED INTO A PA…
Read full complaint
2004 NISSAN MURANO FRONT DOOR LOCKED WHEN CONSUMER OPENED IT. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DOOR STAYED LOCKED WHEN SHE OPENED THE DOOR AND REMAINED LOCKED UPON EXITING THE VEHICLE. *KB THE CONSUMER STATED ON A 95 DEGREE DAY, SHE HAD HER 5 MONTH OLD INFANT IN THE VEHICLE WHEN HER. HER INFANT STARTED TO CRY SO SHE PULLED INTO A PARKING LOT TO CALM HER DOWN WHILE EXITING THE VEHICLE TO RE-ENTER ON HER SON'S SIDE THE VEHICLE DOORS LOCKED AND WOULD NOT OPEN. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT SHE CALLED 911 AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OPENED THE VEHICLE BUT THE INFANT WAS CRYING HYSTERICALLY FOR 20 MINUTES AND LUCKILY THE CONSUMER HAD THE A/C BLOWING. THE CONSUMER STATED WOULD LIKE THE MANUFACTURER TO BE MADE AWARE OF THE DANGEROUS SITUATION AND TO BE REIMBURSED FOR THE FIXING THE LIFE THREATENING DEFECT. THE DEALER STATED A/C BELT WAS FRAYING. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10202630
3,000 miles · Sep 15, 2004
Latches/locks/linkages
THE REAR HATCH OF MY 2004 NISSAN MURANO SE HAS A HYDRAULIC LIFT THAT CAUSES THE REAR HATCH TO MOVE TO A FULLY OPENED POSITION WITHOUT ANY HUMAN ASSISTANCE (BEYOND PULLING ON THE EXTERNAL REAR HATCH LEVER TO INITIATE THE PROCESS).*AK ON SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2004, THE REAR HATCH HYDRAULICS FAILED ON 5 SEPARATE OCCASIONS TO LIF…
Read full complaint
THE REAR HATCH OF MY 2004 NISSAN MURANO SE HAS A HYDRAULIC LIFT THAT CAUSES THE REAR HATCH TO MOVE TO A FULLY OPENED POSITION WITHOUT ANY HUMAN ASSISTANCE (BEYOND PULLING ON THE EXTERNAL REAR HATCH LEVER TO INITIATE THE PROCESS).*AK ON SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2004, THE REAR HATCH HYDRAULICS FAILED ON 5 SEPARATE OCCASIONS TO LIFT THE HATCH OPEN BY MORE THAN A FEW INCHES. WHEN I MANUALLY LIFTED THE HATCH TO AN OPEN POSITION, THE TOP CENTER EDGE OF THE HATCH CAUGHT ON THE REAR CENTER EDGE OF THE ROOF, CAUSING BODY DAMAGE. MORE IMPORTANTLY, NOW THE HATCH WILL DOES NOT OPEN FULLY WITH ANY CONSISTENCY, EITHER AUTOMATICALLY OR MANUALLY DUE TO THE BODY DAMAGE. WHEN THE DAMAGED REAR HATCH TOP EDGE CATCHES ON THE REAR CENTER EDGE OF THE ROOF, ANYBODY TRYING TO EXIT THE VEHICLE THROUGH THE REAR WILL HAVE DIFFICULTY SQUEEZING THROUGH THE OPENING. I'M TRYING TO GET A NISSAN DEALERSHIP TO REPAIR THE DAMAGE (SURPRISE, SURPRISE, THEY ARE TRYING TO EXCLUDE COVERAGE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE FROM THE VEHICLE WARRANTY), BUT THOUGHT NHTSA SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE REAR HATCH FAILURE AND THE POTENTIAL FOR TRAPPING PEOPLE IN THE REAR.
NHTSA ODI #10091049
Mileage unknown · Sep 6, 2004
Latches/locks/linkages
IMMEDIATELY AFTER PURCHASING 2 SEPARATE 2004 MURANOS AROUND THE MIDDLE OF JULY 2004, WE HAD THE DRIVER-SIDE DOORS ON BOTH VEHICLES INTERMITTENTLY LOCK ABOUT 20% OF THE TIME. THE ENGINE CAN BE RUNNING OR NOT, THE KEY CAN BE IN THE IGNITION WITH THE ENGINE OFF, OR THE KEY CAN BE OUT OF THE IGNITION ENTIRELY. THREE SEPARATE FAMIL…
Read full complaint
IMMEDIATELY AFTER PURCHASING 2 SEPARATE 2004 MURANOS AROUND THE MIDDLE OF JULY 2004, WE HAD THE DRIVER-SIDE DOORS ON BOTH VEHICLES INTERMITTENTLY LOCK ABOUT 20% OF THE TIME. THE ENGINE CAN BE RUNNING OR NOT, THE KEY CAN BE IN THE IGNITION WITH THE ENGINE OFF, OR THE KEY CAN BE OUT OF THE IGNITION ENTIRELY. THREE SEPARATE FAMILY MEMBERS HAVE HAD THIS HAPPEN SEVERAL TIMES EACH ON BOTH CARS. FORTUNATELY, THERE HAVE BEEN NO DIRE CONSEQUENCES YET. I HAVE WALKED HOME FROM THE MAIL BOX TO GET THE SECOND KEY. MY WIFE AND HER FATHER HAVE BEEN AT A GAS STATION AND COULD ENTER THE CAR THROUGH ONE OF THE BACK DOORS. POTENTIAL SAFETY ISSUES: BEING COMPLETELY LOCKED OUT OF THE VEHICLE ON A ROAD IN THE DESERT WITH NO WATER AND UNABLE TO GET INTO THE CAR; MY WIFE BEING OUT ALONE AT NIGHT AND UNABLE TO GET INTO THE CAR FOR HER CELL PHONE TO CALL FOR HELP; A CHILD OR ANIMAL BEING LOCKED IN THE CAR IN THE HIGH HEAT IN THE ARIZONA DESERT (AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A REAL TRAGEDY). WE HAVE CONTACTED THE DEALERSHIP SEVERAL TIMES AND TAKEN THE CARS INTO THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT. OUR SERVICE MANAGER SAID HE BELIEVED IT WAS A DESIGN FLAW. APPARENTLY THERE HAD BEEN A SIMILAR PROBLEM WITH THE 2003 MURANOS, BUT NISSAN SAYS THIS HAS BEEN FIXED ON THE 2004 MODELS. IT HASN'T BEEN FIXED ON OURS. NISSAN'S CUSTOMER SERVICE CLAIMS THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER COMPLAINTS AND THAT WE (THE CONSUMER) WERE THE PROBLEM. IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE THAT THREE SEPARATE PERSONS ON TWO DIFFERENT CARS ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS HAVE THE SAME ISSUE IF THERE IS NOT A PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE. AND THIS IS WITH ALL OF US BEING MINDFUL OF THE PROBLEM AND BEING CAREFUL HOW WE CLOSE THE DOOR. AS A LAST RESORT, I HAVE WRITTEN A LETTER TO MR. CARLOS GHOSN, CEO OF NISSAN, N.A. APPRISING HIM OF OUR DIFFICULTY AND OF OUR INABILITY TO GET ANY HELP WHATSOEVER FROM NISSAN. IN SHORT, NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE. NO REPAIR HAS BEEN MADE. NISSAN HAS ESSENTIALLY INFORMED US THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM, WE DO. CAN YOU HELP? *AK
NISSAN IS RECALLING 362,891 MY 2003-2007 MURANO VEHICLES. THE INTAKE AIR DUCTS, WHICH ARE CONNECTED TO THE INTERMEDIATE RESONATOR IN THE AIR INTAKE SYSTEM OF THE ENGINE, MAY SEPARATE FROM THE RESONATOR WITH ENGINE MOVEMENT. THIS SEPARATION OCCURS DUE TO THE PREMATURE AGING OF THE MATERIAL USED IN THE INTAKE AIR DUCTS WHICH CAUSES EXCESSIVE SHRINKING.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: ENGINE MAY STALL INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE/REPAIR THE APPROPRIATE COMPONENTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
ON SOME SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, IN CERTAIN HIGH SPEED FRONTAL CRASHES, THE WEBBING OF A REAR OUTBOARD SEAT BELT MAY CONTACT THE REAR SEAT BACK HINGE WHERE IT CAN BE CUT BY THE SHARP EDGE OF THE METAL PORTION OF THE HINGE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THE WEBBING IS COMPLETELY SEPARATED, IT CAN INCREASE THE RISK OF INJURY TO AN OCCUPANT IN A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL PROTECTORS OVER THE WEBBING OF THE REAR SEAT BELTS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 20, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE FORWARD EDGE OF THE FUEL TANK, IN THE EVENT THAT A VEHICLE FRONT TIRE RUNS OVER A SMALL, SHARP OBJECT IN THE ROAD, CATCHES IT AND PROPELS IT TOWARDS THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE, IT MAY STRIKE AND PUNCTURE THE FUEL TANK.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A PUNCTURED TANK COULD INCREASE THE RISK OF A FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL PROTECTORS IN FRONT OF THE TANK FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 20, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT A WIRE BREAKING INSIDE THE ALTERNATOR COULD STOP THE BATTERY FROM CHARGING.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGER WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL IMMEDIATELY COME ON AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE. AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL GO INTO A "FALL SAFE" CONDITION WHICH WILL LIMIT VEHICLE SPEED. THE ENGINE WILL STOP RUNNING WHICH COULD RESULT IN A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE THE ALTERNATOR WITH A NEW VERSION WHICH HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF THE COIL. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 1, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
4
PE08065 · Driver Seat Anchor Failure
Opened Nov 18, 2008 · Closed Jul 2, 2009
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seats
THIS INVESTIGATION CONCERNS STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE ANCHOR/BRACKET ON THE LEFT REAR SIDE OF THE DRIVER'S SEAT.THE CONCERN IS THAT SUCH FAILURES MAY ALTER THE DRIVER'S SEATED POSITION SO AS TO REDUCE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OCCUPANT PROTECTION SYSTEM OR POTENTIALLY COMPROMISE VEHICLE CONTROL.FAILURE OF THE SUBJECT ANCHOR BRACKET RESULTS FROM METAL FATIGUE AND CAUSES REARWARD TILTING OF THE DRIVER'S SEAT.THESE FAILURES USUALLY OCCUR DURING DRIVER INGRESS BUT MAY ALSO OCCUR WHILE THE VEHICLE IS BEING OPERATED.THE SAFETY RELATED CONCERNS DURING ACTUAL VEHICLE USE WERE NOT VALIDATED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.WHILE THE NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS OF THIS PROBLEM IS RELATIVELY HIGH, ONLY THREE VERY MINOR, UNDOCUMENTED INJURIES WERE REPORTED.THE REPORTED INJURIES OCCURRED DURING DRIVER INGRESS, NOT WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION.INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED THAT THE APPARENT RISK OF COMPROMISE TO VEHICLE CONTROL HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED.INVESTIGATION ALSO DISCLOSED THAT THE APPARENT RISK OF COLLAPSE OF THE DRIVER'S SEAT BACK HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATEDA SAFETY RELATED DEFECT TREND WAS NOT IDENTIFIED AND THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
ODI OPENED A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION BASED ON FOUR VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES (VOQ'S) INDICATING THAT THE FUEL TANKS WEREPUNCTURED BY ROAD DEBRIS UNDER NORMAL, NON OFF-ROAD DRIVING CONDITIONS.AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2005, THE COMPLAINT TOTAL INCREASED TO 12.NISSAN SUPPLIED ODI WITH 31 COMPLAINTS OF FUEL TANK PUNCTURES, INCLUDING 26 NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO ODI FROM THE VOQ RECORDS. IN A LETTER DATED JANUARY 9, 2006, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. NOTIFIED ODI OF ITS PLAN TO RECALL APPROXIMATELY 209,000 MODEL YEAR 2003 - 2006 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES BUILT FROM APRIL 24, 2002 (START OF PRODUCTION OF MY 2003) THROUGH NOVEMBER 24, 2005 (INCLUDING A PORTION OF MY 2006 VEHICLES) TO CORRECT A DEFICIENCY IN FUEL TANK SHIELDING FROM ROAD DEBRIS.THIS RECALL HAS BEEN DESIGNATED NHTSA NO. 06V-003.RECALLED VEHICLES WILL BE FITTED WITH PROTECTIVE SHIELDING FOR THE FRONTAL PORTION OF THE FUEL TANK TO REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF PUNCTURE BY PROJECTILES FROM THE FRONT WHEELS.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly
ODI OPENED A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION BASED ON FOUR VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES (VOQ'S) INDICATING THAT THE FUEL TANKS WEREPUNCTURED BY ROAD DEBRIS UNDER NORMAL, NON OFF-ROAD DRIVING CONDITIONS.AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2005, THE COMPLAINT TOTAL INCREASED TO 12.NISSAN SUPPLIED ODI WITH 31 COMPLAINTS OF FUEL TANK PUNCTURES, INCLUDING 26 NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO ODI FROM THE VOQ RECORDS. IN A LETTER DATED JANUARY 9, 2006, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. NOTIFIED ODI OF ITS PLAN TO RECALL APPROXIMATELY 209,000 MODEL YEAR 2003 - 2006 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES BUILT FROM APRIL 24, 2002 (START OF PRODUCTION OF MY 2003) THROUGH NOVEMBER 24, 2005 (INCLUDING A PORTION OF MY 2006 VEHICLES) TO CORRECT A DEFICIENCY IN FUEL TANK SHIELDING FROM ROAD DEBRIS.THIS RECALL HAS BEEN DESIGNATED NHTSA NO. 06V-003.RECALLED VEHICLES WILL BE FITTED WITH PROTECTIVE SHIELDING FOR THE FRONTAL PORTION OF THE FUEL TANK TO REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF PUNCTURE BY PROJECTILES FROM THE FRONT WHEELS.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
Fuel System, Other:storage:tank Assembly
ODI OPENED A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION BASED ON FOUR VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES (VOQ'S) INDICATING THAT THE FUEL TANKS WEREPUNCTURED BY ROAD DEBRIS UNDER NORMAL, NON OFF-ROAD DRIVING CONDITIONS.AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2005, THE COMPLAINT TOTAL INCREASED TO 12.NISSAN SUPPLIED ODI WITH 31 COMPLAINTS OF FUEL TANK PUNCTURES, INCLUDING 26 NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO ODI FROM THE VOQ RECORDS. IN A LETTER DATED JANUARY 9, 2006, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. NOTIFIED ODI OF ITS PLAN TO RECALL APPROXIMATELY 209,000 MODEL YEAR 2003 - 2006 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES BUILT FROM APRIL 24, 2002 (START OF PRODUCTION OF MY 2003) THROUGH NOVEMBER 24, 2005 (INCLUDING A PORTION OF MY 2006 VEHICLES) TO CORRECT A DEFICIENCY IN FUEL TANK SHIELDING FROM ROAD DEBRIS.THIS RECALL HAS BEEN DESIGNATED NHTSA NO. 06V-003.RECALLED VEHICLES WILL BE FITTED WITH PROTECTIVE SHIELDING FOR THE FRONTAL PORTION OF THE FUEL TANK TO REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF PUNCTURE BY PROJECTILES FROM THE FRONT WHEELS.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED.
ODI RECEIVED 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE ON MY 2003-2004 MURANO (SUBJECT) VEHICLES.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.BASED ON THESE COMPLAINTS, ODI OPENED PE04-077 AND LATER UPGRADED TO EA05-006 FOR THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.DURING EA05-006, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WERE IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE.ON JULY 12, 2005, NISSAN NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SAFETY DEFECT ON MY 2003-2005 MURANO VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM APRIL 8, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 (RECALL 05V-319).THE NOTIFICATION STATED THAT AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ALTERNATOR CAN OCCUR DUE TO WIRE FATIGUE CAUSED BY MOVEMENT OF THE ROTOR COIL DURING RAPID CHANGES IN ENGINE SPEED IN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION (CVT).HIGHER ENGINE COMPARTMENT TEMPERATURE IN THE MURANO COMPARED TO OTHER NISSAN MODELS MAY ALSO BE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE WIRE FATIGUE.NISSAN ALSO REPORTED THAT WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGE WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL ILLUMINATE AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE.AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL THEN ENTER A FAIL SAFE MODE THAT LIMITS VEHICLE SPEED.VERY SHORTLY AFTER REACHING THIS CONDITION, THE ENGINE WILL STOP.NHTSA'S TESTING, HOWEVER, SHOWED THAT ALTHOUGH THE WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATE, THE VEHICLE SPEED IS LIMITED TO ONLY 4-7 MPH RATHER THAN WHAT NHTSA CONSIDERS A FAIL SAFE MODE. NISSAN WILL INSTRUCT OWNERS TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO ANY NISSAN DEALER FOR AN ALTERNATOR INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT, IF REQUIRED.NOTE:SOME VEHICLES MAY HAVE HAD THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALTERNATOR PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED UNDER WARRANTY.CONSEQUENTLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.ODI WILL MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator
ODI RECEIVED 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE ON MY 2003-2004 MURANO (SUBJECT) VEHICLES.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.BASED ON THESE COMPLAINTS, ODI OPENED PE04-077 AND LATER UPGRADED TO EA05-006 FOR THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.DURING EA05-006, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WERE IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE.ON JULY 12, 2005, NISSAN NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SAFETY DEFECT ON MY 2003-2005 MURANO VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM APRIL 8, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 (RECALL 05V-319).THE NOTIFICATION STATED THAT AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ALTERNATOR CAN OCCUR DUE TO WIRE FATIGUE CAUSED BY MOVEMENT OF THE ROTOR COIL DURING RAPID CHANGES IN ENGINE SPEED IN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION (CVT).HIGHER ENGINE COMPARTMENT TEMPERATURE IN THE MURANO COMPARED TO OTHER NISSAN MODELS MAY ALSO BE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE WIRE FATIGUE.NISSAN ALSO REPORTED THAT WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGE WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL ILLUMINATE AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE.AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL THEN ENTER A FAIL SAFE MODE THAT LIMITS VEHICLE SPEED.VERY SHORTLY AFTER REACHING THIS CONDITION, THE ENGINE WILL STOP.NHTSA'S TESTING, HOWEVER, SHOWED THAT ALTHOUGH THE WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATE, THE VEHICLE SPEED IS LIMITED TO ONLY 4-7 MPH RATHER THAN WHAT NHTSA CONSIDERS A FAIL SAFE MODE. NISSAN WILL INSTRUCT OWNERS TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO ANY NISSAN DEALER FOR AN ALTERNATOR INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT, IF REQUIRED.NOTE:SOME VEHICLES MAY HAVE HAD THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALTERNATOR PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED UNDER WARRANTY.CONSEQUENTLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.ODI WILL MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED.
Electrical System
ODI RECEIVED 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE ON MY 2003-2004 MURANO (SUBJECT) VEHICLES.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.BASED ON THESE COMPLAINTS, ODI OPENED PE04-077 AND LATER UPGRADED TO EA05-006 FOR THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.DURING EA05-006, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WERE IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE.ON JULY 12, 2005, NISSAN NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SAFETY DEFECT ON MY 2003-2005 MURANO VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM APRIL 8, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 (RECALL 05V-319).THE NOTIFICATION STATED THAT AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ALTERNATOR CAN OCCUR DUE TO WIRE FATIGUE CAUSED BY MOVEMENT OF THE ROTOR COIL DURING RAPID CHANGES IN ENGINE SPEED IN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION (CVT).HIGHER ENGINE COMPARTMENT TEMPERATURE IN THE MURANO COMPARED TO OTHER NISSAN MODELS MAY ALSO BE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE WIRE FATIGUE.NISSAN ALSO REPORTED THAT WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THE CHARGE WARNING AND BRAKE WARNING LAMPS WILL ILLUMINATE AND THE BATTERY WILL BEGIN TO DISCHARGE.AFTER A SHORT TIME, THE ENGINE WILL THEN ENTER A FAIL SAFE MODE THAT LIMITS VEHICLE SPEED.VERY SHORTLY AFTER REACHING THIS CONDITION, THE ENGINE WILL STOP.NHTSA'S TESTING, HOWEVER, SHOWED THAT ALTHOUGH THE WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATE, THE VEHICLE SPEED IS LIMITED TO ONLY 4-7 MPH RATHER THAN WHAT NHTSA CONSIDERS A FAIL SAFE MODE. NISSAN WILL INSTRUCT OWNERS TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO ANY NISSAN DEALER FOR AN ALTERNATOR INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT, IF REQUIRED.NOTE:SOME VEHICLES MAY HAVE HAD THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALTERNATOR PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED UNDER WARRANTY.CONSEQUENTLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.ODI WILL MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED.
ODI OPENED PE04-077 BASED ON 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.DURING PE04-077, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WAS IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE . DURING THE INVESTIGATION, NISSAN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE HAD BEEN ALTERNATOR WARRANTY REPLACEMENTS DUE TO AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ROTOR COIL CAUSED BY WIRE FATIGUE. ODI?S ANALYSIS SHOWS FAILURE RATES THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO ODI AND INDICATES THAT THE ALLEGED DEFECT IS CONTINUING TO OCCUR IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.ODI'S ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE ALTERNATOR WARRANTY CLAIMS SUBMITTED RESULTED IN ENGINE STALLS AND AT LEAST 25% OF THE ENGINE STALLS RESULTED IN A NO RESTART CONDITION.HOWEVER, IN 71% OF THE WARRANTY DATA SUBMITTED, ODI HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE CONSUMER COULD RESTART THE VEHICLE.THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS CONCERN, TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL SAFETY-RELATED CONSEQUENCES, AND TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE AFFECTED POPULATION.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator
ODI OPENED PE04-077 BASED ON 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.DURING PE04-077, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WAS IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE . DURING THE INVESTIGATION, NISSAN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE HAD BEEN ALTERNATOR WARRANTY REPLACEMENTS DUE TO AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ROTOR COIL CAUSED BY WIRE FATIGUE. ODI?S ANALYSIS SHOWS FAILURE RATES THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO ODI AND INDICATES THAT THE ALLEGED DEFECT IS CONTINUING TO OCCUR IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.ODI'S ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE ALTERNATOR WARRANTY CLAIMS SUBMITTED RESULTED IN ENGINE STALLS AND AT LEAST 25% OF THE ENGINE STALLS RESULTED IN A NO RESTART CONDITION.HOWEVER, IN 71% OF THE WARRANTY DATA SUBMITTED, ODI HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE CONSUMER COULD RESTART THE VEHICLE.THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS CONCERN, TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL SAFETY-RELATED CONSEQUENCES, AND TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE AFFECTED POPULATION.
Electrical System
ODI OPENED PE04-077 BASED ON 14 REPORTS OF ALLEGED ENGINE STALLING DUE TO ALTERNATOR FAILURE.ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS REPORTED THAT THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE RESTARTED AFTER THE STALL OCCURRED.DURING PE04-077, ADDITIONAL FAILURE DATA WAS IDENTIFIED AS NOTED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY ABOVE . DURING THE INVESTIGATION, NISSAN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE HAD BEEN ALTERNATOR WARRANTY REPLACEMENTS DUE TO AN OPEN CIRCUIT IN THE ROTOR COIL CAUSED BY WIRE FATIGUE. ODI?S ANALYSIS SHOWS FAILURE RATES THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO ODI AND INDICATES THAT THE ALLEGED DEFECT IS CONTINUING TO OCCUR IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES.ODI'S ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE ALTERNATOR WARRANTY CLAIMS SUBMITTED RESULTED IN ENGINE STALLS AND AT LEAST 25% OF THE ENGINE STALLS RESULTED IN A NO RESTART CONDITION.HOWEVER, IN 71% OF THE WARRANTY DATA SUBMITTED, ODI HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE CONSUMER COULD RESTART THE VEHICLE.THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS CONCERN, TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL SAFETY-RELATED CONSEQUENCES, AND TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE AFFECTED POPULATION.
2004 Nissan Murano Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year
Illustration