REAR BRAKE PADS COMPLETELY WORN, NEEDING REPLACEMENT AND MACHINING OF ROTORS. DEALER THOUGHT FRONT BRAKES HAD BEEN SERVICED BECAUSE PADS WERE IN SUCH GOOD SHAPE. ALL BRAKE PARTS WERE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT FROM TIME VEHICLE WAS BUILT. DEALER CLAIMS REAR BRAKES DO 70% OF STOPPING ON THIS CAR BY DESIGN.*AK
1998 Mercury Sable
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 1998 Mercury Sable do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 201.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Sable years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 45 of 190 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 32 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 28 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Power Train. Review the 25 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints
28 reportsMY CAR MADE A LOW ROARING NOISE FROM THE REAR END AFTER ABOUT 3 MONTHS, SINCE THE FIRST INCIDENT DIDN'T OCCUR AGAIN FOR A FEW WEEKS I DIDN'T WORRY ABOUT IT, HOWEVER, AFTER I HAD IT FOR ABOUT 6 MONTHS THE NOISE GOT WORSE AND I WAS TOLD I NEEDED NEW BRAKE PADS, THESE WERE INSTALLED THE SAME DAY, A FEW WEEKS LATER THE SAME NOISE OC…
Read full complaint
MY CAR MADE A LOW ROARING NOISE FROM THE REAR END AFTER ABOUT 3 MONTHS, SINCE THE FIRST INCIDENT DIDN'T OCCUR AGAIN FOR A FEW WEEKS I DIDN'T WORRY ABOUT IT, HOWEVER, AFTER I HAD IT FOR ABOUT 6 MONTHS THE NOISE GOT WORSE AND I WAS TOLD I NEEDED NEW BRAKE PADS, THESE WERE INSTALLED THE SAME DAY, A FEW WEEKS LATER THE SAME NOISE OCCURRED AGAIN AND THIS TIME I WAS TOLD I NEEDED NEW TIE ROD ENDS, THESE WERE INSTALLED THAT DAY, THEN IT WAS MY BRAKE PADS LATER IT WAS THE ROTORS, BRAKE PADS AND SHOES, I STILL HAVE THE NOISE IN THE REAR OF THE CAR AND NOW MY BRAKES ARE STILL NOT RIGHT, I CAME DOWN A HILL LAST WEEK AND WHEN I HIT MY BRAKES THERE WERE NONE, THE DEALER IS SAYING IT IS THE FACT THAT I DRIVE A LOT FORD MOTOR CO IS SAYING THEY AREN'T RESPONSIBLE AND BUD SHELL IS SAYING IT IS MY FAULT CAN YOU HELP ME I HAVE HAD THIS CAR IN THE SHOP FOR THIS SAME PROBLEM ABOUT 10 TIMES SINCE SEPT 1999 I AM AFRAID THAT MY BRAKES WILL FAIL ME AGAIN IN A MORE DANGEROUS SITUATION THAN THE LAST TIME. *AK
NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK
I ROTATE TIRES EVERY 6000 MI. DURING ROTATION I INSPECT BRAKE PADS FOR WEAR. AT 18000 MI I FOUND EXCESSIVE WEAR ON REAR PADS, TO THE POINT THAT THEY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED FAIRLY SOON. I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALER FOR REPLACEMENT UNDER WARRANTY. THEY ADVISED THAT THOS WEAR WAS "NORMAL" AND WAS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. THA…
Read full complaint
I ROTATE TIRES EVERY 6000 MI. DURING ROTATION I INSPECT BRAKE PADS FOR WEAR. AT 18000 MI I FOUND EXCESSIVE WEAR ON REAR PADS, TO THE POINT THAT THEY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED FAIRLY SOON. I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALER FOR REPLACEMENT UNDER WARRANTY. THEY ADVISED THAT THOS WEAR WAS "NORMAL" AND WAS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. THAT'S NONSENSE. I'VE NEVER HAD A CAR THAT NEEDED REAR PAD REPLACEMENT AT LESSS THAN 50000 MI. NO PROFESSIONLS I SPOKE WITH THOUGHT THIS WAS "NORMAL" WEAR. THIS IS MADE WORSE BY THE FACT THAT, WHEN THE CAR WAS NEW, I HAD BROUGHT IT IN FOR CORRECTION OF BRAKE VIBRATION. THE DEALER MACHINED THE ROTORS AND THE TECH SAID HE "DIDN'T LIKE THE LOOKS OF THE REAR PADS SO HE REPLACED THEM." THAT'S AT 1500 MI. WHICH MEANS THE REPLACMENT SET ONLY LASTED 16500 MI. THE OWNER SERVICE GUIDE ONLY SAYS TO INSPECT FRONT AND REAR BRAKES AT 30000 MI. IF I HAD WAITED TO 30000 MI I WOULD HAVE HAD AT LEAST ROTOR FAILURE AND MIGHT HAVE HAD BRAKE SEIZURE, CAUSING ACCIDENT/INJURY. DEALER CONTACTED FORD MOTOR CO REP WHO SAID IT WAS NORMAL WEAR AND WOULD NOT BE COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. I PERSONALLY REPLACED REAR PADS WITH AFTER-MARKET LIFE-OF-THE-CAR-WARRANTY PREMIUM-GRADE PADS BECAUSE I WON'T PAY FORD FOR ANOTHER SET OF FAST-WEARING PADS. I KEPT THE ORIGINAL PADS FOR NHTSA INSPECTION, IF DESIRED. *AK
WHILE EXITING RAMP FROM A HIGHWAY ONTO A MAIN STREET, THE EXPLORER IN FRONT OF US STOPPED BEFORE ENTERING THE MAIN STREET. WE WERE DRIVING SLOWLY WHEN WE TRIED TO STOP BEHIND THE OTHER VEHICLE. MY HUSBAND PUT HIS FOOT ON THE BRAKE AND IT WENT TO THE FLOOR. HE CONTINUED A NUMBER OF TIMES, BUT COULD NOT STOP OR EVEN SLOW DOWN. …
Read full complaint
WHILE EXITING RAMP FROM A HIGHWAY ONTO A MAIN STREET, THE EXPLORER IN FRONT OF US STOPPED BEFORE ENTERING THE MAIN STREET. WE WERE DRIVING SLOWLY WHEN WE TRIED TO STOP BEHIND THE OTHER VEHICLE. MY HUSBAND PUT HIS FOOT ON THE BRAKE AND IT WENT TO THE FLOOR. HE CONTINUED A NUMBER OF TIMES, BUT COULD NOT STOP OR EVEN SLOW DOWN. WE KNEW WE WOULD HIT THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF US, WHICH PREVENTED OUR CAR FROM GOING ONTO THE MAIN STREET OF TRAFFIC. FROM TRYING TO STOP MANY TIMES, MY HUSBAND SUFFERED A SIATICA INJURY, WHICH HE CURRENTLY BEING TREATED BY AN ORTHOPEDIST, CHIROPRACTER, PHYSICAL THERAPIST AND PRIMARY CARE DOCTOR. *AK
CONSUMER HEARD GRINDING SOUND FROM THE REAR & TOOK VEHICLE TO THE DEALER. ROTORS, AND BRAKE SHOES AND PADS WERE REPLACED. HOWEVER, PROBLEM OCCURRED AGAIN ON 10-AUG-1999. IT WAS TAKEN TO THE SAME DEALER, AND HE REPLACED ALOT OF PARTS. AS OF 10-APR-2000, VEHICLE IS AT THE DEALER'S AGAIN. DEALER COULDN'T FIND CAUSE OF PROBL…
Read full complaint
CONSUMER HEARD GRINDING SOUND FROM THE REAR & TOOK VEHICLE TO THE DEALER. ROTORS, AND BRAKE SHOES AND PADS WERE REPLACED. HOWEVER, PROBLEM OCCURRED AGAIN ON 10-AUG-1999. IT WAS TAKEN TO THE SAME DEALER, AND HE REPLACED ALOT OF PARTS. AS OF 10-APR-2000, VEHICLE IS AT THE DEALER'S AGAIN. DEALER COULDN'T FIND CAUSE OF PROBLEM. BRAKES ARE STILL LOCKING UP. *AK
BRAKES FAILED. YH
4 BRAKE ROTORS HAVE BEEN REPLACED 3 TIMES BECAUSE THEY OVERHEATED/WARPED AND WERE OUT OF ROUND. CAUSE UNKNOWN. CONSUMER CLAIMS BRAKE MUST BE APPLIED CONSTANTLY WHILE DRIVING. *AK
Official recalls
298V198000 · Seat Belts:front:anchorage
Aug 25, 1998
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH MANUAL SEAT TRACKS. THE FRONT SEAT BELT BUCKLE ATTACHING STUD MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY HEAT TREATED. THIS HEAT TREATMENT MAY HAVE RESULTED IN CRACKS DEVELOPING IN THE STUD.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THE STUD IS CRACKED, IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED, INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE SEAT BELT BUCKLE MOUNTING BRACKET AND STUD ASSEMBLY.
98V028000 · Exterior Lighting:headlights
Feb 10, 1998
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE TEXT AND/OR GRAPHICS FOR THE VEHICLE HEADLAMP AIMING INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THE OWNER GUIDES ARE NOT SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THE HEADLAMP ASSEMBLIES ARE REPLACED, CUSTOMERS MAY BE CONFUSED BY THE AIMING INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THE OWNER GUIDES CAUSING THE HEADLAMPS TO BE IMPROPERLY AIMED.
Remedy: OWNER GUIDES CONTAINING REVISED AIMING INSTRUCTIONS WILL BE MAILED TO OWNERS OF THESE VEHICLES.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
0No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.
Illustration