← New search

1999 Mercedes Benz E320

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 1999 Mercedes Benz E320 do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 42.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all E320 years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

51 reports with mileage · 32 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 18 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 17 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 11 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

12 crash reports6 fire reports6 injury reports

What owners actually said

83 reports
Mileage unknown · Apr 9, 2007
Unknown Or Other

99 MERCEDES BENZ WITH CRACKS ALONG THE SEAMS OF THE PASSENGER SIDE DASHBOARD AIRBAGS**CC *JB

NHTSA ODI #10187964

31,000 miles · Jan 24, 2007
Visibility

I AM ORIGINAL OWNER OF 1999 MERCEDES BENZ E320. VEHICLE HAS 31000 MILES; KEPT IN GARAGE. REPLACED DRIVER SIDE REAR WINDOW REGULATOR AT $350 COST 2 YEARS AGO. PASSENGER SIDE REAR WINDOW REGULATOR IS NOW INOPERATIVE. I AM RETIREE AND NO ONE RIDES IN BACK SEAT. REAR WINDOWS OPENED IN SUMMER ONLY. CONTACTED SEVERAL DEALERS REGARDING…

Read full complaint

I AM ORIGINAL OWNER OF 1999 MERCEDES BENZ E320. VEHICLE HAS 31000 MILES; KEPT IN GARAGE. REPLACED DRIVER SIDE REAR WINDOW REGULATOR AT $350 COST 2 YEARS AGO. PASSENGER SIDE REAR WINDOW REGULATOR IS NOW INOPERATIVE. I AM RETIREE AND NO ONE RIDES IN BACK SEAT. REAR WINDOWS OPENED IN SUMMER ONLY. CONTACTED SEVERAL DEALERS REGARDING CONCERN. ALL ADVISE NO RECALLS OR SERVICE BULLETINS ADDRESSING PROBLEM. OWNED SEVERAL BRAND AUTOS IN PAST; NEVER THIS PROBLEMS WITH ANY OF THEM.*JB THANKS FOR YOUR HELP.

NHTSA ODI #10179534

Mileage unknown · Oct 25, 2006
TiresCrashInjury

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH THE REAR LEFT TIRE HAD A BLOW OUT ,CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO COLLIDE INTO A GUARD RAIL. THE SERVICE DEALER AND TIRE MANUFACTURER WERE NOT CONTACTED. THE VEHICLE WAS DEEMED TOTALED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY. A POLICE REPORT WAS TAKEN. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED A CONCUSSION, BACK, NECK, AND …

Read full complaint

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH THE REAR LEFT TIRE HAD A BLOW OUT ,CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO COLLIDE INTO A GUARD RAIL. THE SERVICE DEALER AND TIRE MANUFACTURER WERE NOT CONTACTED. THE VEHICLE WAS DEEMED TOTALED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY. A POLICE REPORT WAS TAKEN. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED A CONCUSSION, BACK, NECK, AND SPINAL INJURIES. THE TIRE MANUFACTURER WAS PIRELLI . *AK

NHTSA ODI #10171796

64,000 miles · Jul 29, 2006
Electrical SystemEngine And Engine Cooling

CRANK POSITION SENSOR (CPS) STARTED TO FAIL WHEN THE OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE WAS ABOVE 95F. CAR (1999 MERCEDES BENZ E320) FAILED TO START TWICE WHEN PARKED AFTER DRIVING FOR A SHORT DISTANCE. ONLY AFTER COOLING IT WOULD START AGAIN. AT ONE POINT THE ENGINE BECAME VERY ERRATIC WHILE IN TRAFFIC. AT ANOTHER POINT I WAS STOPPED ON T…

Read full complaint

CRANK POSITION SENSOR (CPS) STARTED TO FAIL WHEN THE OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE WAS ABOVE 95F. CAR (1999 MERCEDES BENZ E320) FAILED TO START TWICE WHEN PARKED AFTER DRIVING FOR A SHORT DISTANCE. ONLY AFTER COOLING IT WOULD START AGAIN. AT ONE POINT THE ENGINE BECAME VERY ERRATIC WHILE IN TRAFFIC. AT ANOTHER POINT I WAS STOPPED ON THE TRAFFIC LIGHT AND THE ENGINE JUST STOPPED RUNNING. FORTUNATELY I WAS NEAR HOME AND AFTER WAITING A FEW MINUTES IT STARTED AGAIN. IT WAS EMBARRASSING TO SAY THE LEAST , HAVING A MB CAR STALL IN FRONT OF OTHER MUCH CHEAPER CARS ON THE TRAFFIC LIGHT. FORTUNATELY, I WAS USING THIS CAR FOR ONLY SHORT TRIPS AND DID NOT INCUR THE RISK OF HAVING IT STALL ON A HIGHWAY, BUT I AM SURE IT WOULD AS LONG AS THE ENGINE TEMPERATURE WAS ABOVE A CERTAIN POINT. I RESEARCHED THIS PROBLEM ON THE INTERNET AND FOUND THE FOLLOWING MB CAR OWNERS CHAT/FORUM ROOM WITH DISCUSSIONS ON THE MANY SIMILAR PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED BY OTHERS: HTTP://WWW.MBWORLD.ORG/FORUMS/SHOWTHREAD.PHP?T=80989. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10163861

28,000 miles · Jul 10, 2006
Engine And Engine Cooling

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ILLUMINATED WHILE DRIVING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED BY DIAGNOSTIC TESTING THE AIR MASS SENSOR NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT STATED ALSO OWNS AN ML320 WHICH HAD THE SAME FAILURE JULY 2006. IF THE AIR MASS SENSOR IS NOT REPLACED, FURTHER DAMA…

Read full complaint

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ILLUMINATED WHILE DRIVING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED BY DIAGNOSTIC TESTING THE AIR MASS SENSOR NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT STATED ALSO OWNS AN ML320 WHICH HAD THE SAME FAILURE JULY 2006. IF THE AIR MASS SENSOR IS NOT REPLACED, FURTHER DAMAGE CAN RESULT TO THE ENGINE.

NHTSA ODI #10161974

55,000 miles · Feb 21, 2006
Engine And Engine CoolingExterior LightingPower TrainFire

CONSUMER 1999 E320 HAD TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS AND CAUGHT ON FIRE WITH 110,000 MILES ON IT. *TS THE CONSUMER STATED THE TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS STARTED WHEN THE VEHICLE ONLY HAD 55,000 MILES. BEFORE THE FIRE, THE VEHICLE HAD A TIRE LEAK AND A DEFECTIVE LAMP ASSEMBLY. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10151902

Mileage unknown · Jan 1, 2006
Air BagsCrashInjury

I WAS INVOLVED IN A SERIOUS SIDE IMPACT ACCIDENT - IT WAS ESTIMATED THAT THE CAR THAT HIT ME WAS GOING APPROX. 40 MPH. I WAS HIT DIRECTLY ON BOTH THE FRONT AND REAR DOOR (DRIVER'S SIDE) OF MY VEHICLE. THE DAMAGE COST OVER $10,600 TO REPAIR. THE AIRBAGS IN MY 1999 MERCEDES E320 DID NOT DEPLOY. MERCEDES SENT SOMEONE OVER TO IN…

Read full complaint

I WAS INVOLVED IN A SERIOUS SIDE IMPACT ACCIDENT - IT WAS ESTIMATED THAT THE CAR THAT HIT ME WAS GOING APPROX. 40 MPH. I WAS HIT DIRECTLY ON BOTH THE FRONT AND REAR DOOR (DRIVER'S SIDE) OF MY VEHICLE. THE DAMAGE COST OVER $10,600 TO REPAIR. THE AIRBAGS IN MY 1999 MERCEDES E320 DID NOT DEPLOY. MERCEDES SENT SOMEONE OVER TO INSPECT THE CAR 9 WEEKS AGO AND HAS NOT RESPONDED TO SEVERAL CALLS FROM ME INQUIRING ABOUT THE FAILURE. BOTH THE AMBULANCE ATTENDANTS AT THE SCENE AND THE MERCEDES CERTIFIED REPAIRMAN AGREED THAT THE AIRBAGS SHOULD HAVE DEPLOYED - HOWEVER, MERCEDES BENZ WILL NOT ISSUE A REPORT TO ME. I AM NOW DRIVING THE CAR AGAIN AND FEAR THAT THE AIRBAGS ARE FAULTY. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10146674

76,249 miles · Aug 26, 2005
Power Train

I BOUGHT A MERCEDES ML320 IN 2003 AS CERTIFIED CAR WITH ONLY 45628 MILES. I DROVE ON MY WAY FROM MARIPOSA ON 8/23/05 THE CAR SUDDENLY LOCKED THE TRANSMISSION TO LOW GEAR AND REFUSED SHIFT TO HIGH GEAR AUTOMATICALLY. I STOPPED THE CAR AND RESTARTED THE ENGINE MAINTAINING A LOW SPEED BACK HOME. ON 8/24/05 I BROUGHT THE ML320 TO…

Read full complaint

I BOUGHT A MERCEDES ML320 IN 2003 AS CERTIFIED CAR WITH ONLY 45628 MILES. I DROVE ON MY WAY FROM MARIPOSA ON 8/23/05 THE CAR SUDDENLY LOCKED THE TRANSMISSION TO LOW GEAR AND REFUSED SHIFT TO HIGH GEAR AUTOMATICALLY. I STOPPED THE CAR AND RESTARTED THE ENGINE MAINTAINING A LOW SPEED BACK HOME. ON 8/24/05 I BROUGHT THE ML320 TO FRESNO MERCEDES FOR REPAIR. FINALLY I FOUND THAT THEY SOLD ME ML320 WITHOUT PROPER DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE CAR PREVIOUS HISTORY OF TRANSMISSION MALFUNCTION AND SERVICES IN 2003. I WOULD NOT BUY THAT CAR IF I WAS TOLD ML320 HAVING HAD TRANSMISSION SERVICES. THE TRANSMISSION FAILED AT 76349 MILES DID INDICATE THAT MECHANICAL FAILURE COULD ENDANGER THE DRIVER'S LIFE IN FREEWAY AT 65 MILES WHEN FOLLOWING CAR COULD HIT FROM BEHIND AS A RESULT OF NO PROPER WARNING SIGNAL LIKE BRAKE LIGHT. IT IS PROPER THAT YOUR GOOD OFFICE LOOK INTO THIS MATTER. EVEN MORE, IF IT WARRANT ML320 SHOULD HAVE A RECALL TO FIX THE TRANSMISSION BEFORE IT COULD HAPPEN TO ENDANGER PUBLIC SAFETY. IT IS MY OPINION THAT 100,000 WARRANTY MUST BE EQUALLY PRINTED WITH ONE YEAR WARRANTY WHICH EVER COMES FIRST. OTHERWISE, WHEN YOU BUY A CERTIFIED CAR YOU THOUGHT YOU BOUGHT 50,000 MILES POWERTRAIN WARRANTY. IT COULD WARRANT ONE YEAR AND IT IS VERY MISLEADING. YOUR ATTENTION IS INVITED TO THIS MATTER STRONGLY. SINCERELY YOURS MICHAEL. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10134354

50,000 miles · Jun 24, 2005
Suspension

DT: FRONT WHEEL BEARING ON CAR EXPLODED CAUSING DAMAGE TO HUB AND SPINDLE ALSO DAMAGING BRAKES. THIS INCIDENT HAPPENED ON THE RIGHT PASSENGER SIDE AND LAST YEAR ON THE DRIVERS SIDE. THE FIRST INCIDENT HAPPENED AT 50,000 AND THE SECOND TIME HAPPENED AT 60,000. IT IS A CONTAINED UNIT, SO IT CAN NOT BE MAINTAINED AS THOUGH YOU COU…

Read full complaint

DT: FRONT WHEEL BEARING ON CAR EXPLODED CAUSING DAMAGE TO HUB AND SPINDLE ALSO DAMAGING BRAKES. THIS INCIDENT HAPPENED ON THE RIGHT PASSENGER SIDE AND LAST YEAR ON THE DRIVERS SIDE. THE FIRST INCIDENT HAPPENED AT 50,000 AND THE SECOND TIME HAPPENED AT 60,000. IT IS A CONTAINED UNIT, SO IT CAN NOT BE MAINTAINED AS THOUGH YOU COULD JUST ADD LUBRICATION. SERVICE DEALER WAS SURPRISED AT HOW THIS OCCURRED AT SUCH LOW MILEAGE. *TT *SB *NM

NHTSA ODI #10121085

39,500 miles · Feb 7, 2005
Tires

CONSUMER WAS DRIVING AT 60 MPH WHEN THE REAR PASSENGER'S TIRE BLEW OUT. CONSUMER PULLED TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. THE TIRE WAS CHANGED BY AAA. *AK *JB

NHTSA ODI #10106731

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

PE07021 · Front Suspension Coil Spring Ejection

Opened Apr 19, 2007 · Closed Aug 9, 2007

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

ODI HAS FOCUSED THIS INVESTIGATION ON ASSESSING THE RISKS POSED BY A SEPARATED SPRING AS (1) A ROAD HAZARD AND (2) THE POTENTIAL FOR VEHICLE CONTROL TO BE COMPROMISED AFTER THE FRONT COIL SPRING HAS BEEN EJECTED FROM ITS INTENDED POSITION IN THE VEHICLE.BOTH RISKS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH CORROSION, FLEXING, AND FRACTURE OF THE UPPER FRONT SUSPENSION MOUNTING BRACKET.TIME-IN-SERVICE FAILURE RATES ARE NOTABLY HIGHER IN SALT BELT STATES SINCE CORROSION IS A PRIMARY CONTRIBUTOR TO THE FAILURE MODE.SINCE A NUMBER OF INCIDENTS HAVE OCCURRED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS BEING OPERATED, ODI IS SKEPTICAL THAT OWNERS CAN ALWAYS DETECT THE SUBTLE SIDE TO SIDE DIFFERENCE IN RIDE HEIGHT AND/OR INSPECT OR NOTICE THAT THE UPPER SUSPENSION BRACKET HAS BEEN COMPROMISED BY CORROSION.(1) ROAD HAZARD - ALTHOUGH THE (APPROX. 7 LB.) FRONT SUSPENSION SPRING THAT MAY BE EJECTED AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS COULD POSE A SERIOUS ROAD HAZARD TO PEDESTRIANS AND OTHER VEHICLES, THE OCCURRENCE RATE HAS BEEN LOW (.03% BASED ON 51 REPORTED INCIDENTS OCCURRING AND AN INITIAL POPULATION OF 172,781 VEHICLES AFTER 9 - 12 YEARS OF USE / EXPOSURE) AND THERE ARE NO KNOWN INJURIES, FATALITIES, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE REPORTS DUE TO AN EJECTED SPRING.ALSO, MANY OF THE 51 INCIDENTS OCCURRED AT LOW SPEED OR WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS STOPPED OR PARKED.(2) VEHICLE CONTROL - VEHICLE HANDLING AND CONTROL COULD BE AFFECTED BY THE FRACTURE OF THE UPPER SUSPENSION MOUNT AND/OR THE ASSOCIATED SPRING EJECTION.ODI FIRST IDENTIFIED ITS CONCERN ABOUT CORROSION IN THE UPPER SUSPENSION BRACKET OF SUBJECT VEHICLES IN 2002, AT WHICH TIME MERCEDES PROVIDED A VIDEO THAT SHOWED THAT A VEHICLE COULD BE STEERED, STOPPED, AND CONTROLLED THROUGH VARIOUS MANEUVERS AT HIGH SPEEDS WITH A FRONT COIL SPRING COMPLETELY MISSING FROM THE VEHICLE. DURING PE07-021, IN ADDITION TO REVIEWING THE 2002 VIDEO-TAPE, ODI ENGINEERS DROVE AN EXEMPLAR VEHICLE WITH THE SPRING REMOVED AND SIMULATED VARIOUS COMBINATIONS OF STEERING ANGLES TO ASSESS WHETHER THERE WERE ANY POSSIBLE CONDITIONS / DISPLACEMENTS IN WHICH THE SEPARATED SPRING MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE WHEELS. IN A VEHICLE WITH THE FRONT SPRING REMOVED, THE TOP OF THE WHEEL CAN LIGHTLY CONTACT THE BOTTOM AREA OF THE WHEEL FENDER DURING HIGH ANGLE TURNS TYPICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SLOWER SPEED MANEUVERS SUCH AS CITY DRIVING. THE LIGHT TIRE CONTACT GENERATED AN OBVIOUS GRINDING NOISE AND WOULD LIKELY ABRADE OR BEND THE EDGE OF THE FENDER WITH CONTINUED USE.HOWEVER, THE EXTENT OF THE INTERFERENCE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT TO AFFECT VEHICLE STEERING AND DOES NOT OCCUR AT SMALLER TURNING ANGLES ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHWAY DRIVING.ODI HAS NOT IDENTIFIED A SAFETY RELATED DEFECT TREND AT THIS TIME.FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING THAT A SAFETY RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF FUTURE CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANT.

PE03058 · Engine Crankshaft Pulley Failure

Opened Dec 17, 2003 · Closed Apr 22, 2004

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine And Engine Cooling:engine:gasoline:belts And Associated Pulleys

THE OFFICE OF DEFECTS INVESTIGATION (ODI) OPENED THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF ENGINE CRANKSHAFT PULLEY HARMONIC BALANCER FAILURE THAT COULD RESULT IN LOSS OF POWER-STEERING ASSIST.ODI HAS RECEIVED A TOTAL OF 546 NON-DUPLICATIVE REPORTS THAT ALLEGE ENGINE CRANKSHAFT PULLEY HARMONIC BALANCER FAILURE ON ALL MERCEDES-BENZ VEHICLES USING THE SUBJECT COMPONENT.THE SUBJECT COMPONENT FAILURES ARE PROGRESSIVE IN NATURE AND ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE COMPLAINTS AND WARRANT CLAIMS INVOLVED A FAILURE THAT HAD PROGRESSED FAR ENOUGH TO EFFECT POWER STEERING PERFORMANCE (6 OF 55 ODI COMPLAINTS REFERENCE INCREASED STEERING EFFORT).THERE HAVE BEEN NO CRASHES OR INJURIES RELATED TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT.A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AT THIS TIME AND FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY WILL TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.SEE SUMMARY REPORT ATTACHED FOR FURTHER DETAIL.