← New search

2010 Mack CXU612

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all CXU612 years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 5 of 6 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Trailer Hitches. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 3 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Suspension. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

Suspension complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Sep 20, 2010
SuspensionTrailer Hitches

I AM A MECHANIC FOR ABF. FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS, MACK HAS SOLD TO ABF ROAD TRACTORS WITH DEFECTIVE 5TH WHEEL MOUNTING BOLTS. THE BOLTS STRETCH AND BECOME LOOSE WITH USE (USUALLY WITHIN THE FIRST 30,000 MILES). FOR UNKNOWN REASONS ABF HAS NEVER HELD MACK ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS PROBLEM, PREFERRING TO TIGHTEN THE BOLTS WHEN A DRIVE…

Read full complaint

I AM A MECHANIC FOR ABF. FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS, MACK HAS SOLD TO ABF ROAD TRACTORS WITH DEFECTIVE 5TH WHEEL MOUNTING BOLTS. THE BOLTS STRETCH AND BECOME LOOSE WITH USE (USUALLY WITHIN THE FIRST 30,000 MILES). FOR UNKNOWN REASONS ABF HAS NEVER HELD MACK ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS PROBLEM, PREFERRING TO TIGHTEN THE BOLTS WHEN A DRIVER COMPLAINS AND REPLACING BOLTS WHEN THEY PULL IN TWO. I HAVE REPEATEDLY WARNED MY SUPERVISORS THAT THESE BOLTS SHOULD BE REPLACED RATHER THAN REPEATEDLY RETORQUED, BUT HAVE BEEN REBUFFED DUE TO MANAGEMENT DISTRUST OF UNION EMPLOYEES. NOW OUR 2010 MODEL TRUCKS ARE GETTING 20-50K MILES ON THEM AND I AM SEEING NEARLY 100% WITH LOOSE 5TH WHEEL MOUNT BOLTS. WE PURCHASED REPLACEMENT BOLTS FROM MACK AND DISCOVERED THAT THEY WOULD NOT TAKE THE TORQUE SPEC THAT MACK GAVE US, THEY SIMPLY STRETCHED UNTIL THE CROSS SECTIONAL AREA WAS ABOUT HALF NORMAL AND THEN BROKE! WE THEN ACQUIRED AFTERMARKET BOLTS LOCALLY AND HAD NO PROBLEMS TIGHTENING THEM TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. IT IS MY THEORY (AND FEAR) THAT MACK'S SUPPLIER HAS PROVIDED BOLTS OF INFERIOR QUALITY FOR YEARS AND THAT THOSE BOLTS HAVE BEEN USED IN THE ASSEMBLY LINES AS WELL AS IN MACK PARTS DEPARTMENTS NATIONWIDE. I AM ASKING THE NHTSA TO INVESTIGATE THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE ABF MANAGEMENT SEEMS UNWILLING TO VIGOROUSLY SEEK A SOLUTION. AFTER THREE YEARS OF BOLT FAILURE OUR LARGEST ABF PARTS DEPARTMENT ONLY STOCKS ENOUGH BOLTS TO FIX ONE TRUCK AT A TIME. I AM ALSO CERTAIN THAT THESE BOLTS ARE IN SERVICE IN MANY OTHER FLEETS ACROSS THE NATION, SO IT IS NOT A PROBLEM THAT ABF SHOULD HAVE TO SOLVE ALONE. I HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS AND SAMPLES OF THE DEFECTIVE HARDWARE AND CAN OBTAIN MODELS AND VIN'S IF NECESSARY. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10356665

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE10042 · Failing 5th Wheel Attachment Bolts

Opened Nov 4, 2010 · Closed Apr 27, 2011

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Trailer Hitches:fifth Wheel Assembly

On October 3rd 2010 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received two complaints on 2009 - 2010 Mack CXU612 and CXU trucks for failing bolts that clamp the 5th wheel to the frame of the truck. On January 19, 2011 ODI opened this Preliminary Evaluation.During the course of the investigation ODI took possession of fasteners from the field.These fasteners, taken off subject complaint vehicles, exhibited 'hourglass like stretching' indicating plastic deformation.This same source supplied ODI with new fasteners (for the subject vehicle) that were recently purchased and never used.The bolts supplied by the manufacturer are M16 x 2 Class 10.9 bolts.Per SAE J1199, these bolts should have a proof load 130 kN (~29,000 lbf) and tensile strength of 163 kN (~36,600 lbf).These bolts are not designed to be torque to yield.ODI took possession of these field samples and sent them to (VRTC) Vehicle Research and Testing Center for testing.Some of the new and used fasteners from the field were tested to the SAE J1199 standard and all passed.Other tests at VRTC indicated that the stretched bolts were likely the result of over torque during installation or maintenance.VRTC tested other methods to pre-tension the bolts and found that load indicating washers and turn-of-the-nut method both gave better clamping load control than a torque wrench.In February 2011 Mack started to perform field inspections associated with this investigation in an attempt to understand the cause of the bolt failures.During these inspections, Mack discovered that there was an interference with the bolts used to secure the fifth wheel to the frame.This interference can prevent the bolts from being torqued to specification.If this occurs, the bolt(s) may fail and in extreme cases may result in the fifth wheel coming loose causing the trainer to separate from the tractor.Mack has issued a voluntary Safety Recall 11V-209 for (failure of fifth wheel mounting bolts). However, claims in the field suggest the manufactured supplied fasteners are inferior and stretch regardless of interference.ODI will continue to monitor this issue and follow the completion progress.If failures continue, ODI may open another investigation to investigate future failures.Mack Truck's recall action resolves the issues raised by this investigation and, therefore, this investigation is closed.