← New search

2007 Lincoln Town Car

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2007 Lincoln Town Car do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 86.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Town Car years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

63 reports with mileage · 21 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 32 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Steering. Review the 18 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 12 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

19 crash reports1 fire reports9 injury reports

Vehicle Speed Control complaints

32 reports
Clear category filter
1,500 miles · Mar 15, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR PRESIDENTIAL. THE CONTACT STATED UNDER NORMALLY ROAD CONDITIONS, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED FROM APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH TO 50 MPH IN THE SHOPPING CENTER. HE PRESSED THE BRAKES FIFTEEN TIMES BEFORE THE VEHICLE CAME TO A STOP, WHICH CAUSED A CRASH WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR PRESIDENTIAL. THE CONTACT STATED UNDER NORMALLY ROAD CONDITIONS, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED FROM APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH TO 50 MPH IN THE SHOPPING CENTER. HE PRESSED THE BRAKES FIFTEEN TIMES BEFORE THE VEHICLE CAME TO A STOP, WHICH CAUSED A CRASH WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED BACK AND NECK INJURIES AND IS NOW DISABLED DUE TO THE INCIDENT. THE VEHICLE ,WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WAS1,500. UPDATED 06/17/10. *LJ UPDATED 10/12/10

NHTSA ODI #10319908

3,000 miles · Oct 17, 2009
Service Brakes, HydraulicVehicle Speed Control

COMPONENT: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL DETAILS: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE GAS PEDAL AND BRAKES WERE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER. THE CONTACT OBSERVED THAT THEY WERE TOO CLOSE WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED; I NOTIFY THE DEALER, REEDMAN-TOLL, LANGHORNE, PA APPROXIMATELY 6 MONTHS AFTER PURCHASE A…

Read full complaint

COMPONENT: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL DETAILS: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE GAS PEDAL AND BRAKES WERE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER. THE CONTACT OBSERVED THAT THEY WERE TOO CLOSE WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED; I NOTIFY THE DEALER, REEDMAN-TOLL, LANGHORNE, PA APPROXIMATELY 6 MONTHS AFTER PURCHASE AND WAS TOLD THAT THERE WAS NO RECALL ON THIS CONDITION. MY HUSBAND, JULIUS HYMAN, THE PRIMARY DRIVER, HAS EXPERIENCED THIS UNATTENDED ACCELERATION APPROXIMATELY 6 TIMES AND FORTUNATELY HE WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE FOOT FROM THE ACCELERATOR ALLOWING THE BRAKE TO FUNCTION BEFORE AN ACCIDENT OCCURRED.OR THE MANUFACTURER. . *TR

NHTSA ODI #10288776

38,000 miles · Sep 23, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE GAS PEDAL AND BRAKES WERE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER. THE CONTACT OBSERVED THAT THEY WERE TOO CLOSE WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED; HOWEVER, HE DIDN'T NOTIFY THE DEALER OR THE MANUFACTURER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 38,000.

NHTSA ODI #10285055

22,000 miles · Mar 17, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR SIGNATURE. ON THREE TO FOUR DIFFERENT OCCASIONS, THE VEHICLE MADE A STRANGE NOISE, BUCKED FORWARD, AND THEN ACCELERATED WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE CONTACT HAD TO APPLY THE EMERGENCY BRAKE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE DEALER STATED THAT WHEN THE COILS MISFIRE, THE VEHICLE FE…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR SIGNATURE. ON THREE TO FOUR DIFFERENT OCCASIONS, THE VEHICLE MADE A STRANGE NOISE, BUCKED FORWARD, AND THEN ACCELERATED WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE CONTACT HAD TO APPLY THE EMERGENCY BRAKE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE DEALER STATED THAT WHEN THE COILS MISFIRE, THE VEHICLE FEELS AS IF IT WILL ACCELERATE. HOWEVER, THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE DID ACCELERATE AND THE DEALER REPLACED THE COILS. THE FOLLOWING DAY, THE FAILURE RECURRED AND THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER. THEY COULD NOT FIND ANY FAILURES WITH THE VEHICLE. ON ANOTHER OCCASION, THE FAILURE OCCURRED TWICE IN THE SAME DAY. THE CONTACT CALLED THE DEALER AND THEY STATED THAT THEY INSPECTED THE VEHICLE AND FOUND NO FAILURES. SHE WAS INFORMED BY A REPRESENTATIVE TO BRING THE VEHICLE BACK TO THEM WHILE THE FAILURE WAS OCCURRING. THE CONTACT STATED THAT TWO OTHER 2007 LINCOLN CONTINENTALS SHE OWNED HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME FAILURES. THE MANUFACTURER HAS NOT BEEN NOTIFIED. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 23,978 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 22,000.

NHTSA ODI #10262154

14,900 miles · Nov 10, 2008
Vehicle Speed Control

ON THE VENTURA FREEWAY IN HEAVY TRAFFIC ON NOV 6,2008. DRIVING AT ABOUT 30 MILES PER HOUR, TRAFFIC MADE IT NECESSARY TO STOP. THE CAR, AS IT HAS DONE BEFORE, HAD UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. THIS WAS ABOUT THE FIFTH OR SIXTH TIME IT HAS HAPPENED IN ONE YEAR OF MY OWNING THE CAR. THE OTHER TIMES IT HAPPENED, I HAD BROUGHT IT BACK…

Read full complaint

ON THE VENTURA FREEWAY IN HEAVY TRAFFIC ON NOV 6,2008. DRIVING AT ABOUT 30 MILES PER HOUR, TRAFFIC MADE IT NECESSARY TO STOP. THE CAR, AS IT HAS DONE BEFORE, HAD UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. THIS WAS ABOUT THE FIFTH OR SIXTH TIME IT HAS HAPPENED IN ONE YEAR OF MY OWNING THE CAR. THE OTHER TIMES IT HAPPENED, I HAD BROUGHT IT BACK TO THE DEALER AND THEY REPLACED TRANSMISSION PARTS THE FIRST TIME BUT THEREAFTER COULD NOT DETERMINE THE PROBLEM IN FACT THEY HAD GIVEN ME A TYPE OF COMPUTER TO ATTACH WHILE I WAS DRIVING SO THAT IF IT DID HAPPEN IT WOULD RECORD SOME FACTS THAT WOULD HELP THEM DETERMINE THE CAUSE. THIS COMPUTER STAYED ON FOR ABOUT TWO WEEKS A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO BUT IT DID NOT HAPPEN AT THAT TIME. THE WEEK BEFORE NOV 6, 2008, THE COMPUTER, WAS AGAIN PUT ON MY CAR. SO NOW I WAS STANDING ON THE BRAKE IN THE MIDDLE LANE OF HEAVY TRAFFIC WITH THE CAR SURGING AHEAD WITH UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. IT HAPPENED AGAIN WHEN I GOT OFF THE FREEWAY AND THE SAME UNINTENDED ACCELERATION WHICH COULD HAVE CAUSED TERRIBLE DESTRUCTION OF LIFE AND OR PROPERTY HAD TO BE CONSTRAINED BY ME STANDING ON THE BRAKE AND PRESSING A BUTTON ON THE COMPUTER TO REGISTER THE EFFECT. THIS TOWN CAR IS EXTRAORDINARILY DANGEROUS, I HAVE HAD IT BACK MANY TIMES FOR THE SAME PROBLEM, AND I DO BELIEVE IT CANNOT BE REPAIRED AND SHOULD NOT BE DRIVEN, AS TO THE PAIN AND SUFFERING IT MAY VERY WELL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IF IT CANNOT BE STOPPED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10248224

11,806 miles · Sep 12, 2008
Service Brakes, HydraulicVehicle Speed Control

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. ON FOUR SEPARATE OCCASIONS, WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE BRAKE PUSHED BACK UNDER HIS FOOT AND THE VEHICLE SURGED FORWARD. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 17,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 11,806. UPDATED 10/03/08 *BF UPDA…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. ON FOUR SEPARATE OCCASIONS, WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE BRAKE PUSHED BACK UNDER HIS FOOT AND THE VEHICLE SURGED FORWARD. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 17,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 11,806. UPDATED 10/03/08 *BF UPDATED 10/06/08. 8JB

NHTSA ODI #10241986

Mileage unknown · Jun 18, 2008
Air BagsVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

TL*THE CONTACT DROVE A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR, WHICH WAS A COMPANY VEHICLE. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED, THE CONTACT PLACED THE VEHICLE INTO DRIVE. THE VEHICLE TRAVELED FOUR FEET AND THEN ACCELERATED. HE ATTEMPTED TO STEER AND APPLY THE BRAKES, BUT THE VEHICLE ONLY ACCELERATED MORE. THE VEHICLE FINALLY STOPPED AFTER STRIKING…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT DROVE A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR, WHICH WAS A COMPANY VEHICLE. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED, THE CONTACT PLACED THE VEHICLE INTO DRIVE. THE VEHICLE TRAVELED FOUR FEET AND THEN ACCELERATED. HE ATTEMPTED TO STEER AND APPLY THE BRAKES, BUT THE VEHICLE ONLY ACCELERATED MORE. THE VEHICLE FINALLY STOPPED AFTER STRIKING TWO POLES AND ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE OTHER VEHICLE THEN STRUCK THREE ADDITIONAL VEHICLES. THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE SPUN AROUND AND WAS FACING THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE THAT HE STRUCK. THE INSTRUMENT PANEL LIGHTS ILLUMINATED AND A CRUSHING SOUND WAS HEARD. THE AIR BAGS NEVER DEPLOYED UNTIL THE VEHICLE STOPPED. THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE AND TWO OTHER VEHICLES WERE DESTROYED. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED INJURIES TO HIS NECK, RIGHT SHOULDER, LOWER BACK, BOTH WRISTS, LEFT HAND, RIGHT PELVIS, BOTH KNEES, AND RIGHT ANKLE. HE ALSO SUFFERED FROM DIZZY SPELLS, WAS ON MEDICATION, LOST 40 LBS., AND IS SEEING A PSYCHIATRIST. THE PASSENGER IN THE REAR SEAT SUSTAINED A BUMP TO HER HEAD. THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN SERVICED AT THE DEALER TWO MONTHS PRIOR TO THE CRASH. UPDATED 07/22/08 *BF THE AIR BAGS DEPLOYED AFTER THE CRASH AND WHEN THE VEHICLE SHUT OFF. UPDATED 07/22/08

NHTSA ODI #10231481

14,000 miles · May 19, 2008
Vehicle Speed Control

UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. IT HAPPENED ABOUT 6 TIMES IN 4000 MILES. TRANSMISSION OVERHAUL ONE TIME, NEXT TIME DEALER COULD NOT FIND ANY THING WRONG,HOWEVER IT HAPPENED TWO DAYS LATER AND I WILL BRING IT BACK TO DEALER FOR THE THIRD TIME ABOUT THE SAME PROBLEM. WHOEVER EXPERIENCES THIS DIFFICULTY DON'T ACCEPT ANYONE TELLING YO…

Read full complaint

UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. IT HAPPENED ABOUT 6 TIMES IN 4000 MILES. TRANSMISSION OVERHAUL ONE TIME, NEXT TIME DEALER COULD NOT FIND ANY THING WRONG,HOWEVER IT HAPPENED TWO DAYS LATER AND I WILL BRING IT BACK TO DEALER FOR THE THIRD TIME ABOUT THE SAME PROBLEM. WHOEVER EXPERIENCES THIS DIFFICULTY DON'T ACCEPT ANYONE TELLING YOU THE ACCELERATOR WAS BEING PUSHED OR THE CARPET WAS STICKING. I HAVE DRIVEN PROBABLY MORE THAN A MILLION MILES I KNOW UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. PERIOD. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10228144

1,500 miles · Mar 14, 2008
Air BagsVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONTACT ACTIVATED THE SPEED CONTROL AND THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED. HE DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. WHEN THE VEHICLE FINALLY STOPPED, THE DRIVER SIDE WAS STRUCK BY ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE FRONT AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED …

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONTACT ACTIVATED THE SPEED CONTROL AND THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED. HE DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. WHEN THE VEHICLE FINALLY STOPPED, THE DRIVER SIDE WAS STRUCK BY ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE FRONT AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED INJURIES TO HIS NECK AND BACK. THE VEHICLE WAS TRADED BACK TO THE DEALER. THE CONTACT WAS INJURED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 1,500. UPDATED 4/21/08 *CN

NHTSA ODI #10221147

8,000 miles · Feb 10, 2008
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE, COULD NOT REGAIN CONTROL DUE TO ACTION OF CRUISE CONTROL. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10217569

Official recalls

3

14V704000 · Steering:rack And Pinion:pinion Shaft

Nov 5, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria, 2005-2011 Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles manufactured March 23, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and 2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car vehicles manufactured March 8, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and on which the upper intermediate shaft was serviced during the course of safety recall 13V-385. The prior repairs may not have been correctly performed.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Improper servicing of the upper intermediate shaft could cause the shaft to separate, which can then result in a loss of steering control, and increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Ford will notify the owners of vehicles whose repair records reflect that the upper intermediate steering shaft was repaired during the course of the prior recall 13V-385. Dealers will inspect and replace the upper immediate shaft if necessary free of charge. The recall began November 17, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 14S25.

13V385000 · Steering

Aug 29, 2013

Ford is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria (including Crown Victoria Police Interceptors), Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car vehicles. The affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Severe corrosion can seize the lower intermediate shaft which may cause the upper intermediate shaft to collapse and the steering column lower bearing to separate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the lower bearing separates, the vehicle may experience a loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners and dealers will replace the lower intermediate shaft, free of charge. The upper intermediate shaft and steering column lower bearing will be inspected to identify any damage that may have occurred as a result of lower intermediate shaft corrosion, and repaired or replaced as necessary. If the steering column lower bearing has separated, a retainer clip will be installed. The recall began on October 23, 2013. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's recall number is 13S08.

07V270000 · Suspension:front:hub

Jun 26, 2007

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, A FRONT WHEEL BEARING AND HUB ASSEMBLY MAY FRACTURE DUE TO IMPROPER HEAT TREATMENT.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IF A HUB FRACTURES, IT MAY POTENTIALLY DETACH FROM THE WHEEL KNUCKLE, RESULTING IN THE WHEEL BEING RETAINED ONLY BY THE BRAKE CALIPER ASSEMBLY. AS A RESULT, THE WHEEL MAY SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE POTENTIALLY RESULTING IN A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT BOTH FRONT WHEEL BEARING AND HUB ASSEMBLIES AND REPLACE THEM FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JUNE 22, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE08060 · Tire Valve Cracking

Opened Oct 14, 2008 · Closed Apr 9, 2009

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Tires:valve

ON OCTOBER 14, 2008, ODI OPENED PE08-060 TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF CRACKED AND LEAKING SNAP-IN TIRE VALVES IN MODEL YEAR (MY) 2007 VEHICLES MANUFACTURED BY FORD MOTOR COMPANY.THE VALVES WERE SUPPLIED TO FORD BY TOPSEAL AUTO-PARTS, A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SHANGHAI BAOLONG AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION IN CHINA.VALVES MADE BY TOPSEAL FOR AFTERMARKET SALE WERE THE SUBJECT OF TWO RECENT SAFETY RECALLS BY TECH INTERNATIONAL (08T-018) AND DILL AIR CONTROLS (08T-028), THE LATTER OF WHICH WAS INVESTIGATED BY ODI IN PE08-036 AND EA08-022.THE DEFECT CONDITIONS ADDRESSED BY THE AFTERMARKET TIRE VALVE RECALLS BOTH INVOLVED INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING DUE TO ISSUES WITH THE SUPPLY OF ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS TO TOPSEAL FOR A PERIOD FROM JULY TO MID-NOVEMBER 2006.THE AFTERMARKET VALVES WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A BLEND OF EPDM AND NATURAL RUBBER, USING A RELATIVELY LOW PERCENTAGE OF EPDM (EPDM PROVIDES INHERENT RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING).HENCE, THE NEED FOR ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS AND THE PROBLEMS WITH CRACKING WHEN THOSE CHEMICALS WERE MISSING OR OUT OF SPECIFICATION IN SOME LOTS OF VALVES.BOTH RECALL CAMPAIGNS INVOLVED INSPECTION PROGRAMS TO IDENTIFY AND REPLACE VALVES WITH VISIBLE SURFACE CRACKING.ALTHOUGH THE TOPSEAL VALVES SUPPLIED TO FORD ALSO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY THE ANTI-OZONANT SUPPLY ISSUES IN MID TO LATE-2006, FORD INDICATED THAT ITS VALVES WERE MADE AT A DIFFERENT TOPSEAL PRODUCTION LINE AND WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF EPDM RUBBER TO MEET MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATIONS FROM FORD.ODI'S ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY DATA PROVIDED BY FORD SHOWED THAT PROBLEMS WITH CRACKED TIRE VALVES WERE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER FOR MY 2007 VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007.FORD RESPONDED BY IMPLEMENTING CHANGES IN ITS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SNAP-IN RUBBER TIRE VALVES AND ALSO INCREASING THE QUALITY AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR VALVES IMPORTED FOR USE IN ITS VEHICLES.WHILE THE COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY CLAIM RATES ARE ELEVATED FOR SUBJECT VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007, THE RATES OF LEAKING VALVES ARE WELL BELOW ONE PERCENT OF PRODUCTION FOR EACH OF THE PEAK MONTHS FOR ALL OF THE AFFECTED MODELS.A SUBSTANTIAL MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS (TPMS) WHICH WARN THE DRIVER WHEN ANY TIRE PRESSURES DROPS BELOW 25 PERCENT OF RECOMMENDED INFLATION PRESSURE. AS OUTLINED IN A LETTER TO ODI DATED APRIL 6, 2009, FORD HAS AGREED TO SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS OF CERTAIN MY 2007 AND 2008 FORD, LINCOLN AND MERCURY VEHICLES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CRACKING CONCERN. LETTERS WILL BE SENT TO OWNERS OF VEHICLES BUILT FROM NOVEMBER 2006 THROUGH MAY 2007.OWNERS CAN OPT FOR A FREE DEALER INSPECTION.VALVES EXHIBITING SURFACE CRACKS OR AIR LEAKAGE RELATED TO OZONE ATTACK WILL BE REPLACED BY FORD UNDER ITS NORMAL WARRANTY TERMS.FORD EXPECTS TO SEND THE LETTER BY APPROXIMATELY MID-MAY 2009. BASED ON THE USE OF TPMS IN THE MAJORITY OF SUBJECT VEHICLES AND THE RELATIVELY LOW RATES OF REPAIRS ASSOCIATED WITH LEAKING VALVES AND RESULTANT TIRE DAMAGE, ODI BELIEVES THAT THE ACTIONS FORD HAS AGREED TO TAKE WILL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AND EXPEDITIOUS RESOLUTION FOR VEHICLES THAT WERE BUILT DURING THE PERIOD WHEN VALVES WITH INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING WERE MOST LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN USED IN VEHICLE PRODUCTION.FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF THIS MATTER WOULD NOT BE AN EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF AGENCY RESOURCES.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO