← New search

2009 Jeep Liberty

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2009 Jeep Liberty do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 541.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

92 reports with mileage · 16 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Structure. Review the 20 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 19 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 15 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

2 crash reports2 fire reports4 injury reports

Visibility/wiper complaints

4 reports
Clear category filter
140,000 miles · Aug 5, 2019
Visibility/wiper

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT VENTS WERE MALFUNCTIONING AND PREVENTED THE WINDOWS FROM DEFOGGING, ESPECIALLY DURING THE WINTER MONTHS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A DIRECTIONAL FLAP THAT TURNED THE VENTS, INCLUDING ONE FOR THE HEAT, AIR CONDITIONER, AND DEFOGGERS. THE CONTACT …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT VENTS WERE MALFUNCTIONING AND PREVENTED THE WINDOWS FROM DEFOGGING, ESPECIALLY DURING THE WINTER MONTHS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A DIRECTIONAL FLAP THAT TURNED THE VENTS, INCLUDING ONE FOR THE HEAT, AIR CONDITIONER, AND DEFOGGERS. THE CONTACT BOUGHT THE VEHICLE FROM A PRIVATE PARTY AND HAD NOT CONTACTED A DEALER OR MANUFACTURER. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 140,000.

NHTSA ODI #11241753

104,968 miles · Jul 23, 2015
StructureVisibility/wiper

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SLIDER ROOF HESITATED TO OPERATE. IN ADDITION, THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A LEAK ON THE DRIVER SIDE AND THE REARVIEW MIRROR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE RIGHT AND LEFT SIDE PINS WERE FRACTURED AND THE SLIDER ROOF…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SLIDER ROOF HESITATED TO OPERATE. IN ADDITION, THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A LEAK ON THE DRIVER SIDE AND THE REARVIEW MIRROR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE RIGHT AND LEFT SIDE PINS WERE FRACTURED AND THE SLIDER ROOF NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 104,968.

NHTSA ODI #10735954

72,500 miles · Nov 9, 2014
Visibility/wiper

REAR WINDOW HINGE HAS CORRODED OUT AND NO LONGER HOLDING WINDOW. WINDOW ONLY HELD ON BY REMAINING HINGE AND LATCH. DEALER/CHRYSLER WILL NOT COVER REPAIR OR DO RECALL EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM. SEE HTTP://WWW.JEEPFORUM.COM/FORUM/F292/HELP-BACK-GLASS-LIFT-GATE-1460124/ IF WINDOW FALLS OUT DURING TRAVEL ON HIGHWAY, C…

Read full complaint

REAR WINDOW HINGE HAS CORRODED OUT AND NO LONGER HOLDING WINDOW. WINDOW ONLY HELD ON BY REMAINING HINGE AND LATCH. DEALER/CHRYSLER WILL NOT COVER REPAIR OR DO RECALL EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM. SEE HTTP://WWW.JEEPFORUM.COM/FORUM/F292/HELP-BACK-GLASS-LIFT-GATE-1460124/ IF WINDOW FALLS OUT DURING TRAVEL ON HIGHWAY, COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ACCIDENT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10653707

44,000 miles · Jan 30, 2014
Visibility/wiper

THE DEFROSTER ON THESE MODELS ARE CENTERED ON THE DASHBOARD AND DO NOT EXTEND FAR ENOUGH TO THE LEFT AND RIGHT TO PREVENT ICING OF THE WINDSHIELD AND WIPERS, WHICH CAUSES VISIBILITY ISSUES. IT HAS BEEN AN ISSUE SINCE NEW, AND THE DEALER SAYS IT IS A CHARACTERISTIC OF THE VEHICLE. SOME TYPE OF ADAPTER TO DIRECT MORE OF THE DEFROS…

Read full complaint

THE DEFROSTER ON THESE MODELS ARE CENTERED ON THE DASHBOARD AND DO NOT EXTEND FAR ENOUGH TO THE LEFT AND RIGHT TO PREVENT ICING OF THE WINDSHIELD AND WIPERS, WHICH CAUSES VISIBILITY ISSUES. IT HAS BEEN AN ISSUE SINCE NEW, AND THE DEALER SAYS IT IS A CHARACTERISTIC OF THE VEHICLE. SOME TYPE OF ADAPTER TO DIRECT MORE OF THE DEFROST TO THE EDGES OF THE WINDSHIELD WOULD BE HELPFUL. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10562297

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

DP14004 · Totally Integrated Power Module Failure

Opened Sep 25, 2014 · Closed Jul 24, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System

In a letter dated August 21, 2014, the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged failures associated with the Totally Integrated Power Module (TIPM) installed in Chrysler SUV?s, trucks, and vans beginning in the 2007 model year. The petitioner alleges that TIPM defects may result in engine stall, airbag non-deployment, failure of fuel pump shutoff resulting in unintended acceleration, fire, and other symptoms. On September 25, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP14-004 to evaluate the petition for a grant or deny decision. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by CAS as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, there were 296 complaints submitted by the petitioner in the original petition and five supplements, including 271 complaints related to the subject vehicles equipped with TIPM-7. Approximately 3 percent of CAS complaints are related to vehicles equipped with TIPM-6 and ODI?s review of these complaints did not identify any safety defect trends. ODI conducted a detailed review of complaints narratives submitted by CAS and consumers including careful analysis of vehicle repair histories, warranty claims obtained from the manufacturer and any available Customer Assistance Inquiry reports (CAIR). Analysis of the field data indicated that MY2011-2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles exhibited significantly higher complaint rates related to fuel pump relay (FPR) failures than other subject vehicles. In a September 3, 2014 letter to NHTSA, Chrysler submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a defect in the FPR within the TIPM-7 which can result in a no start or stall condition in approximately 188,723 model year (MY) 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK) and Dodge Durango (WD) vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2010 through July 20, 2011 (14V-530).In a February 24, 2015 letter, Chrysler submitted a second DIR expanding the scope of the FPR defect condition to include an additional 338,216 MY 2012 through 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured from September 17, 2010 through August 19, 2013 and MY 2012 through 2013 Dodge Durango vehicles manufactured from January 18, 2011 through August 19, 2013 (15V-115).ODI analysis of the CAS allegations of TIPM defects resulting in stall while driving, airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, fire and other faults identified a single defect condition related to 1 of over 60 different circuits in the TIPM assembly. The most common effect of this defect condition, related to the fuel pump relay, was a no-start concern, but it could also result in stall while driving (76 complaints). No valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components.Except insofar as the petitioner's contentions relate to the defect condition addressed by the Chrysler recalls, the factual bases of the petitioner's contentions that any further investigation is necessary are unsupported. In our view, additional investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists or a NHTSA order for the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect as alleged by the petitioner at the conclusion of the requested investigation. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is den