← New search

2009 Jeep Liberty

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2009 Jeep Liberty do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 541.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

92 reports with mileage · 16 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Structure. Review the 20 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 19 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 15 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

2 crash reports2 fire reports4 injury reports

Vehicle Speed Control complaints

3 reports
Clear category filter
82,000 miles · Jan 7, 2019
Vehicle Speed Control

WHILE DRIVING THROUGH A GROCERY STORE PARKING LOT, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED TO 4000RPM. THANKFULLY, DUE TO QUICK THINKING, I GOT ON THE BRAKES, PUT THE CAR IN NEUTRAL AND TURNED THE IGNITION OFF. SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY WRONG. THANK GOD I DIDN'T MOW DOWN THE 4 PEOPLE WALKING IN FRONT OF ME. A QUICK SEARCH OF THE INTERNET …

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING THROUGH A GROCERY STORE PARKING LOT, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED TO 4000RPM. THANKFULLY, DUE TO QUICK THINKING, I GOT ON THE BRAKES, PUT THE CAR IN NEUTRAL AND TURNED THE IGNITION OFF. SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY WRONG. THANK GOD I DIDN'T MOW DOWN THE 4 PEOPLE WALKING IN FRONT OF ME. A QUICK SEARCH OF THE INTERNET REVEALS THIS TO BE A COMMON PROBLEM WITH JEEPS. HOW IN THE WORLD HAS THIS ISSUE NOT BEEN A RECALL??!!

NHTSA ODI #11164806

62,000 miles · Apr 11, 2015
SteeringVehicle Speed ControlWheels

WHEN DRIVING MY CAR STARTED LEANING TO THE LEFT DRIVER'S SIDE. I HAVEN'T HIT ANYTHING OR BEEN IN A CAR ACCIDENT. ANYTIME I AM AT A 25+ SPEED IT IS MORE NOTICEABLE, AND VERY MUCH SO ON THE HIGHWAY. NOTHING ELSE SEEMS WRONG WITH THE CAR BUT I'M AFRAID THIS MAY DO OTHER DAMAGE TO THE CAR. AS I HAVE BEEN RESEARCHING FOR RECALLS THE…

Read full complaint

WHEN DRIVING MY CAR STARTED LEANING TO THE LEFT DRIVER'S SIDE. I HAVEN'T HIT ANYTHING OR BEEN IN A CAR ACCIDENT. ANYTIME I AM AT A 25+ SPEED IT IS MORE NOTICEABLE, AND VERY MUCH SO ON THE HIGHWAY. NOTHING ELSE SEEMS WRONG WITH THE CAR BUT I'M AFRAID THIS MAY DO OTHER DAMAGE TO THE CAR. AS I HAVE BEEN RESEARCHING FOR RECALLS THERE SEEM TO BE OTHERS WITH A SIMILAR PROBLEM AS THIS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10705082

2,000 miles · May 22, 2009
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

I OWN A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY WITH 2000 MILES ON IT. TWICE IT HAS SUDDENLY ACCELERATED ON IT'S OWN WHEN I WAS STARTING FROM A STOPPED POSITION TO PULL INTO A PARKING SPACE. THE FIRST TIME I WAS ABLE TO STOP IT USING THE BRAKES BEFORE IT JUMPED OVER THE CURB. THE SECOND TIME IT HAPPENED SO FAST I COULDN'T STOP IT IN TIME AND IT …

Read full complaint

I OWN A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY WITH 2000 MILES ON IT. TWICE IT HAS SUDDENLY ACCELERATED ON IT'S OWN WHEN I WAS STARTING FROM A STOPPED POSITION TO PULL INTO A PARKING SPACE. THE FIRST TIME I WAS ABLE TO STOP IT USING THE BRAKES BEFORE IT JUMPED OVER THE CURB. THE SECOND TIME IT HAPPENED SO FAST I COULDN'T STOP IT IN TIME AND IT HIT A LARGE CONCRETE COLUMN IN FRONT OF THE PARKING SPACE. THE CAR SUFFERED QUITE A LOT OF BODY DAMAGE AND WILL BE IN A BODY SHOP FOR 3 OR MORE WEEKS. I SUFFERED SEVERAL SKIN WOUNDS ON MY HAND AND ARM AND A SPRAINED THUMB. AFTER TALKING WITH SEVERAL MECHANIC FRIENDS, HERE IS WHAT I THINK MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED. IN BOTH CASES I WAS MAKING AN EXTREME LEFT TURN INTO A RIGHT-SLANTED PARKING SPACE FROM A TWO-LANE AISLE. IN BOTH CASES I HAD JUST CROSSED OVER A SAFETY BUMP AND STOPPED TO LET ONCOMING TRAFFIC GO BY BEFORE I TURNED. IN BOTH CASES, IT WAS HOT AND MY AIR CONDITIONER WAS TURNED TO HIGH. THE COMBINATION OF THE LOAD OF THE AIR AND THE POWER STEERING COULD HAVE BEEN ENOUGH TO SHOW UP A DEFECT IN THE ELECTRONIC CONTROL THROTTLE SENSOR SOFTWARE AND CAUSE THE SUDDEN ACCELERATION. THIS IS THE ONLY EXPLANATION THAT I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO FIND. I'M SURE IT WAS NOT DRIVER ERROR. I HAVE DRIVEN JEEPS FOR MANY YEARS AND NEVER HAVE HAD AN ACCIDENT IN ALL MY YEARS OF DRIVING. I WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR ANALYSIS OF THIS PROBLEM BEFORE IT RESULTS IN MORE SERIOUS ACCIDENTS FOR JEEP LIBERTY OWNERS. *TR THANK YOU

NHTSA ODI #10269746

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

DP14004 · Totally Integrated Power Module Failure

Opened Sep 25, 2014 · Closed Jul 24, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System

In a letter dated August 21, 2014, the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged failures associated with the Totally Integrated Power Module (TIPM) installed in Chrysler SUV?s, trucks, and vans beginning in the 2007 model year. The petitioner alleges that TIPM defects may result in engine stall, airbag non-deployment, failure of fuel pump shutoff resulting in unintended acceleration, fire, and other symptoms. On September 25, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP14-004 to evaluate the petition for a grant or deny decision. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by CAS as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, there were 296 complaints submitted by the petitioner in the original petition and five supplements, including 271 complaints related to the subject vehicles equipped with TIPM-7. Approximately 3 percent of CAS complaints are related to vehicles equipped with TIPM-6 and ODI?s review of these complaints did not identify any safety defect trends. ODI conducted a detailed review of complaints narratives submitted by CAS and consumers including careful analysis of vehicle repair histories, warranty claims obtained from the manufacturer and any available Customer Assistance Inquiry reports (CAIR). Analysis of the field data indicated that MY2011-2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles exhibited significantly higher complaint rates related to fuel pump relay (FPR) failures than other subject vehicles. In a September 3, 2014 letter to NHTSA, Chrysler submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a defect in the FPR within the TIPM-7 which can result in a no start or stall condition in approximately 188,723 model year (MY) 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK) and Dodge Durango (WD) vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2010 through July 20, 2011 (14V-530).In a February 24, 2015 letter, Chrysler submitted a second DIR expanding the scope of the FPR defect condition to include an additional 338,216 MY 2012 through 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured from September 17, 2010 through August 19, 2013 and MY 2012 through 2013 Dodge Durango vehicles manufactured from January 18, 2011 through August 19, 2013 (15V-115).ODI analysis of the CAS allegations of TIPM defects resulting in stall while driving, airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, fire and other faults identified a single defect condition related to 1 of over 60 different circuits in the TIPM assembly. The most common effect of this defect condition, related to the fuel pump relay, was a no-start concern, but it could also result in stall while driving (76 complaints). No valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components.Except insofar as the petitioner's contentions relate to the defect condition addressed by the Chrysler recalls, the factual bases of the petitioner's contentions that any further investigation is necessary are unsupported. In our view, additional investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists or a NHTSA order for the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect as alleged by the petitioner at the conclusion of the requested investigation. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is den