NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
233 reportsMileage unknown · Oct 18, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
1991 JEEP CHEROKEE. CONSUMER STATES PROBLEMS WITH BRAKES *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS VERY HARD. THE CONSUMER STATED HE DISCOVERED THE MASTER CYLINDER NEARLY EMPTY. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND IT WAS DETERMINED THE ABS PUMP AND ACTUATOR HAD FAILED. THE CONSUMER…
Read full complaint
1991 JEEP CHEROKEE. CONSUMER STATES PROBLEMS WITH BRAKES *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS VERY HARD. THE CONSUMER STATED HE DISCOVERED THE MASTER CYLINDER NEARLY EMPTY. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND IT WAS DETERMINED THE ABS PUMP AND ACTUATOR HAD FAILED. THE CONSUMER STATED THE ABS PUMP AND ACTUATOR FAILED AGAIN WHICH LEFT HIM WITH NO BRAKES WHILE DRIVING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AGAIN, WHERE THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THE ABS PUMP WAS LEAKING. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10360881
167,000 miles · May 29, 2009
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1991 JEEP CHEROKEE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKE ASSEMBLY FAILED. THE BRAKES HAVE A LIFETIME WARRANTY, BUT IT IS NOT BEING HONORED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THEY PREVIOUSLY REPAIRED THE VEHICLE AND WILL NOT REPAIR IT AGAIN UNLESS THE CONTACT ASSUMES FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. THE FAILURE MILEAGE…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1991 JEEP CHEROKEE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKE ASSEMBLY FAILED. THE BRAKES HAVE A LIFETIME WARRANTY, BUT IT IS NOT BEING HONORED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THEY PREVIOUSLY REPAIRED THE VEHICLE AND WILL NOT REPAIR IT AGAIN UNLESS THE CONTACT ASSUMES FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 167,000.
NHTSA ODI #10272374
233,198 miles · Dec 16, 2007
Service Brakes, HydraulicCrashInjury
I RECENTLY INSTALLED NEW BUMPSTOPS ON THE REAR OF MY JEEP AND NOTICED A DECREASE IN BRAKING ABILITY. TODAY WHILE DRIVING I HAD A SUDDEN LOSS OF BRAKING POWER AND REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE. WHILE INSPECTING MY BRAKING SYSTEM AND MY JEEP FOR DAMAGE. I NOTICED THAT I HAD A REAR BRAKE LINE COLLAPSED. I REMEMBER READING ABOUT RE…
Read full complaint
I RECENTLY INSTALLED NEW BUMPSTOPS ON THE REAR OF MY JEEP AND NOTICED A DECREASE IN BRAKING ABILITY. TODAY WHILE DRIVING I HAD A SUDDEN LOSS OF BRAKING POWER AND REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE. WHILE INSPECTING MY BRAKING SYSTEM AND MY JEEP FOR DAMAGE. I NOTICED THAT I HAD A REAR BRAKE LINE COLLAPSED. I REMEMBER READING ABOUT RECALL 90V206000. IT STATED THAT "CONTACT AT FULL JOUNCE MAY CAUSE THE BRAKE TUBE TO COLLAPSE AND RESTRICT THE HYDRAULIC BRAKE FLUID PRESSURE TO THE LEFT REAR BRAKE WHICH AFFECTS THE BRAKING CAPABILITY OF THE VEHICLE." THIS WAS QUOTED FROM THIS SITE. I READ THE DOCUMENTS THAT WERE LINKED, AND EVEN THOUGH MY VIN DOES NOT PULL UP THE RECALL, WHICH I HAVE GONE TO A DEALER UPON BUYING MY VEHICLE AND HAD THEM MAKE SURE ALL RECALLS WERE PERFORMED. THEY DID NOT SAY I NEEDED THE RECALL REFERENCED. MY JEEP DOES MEET ALL THE OTHER PARTS OF THE RECALL IN TERMS OF WHAT VEHICLES WERE AFFECTED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10212024
170,468 miles · Apr 12, 2006
Power TrainCrash
PARTICULAR INCIDENT INVOLVED SAID VEHICLE ROLLING BACKWARD DOWN A SUBTLE GRADE AFTER THE OWNER EXITED THE VEHICLE W/KEYS IN HAND. THE VEHICLE SHIFT LEVER WAS ENGAGED IN D (DRIVE) AND THE VEHICLE ENGINE WAS NOT RUNNING. AS A RESULT, VEHICLE IMPACTED ANOTHER CAR INCURRING SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO THE REAR OF SAID VEHICLE. WHEN VEH…
Read full complaint
PARTICULAR INCIDENT INVOLVED SAID VEHICLE ROLLING BACKWARD DOWN A SUBTLE GRADE AFTER THE OWNER EXITED THE VEHICLE W/KEYS IN HAND. THE VEHICLE SHIFT LEVER WAS ENGAGED IN D (DRIVE) AND THE VEHICLE ENGINE WAS NOT RUNNING. AS A RESULT, VEHICLE IMPACTED ANOTHER CAR INCURRING SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO THE REAR OF SAID VEHICLE. WHEN VEHICLE MOTOR IS TURNED OFF, WHILE TRANSMISSION SHIFT LEVER IS ENGAGED IN D (DRIVE), R (REVERSE), 3, OR 1-2 (LOW GEAR) AND IGNITION KEY IS REMOVED, VEHICLE CAN MOVE FREELY FORWARD OR BACKWARD (AS IF IT IS IN NEUTRAL GEAR). FOLLOWING INCIDENT, CONDITIONS LEADING TO THE INCIDENT COULD BE RECREATED AT WILL (VEHICLE ROLLED FREELY WHILE IN GEAR AND ENGINE TURNED OFF). VEHICLE DOES NOT ROLL FREELY WHILE IN P (PARK). *NM
NHTSA ODI #10155234
185,000 miles · Aug 2, 2005
Seat Belts
DT: 1991 JEEP CHEROKEE SPORT. THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT BROKE. THE STRAP PART OF THE SEAT BELT WILL NOT CLICK TO GO INTO THE PART IN THE SEAT. THERE HAD NEVER BEEN ANY ACCIDENTS. CONSUMER RECEIVED A TICKET FOR NOT WEARING A SEAT BELT BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT CLICK. THERE WERE NO OTHER PROBLEMS WITH THE VEHICLE. *AK
NHTSA ODI #10131158
Mileage unknown · Jul 25, 2005
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
CONSUMER REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR 1991 JEEP CHEROKEE ABS WORK.****NO ANSWER REQUIRED***.*MR THE CONSUMER REQUESTED REIMBURSEMENT BECAUSE THE PART REPLACED WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE A LIFETIME WARRANTY UNDER THE TERMS OF RECALL #702. THE MANUFACTURER CLAIMED THAT THE PART WAS NOT COVERED FOR THE CONSUMER'S VEHICLE. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10130254
Mileage unknown · Jul 18, 2005
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
DT: THE CONTACT RECEIVED NHTSA CAMPAIGN RECALL 96V260000 CONCERNING ANTI LOCK BRAKES. DEALERSHIP HAS HAD THIS VEHICLE FOR A TOTAL OF FIVE WEEKS TRYING TO GET RECALL CORRECTED, AND CONTACT KEPT GETTING THE RUN AROUND FROM DEALERSHIP, TELLING HIM DIFFERENT STORIES REGARDING THE PROBLEM. THE DEALERSHIP HAS NOT EVEN DONE THE DIA…
Read full complaint
DT: THE CONTACT RECEIVED NHTSA CAMPAIGN RECALL 96V260000 CONCERNING ANTI LOCK BRAKES. DEALERSHIP HAS HAD THIS VEHICLE FOR A TOTAL OF FIVE WEEKS TRYING TO GET RECALL CORRECTED, AND CONTACT KEPT GETTING THE RUN AROUND FROM DEALERSHIP, TELLING HIM DIFFERENT STORIES REGARDING THE PROBLEM. THE DEALERSHIP HAS NOT EVEN DONE THE DIAGNOSTIC TEST, AND AS OF RIGHT NOW THEY WERE GOING TO ORDER THE PARTS, BUT WERE UNCERTAIN OF DATE OF AVAILABILITY. THE MANUFACTURER STATED HE COULD CALL CUSTOMER SERVICE, AND MAYBE TAKE IT SOME WHERE ELSE, BUT REALLY NOTHING FOR SURE OF WHAT THEY COULD DO ABOUT THIS.*AK
NHTSA ODI #10129210
135,000 miles · Jul 14, 2005
Service Brakes, HydraulicCrashInjury
SECOND ABS BRAKING SYSTEM FAILURE (UNDER RECALL 96V260000). PUMP MOTOR / ACTUATOR PISTON SEAL FAILURE FOR SECOND TIME. CAUSED ACCUMULATOR TO FAIL - MANUFACTURER REFUSES STAND BEHIND ABS SYSTEM - WILL REPAIR ONLY THE PART UNDER LIFETIME RECALL. HAVE HAD TWO FRONT END COLLISIONS DUE TO THIS PRODUCT FAILURE. ALL POWER ASSIST IS…
Read full complaint
SECOND ABS BRAKING SYSTEM FAILURE (UNDER RECALL 96V260000). PUMP MOTOR / ACTUATOR PISTON SEAL FAILURE FOR SECOND TIME. CAUSED ACCUMULATOR TO FAIL - MANUFACTURER REFUSES STAND BEHIND ABS SYSTEM - WILL REPAIR ONLY THE PART UNDER LIFETIME RECALL. HAVE HAD TWO FRONT END COLLISIONS DUE TO THIS PRODUCT FAILURE. ALL POWER ASSIST IS LOST TO BRAKES - LEFT WITH MANUAL BRAKES ONLY - BRAKE WARNING LIGHTS COME ON, PUMP RUNS CONTINUOUSLY - BRAKE PEDAL VIBRATES/HUMS WHEN DEPRESSED.
NHTSA ODI #10128795
165,000 miles · Jun 21, 2005
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
DT: THE ABS SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING CORRECTLY, THE ABS SYSTEM IS RUNNING CONTENTIOUSLLY, THERE WAS A RECALL AND HAD RECALL REPAIRS DONE, HOWEVER, HAS THE SAME PROBLEM AGAIN, AND THE DEALERSHIP IS TELLINCONSUMER THE DEFECTIVE PART IS NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL.*AK
NHTSA ODI #10126016
Mileage unknown · Feb 11, 2005
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
THE CONSUMER WAS TRAVELING AT 55 MPH WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THE BRAKES DID NOT OPERATE. THE ABS CHECK LIGHT ILLUMINATED ABOUT 3 SECONDS LATER AND THE OWNER HAD TO STEP ON THE BRAKE PEDAL SEVERAL TIMES IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE. CONSUMER WILL CONTACT MANUFACTURER. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10111341
Official recalls
5Jan 12, 1998
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER AND MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLES ORIGINALLY SOLD OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE STATES OF CONNECTICUT, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, OR WISCONSIN, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. THE FRONT DISC BRAKE ROTORS CAN EXPERIENCE SEVERE CORROSION IF OPERATED FOR AN EXTENSIVE PERIOD IN THE "SALT BELT." IF THE ROTORS ARE NOT REPLACED, THE CORROSION CAN EVENTUALLY COMPROMISE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE STAMPED STEEL CENTER HUB SECTION OF THE ROTOR.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THE REDUCED STRENGTH CAN ALLOW THE CAST IRON WEAR SURFACE TO SEPARATE FROM THE HUB, REDUCING THE BRAKE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE VEHICLE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THESE ROTORS WITH ROTORS THAT ARE COATED WITH A CORROSION PROTECTION.
Dec 27, 1996
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH ANTILOCK BRAKE SYSTEM (ABS). THE ANTILOCK BRAKE SYSTEM (ABS) HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT CAN EXPERIENCE EXCESSIVE BRAKE ACTUATOR PISTON SEAL WEAR WHICH COULD CAUSE PUMP-MOTOR DETERIORATION.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS OCCURS, THE ABS FUNCTION WOULD BE LOSE AND REDUCED POWER ASSIST WOULD BE EXPERIENCED DURING VEHICLE BRAKING. THE INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING LIGHTS WILL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPAIRMENT AND THE BASE MANUAL BRAKES WILL REMAIN FUNCTIONAL.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TEST THE VEHICLE'S ABS AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY. THE WARRANTY ON ALL ABS COMPONENTS WILL BE EXTENDED TO 10 YEARS OR 100,000 MILES (EXCEPT FOR THE BRAKE ACTUATOR PISTON ASSEMBLY AND THE PUMP-MOTOR ASSEMBLY WHICH WILL HAVE A LIFETIME COVERAGE). OWNERS WILL BE REIMBURSED FOR PREVIOUS ABS COMPONENT REPAIR COSTS.
Apr 15, 1991
IMPROPER INSERTION/CRIMPING OF THE HOSE-TO-END FITTINGS OF THE HIGH PRESSURE HOSE ON THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM CAN CAUSE DETACHMENT OF THE HOSE FROM THE ABS SYSTEM, AND DISCHARGE OF HYDRAULIC FLUID.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: DETACHMENT OF THE HOSE FROM THE ABS SYSTEM CAUSES THELOSS OF THE ABS FUNCTION AND HYDRAULIC BRAKE ASSIST, LEAVING ONLY MANUAL BRAKESAND DECREASING STOPPING ABILITY, WHICH COULD RESULT IN AN ACCIDENT. DISCHARGE OFHYDRAULIC FLUID IN THE AREA OF THE HOT EXHAUST SYSTEM COULD RESULT IN AN ENGINECOMPARTMENT FIRE.
Remedy: REPLACE THE ABS HIGH PRESSURE HOSE.
Feb 11, 1991
IMPROPERLY INSTALLED BRAKE FLUID TUBE MAY ALLOW THE TUBE TO CONTACT THE STEERING INTERMEDIATE SHAFT DAMAGING THE TUBE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: BRAKE FLUID LEAKAGE COULD OCCUR AND RESULT IN PARTIALLOSS OF BRAKING CAPABILITY.
Remedy: REPOSITION BRAKE TUBE TO AVOID CONTACT WITH STEERING SHAFT; ALSO, REPLACE ANY DAMAGED BRAKE TUBES.
Dec 18, 1990
SUSPENSION JOUNCE BUMPER COULD CONTACT LEFT REAR WHEEL BRAKE TUBE WHEN SUSPENSION IS AT FULL JOUNCE (BOUNCE).
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: CONTACT AT FULL JOUNCE MAY CAUSE THE BRAKE TUBE TOCOLLAPSE AND RESTRICT THE HYDRAULIC BRAKE FLUID PRESSURE TO THE LEFT REAR BRAKEWHICH AFFECTS THE BRAKING CAPABILITY OF THE VEHICLE.
Remedy: REPLACE LEFT REAR BRAKE TUBE WITH TUBE DESIGNED TO ELIMINATE CONTACT WITH BUMPER.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
6DP02005 · Sudden Acceleration
Opened Apr 25, 2002 · Closed Sep 10, 2002
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Power Train
There is no summary currently available
EA97001 · Brake Disc/hub Separation
Opened Jan 13, 1997 · Closed Jan 9, 1998
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
CONSUMER COMPLAINTS INDICATE THAT CORROSION OF THE BRAKE ROTORS HAVE CAUSED SEPARATION OF THE BRAKE DISC FROM ITS HUB, RESULTING IN BRAKE FAILURE.
PE96053 · Brake Disc/hub Separation
Opened Sep 5, 1996 · Closed Jan 13, 1997
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
consumer complaints indicate that corrosion of hte brake rotors have caused separation of the brake disc from its hub, resulting in brake failure.
DP95007 · Vehicle Sudden Acceleration
Opened Nov 17, 1995 · Closed Dec 5, 1995
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
There is no summary currently available
PE95049 · Rear Axle Shaft Separation
Opened Aug 17, 1995 · Closed Jan 26, 1996
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension
THIS INVESTIGATION WAS OPENED TO EXAMINE THE FAILURE MODE AND THE RISK TO MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY POSED BY ALLEGATIONS OF REAR AXLE SEPARATIONS.THE REAR AXLE SHAFT AND HOUSING DESIGN IS TYPICAL OF THOSE IN WHICH THE WEIGHT OF THE VEHICLE IS CARRIED ON THE AXLE HOUSING.THE LEFT AND RIGHT AXLE SHAFTS, SUPPORTED BY ROLLER BEARINGS, ARE SITUATED INSIDE THE AXLE HOUSING.THE INBOARD SPLINED END OF THE AXLE SHAFT RECEIVES POWER TRANSMITTED FROM THE DIFFERENTIAL ASSEMBLY, PROVIDING TORQUE TO THE REAR WHEELS.THE ALLEGATIONS ARE THAT THE AXLE SHAFT FAILS, RESULTING IN THE SEPARATION OF A WHEEL AND AXLE HUB ASSEMBLY OR THE ENTIRE AXLE SHAFT AND WHEEL ASSEMBLY, DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION OF THE AXLE SHAFT FAILURE.AS IDENTIFIED BY CHRYSLER, THE SUBJECT REAR AXLES ARE DANA 35C AND 35CM MODELS, WHICH HAVE BEEN USED ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES SINCE THE 1990 MODEL YEAR.A SAFETY DEFECT TREND WITH RESPECT TO THE SUBJECT AXLE SHAFTS HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED.SEE HARD COPY RESUME FOR FULL TEXT OF SUMMARY.
PE93057 · Driveshaft/univ.joint Fail
Opened Jun 14, 1993 · Closed Oct 29, 1993
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Power Train
There is no summary currently available