2002 Jaguar Vanden Plas

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

2Owner complaints

Model-year median: 2

0Recall campaigns

View recall details →

0Investigations

View investigation details →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year

Compare all Vanden Plas years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 1 of 2 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

Engine. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Seat Belts. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Suspension. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

Tires complaints

1 reports

Clear category filter

Mileage unknown · Jan 24, 2013

Tires

2002 JAGUAR VANDEN PLAS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO UNSAFE TIRES ON VEHICLE AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES AT DEALERSHIP. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE FAILED, AS A RESULT AGE AND DRY ROT. ALSO, THE LEFT REAR TIRE HAD A BUBBLE ON THE OUTER SIDEWALL. A MICHELIN DEALER INFORMED THE CONSUMER THE TIRES WERE MO…

Read full complaint

2002 JAGUAR VANDEN PLAS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO UNSAFE TIRES ON VEHICLE AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES AT DEALERSHIP. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE FAILED, AS A RESULT AGE AND DRY ROT. ALSO, THE LEFT REAR TIRE HAD A BUBBLE ON THE OUTER SIDEWALL. A MICHELIN DEALER INFORMED THE CONSUMER THE TIRES WERE MORE THAN SEVEN YEARS OLD AND WERE NO LONGER BEING MADE. THE CONSUMER STATED THE DEALER DID NOT INFORM HIM OF THE AGE OF THE TIRES.*JB

NHTSA ODI #10494321

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.