DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT, THE HEAD LIGHTS WERE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH DUE TO THE LENSES CLOUDING AND LOOKING MILKY. THE VEHICLE WAS DRIVEN TO THE DEALER, WHO DETERMINED THE HEAD LIGHTS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT REPLACED THE HEAD LIGHTS. UPDATED 01/10/07. *JB
1999 GMC Suburban
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Limited comparison data
There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Suburban years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
96 reports with mileage · 189 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 118 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Tires. Review the 28 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 23 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Exterior Lighting complaints
5 reportsDT: THE CONTACT STATES NEITHER OF THE HEADLIGHTS WORKED. HE BELIEVED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS WITH A FUSE LINK. THE VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY BEING INSPECTED. *AK
THE LAMPHOLDER ASSEMBLY HAS PRINTED-WIRING SHEET TO ROUTE CURRENT TO BULB SOCKETS. DURING MANUFACTURE, THIS CIRCUIT LAYER IS MOUNTED TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE LAMP HOLDER ASSEMBLY WITH A PLASTIC RIVETING PROCESS. A (PLASTIC AND THUS NON-CONDUCTING) RIVET PASSES *THROUGH* A CONDUCTOR COMMON TO THE BRAKE AND TURN LAMPS, NEARLY SE…
Read full complaint
THE LAMPHOLDER ASSEMBLY HAS PRINTED-WIRING SHEET TO ROUTE CURRENT TO BULB SOCKETS. DURING MANUFACTURE, THIS CIRCUIT LAYER IS MOUNTED TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE LAMP HOLDER ASSEMBLY WITH A PLASTIC RIVETING PROCESS. A (PLASTIC AND THUS NON-CONDUCTING) RIVET PASSES *THROUGH* A CONDUCTOR COMMON TO THE BRAKE AND TURN LAMPS, NEARLY SEVERING THE CONDUCTOR. EVENTUALLY THE SMALL THREAD OF REMAINING CONDUCTOR FAILS ENTIRELY, RESULTING IN A LACK OF SAFETY SIGNALLING THAT CAN NOT BE REPAIRED BY BULB REPLACEMENT. ** EVENTUALLY, ALL ASSEMBLIES WITH THIS DEFECT WILL FAIL, AS THE CURRENT REQUIRED TO LIGHT THE BRAKE AND TURN LAMPS FAR EXCEEDS THE CAPACITY OF THE HAIR-THIN THREAD OF COPPER THAT SURVIVES THE HOLE PUNCHED FOR THE RIVET ** THIS APPEARS TO BE A DESIGN DEFECT. THE FAILURE POINT IS ALSO ONE OF THE TEST POINT AREAS ON THE ASSEMBLY. THERE APPEARS TO BE NO ENGINEERING REASON WHY THE RIVET MUST BE IN THIS LOCATION, AND I SUSPECT THAT A CAD ERROR CAUSED A RIVET LOCATION AND A TEST POINT LOCATION TO BE ERRONEOUSLY COMBINED. THE SURFACE INSULATION MATERIAL IS NOT PRESENT AT THE TEST POINTS TO ALLOW TESTING EITHER BY AUTOMATED EQUIPMENT OR SERVICE TECHNICIANS. THE ASSEMBLY DESIGN HAD TO COORDINATE THREE FUNCTIONAL LAYERS -- THE TEST-POINT HOLES, THE PRINTED WIRING LAYER, AND THE RIVET-STUDS WHICH PASS THROUGH FROM THE PLASTIC STRUCTURE OF THE ASSEMBLY. I BELIEVE THAT A CAD ERROR CAUSED A RIVET STUD (AND ITS ASSOCIATED THRU-HOLE) TO BE ERRONEOUSLY CO-LOCATED WITH A TEST POINT. THIS ONE-LINE-AT-A-TIME TEXT ENTRY FIELD IS LUDICROUS. YOU ASK FOR A DETAILED DESCRIPTION, AND THEN MAKE IT NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO DO SO.
HEADLIGHTS FLASHED ON AND OFF. WAS TOLD BY DEALER THAT THEY COULD NOT FIND THE CAUSE. CONSUMER ALSO HAD CONTACT WITH GMC WHICH HAS NOT HELPED HER. *AK *SLC
EVERY TIME VEHICLE IS DRIVEN WITH THE HEADLIGHTS ON, HEADLIGHTS FLICKER ON AND GO OFF. VEHICLE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP FOUR TIMES IN A SIX-MONTH PERIOD. DEALER WAS NOT ABLE TO FIX THE PROBLEM. ALSO, DOORS ARE WARPED/ENGINE RUNS ROUGH/REPLACED DIFFERENTIAL/BRAKES ARE LOCKING UP. *AK
Official recalls
100V122000 · Seat Belts:front:webbing
Apr 27, 2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: LIGHT DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES. THESE VEHICLES DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE OCCUPANT PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE RIGHT FRONT PASSENGER RESTRAINT SYSTEMS MAY NOT MEET THE NECK EXTENSION REQUIREMENTS.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A TRAY INSERT ON THE TOP OF THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THE TRAY INSERT CORRECTS THE NONCOMPLIANCE.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
0No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.
Illustration