← New search

2011 Four Winds International Windsport

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Windsport years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 0 of 2 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Suspension. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

Suspension complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Aug 12, 2013
Suspension

2011 FORD FOUR WINDS WINDSPORT MOTORHOME. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO DEFECTIVE LEFT FRONT LEAF SPRING FAILED AT THE AXLE. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED THE DEFECTIVE LEAF SPRING WAS DISCOVERED, WHEN HE TOOK THE MOTORHOME TO THE REPAIR SHOP FOR AN ALIGNMENT, BECAUSE THE FRONT TIRES WERE BADLY WORN AND CUPPED. FORD INFORMED THE …

Read full complaint

2011 FORD FOUR WINDS WINDSPORT MOTORHOME. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO DEFECTIVE LEFT FRONT LEAF SPRING FAILED AT THE AXLE. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED THE DEFECTIVE LEAF SPRING WAS DISCOVERED, WHEN HE TOOK THE MOTORHOME TO THE REPAIR SHOP FOR AN ALIGNMENT, BECAUSE THE FRONT TIRES WERE BADLY WORN AND CUPPED. FORD INFORMED THE CONSUMER, THE MOTORHOME WAS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE, AND AFTER CONSIDERABLE HASSLE AND GIVEN THE RUN-AROUND, FORD HAD THE MOTORHOME TOWED TO A DEALERSHIP. THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED BY TWO MECHANICS AT TWO INDEPENDENT TRUCK REPAIR SHOPS, THAT FORD SHOULD NOT ONLY COVER THE COST OF REPLACING THE DEFECTIVE SPRING AND DAMAGED TO THE TIRES, BUT THEY SHOULD ALSO REPLACE THE OTHER FRONT SPRING. THEY STATED FORD SHOULD REPLACE BOTH SPRINGS TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE FRONT SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR SAFETY REASONS, PROPER ALIGNMENT AND TIRE WEAR. TO DATE, FOR HAS NOT CONSIDERED THE CONSUMERS REQUEST FOR WARRANTY REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE DEFECTIVE SPRING AND DAMAGE TO THE TIRES. FORD STATED THE LEAF SPRING WAS SUBJECTED TO EXTERNAL DAMAGE AND THEREFORE, WAS NOT COVERED BY WARRANTY.

NHTSA ODI #10533554

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.