← New search

2011 Ford Fusion Hybrid

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Fusion Hybrid years

Owner complaints for the 2011 Ford Fusion Hybrid are substantially higher than the model-year median of 65.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Fusion Hybrid years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

97 reports with mileage · 35 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Steering. Review the 43 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 34 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 21 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

3 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

21 reports
Clear category filter
86,000 miles · Nov 16, 2020
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO STOP, THE BRAKE PEDAL BECAME VERY HARD TO DEPRESS. THE DRIVER USED THE PARKING BRAKES TO STOP THE VEHICLE. DURING THE FAILURE, THE ABS WARNING LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO BILL KNIGHT FORD LOCATED AT 9607 SOUTH MEMORIAL…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO STOP, THE BRAKE PEDAL BECAME VERY HARD TO DEPRESS. THE DRIVER USED THE PARKING BRAKES TO STOP THE VEHICLE. DURING THE FAILURE, THE ABS WARNING LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO BILL KNIGHT FORD LOCATED AT 9607 SOUTH MEMORIAL DR, TULSA, OK 74133, TO BE DIAGNOSED. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE ABS MODULE FAILED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE HOWEVER, NO ASSISTANCE WAS OFFERED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 86,000.

NHTSA ODI #11374850

58,710 miles · Dec 27, 2019
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD WHEN IT WAS DEPRESSED AND THE ABS WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO ROUSH FORD (LOCATED AT 5575 KEIM CIRCLE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228, 614-888-333) WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD WHEN IT WAS DEPRESSED AND THE ABS WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO ROUSH FORD (LOCATED AT 5575 KEIM CIRCLE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228, 614-888-333) WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FAILURE WAS RELATED TO NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 19V904000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC); HOWEVER, THE RECALL STOPPED AT MODELS MANUFACTURED IN 2010. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 58,710.

NHTSA ODI #11291592

99,000 miles · Aug 16, 2019
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE ABS MODULE HAD A GLITCH THAT CAUSED THE BRAKES TO FAIL WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION. THE ABS INDICATOR WOULD ILLUMINATE WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SYSTEM WOULD RESET WHEN THE ENGINE WAS TURNED OFF FOR FIVE MINUTES. THE VEHI…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE ABS MODULE HAD A GLITCH THAT CAUSED THE BRAKES TO FAIL WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION. THE ABS INDICATOR WOULD ILLUMINATE WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SYSTEM WOULD RESET WHEN THE ENGINE WAS TURNED OFF FOR FIVE MINUTES. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO FORD CRESTVIEW (4060 S FERDON BLVD, CRESTVIEW, FL 32536, (850) 682-2721) WHERE IT WAS CURRENTLY BEING DIAGNOSED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THERE WERE NO RECALLS AND REFERRED THE CONTACT TO NHTSA. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 99,000.

NHTSA ODI #11244355

65,000 miles · Jul 16, 2019
Service Brakes

THE VEHICLE SHOWS AN ERROR ON IGNITION STATING "CHECK ADVANCETRACK" AND THE ABS LIGHT COMES ON. WHEN DRIVING THE VEHICLE IN THIS CONDITION IT HAS MANUAL BRAKES, AND THEY MUST BE PRESSED TO THE FLOOR TO ENGAGE. TURNING OFF THE CAR AND RE-STARTING IT SOMETIMES CLEARS THE ERROR AND I AM ABLE TO DRIVE THE CAR NORMALLY, WITH ABS AND …

Read full complaint

THE VEHICLE SHOWS AN ERROR ON IGNITION STATING "CHECK ADVANCETRACK" AND THE ABS LIGHT COMES ON. WHEN DRIVING THE VEHICLE IN THIS CONDITION IT HAS MANUAL BRAKES, AND THEY MUST BE PRESSED TO THE FLOOR TO ENGAGE. TURNING OFF THE CAR AND RE-STARTING IT SOMETIMES CLEARS THE ERROR AND I AM ABLE TO DRIVE THE CAR NORMALLY, WITH ABS AND HIGHLY RESPONSIVE BRAKES. FORD DEALERSHIP SAYS IT'S CAUSED BY THE FAILURE OF THE ABS MODULE AND THE HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT (HCU), WHICH THEY CLAIM ARE NORMAL WEAR ITEMS NOT CAUSED BY DRIVER AND THE COST OF REPAIR IS $1,800.00.

NHTSA ODI #11232386

108,000 miles · Jul 15, 2019
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Service BrakesWheels

MY DASH WARNING LIGHTS FOR THE BRAKE SYSTEM, ADVANCED TRACTION CONTROL, BRAKE FAILURE, AND CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON ALL OF A SUDDEN AND MY BRAKE PEDAL WENT STRAIGHT TO THE FLOOR WHEN I WAS COMING TO A STOP... ALMOST CAUSING AN ACCIDENT. MY BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS ARE ALL IN GOOD SHAPE. MY TIRES ARE IN GREAT SHAPE AS WELL. THERE …

Read full complaint

MY DASH WARNING LIGHTS FOR THE BRAKE SYSTEM, ADVANCED TRACTION CONTROL, BRAKE FAILURE, AND CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON ALL OF A SUDDEN AND MY BRAKE PEDAL WENT STRAIGHT TO THE FLOOR WHEN I WAS COMING TO A STOP... ALMOST CAUSING AN ACCIDENT. MY BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS ARE ALL IN GOOD SHAPE. MY TIRES ARE IN GREAT SHAPE AS WELL. THERE WAS NO WARNING BEFORE THE PEDAL WENT STRAIGHT TO THE FLOOR.

NHTSA ODI #11231854

73,650 miles · Mar 26, 2019
Service Brakes

DRIVING IN CITY TRAFFIC, PROBABLY ABOUT 25 MPH AND WENT TO BRAKE AS SOMEONE MERGED INTO MY LANE BUT PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WITH NO RESISTANCE. WARNING LIGHTS WENT OFF ON THE DASH REGARDING BRAKE FAILURE AND ABS AND ADVANCE TRAC. I WAS ABLE TO PULL THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND MOVE INTO THE MIDDLE TURN LANE TO AVOID HITTING THE CAR I…

Read full complaint

DRIVING IN CITY TRAFFIC, PROBABLY ABOUT 25 MPH AND WENT TO BRAKE AS SOMEONE MERGED INTO MY LANE BUT PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WITH NO RESISTANCE. WARNING LIGHTS WENT OFF ON THE DASH REGARDING BRAKE FAILURE AND ABS AND ADVANCE TRAC. I WAS ABLE TO PULL THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND MOVE INTO THE MIDDLE TURN LANE TO AVOID HITTING THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME. FROM THAT POINT ON BRAKES CEASED TO FUNCTION RELIABLY--SOMETIMES JERKING TO AN ALMOST STOP AND THEN NOTHING, SOMETIMES JUST NOTHING, HAD TO CONTINUE TO USE THE EMERGENCY BRAKE TO GET HOME AND TO THE DEALERSHIP IN THE AM AND IT IS BASICALLY A MIRACLE THAT I MADE IT SAFELY. THIS IS CLEARLY NOT A MECHANICAL PART WEARING OUT--LIKE BRAKE PADS ETC. BUT RATHER SOME KIND OF COMPUTER FAILURE THAT HAPPENS WITHOUT WARNING AND IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS.

NHTSA ODI #11191665

52,000 miles · Feb 10, 2019
Service Brakes

RED DASH LIGHT SHOWED BRAKE PROBLEM. BRAKES FAILED ENTIRELY.TRAVEWLING ON STREET LESS THAN 10 MPH. CAR WAS TOWED TP DEALER. A MODULE WAS REPLACED. TWO WEEKS LATER RED ABS BRAKE LIGHT WENT ON, BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO FLOOR TO STOP. TRAVELING ON CITY STREET LESS THAN 10 MPH. CAR WAS TOWED TO DEALER.

NHTSA ODI #11176078

68,000 miles · Sep 11, 2018
Service Brakes

WHILE MOVING ON A DRY, ASPHALT, CITY ROAD, APPROACHING A STOP SIGN, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, BUT THE BRAKES DID NOT ENGAGE AT ALL. THE EMERGENCY BRAKE WAS APPLIED TO STOP VEHICLE. THEN SLOWLY MOVING FORWARD AND RETESTING BRAKES PRODUCED THE SAME RESULT. THEN TURNED OFF IGNITION AND RESTARTED IGNITION. THEN NORMAL BRAKI…

Read full complaint

WHILE MOVING ON A DRY, ASPHALT, CITY ROAD, APPROACHING A STOP SIGN, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, BUT THE BRAKES DID NOT ENGAGE AT ALL. THE EMERGENCY BRAKE WAS APPLIED TO STOP VEHICLE. THEN SLOWLY MOVING FORWARD AND RETESTING BRAKES PRODUCED THE SAME RESULT. THEN TURNED OFF IGNITION AND RESTARTED IGNITION. THEN NORMAL BRAKING FUNCTION RETURNED. TOOK CAR TO A MECHANIC AND NO CORRECTIVE TAKEN (EVERYTHING TESTED OK). INCIDENTALLY, LEFT FRONT AND REAR TIRES WERE RECENTLY SWAPPED. SO TREAD WEAR WAS DIFFERENT BETWEEN LEFT AND RIGHT TIRES ON EACH AXLE.

NHTSA ODI #11128640

61,000 miles · Jul 31, 2018
Service Brakes

MY 2011 FUSION ONLY HAS 61K MILES. ALL OF A SUDDEN, COUPLE OF DAYS AGO, THE BREAK WOULD GO ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR AND THE CAR WOULD BARELY STOP. I HAD TO USE THE PARKING BRAKE TO STOP. LUCKILY, I WAS IN A PARKING LOT AND TRYING TO PULL OUT OF A SLOT WHEN THIS HAPPENED. THE DASH HAD THE WRENCH SYMBOL AND ALSO BRAKE SYSTEM WAR…

Read full complaint

MY 2011 FUSION ONLY HAS 61K MILES. ALL OF A SUDDEN, COUPLE OF DAYS AGO, THE BREAK WOULD GO ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR AND THE CAR WOULD BARELY STOP. I HAD TO USE THE PARKING BRAKE TO STOP. LUCKILY, I WAS IN A PARKING LOT AND TRYING TO PULL OUT OF A SLOT WHEN THIS HAPPENED. THE DASH HAD THE WRENCH SYMBOL AND ALSO BRAKE SYSTEM WARNING AND SERVICE ADVANCETRAC MESSAGE. I BARELY MANAGED TO STOP AND TURNED OFF THE ENGINE. AND ABOUT AN HOUR LATER, WHEN I STARTED THE VEHICLE THE WARNING MESSAGES WENT AWAY AND THE VEHICLE BEHAVED NORMALLY. WITHOUT TAKING CHANCES, I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO A LOCAL FORD DEALERSHIP AND EXPLAINED CLEARLY WHAT HAPPENED. THEY RAN SOME DIAGNOSTICS AND DETERMINED THAT THE ABS ECU AND THE ABS HCU UNIT NEED TO BE REPLACED (COST $3,125). WHAT REALLY APPALLS ME IS THAT A VEHICLE WITH ONLY 61K MILES WOULD COMPLETELY LOSE ITS BRAKING ABILITY AND PUT THE OCCUPANTS AND THE PEOPLE ON THE ROAD IN SERIOUS JEOPARDY. EITHER I COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED/INJURED IN A SERIOUS ACCIDENT IF I WAS ON A HIGHWAY OR I COULD HAVE EASILY RUN OVER A PEDESTRIAN OR A CYCLIST ON A CITY STREET. MAKES ME SHIVER THINKING OF THESE SITUATIONS.

NHTSA ODI #11114916

63,000 miles · Jul 1, 2018
Service Brakes

BRAKE FAILURE..FORD FUSION A.B.S... I WAS EXITING A PARKING LOT AT APPROXIMATELY 20MPH FOR A RIGHT HAND TURN AT A STOP SIGN. AS I APPROACHED THE STOP SIGN, I WENT TO SLOW DOWN AND STOP, AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR- THE CAR DID NOT SLOW OR STOP. I GRABBED THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND PULLED IT UP, AND THE CAR …

Read full complaint

BRAKE FAILURE..FORD FUSION A.B.S... I WAS EXITING A PARKING LOT AT APPROXIMATELY 20MPH FOR A RIGHT HAND TURN AT A STOP SIGN. AS I APPROACHED THE STOP SIGN, I WENT TO SLOW DOWN AND STOP, AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR- THE CAR DID NOT SLOW OR STOP. I GRABBED THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND PULLED IT UP, AND THE CAR STILL DID NOT SLOW OR STOP. I WENT BEYOND THE STOP SIGN AND ROLLED INTO A CITY STREET. THERE WAS ONCOMING TRAFFIC SO I ACCELERATED TO BE AHEAD OF THE APPROACHING TRAFFIC. I VERY SLOWLY DROVE THE 1 MILE TO MY HOME. THE ABS LIGHT, BRAKE LIGHT, AND CHECK ENGINE LIGHT WERE ALL ON. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A FORD DEALER. THE BRAKES CHECKED OUT OK, HOWEVER, THE A.B.S. SYSTEM FAILED. THE A.B.S. MODULE AND A.B.S. CONTROL WERE FAULTY. THE SAME MODEL PARTS REPLACED THE FAULTY PARTS!!! WHEN WILL THE BRAKES FAIL AGAIN?? ONLY 63,000 MILES ON THE VEHICLE. THE FORD SERVICE ADVISOR STATED, "THE BRAKE FAILURE WAS DUE TO NOTHING YOU DID". THIS WAS A VERY FRIGHTENING EXPERIENCE AND THANK HEAVENS I WAS NOT DRIVING FASTER OR ON A FREEWAY. I KNOW OF 2 OTHER PEOPLE THAT HAVE HAD SIMILAR EXPERIENCES (BRAKES TO THE FLOOR AND NOT STOPPING) WITH FORD FUSION BRAKE FAILURE. I HAVE ENCOURAGED BOTH TO REPORT TO THE NHTSA, HOWEVER BOTH ARE FLEET CARS AND THEY ARE NOT THE OWNERS.

NHTSA ODI #11105010

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

3

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

PE14030 · Electric Power Steering Failure

Opened Oct 2, 2014 · Closed Sep 10, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering:electric Power Assist System

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation to investigate complaints of the loss of power steering while driving. The subject vehicles are equipped with a rack mounted Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) unit.Some of the complaints alleged that the steering assist failed and resulted in increased steering efforts that contributed to a loss of control and in some cases a crash.The EPAS system was manufactured by TRW Automotive for Ford and was designated as Generation I.These units were first produced and put into vehicle production in July 2008 beginning with the model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan.The system is comprised of a mechanical steering rack-and-pinion gear with torque sensor, electric assist motor, motor position sensor and a power steering control module (PSCM). The PSCM is self-monitoring and designed to detect faults within the system and can store diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) if a problem is detected.There are 29 potential DTCs the system can detect.Many of these allow the system to go into reduced-assist steering mode by using the default vehicle speed signal should the live speed signal be lost, if voltage to EPAS system falls below 10.7 or goes above 17 volts, the temperature at the PSCM goes above 105C (221F), or if high friction is detected.Some DTCs will cause the system to go into manual steering mode (no assist). On July 1, 2015, Ford filed a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a safety related defect in TRW GEN I EPAS systems installed in some of the subject vehicles (NHTSA Recall 15V-340, Ford No. 15S18).The DIR indicated that intermittent electrical connections caused by quality issues associated with conformal coat contamination and ribbon cable pin misalignment within the steering gear motor may lead to a loss of the motor position sensor signal, resulting in a sudden loss of power assist while driving.The recall covers approximately 393,623 vehicles built from September 2010 through February 2012:2011-12 Fusion built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-12 Lincoln MKZ built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011 Milan built SEP 2010 - DEC 2010; 2011-13 Taurus built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-13 Flex with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; and 2011-13 MKS, MKT with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012.The repair consists of updating the PSCM software to prevent a loss of steering assist while driving. The revised software will provide audible and visual warnings to the driver. If one or more of the following DTCs are stored, C1B00-62, C200B-2F, C200B-61, C200B-62, C200C-2F, C200D-49, U0300-00, U2011-49, U2011-61, U3000-46, U3000-49, U3000-61, U3000-72, U3000-96, P07AE-09, the dealer will replace the EPAS system at no charge to the owner.ODI's analysis of failure data for this PE identified a total of 2,584 complaints to ODI and Ford and 9,967 Ford warranty claims related to the alleged defect.The recalled vehicles account for 1,634 of the complaints and 7,311 of the warranty claims.ODI's analysis identified 40 complaints alleging crashes that may be related to loss of steering assist while driving, 20 of which involved vehicles included in Ford's recall.The information available for the alleged crashes were not sufficient to assess specific causes of the incidents or to verify EPAS malfunctions in each case.Most of the crashes were low-speed impacts with curbs or roadside objects resulting in wheel or minor body damage.None of the injury claims indicated medical attention was required.In addition, statistical modeling of the failure data by NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis projected 10-year failur

EA12009 · Floor Mat Interference With Accelerator

Opened Dec 12, 2012 · Closed Jun 12, 2014

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control; Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.

Vehicle Speed Control

On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.