← New search

2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Fusion Hybrid years

Owner complaints for the 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid are substantially higher than the model-year median of 65.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

375 reports with mileage · 133 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Steering. Review the 138 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 135 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 79 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

9 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Vehicle Speed Control complaints

45 reports
Clear category filter
37,500 miles · Sep 28, 2016
Power TrainVehicle Speed Control

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE VEHICLE DECELERATED AND THE POWER TRAIN WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER TO REPAIR THE THROTTLE BODY; HOWEVER, THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE REPAIR WAS NOT PART OF A RECALL AND WAS OUTSIDE OF THE EXTENDED WARRAN…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE VEHICLE DECELERATED AND THE POWER TRAIN WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER TO REPAIR THE THROTTLE BODY; HOWEVER, THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE REPAIR WAS NOT PART OF A RECALL AND WAS OUTSIDE OF THE EXTENDED WARRANTY DUE TO THE VEHICLE BEING A HYBRID. THE CONTACT WAS INQUIRING ABOUT REIMBURSEMENT ELIGIBILITY. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 37,500. THE CONSUMER STATED SHE IMMEDIATELY LOST SPEED AND HAD TROUBLE ACCELERATING. UPDATED 10/27/16.*JB..UPDATED 12/20/16 *BF *TR

NHTSA ODI #10910137

75,000 miles · Sep 6, 2016
Electrical SystemEngineVehicle Speed Control

DRIVING ON HIGHWAY W/ CRUISE CONTROL ENGAGED AT 65 MPH SPEED. SUDDENLY CAR LOSES COMPLETE ACCELERATION & PROPULSION ABILITY, RESULTING IN CAR TO SLOW DOWN RATHER SUDDENLY. I WAS ABLE TO PULL ONTO OFF RAMP IN MY CASE, BUT IF I WAS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION, I WOULD HAVE DEFINITELY BEEN IN A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION/SERIOUS ACCIDENT…

Read full complaint

DRIVING ON HIGHWAY W/ CRUISE CONTROL ENGAGED AT 65 MPH SPEED. SUDDENLY CAR LOSES COMPLETE ACCELERATION & PROPULSION ABILITY, RESULTING IN CAR TO SLOW DOWN RATHER SUDDENLY. I WAS ABLE TO PULL ONTO OFF RAMP IN MY CASE, BUT IF I WAS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION, I WOULD HAVE DEFINITELY BEEN IN A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION/SERIOUS ACCIDENT. I TURNED OFF VEHICLE AND RESTARTED THE VEHICLE A FEW MINUTES LATER. PROCEEDED TO THE HIGHWAY AGAIN, EXPERIENCED THE PROBLEM AGAIN, THIS TIME I WAS ONLY ABLE TO PULL OVER TO THE LEFT SHOULDER, WHICH WAS QUITE NARROW TO BEGIN WITH."WRENCH SYMBOL" APPEARED THE SECOND TIME AND STAYED ON WITH CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ON. CAR WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE FURTHER. THE CHECK ENGINE TROUBLE SHOOTING CODES I HAD WERE P2111 AND P2112. CAUSE OF THIS ISSUE IS KNOWN TO FORD MOTOR BUT THEY REFUSE TO INCLUDE HYBRID CARS IN THEIR "CONSUMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N03". THROTTLE BODY CONTROL MODULE SENOR, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY IS DEFECTIVE AS FORD HAS AGREED TO REPLACE THIS ON MILLIONS OF CARS ACROSS VARIOUS MODEL YEARS, INCLUDING THE FUSION 2010, BUT NOT FUSION HYBRID VERSIONS. FORD STATES THEY WILL NOT REPAIR PROBLEM THAT I EXPERIENCED RECENTLY UNDER THIS ESTABLISHED PROGRAM WHICH NHTSA WAS PROPONENT FOR. THE DEFECTIVE PART IN QUESTION IS THE THROTTLE BODY ASSEMBLY AND SENSOR WHICH IS NO DIFFERENT THAN THE PART IN THE NON-HYBRID VERSION FOR THE SAME MODEL YEAR. REAL HAZARD TO DRIVER AND I WAS LUCKY THAT I WAS NOT REAR ENDED AS A RESULT OR IN A SERIOUS CAR ACCIDENT FROM THIS KNOWN DEFECTIVE PART. FORD MOTOR MUST BE REQUIRED TO NOTIFY ALL AFFECTED OWNERS WHO WILL/HAVE EXPERIENCED THIS PROBLEM TO HAVE IT REPAIRED AT THEIR EXPENSE, AS THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE THAT MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY GIVEN NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT ARE INVOLVED THAT WILL EXPERIENCE THIS. I EXPERIENCED THIS AT MILEAGE OF 75K BUT I HAVE READ THAT OTHERS HAVE HAD THIS HAPPEN AT MUCH LOWER MILEAGE.

NHTSA ODI #10904247

53,000 miles · Aug 20, 2016
Electrical SystemEngineVehicle Speed Control

MY 2010 FUSION HYBRID BEGAN A NO-START/STALLING CONDITION. IT HAS HAPPENED SIX TIMES NOW. FIRST OCCURRENCE WAS AFTER FUELING AT LOW SPEED AFTER ENTERING STREET. SECOND OCCURRENCE WAS WHILE TRAVELING ON THE HIGHWAY AT 55 MPH. THIRD OCCURRENCE WAS WHILE EXITING THE INTERSTATE. FOURTH OCCURRENCE WAS AT LOW SPEED. FIFTH OCCURRENCE …

Read full complaint

MY 2010 FUSION HYBRID BEGAN A NO-START/STALLING CONDITION. IT HAS HAPPENED SIX TIMES NOW. FIRST OCCURRENCE WAS AFTER FUELING AT LOW SPEED AFTER ENTERING STREET. SECOND OCCURRENCE WAS WHILE TRAVELING ON THE HIGHWAY AT 55 MPH. THIRD OCCURRENCE WAS WHILE EXITING THE INTERSTATE. FOURTH OCCURRENCE WAS AT LOW SPEED. FIFTH OCCURRENCE WAS IMMEDIATELY AFTER REFUELING WHILE STILL IN PARKING LOT. AND SIXTH OCCURENCE WAS ALSO IMMEDIATELY AFTER REFUELING JUST AFTER LEAVING GAS STATION AT LOW SPEED. FOUR OF THE SIX OCCURRENCES WAS A FAILURE FOR THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE TO START AFTER THE ELECTRIC MOTOR HAD ALREADY BEGAN MOVING THE VEHICLE. THE OTHER TWO OCCURRENCES WAS WHILE COASTING. IN ALL INSTANCES THERE WOULD BE A RED TRIANGLE WARNING MESSAGE TO PULL OVER SAFELY, NO CODES WERE THROWN ACCORDING TO THE ENGINEERING REPORT, NO ISSUES REPORTED VIA THE VEHICLE HEALTH REPORT, THE VEHICLE WAS TRAVELING IN A MOSTLY LEVEL AND STRAIGHT LINE, AND THE VEHICLE WOULD USUALLY RESET AND RUN NORMALLY AFTER THE FIRST OR SECOND ATTEMPT AT RESTARTING ONCE THE VEHICLE WAS PULLED OVER.

NHTSA ODI #10897339

71,000 miles · Aug 19, 2016
Vehicle Speed Control

I WAS DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY AT 65 MPH WHEN TWO WRENCH SYMBOLS APPEARED ON THE DASHBOARD. WITHIN A FEW MINUTES, THE CAR BEGAN TO DECELERATE QUICKLY AND LOST POWER. I HAD TO PULL OVER TO THE SHOULDER TO AVOID AN ACCIDENT. IT IS THE SAME ISSUE THAT FORD HAS EXTENDED THE WARRANTY FOR WITH REGARD TO THE NON-HYBRID FORD FUSION MODE…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY AT 65 MPH WHEN TWO WRENCH SYMBOLS APPEARED ON THE DASHBOARD. WITHIN A FEW MINUTES, THE CAR BEGAN TO DECELERATE QUICKLY AND LOST POWER. I HAD TO PULL OVER TO THE SHOULDER TO AVOID AN ACCIDENT. IT IS THE SAME ISSUE THAT FORD HAS EXTENDED THE WARRANTY FOR WITH REGARD TO THE NON-HYBRID FORD FUSION MODEL. ALSO THERE ARE MANY SIMILAR COMPLAINTS THAT HYBRID OWNERS ARE REPORTING ON THE INTERNET. I DO NOT KNOW WHY THE EXTENDED WARRANTY DOES NOT APPLY TO THE HYBRIDS AS IT IS THE SAME ISSUE. THE DEALER TOLD ME THAT THE THROTTLE BODY MUST BE REPLACED IN MY CAR AND THEY ALSO HAVE TO REPROGRAM THE POWERTRAIN CODE.

NHTSA ODI #10897076

144,000 miles · Aug 15, 2016
Vehicle Speed Control

I EXPERIENCE RAPID DECELERATION OF MY VEHICLE WHEN GOING OVER 60MPH ON THE HIGHWAY. THE WRENCH SERVICES LIGHT CAME ON, AS WELL AS THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT, AND THE ACCELERATOR STOPPED RESPONDING AT ALL. I HAVE FOUND MANY INSTANCES OF THIS HAPPENING IN OTHER FORD VEHICLES, INCLUDING THE FUSION, BUT AM TOLD BY FORD THAT THE HYBRID…

Read full complaint

I EXPERIENCE RAPID DECELERATION OF MY VEHICLE WHEN GOING OVER 60MPH ON THE HIGHWAY. THE WRENCH SERVICES LIGHT CAME ON, AS WELL AS THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT, AND THE ACCELERATOR STOPPED RESPONDING AT ALL. I HAVE FOUND MANY INSTANCES OF THIS HAPPENING IN OTHER FORD VEHICLES, INCLUDING THE FUSION, BUT AM TOLD BY FORD THAT THE HYBRID HAS NOT BEEN AFFECTED AND THEREFORE THERE IS NO RECALL OR REPAIR ASSISTANCE. HOWEVER, CLEARLY THIS SAME PART IN MY VEHICLE, THE FUSION HYBRID, IS EXPERIENCING ISSUES.

NHTSA ODI #10895949

87,000 miles · Jul 11, 2016
Vehicle Speed Control

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH, THE WRENCH WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO ACCELERATE WHEN THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE CONTACT SWITCHED OFF AND WAS ABLE TO RESTART THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH, THE WRENCH WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO ACCELERATE WHEN THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE CONTACT SWITCHED OFF AND WAS ABLE TO RESTART THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 87,000.

NHTSA ODI #10883968

70,000 miles · Jun 12, 2016
Electrical SystemFuel/propulsion SystemVehicle Speed Control

I WAS DRIVING THE CAR ABOUT 60 MPH ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN I SAW A BIG RED TRIANGLE ON THE DISPLAY SAYING "PULL OVER AND STOP SAFELY" AND THE CAR SLOWED DOWN DRAMATICALLY. I DID THAT AND TURNED OFF THE ENGINE. I RESTARTED THE CAR. THIS OCCURRED 8 MORE TIMES BEFORE I GOT HOME (15 MILES LATER). WHEN I GOT HOME, I NOTICED THAT THE …

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING THE CAR ABOUT 60 MPH ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN I SAW A BIG RED TRIANGLE ON THE DISPLAY SAYING "PULL OVER AND STOP SAFELY" AND THE CAR SLOWED DOWN DRAMATICALLY. I DID THAT AND TURNED OFF THE ENGINE. I RESTARTED THE CAR. THIS OCCURRED 8 MORE TIMES BEFORE I GOT HOME (15 MILES LATER). WHEN I GOT HOME, I NOTICED THAT THE CAR'S FAN WAS RUNNING VERY HIGH FOR SEVERAL MINUTES. IT FINALLY STOPPED.

NHTSA ODI #10873748

75,250 miles · Jun 10, 2016
Power TrainVehicle Speed Control

MY DAUGHTER HAS HER LEARNER'S PERMIT AND WAS DRIVING MY FORD FUSION HYBRID ON A 45 MPH STREET. THE WRENCH LIGHT CAME ON AND THE CAR WOULD NOT ACCELERATE AS SHE WAS DRIVING UP A HILLY PART OF THE STREET. CARS BEGAN HONKING AND PASSING AND MY DAUGHTER BECAME EXTREMELY NERVOUS. THANKFULLY, WE WERE NOT INVOLVED IN A CAR ACCIDENT …

Read full complaint

MY DAUGHTER HAS HER LEARNER'S PERMIT AND WAS DRIVING MY FORD FUSION HYBRID ON A 45 MPH STREET. THE WRENCH LIGHT CAME ON AND THE CAR WOULD NOT ACCELERATE AS SHE WAS DRIVING UP A HILLY PART OF THE STREET. CARS BEGAN HONKING AND PASSING AND MY DAUGHTER BECAME EXTREMELY NERVOUS. THANKFULLY, WE WERE NOT INVOLVED IN A CAR ACCIDENT BUT SHE WAS QUITE SHAKEN BY THE INCIDENT. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE FORD DEALERSHIP TO HAVE IT REPAIRED AND WAS ADVISED THIS WAS NOT A RECALL EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE SEVERAL THOUSAND COMPLAINTS AND ISSUES. I HAD TO HAVE THE THROTTLE BODY REPLACED WHICH IS APPARENTLY A DEFECTIVE PART. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THERE ISN'T A RECALL FOR THIS DEFECT. I UNDERSTAND THE NHTSA CONSIDERS SAFETY A HUGE FACTOR WHEN RECALLING PARTS. HOWEVER, THE PART IS CLEARLY DEFECTIVE AND HAS COST CONSUMERS GREATLY. PLEASE RECONSIDER RECALLING OR AT LEAST SUBSIDIZING THE PAYMENT FOR THOSE AFFECTED BY THIS DEFECTIVE PART.

NHTSA ODI #10873569

65,000 miles · May 20, 2016
EnginePower TrainVehicle Speed Control

WHEN OPERATING THE CAR ON THE FREEWAY, THE CAR SUDDENLY LOST POWER AND ONLY COULD ACHIEVE 45 MPH IN SPITE OF THE ACCELERATOR BEING FLOORED. WHEN EVENTUALLY STOPPED, THE ENGINE WOULD SURGE AND SHUDDER PERIODICALLY. THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON. PULLING THE TROUBLE CODE REVEALED P2112 WHICH IS A THROTTLE BODY ERROR.

NHTSA ODI #10870008

79,333 miles · May 10, 2016
Vehicle Speed Control

VEHICLE WAS ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN THE THROTTLE CLOSED. I SUDDENLY COULD NOT GET TO A SPEED ABOVE 25 MPH. FORTUNATELY I WAS ABLE TO GET TO AN EXIT WITHOUT BEING HIT, AND LIMPED TO THE FORD DEALER WHERE I BOUGHT IT. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT OTHER FORD FUSIONS OF THAT YEAR HAD AN EXTENDED WARRANTY CREATED WHEN THEY HAD THE SAME FL…

Read full complaint

VEHICLE WAS ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN THE THROTTLE CLOSED. I SUDDENLY COULD NOT GET TO A SPEED ABOVE 25 MPH. FORTUNATELY I WAS ABLE TO GET TO AN EXIT WITHOUT BEING HIT, AND LIMPED TO THE FORD DEALER WHERE I BOUGHT IT. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT OTHER FORD FUSIONS OF THAT YEAR HAD AN EXTENDED WARRANTY CREATED WHEN THEY HAD THE SAME FLAW; IT EVEN TRIGGERED THE SAME CODE (P2112). THIS PROBLEM SEEMS TO EXTEND, THEN, TO HYBRIDS, ALTHOUGH FORD CURRENTLY DOES NOT INCLUDE THEM.

NHTSA ODI #10864129

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

6

DP26004 · Anti-lock Brake System (abs) Malfunction Indicator Lamp (mil) Illuminated

Opened Apr 9, 2026 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a petition on December 22, 2025, requesting a defect investigation into the hydraulic control unit (HCU) for the Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) on the MY 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid. The petition alleges that an illuminated ABS MIL is associated with a failure of the ABS HCU, resulting in ABS malfunction, loss of traction and electronic stability control functions, and reduced braking performance, particularly on slippery road surfaces. A defect petition has been opened to evaluate the issue and determine whether to grant or deny the petition.The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI number 11647929.

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

EA17004 · Power Steering Failure

Opened Nov 20, 2017 · Closed Feb 9, 2024

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:electric Power Assist System; Steering:rack And Pinion; Steering:rack And Pinion:rack

On September 28, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.  During the PE, ODI received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at various speeds with no warning.  Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1,851 unique reports and 1,720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.  It should be noted that as the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford conducted a safety recall (15V-340) ofMY 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist. On November 20, 2017, PE16-011 was upgraded to this Engineering Analysis (EA17-004) to further assess the scope, frequency, and consequence of this failure.  This was based on an analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data that had indicated an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.  At the time, the rate of occurrence of this failure was comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030. During the EA, ODI’s analysis of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles identified the following:  testing showed minor steering effort changes between “assist” and “no assist”, no root cause identified, a declining failure trend, the ramp-down or reduced assist provided when a DTC is set, a lower failure rate than the recalled Fusion vehicles, and the high age of the vehicles. A safety-related defect trend has not been identified.  Accordingly, this Engineering Analysis is closed.  See the attached Engineering Analysis Closing Report for details.  The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety defect does not exist, and ODI will take further actions if warranted by future circumstances.  To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Additional source detail variants (4)

Steering:electric Power Assist System

On September 28, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.  During the PE, ODI received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at various speeds with no warning.  Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1,851 unique reports and 1,720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.  It should be noted that as the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford conducted a safety recall (15V-340) ofMY 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist. On November 20, 2017, PE16-011 was upgraded to this Engineering Analysis (EA17-004) to further assess the scope, frequency, and consequence of this failure.  This was based on an analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data that had indicated an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.  At the time, the rate of occurrence of this failure was comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030. During the EA, ODI’s analysis of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles identified the following:  testing showed minor steering effort changes between “assist” and “no assist”, no root cause identified, a declining failure trend, the ramp-down or reduced assist provided when a DTC is set, a lower failure rate than the recalled Fusion vehicles, and the high age of the vehicles. A safety-related defect trend has not been identified.  Accordingly, this Engineering Analysis is closed.  See the attached Engineering Analysis Closing Report for details.  The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety defect does not exist, and ODI will take further actions if warranted by future circumstances.  To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Steering

On September 28, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.  During the PE, ODI received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at various speeds with no warning.  Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1,851 unique reports and 1,720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.  It should be noted that as the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford conducted a safety recall (15V-340) ofMY 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist. On November 20, 2017, PE16-011 was upgraded to this Engineering Analysis (EA17-004) to further assess the scope, frequency, and consequence of this failure.  This was based on an analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data that had indicated an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.  At the time, the rate of occurrence of this failure was comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030. During the EA, ODI’s analysis of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles identified the following:  testing showed minor steering effort changes between “assist” and “no assist”, no root cause identified, a declining failure trend, the ramp-down or reduced assist provided when a DTC is set, a lower failure rate than the recalled Fusion vehicles, and the high age of the vehicles. A safety-related defect trend has not been identified.  Accordingly, this Engineering Analysis is closed.  See the attached Engineering Analysis Closing Report for details.  The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety defect does not exist, and ODI will take further actions if warranted by future circumstances.  To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Steering:rack And Pinion

On September 28, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.  During the PE, ODI received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at various speeds with no warning.  Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1,851 unique reports and 1,720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.  It should be noted that as the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford conducted a safety recall (15V-340) ofMY 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist. On November 20, 2017, PE16-011 was upgraded to this Engineering Analysis (EA17-004) to further assess the scope, frequency, and consequence of this failure.  This was based on an analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data that had indicated an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.  At the time, the rate of occurrence of this failure was comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030. During the EA, ODI’s analysis of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles identified the following:  testing showed minor steering effort changes between “assist” and “no assist”, no root cause identified, a declining failure trend, the ramp-down or reduced assist provided when a DTC is set, a lower failure rate than the recalled Fusion vehicles, and the high age of the vehicles. A safety-related defect trend has not been identified.  Accordingly, this Engineering Analysis is closed.  See the attached Engineering Analysis Closing Report for details.  The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety defect does not exist, and ODI will take further actions if warranted by future circumstances.  To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Steering:rack And Pinion:rack

On September 28, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.  During the PE, ODI received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at various speeds with no warning.  Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1,851 unique reports and 1,720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.  It should be noted that as the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford conducted a safety recall (15V-340) ofMY 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist. On November 20, 2017, PE16-011 was upgraded to this Engineering Analysis (EA17-004) to further assess the scope, frequency, and consequence of this failure.  This was based on an analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data that had indicated an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.  At the time, the rate of occurrence of this failure was comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030. During the EA, ODI’s analysis of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles identified the following:  testing showed minor steering effort changes between “assist” and “no assist”, no root cause identified, a declining failure trend, the ramp-down or reduced assist provided when a DTC is set, a lower failure rate than the recalled Fusion vehicles, and the high age of the vehicles. A safety-related defect trend has not been identified.  Accordingly, this Engineering Analysis is closed.  See the attached Engineering Analysis Closing Report for details.  The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety defect does not exist, and ODI will take further actions if warranted by future circumstances.  To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

PE16011 · Power Steering Failure

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Dec 25, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:electric Power Assist System

On September 28th, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation PE16-011 to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.ODI has received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at speed with no warning.During the PE16-011 investigation, Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1851 unique reports and 1720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.As the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford previously conducted a recall (15V-340) of the 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist.An analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data indicates an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.The rate of occurrence of this failure is comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030.Therefore, the Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) has been upgraded to an Engineering Analysis to further assess the scope, frequency and consequence of this failure. ODI reports cited above can be reviewed at https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle under the identification (NHTSA ID) numbers found in the attached list.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Steering:electric Power Assist System

On September 28th, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation PE16-011 to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.ODI has received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at speed with no warning.During the PE16-011 investigation, Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1851 unique reports and 1720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.As the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford previously conducted a recall (15V-340) of the 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist.An analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data indicates an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.The rate of occurrence of this failure is comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030.Therefore, the Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) has been upgraded to an Engineering Analysis to further assess the scope, frequency and consequence of this failure. ODI reports cited above can be reviewed at https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle under the identification (NHTSA ID) numbers found in the attached list.

Steering

On September 28th, 2016, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation PE16-011 to investigate claims of power steering assist loss on model year 2010 Ford Fusion vehicles.ODI has received 718 unique claims related to the alleged problem with 598 reports indicating the power steering assist failed while driving at speed with no warning.During the PE16-011 investigation, Ford Motor Company (Ford) provided 1851 unique reports and 1720 warranty claims related to the alleged problem.As the result of investigation PE14-030, Ford previously conducted a recall (15V-340) of the 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and other vehicles using the same electric power assist steering unit to rectify incidents of loss of power steering assist.An analysis of the subject vehicle complaint data indicates an increased likelihood of failure as the vehicles age.The rate of occurrence of this failure is comparable to previous investigations involving loss of power steering assist including the previously mentioned PE14-030.Therefore, the Preliminary Evaluation (PE16-011) has been upgraded to an Engineering Analysis to further assess the scope, frequency and consequence of this failure. ODI reports cited above can be reviewed at https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle under the identification (NHTSA ID) numbers found in the attached list.

PE14030 · Electric Power Steering Failure

Opened Oct 2, 2014 · Closed Sep 10, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering:electric Power Assist System

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation to investigate complaints of the loss of power steering while driving. The subject vehicles are equipped with a rack mounted Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) unit.Some of the complaints alleged that the steering assist failed and resulted in increased steering efforts that contributed to a loss of control and in some cases a crash.The EPAS system was manufactured by TRW Automotive for Ford and was designated as Generation I.These units were first produced and put into vehicle production in July 2008 beginning with the model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan.The system is comprised of a mechanical steering rack-and-pinion gear with torque sensor, electric assist motor, motor position sensor and a power steering control module (PSCM). The PSCM is self-monitoring and designed to detect faults within the system and can store diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) if a problem is detected.There are 29 potential DTCs the system can detect.Many of these allow the system to go into reduced-assist steering mode by using the default vehicle speed signal should the live speed signal be lost, if voltage to EPAS system falls below 10.7 or goes above 17 volts, the temperature at the PSCM goes above 105C (221F), or if high friction is detected.Some DTCs will cause the system to go into manual steering mode (no assist). On July 1, 2015, Ford filed a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a safety related defect in TRW GEN I EPAS systems installed in some of the subject vehicles (NHTSA Recall 15V-340, Ford No. 15S18).The DIR indicated that intermittent electrical connections caused by quality issues associated with conformal coat contamination and ribbon cable pin misalignment within the steering gear motor may lead to a loss of the motor position sensor signal, resulting in a sudden loss of power assist while driving.The recall covers approximately 393,623 vehicles built from September 2010 through February 2012:2011-12 Fusion built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-12 Lincoln MKZ built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011 Milan built SEP 2010 - DEC 2010; 2011-13 Taurus built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-13 Flex with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; and 2011-13 MKS, MKT with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012.The repair consists of updating the PSCM software to prevent a loss of steering assist while driving. The revised software will provide audible and visual warnings to the driver. If one or more of the following DTCs are stored, C1B00-62, C200B-2F, C200B-61, C200B-62, C200C-2F, C200D-49, U0300-00, U2011-49, U2011-61, U3000-46, U3000-49, U3000-61, U3000-72, U3000-96, P07AE-09, the dealer will replace the EPAS system at no charge to the owner.ODI's analysis of failure data for this PE identified a total of 2,584 complaints to ODI and Ford and 9,967 Ford warranty claims related to the alleged defect.The recalled vehicles account for 1,634 of the complaints and 7,311 of the warranty claims.ODI's analysis identified 40 complaints alleging crashes that may be related to loss of steering assist while driving, 20 of which involved vehicles included in Ford's recall.The information available for the alleged crashes were not sufficient to assess specific causes of the incidents or to verify EPAS malfunctions in each case.Most of the crashes were low-speed impacts with curbs or roadside objects resulting in wheel or minor body damage.None of the injury claims indicated medical attention was required.In addition, statistical modeling of the failure data by NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis projected 10-year failur

EA12009 · Floor Mat Interference With Accelerator

Opened Dec 12, 2012 · Closed Jun 12, 2014

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control; Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.

Vehicle Speed Control

On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.