Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
320–25K
2525–50K
5250–75K
3175–100K
32100–150K
12150K+
184 reports with mileage · 24 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Power Train. Review the 57 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Engine. Review the 28 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Electrical System. Review the 25 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
11 crash reports5 fire reports5 injury reports
What owners actually said
208 reports
Mileage unknown · Sep 7, 2009
Tires
I HAVE A 2007 FORD EXPLORER (EDDIE BAUER) AND I AM HAVING A TIRE PROBLEM. I HAVE MICHELIN TIRES ON THE CAR WITH 13000 MILES AND THE TIRES ARE WORN PAST THE WEAR BARS. I HAVE ROTATED THE TIRES EVERY 6000 MILES. THIS IS A LEASE CAR AND I CAN'T PASS THE LEASE INSPECTION WITH THESE BAD TIRES. MICHELIN(ON THEIR WEBSITE) SAYS THESE T…
Read full complaint
I HAVE A 2007 FORD EXPLORER (EDDIE BAUER) AND I AM HAVING A TIRE PROBLEM. I HAVE MICHELIN TIRES ON THE CAR WITH 13000 MILES AND THE TIRES ARE WORN PAST THE WEAR BARS. I HAVE ROTATED THE TIRES EVERY 6000 MILES. THIS IS A LEASE CAR AND I CAN'T PASS THE LEASE INSPECTION WITH THESE BAD TIRES. MICHELIN(ON THEIR WEBSITE) SAYS THESE TIRES SHOULD LAST 6YRS 65,000 MILES. THE CAR IS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE IN THE RAIN. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10283072
20,000 miles · Aug 25, 2009
Power Train
WHEN I BRAKE MY EXPLORER CAR JOLTS FORWARD LIKE I'VE BEEN REAR ENDED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10281736
12,000 miles · Aug 3, 2009
Equipment
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY 2007 FORD EXPLORER ? DUAL AUTOMATIC CLIMATE CONTROL DOES NOT WORK PROPERLY: IN AUTO MODE (DURING COOLING PROCESS) VERY COLD AIR BLOWS INTO MY FACE THROUGH PANEL VENTS AND WARM AIR THROUGH THE VENTS IN FOOTWELL. NO FLOW DIRECTION CHANGE, NO RECIRCULATION AT ALL. AND I HEAR CLICKING NOISE FROM BEHIND THE…
Read full complaint
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY 2007 FORD EXPLORER ? DUAL AUTOMATIC CLIMATE CONTROL DOES NOT WORK PROPERLY: IN AUTO MODE (DURING COOLING PROCESS) VERY COLD AIR BLOWS INTO MY FACE THROUGH PANEL VENTS AND WARM AIR THROUGH THE VENTS IN FOOTWELL. NO FLOW DIRECTION CHANGE, NO RECIRCULATION AT ALL. AND I HEAR CLICKING NOISE FROM BEHIND THE DASH PANEL. WARM AIR BLOWS DOWN IN EVERY MODE (FACE, FACE-FEET, WINDSHIELD-FEET) THAT I CHOSE. I LEARNED FROM INTERNET IT'S A BLEND DOOR ACTUATOR PROBLEM AND IT'S BEEN IN PLACE SINCE 1995 FOR EXPLORER MODEL. OUR LOCAL FORD DEALER SAYS MY AC IS OK - NO FAILURES SHOWN BY SCANNER DEVICE. BUT I KNOW THERE IS THE PROBLEM - THE SCANNER SHOWS ONLY THE ACTUATOR MOTOR MOVE BUT NOT THE DOOR MOVE. MOTOR MAY BE OK AND THE GEAR MAY BE STRIPPED. THEY JUST DON'T WANT TO FIX IT. I KNOW IT?S A SAFETY PROBLEM ALSO BECAUSE SOME TIME THE BLEND DOOR WILL BREAK COMPLETELY AND MY WINDOWS WILL BE FROZEN IN WINTER. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10279126
36,000 miles · Jun 23, 2009
Interior LightingPower Train
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD EXPLORER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS NO LIGHT INDICATION ON THE GEAR SHIFTER. AT NIGHT, HE IS UNABLE TO TELL WHETHER THE VEHICLE IS IN PARK, NEUTRAL, OR DRIVE. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND WAS INFORMED THAT THERE WERE NO ELECTRICAL BOLTS IN THE VEHICLE BECAUSE IT …
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD EXPLORER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS NO LIGHT INDICATION ON THE GEAR SHIFTER. AT NIGHT, HE IS UNABLE TO TELL WHETHER THE VEHICLE IS IN PARK, NEUTRAL, OR DRIVE. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND WAS INFORMED THAT THERE WERE NO ELECTRICAL BOLTS IN THE VEHICLE BECAUSE IT WAS DESIGNED IN THAT MANNER. THE CONTACT CALLED NUMEROUS DEALERS AND THEY ALL CONFIRMED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS MANUFACTURED IN THIS MANNER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 36,000 AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 37,000.
NHTSA ODI #10274711
16,837 miles · Jun 10, 2009
Tires
TIRE VALVE FAILED CAUSING THE TIRE TO LOSE AIR.*TR
NHTSA ODI #10273500
34,012 miles · Jun 4, 2009
Visibility
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD EXPLORER. THE CONTACT HEARD A RUMBLING NOISE WHENEVER HE ROLLED DOWN THE REAR WINDOWS. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS WITH THE WINDOWS DOWN, THE VEHICLE VIBRATES SEVERELY. THE DEALER STATED THAT THERE WAS A DESIGN DEFECT, BUT COULD NOT REPAIR THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 34,012.
NHTSA ODI #10272873
27,676 miles · May 14, 2009
Air BagsCrashInjury
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD EXPLORER. WHILE IDLING AT A RED LIGHT, THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE WAS REAR-ENDED BY ANOTHER VEHICLE TRAVELING APPROXIMATELY 35-40 MPH. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO THE PRECEDING VEHICLE. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE CONTACT AND HER CHILD BOTH EXPERIENCED PAIN IN THEIR BODIES DUE TO T…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD EXPLORER. WHILE IDLING AT A RED LIGHT, THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE WAS REAR-ENDED BY ANOTHER VEHICLE TRAVELING APPROXIMATELY 35-40 MPH. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO THE PRECEDING VEHICLE. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE CONTACT AND HER CHILD BOTH EXPERIENCED PAIN IN THEIR BODIES DUE TO THE CRASH, BUT WAS UNAWARE IF THE OTHER DRIVERS WERE INJURED. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE DEALER STATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT INSPECT HER VEHICLE UNLESS THE AIR BAG LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. THE MANUFACTURER HAS NOT BEEN NOTIFIED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 27,676. UPDATED 06/11/09. *LJ UPDATED 06/11/09.*JB
NHTSA ODI #10268764
Mileage unknown · Jan 30, 2009
Structure
THERE IS A NEW DESIGN TO HAVE THE INTERIOR DOOR HANDLE AT THE TOP OF THE DOOR PANEL. IT IS VERY CLOSE TO THE STEERING COLUMN. THE PAINT THAT IS ON THE HANDLE IS CHIPPING OFF DUE TO WATCHES AND JEWELRY RUBBING IT. THIS LOOKS TACKY. IT IS A BRAND NEW VEHICLE AND IS ALREADY SHOWING SCRATCHES AND WEAR. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10256941
63,292 miles · Jan 20, 2009
Tires
TIRE INSPECTION REVEALED SIGNIFICANT SIDE WALL DETERIORATION AT THE BEAD. THE TIRE WAS STILL HOLDING AIR, HOWEVER, THE CONDITION OF THE SIDE WALL & BEAD INDICATED CATASTROPHIC FAILURE WAS IMMINENT. THE TIRE WAS REMOVED FROM SERVICE. THIS IS THE THIRD TIRE TO EXHIBIT BEAD & SIDE WALL DETERIORATION FOR THIS VEHICLE, TIRE BRAND/…
Read full complaint
TIRE INSPECTION REVEALED SIGNIFICANT SIDE WALL DETERIORATION AT THE BEAD. THE TIRE WAS STILL HOLDING AIR, HOWEVER, THE CONDITION OF THE SIDE WALL & BEAD INDICATED CATASTROPHIC FAILURE WAS IMMINENT. THE TIRE WAS REMOVED FROM SERVICE. THIS IS THE THIRD TIRE TO EXHIBIT BEAD & SIDE WALL DETERIORATION FOR THIS VEHICLE, TIRE BRAND/MODEL, AND DOT NUMBER. THE TIRE CARCASS HAS BEEN RETAINED FOR INSPECTION UNTIL JUNE 30 2009. TIRES: GOODYEAR FORTERA HL P235/70R16 PHOTOS MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WHATLLAMA.COM/TIREPHOTOS/TIRES081003.GZ*TR
NHTSA ODI #10255755
62,200 miles · Jan 20, 2009
Tires
WHILE TRAVELING AT HIGHWAY SPEED OF 70-MPH ON SMOOTH PAVEMENT I EXPERIENCED A TIRE BLOWOUT. NO ROAD HAZARD WAS NOTED. THE TIRE EXHIBITED SIGNIFICANT SIDE WALL DETERIORATION AT THE BEAD AND THE PERPENDICULAR SITE WALL SEPARATION. THE SIDE WALL SEPARATED FROM THE BEAD FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE QUARTER OF THE DIAMETER. THIS IS THE S…
Read full complaint
WHILE TRAVELING AT HIGHWAY SPEED OF 70-MPH ON SMOOTH PAVEMENT I EXPERIENCED A TIRE BLOWOUT. NO ROAD HAZARD WAS NOTED. THE TIRE EXHIBITED SIGNIFICANT SIDE WALL DETERIORATION AT THE BEAD AND THE PERPENDICULAR SITE WALL SEPARATION. THE SIDE WALL SEPARATED FROM THE BEAD FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE QUARTER OF THE DIAMETER. THIS IS THE SECOND INCIDENT FOR THIS VEHICLE, TIRE BRAND/MODEL, AND DOT NUMBER. THE TIRE CARCASS HAS BEEN RETAINED FOR INSPECTION UNTIL JUNE 30 2009. TIRES: GOODYEAR FORTERA HL P235/70R16 PHOTOS MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WHATLLAMA.COM/TIREPHOTOS/TIRES081001.GZ. *TR
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, THE TWO BOLTS THAT ATTACH THE STEERING GEAR ASSEMBLY TO THE FRAME MAY HAVE BEEN OVER-TIGHTENED. THIS CONDITION COULD RESULT IN ONE OR BOTH OF THE BOLTS FRACTURING, CAUSING THE STEERING GEAR TO BECOME LOOSE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE "CLUNKING" NOISE WHEN STEERING AS WELL AS DECREASED STEERING EFFECTIVENESS POTENTIALLY RESULTING IN A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE BOTH THE STEERING GEAR ASSEMBLY MOUNTING BOLTS AND NUTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 27, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1
PE08060 · Tire Valve Cracking
Opened Oct 14, 2008 · Closed Apr 9, 2009
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Tires:valve
ON OCTOBER 14, 2008, ODI OPENED PE08-060 TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF CRACKED AND LEAKING SNAP-IN TIRE VALVES IN MODEL YEAR (MY) 2007 VEHICLES MANUFACTURED BY FORD MOTOR COMPANY.THE VALVES WERE SUPPLIED TO FORD BY TOPSEAL AUTO-PARTS, A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SHANGHAI BAOLONG AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION IN CHINA.VALVES MADE BY TOPSEAL FOR AFTERMARKET SALE WERE THE SUBJECT OF TWO RECENT SAFETY RECALLS BY TECH INTERNATIONAL (08T-018) AND DILL AIR CONTROLS (08T-028), THE LATTER OF WHICH WAS INVESTIGATED BY ODI IN PE08-036 AND EA08-022.THE DEFECT CONDITIONS ADDRESSED BY THE AFTERMARKET TIRE VALVE RECALLS BOTH INVOLVED INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING DUE TO ISSUES WITH THE SUPPLY OF ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS TO TOPSEAL FOR A PERIOD FROM JULY TO MID-NOVEMBER 2006.THE AFTERMARKET VALVES WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A BLEND OF EPDM AND NATURAL RUBBER, USING A RELATIVELY LOW PERCENTAGE OF EPDM (EPDM PROVIDES INHERENT RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING).HENCE, THE NEED FOR ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS AND THE PROBLEMS WITH CRACKING WHEN THOSE CHEMICALS WERE MISSING OR OUT OF SPECIFICATION IN SOME LOTS OF VALVES.BOTH RECALL CAMPAIGNS INVOLVED INSPECTION PROGRAMS TO IDENTIFY AND REPLACE VALVES WITH VISIBLE SURFACE CRACKING.ALTHOUGH THE TOPSEAL VALVES SUPPLIED TO FORD ALSO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY THE ANTI-OZONANT SUPPLY ISSUES IN MID TO LATE-2006, FORD INDICATED THAT ITS VALVES WERE MADE AT A DIFFERENT TOPSEAL PRODUCTION LINE AND WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF EPDM RUBBER TO MEET MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATIONS FROM FORD.ODI'S ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY DATA PROVIDED BY FORD SHOWED THAT PROBLEMS WITH CRACKED TIRE VALVES WERE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER FOR MY 2007 VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007.FORD RESPONDED BY IMPLEMENTING CHANGES IN ITS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SNAP-IN RUBBER TIRE VALVES AND ALSO INCREASING THE QUALITY AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR VALVES IMPORTED FOR USE IN ITS VEHICLES.WHILE THE COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY CLAIM RATES ARE ELEVATED FOR SUBJECT VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007, THE RATES OF LEAKING VALVES ARE WELL BELOW ONE PERCENT OF PRODUCTION FOR EACH OF THE PEAK MONTHS FOR ALL OF THE AFFECTED MODELS.A SUBSTANTIAL MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS (TPMS) WHICH WARN THE DRIVER WHEN ANY TIRE PRESSURES DROPS BELOW 25 PERCENT OF RECOMMENDED INFLATION PRESSURE. AS OUTLINED IN A LETTER TO ODI DATED APRIL 6, 2009, FORD HAS AGREED TO SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS OF CERTAIN MY 2007 AND 2008 FORD, LINCOLN AND MERCURY VEHICLES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CRACKING CONCERN. LETTERS WILL BE SENT TO OWNERS OF VEHICLES BUILT FROM NOVEMBER 2006 THROUGH MAY 2007.OWNERS CAN OPT FOR A FREE DEALER INSPECTION.VALVES EXHIBITING SURFACE CRACKS OR AIR LEAKAGE RELATED TO OZONE ATTACK WILL BE REPLACED BY FORD UNDER ITS NORMAL WARRANTY TERMS.FORD EXPECTS TO SEND THE LETTER BY APPROXIMATELY MID-MAY 2009. BASED ON THE USE OF TPMS IN THE MAJORITY OF SUBJECT VEHICLES AND THE RELATIVELY LOW RATES OF REPAIRS ASSOCIATED WITH LEAKING VALVES AND RESULTANT TIRE DAMAGE, ODI BELIEVES THAT THE ACTIONS FORD HAS AGREED TO TAKE WILL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AND EXPEDITIOUS RESOLUTION FOR VEHICLES THAT WERE BUILT DURING THE PERIOD WHEN VALVES WITH INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING WERE MOST LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN USED IN VEHICLE PRODUCTION.FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF THIS MATTER WOULD NOT BE AN EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF AGENCY RESOURCES.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO