NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints
9 reportsClear category filter25,000 miles · Oct 2, 2013
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH, THE CHECK BRAKES, ABS AND TRACTION CONTROL WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATED. THE FAILURE RECURRED SEVERAL TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH, THE CHECK BRAKES, ABS AND TRACTION CONTROL WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATED. THE FAILURE RECURRED SEVERAL TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 25,000. UPDATED 11/15/13*CN THE CONSUMER STATED ON THREE OCCASIONS, THE BRAKE BECAME VERY SOFT AND ALL THE WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. UPDATED 12/3/13 THE CONSUMER EXPERIENCED A FOURTH BRAKE FAILURE. THE DEALER STATED IT WOULD COST $3,600 TO REPLACE THE HYDRAULIC BRAKE SYSTEM. UPDATED 09/17/14 AFTER INSPECTING THE VEHICLE, THE DEALER DETERMINED THE PROBLEM WAS THE BRAKE PRESSURE SWITCH. IT WAS REPLACED AT A COST OF $670. UPDATED 10/28/14
NHTSA ODI #10546480
27,000 miles · Jan 23, 2012
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WARNING MY BRAKES COMPLETELY FAILED!!!! *TR
NHTSA ODI #10444943
49,398 miles · Jan 7, 2012
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
TWO WEEKS AGO, AT 50,000 MILES AND JUST BACK FROM THE DEALER'S SERVICE, MY BRAKES FAILED AT START-UP: VERY LITTLE BRAKING ACTION AND A WARNING ON THE DASH. I DROVE IT AROUND THE BLOCK AND WENT THROUGH FOUR STOP SIGNS. I HAD IT TOWED BACK TO THE DEALER, WHERE IT HAS BEEN EVER SINCE. THE TECHNICIAN THERE FOUND A CODE FOR "OVER-EXT…
Read full complaint
TWO WEEKS AGO, AT 50,000 MILES AND JUST BACK FROM THE DEALER'S SERVICE, MY BRAKES FAILED AT START-UP: VERY LITTLE BRAKING ACTION AND A WARNING ON THE DASH. I DROVE IT AROUND THE BLOCK AND WENT THROUGH FOUR STOP SIGNS. I HAD IT TOWED BACK TO THE DEALER, WHERE IT HAS BEEN EVER SINCE. THE TECHNICIAN THERE FOUND A CODE FOR "OVER-EXTENDED BRAKE PEDAL" -- NATURALLY THE RESULT WHEN THE BRAKES FAIL AND THE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR. THE SERVICE MANAGER SAYS THEY CANNOT DUPLICATE THE FAILURE DESPITE FREQUENT ATTEMPTS, AND THAT FORD WILL NOT AUTHORIZE REPAIR UNLESS THEY CAN SEE THE FAILURE FOR THEMSELVES. THE "CUSTOMER SERVICE" MANAGER AT FORD HEADQUARTERS, IMPLIES THAT FORD'S ENGINEERS ARE UNAWARE OF THIS KIND OF PROBLEM AND HAVE NO EXPLANATION FOR IT -- A POSITION THAT IS BELIED BY THE MANY POSTS ON FORD ESCAPE HYBRID BRAKE PROBLEM FORUMS. THE DEALER'S TECHNICIAN WAS MORE HONEST: HE SAID "WE CAN'T REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITHOUT FORD'S APPROVAL, AND THEY WON'T APPROVE THAT BECAUSE OF THE HIGH-DOLLAR PARTS." MY READING OF MORE THAN 150 POSTS ON THE WEB SHOWS THAT 1) THIS PROBLEM HAS PLAGUED THE ESCAPE HYBRID SINCE 2005, 2) THE PROBLEM OFTEN GOES AWAY IMMEDIATELY, ONLY TO RECUR UNEXPECTEDLY LATER, AND 3) FORD USUALLY REFUSES TO FIX THE PROBLEM, EVEN WHEN THE CAR IS, LIKE MINE, STILL UNDER WARRANTY. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10442798
38,173 miles · Jan 3, 2012
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
WHEN I STARTED THE VEHICLE THIS MORNING THERE WAS A COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE BRAKING SYSTEM. A FORD DEALERSHIP REPORTED THAT A WIRE HAD BROKEN AND THIS RESULTED IN A ELECTRICAL FAILURE IN THE BRAKING SYSTEM THAT CAUSED THE ENTIRE BRAKING SYSTEM TO FAIL. HAD THIS WIRE BROKE WHILE I WAS ON THE HIGHWAY IT WOULD HAVE LIKELY CAUSED …
Read full complaint
WHEN I STARTED THE VEHICLE THIS MORNING THERE WAS A COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE BRAKING SYSTEM. A FORD DEALERSHIP REPORTED THAT A WIRE HAD BROKEN AND THIS RESULTED IN A ELECTRICAL FAILURE IN THE BRAKING SYSTEM THAT CAUSED THE ENTIRE BRAKING SYSTEM TO FAIL. HAD THIS WIRE BROKE WHILE I WAS ON THE HIGHWAY IT WOULD HAVE LIKELY CAUSED A MAJOR ACCIDENT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10442245
45,000 miles · Aug 17, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
ABOUT 2 WEEKS AGO THE CHECK BRAKE WARNING LIGHT AND A RED BRAKE WARNING LIGHT CAME ON BUT THE BRAKES WERE NOT AFFECTED, AND THE LIGHTS DID NOT REAPPEAR AFTER THE CAR WAS STOPPED AND RESTARTED. I STILL TOOK IT TO THE DEALER BUT NOTHING WRONG WAS FOUND. YESTERDAY WHILE DRIVING HOME THE CHECK BRAKE WARNING LIGHT AND RED BRAKE WARN…
Read full complaint
ABOUT 2 WEEKS AGO THE CHECK BRAKE WARNING LIGHT AND A RED BRAKE WARNING LIGHT CAME ON BUT THE BRAKES WERE NOT AFFECTED, AND THE LIGHTS DID NOT REAPPEAR AFTER THE CAR WAS STOPPED AND RESTARTED. I STILL TOOK IT TO THE DEALER BUT NOTHING WRONG WAS FOUND. YESTERDAY WHILE DRIVING HOME THE CHECK BRAKE WARNING LIGHT AND RED BRAKE WARNING LIGHTS CAME ON AGAIN, A CHIME OR ALARM-TYPE SOUND WENT OFF, AND WHEN I PRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL ALL THE WAY DOWN THE BRAKES DIDN'T RESPOND. TO GET HOME I HAD TO USE THE EMERGENCY BRAKE EVERY TIME I NEEDED TO STOP. THE CAR WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER LAST NIGHT AND I WAS TOLD THE BRAKES WERE WORKING FINE WHEN THEY STARTED THE CAR THIS MORNING. I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING FURTHER. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10350136
7,780 miles · Aug 2, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
THE VEHICLE HAS APPROXIMATELY 7780 MILES ON IT. WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE A COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE BRAKES OCCURRED. WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPLOYED IT DID NOT CREATE BRAKING POWER EVEN BEING PRESSED TO THE FLOOR. TO STOP THE VEHICLE IT WAS DOWN SHIFTED AND THEN PLACED IN PARK AFTER IT COASTED TO A STOP. AFTER TURNING THE VEHI…
Read full complaint
THE VEHICLE HAS APPROXIMATELY 7780 MILES ON IT. WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE A COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE BRAKES OCCURRED. WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPLOYED IT DID NOT CREATE BRAKING POWER EVEN BEING PRESSED TO THE FLOOR. TO STOP THE VEHICLE IT WAS DOWN SHIFTED AND THEN PLACED IN PARK AFTER IT COASTED TO A STOP. AFTER TURNING THE VEHICLE OFF AND RESTARTING IT THE BREAKS SEEM TO WORK AGAIN. THIS IS THE FIRST OCCURRENCE. THE DEALER IS BEING NOTIFIED TODAY. *TR CONSUMER STATED COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED YEARS AGO, VEHICLE WAS SOLD UPDATED 6/8/18*JB
NHTSA ODI #10346820
24,870 miles · Apr 26, 2010
Service Brakes, HydraulicCrash
CHECK BRAKE SYSTEM AND RED EMERGENCY LIGHT CAME ON. PRESSED BRAKES AND CAR DID NOT STOP. HIT CONCRETE WALL. 1ST TIME AT DEALERSHIP, BAD SENSOR. ORDERED NEW SENSOR, AND GOT CAR BACK. SAME DAY SAME LIGHTS CAME ON. 2ND TIME AT DEALERSHIP, CHANGED ABS MODULE. GOT CAR BACK ON 23RD AND ON THE 24TH LIGHTS CAME BACK ON AND CAR CONT…
Read full complaint
CHECK BRAKE SYSTEM AND RED EMERGENCY LIGHT CAME ON. PRESSED BRAKES AND CAR DID NOT STOP. HIT CONCRETE WALL. 1ST TIME AT DEALERSHIP, BAD SENSOR. ORDERED NEW SENSOR, AND GOT CAR BACK. SAME DAY SAME LIGHTS CAME ON. 2ND TIME AT DEALERSHIP, CHANGED ABS MODULE. GOT CAR BACK ON 23RD AND ON THE 24TH LIGHTS CAME BACK ON AND CAR CONTINUED TO ROLL EVEN THOUGH I WAS PRESSING BRAKES. CAR IS BACK AT DEALERSHIP SINCE THE 24TH. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10327496
928 miles · Nov 7, 2009
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
WE PURCHASED THE CAR NEW ON AUGUST 11, 2009. ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 WHILE TRAVELING DOWN A STEEP HILL AT APPROXIMATELY 25 TO 30 MPH WE LOST BRAKE POWER. SPECIFICALLY, THERE WAS NO RESPONSE AS BRAKE FOOT MOVED 2/3 OF THE WAY TO THE FLOOR. IN LAST 1/3 OF THE WAY AS BRAKING FOOT MOVED TO AND MADE CONTACT WITH THE FLOOR, …
Read full complaint
WE PURCHASED THE CAR NEW ON AUGUST 11, 2009. ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 WHILE TRAVELING DOWN A STEEP HILL AT APPROXIMATELY 25 TO 30 MPH WE LOST BRAKE POWER. SPECIFICALLY, THERE WAS NO RESPONSE AS BRAKE FOOT MOVED 2/3 OF THE WAY TO THE FLOOR. IN LAST 1/3 OF THE WAY AS BRAKING FOOT MOVED TO AND MADE CONTACT WITH THE FLOOR, THERE WAS ONLY A WEAK RESPONSE. IT TOOK SEVERAL SECONDS TO STOP THE VEHICLE. BRAKE LIGHT WAS ON. WE WERE TERRIFIED. WE TOOK THE CAR TO THE NEAREST DEALER. THEY HAD THE CAR FOR 5 DAYS, AFTER WHICH TIME THEY INFORMED US THAT THEY HAD REPLACED A FAULTY BOOSTER TRAVEL SWITCH. THEY ASSURED US THAT THE PROBLEM WOULD NOT REOCCUR. HOWEVER, ON OR ABOUT OCTOBER 15, 2009, THE PROBLEM DID REOCCUR. THIS TIME MY SPOUSE WAS DRIVING AND HAD LEVELED OUT AFTER RISING A STEEP HILL. HE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY THE BRAKES. AGAIN, NO RESPONSE FOR THE FIRST 2/3 OF THE WAY AS BRAKING FOOT MOVED TO FLOOR. ONLY A WEAK RESPONSE IN LAST 1/3 AS BRAKING FOOT HIT THE FLOOR. BRAKE LIGHT WAS ON. AGAIN, MY SPOUSE WAS UNABLE TO TIMELY STOP THE VEHICLE. MY SPOUSE WAS TERRIFIED. BOTH TIMES, WHEN WE SHUT THE CAR OFF AND TURNED IT BACK ON, NORMAL BRAKING FUNCTION RESUMED. WE TOOK THE CAR TO THE NEAREST DEALER AGAIN. THEY KEPT THE CAR FOR 18 DAYS. FORD CORPORATE SENT THEIR ENGINEER TO OVERSEE THE REPAIRS. THEY WERE APPARENTLY ABLE TO DUPLICATE THE ERROR IN THEIR TESTING OF THE VEHICLE. THEY REPLACED THE WIRING HARNESS AND HAVE STATED THAT THE VEHICLE IS SAFE TO DRIVE. HOWEVER, WE ARE AFRAID TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE BASED ON OUR TWO SCARY EXPERIENCES WITH THIS NEW CAR WITH LESS THAN 1400 MILES ON IT, AS WELL AS WHAT WE HAVE READ ABOUT OTHER RECURRING PROBLEMS WITH FEV FILED WITH NHTSA AND OTHER SOURCES SUCH AS THE "FORD HYBRID ESCAPE BRAKE PROBLEM" FORUM AT EDMUNDS.COM. *TR *CN
NHTSA ODI #10291324
6,700 miles · Oct 28, 2009
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
BRAKES FAILED AT LOW SPEED WITH BRAKES FEELING LIKE THERE WAS NO PRESSURE. THE 3 LIGHTS FOR THE BRAKING SYSTEM WERE ON WHEN THIS EVENT OCCURRED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10290082
NHTSA investigations
3DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds
Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.
DP15001 · Loss Of Power Steering While Driving
Opened Apr 1, 2015 · Closed Jun 14, 2018
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering:electric Power Assist System
On May 27, 2014, amended June 2, 2014, Ford Motor Company (Ford) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect that may result in a sudden loss of power steering assist while driving in approximately 746,067 model year (MY) 2008 through 2011 Ford Escape vehicles equipped with electric power assisted steering (NHTSA 14V-284, Ford 14S05). Ford's DIR described the defect condition as a poor signal to noise ratio [SNR] in the torque sensor within the Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) system [which] does not allow the PSCM to determine the driver's steering input. When the system detects this fault condition, it transitions the EPAS system to the fail-safe/manual steering mode.Ford's DIR indicates that loss of power steering assist while driving would require higher steering effort at lower vehicle speeds, which may result in an increased risk of a crash.Ford's remedy instructs dealers to check the Power Steering Control Module (PSCM) for Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) to determine the proper repair procedure. If no DTCs are present, dealers are to update the PSCM and instrument cluster module software. The updated PSCM software changes the torque sensor fault strategy so that the SNR condition does not result in a loss of power steering assist while driving.In addition, audible and visual warnings are provided for torque sensor faults.If DTCs indicating faults in the torque sensor, PSCM or Power Steering Motor (motor) are present in the initial recall inspection, the dealer performs the following repairs: 1) replaces the torque sensor for torque sensor faults (DTC B2278); or 2) replaces the steering column for faults related to the PSCM (DTC B1342) or motor (DTC B2277).Continued in attachment pages
DP12006 · Electronic Throttle Body Malfunction
Opened Oct 2, 2012 · Closed Feb 21, 2013
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine
In a letter dated August 30, 2012, The North Carolina Consumers Council (NCCC) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged electronic throttle body failures resulting in engine stall or surge while driving in model year (MY) 2005 through 2012 Ford Escape vehicles. On October 2, 2012 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Defect Petition DP12-006 to evaluate whether to grant or deny the petition. The petition is hereby granted on certain model years. The NCCC letter cites two complaints of stall while driving in MY 2009 Ford Escape vehicles that were diagnosed as failed throttle bodies with diagnostic trouble codes (DTC) P2111, Throttle Body Stuck Open, and P2112, Throttle Body Stuck Closed. The petitioner indicates that the owners of both vehicles reported experiencing repeated incidents of stalling and engine surging. According to Ford, Escape non-hybrid vehicles are equipped with Electronic Throttle Body (ETB) assemblies beginning with MY 2009. Vehicles manufactured between June 22, 2009 and October 15, 2009 may contain contaminated printed circuit boards (PCB) with plating variations. Plating variations could lead to a lack of continuity in the throttle position sensor circuit where P2111 and/or other DTCs would be generated and stored. Ford and its electronic throttle body supplier, Delphi, modified the PCB manufacturing process and issued a technical service bulletin (TSB) 09-23-5. Vehicles produced after October 15, 2009 incorporated ETBs manufactured with a PCB process that resolved this condition. ODI's analysis identified a total of 123 unique reports indicating allegations of reduced motive power or vehicle stall. Depending on the condition of throttle control system malfunction, a driver may experience varying levels of reduced engine performance associated with three limp home modes. In two limp modes, reduced engine performance may maintain vehicle speeds above 20mph while the third is a limited limp home mode with engine speeds limited to approximately 900 RPM. Allegations of stall appear to be related to the limited limp home mode. Vehicles are not likely to unexpectedly stall as a result of this condition, but drivers may characterize the reduced functionality as a stall, even though their vehicle may still has motive capability. Allegations of vehicle surge appear to be related to limp home mode operation. Complaints alleging surge are most likely related to engine RPM fluctuations at low vehicle speeds or idle as the control system engages to prevent engine stall. In limited limp mode, rough-idle conditions may exist while the control system attempts to modulate engine RPMs once the vehicle reaches a reduced speed to maintain approximately 900 RPM. Separately, ODI received 59 complaints alleging incidents of engine stall while driving in model year (MY) 2010-2011 Ford Fusion vehicles. Approximately 60 percent (36) of the incidents occurred at speeds of 40 miles per hour or more. Eighty percent of complaints (47) were received beginning March 2012 and 14 complaints reported that the throttle body was replaced or DTCs associated with limp home modes. Additionally, Ford issued TSB 10-21-6 addressing DTCs associated with idle speed drops and limited limp home mode. The petition is granted on certain model years.Preliminary Evaluation PE13-003 has been opened to assess the scope, frequency and potential safety consequences associated with the alleged defect.See full copy of the closing resume for this defect petition for list of the VOQs associated with the defect petition analysis.