← New search

2009 Ford Escape Hybrid

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Escape Hybrid years

Owner complaints for the 2009 Ford Escape Hybrid are substantially higher than the model-year median of 68.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

143 reports with mileage · 10 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Steering. Review the 70 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 24 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 21 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

6 crash reports3 fire reports1 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

21 reports
Clear category filter
101,000 miles · Aug 31, 2020
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE CHECK BRAKING SYSTEM, TRACTION CONTROL AND EMERGENCY BRAKE WARNING LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT DROVE TO HIS DESTINATION. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE RESTARTING THE VEHICLE, THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR AND …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE CHECK BRAKING SYSTEM, TRACTION CONTROL AND EMERGENCY BRAKE WARNING LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT DROVE TO HIS DESTINATION. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE RESTARTING THE VEHICLE, THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR AND USE THE PARKING BRAKE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DRIVABLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND WAS REFERRED TO LOCAL DEALER. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO LOCAL DEALER NICK MAYER LINCOLN WESTLAKE LOCATED AT 24400 CENTER RIDGE RD, WESTLAKE, OH 44145, (440) 835-3700, WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH NEEDING THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER, BRAKE BOOSTER, ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT AND MODULE AND ABS HYDRAULIC UNIT TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED AS OF YET. THE MANUFACTURER HAD BEEN INFORMED OF FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 101,000.

NHTSA ODI #11352292

100,000 miles · Jun 20, 2019
Service Brakes

HCU MALFUNCTIONING CAUSING BRAKE SYSTEM FAILURE WHILE DRIVING. DEADLY FLAW IN BRAKE SYSTEM DESIGN

NHTSA ODI #11221601

213,856 miles · May 6, 2019
Service Brakes

I HAVE HAD THE SUV FOR 3 MONTHS. I'M EXPERIENCING TOTAL BREAK LOSS. THE FIRST TIME I ALMOST REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE.

NHTSA ODI #11205869

95,000 miles · Apr 15, 2019
Service BrakesFire

MY ABS BRAKES ON MY 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON AND THE RPM RAMPED WHILE I WAS GOING 65 MPH DOWN A HIGHWAY AND THE FRONT PASSENGER BRAKES STARTED SMOKING. I TOOK IT IN TO HAVE IT FIXED AND IT WAS GOING TO COST $5700 TO FIX BECAUSE OF SOME HCU UNIT THAT FAILED WHILE I WAS DRIVING AT PRETTY GOOD RATE OF SPEED. I…

Read full complaint

MY ABS BRAKES ON MY 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON AND THE RPM RAMPED WHILE I WAS GOING 65 MPH DOWN A HIGHWAY AND THE FRONT PASSENGER BRAKES STARTED SMOKING. I TOOK IT IN TO HAVE IT FIXED AND IT WAS GOING TO COST $5700 TO FIX BECAUSE OF SOME HCU UNIT THAT FAILED WHILE I WAS DRIVING AT PRETTY GOOD RATE OF SPEED. I AM GLAD IT DIDN'T THROW ME OFF INTO A DITCH OR CATCH ON FIRE WITH ME IN IT. WHAT A CRAPPY DESIGN THIS IS. WOW!!! SCARY STUFF.

NHTSA ODI #11196529

135,000 miles · Oct 26, 2018
Service Brakes

HYDRAULIC CENTRAL UNIT FAILED, REQUIRING REPLACEMENT TO PREVENT FAILURE OF THE SYSTEM AND LOSS OF BRAKING ABILITY OF THE CAR.

NHTSA ODI #11142904

98,000 miles · Jul 13, 2018
Service Brakes

CAR PASSED SAFETY INSPECTION IN MAY 2018. BRAKE PADS WERE REPLACED IN MAY 2017. ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN MY BRAKES FAILED IN JUNE 2018. WAS GOING ABOUT 55 MPH. HAD CAR TOWED. PROBLEM WAS DIAGNOSED AS A MASTER CYLINDER FAILURE. TOLD SINCE THE BRAKE FLUID RESEVOIR WAS FULL AND NO OBVIOUS SIGNS OF LEAKAGE, THIS COULDN'T BE PREDICTED O…

Read full complaint

CAR PASSED SAFETY INSPECTION IN MAY 2018. BRAKE PADS WERE REPLACED IN MAY 2017. ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN MY BRAKES FAILED IN JUNE 2018. WAS GOING ABOUT 55 MPH. HAD CAR TOWED. PROBLEM WAS DIAGNOSED AS A MASTER CYLINDER FAILURE. TOLD SINCE THE BRAKE FLUID RESEVOIR WAS FULL AND NO OBVIOUS SIGNS OF LEAKAGE, THIS COULDN'T BE PREDICTED OR PREVENTED. REPAIR MADE. BRAKES FAILED AGAIN. I WAS ON A CITY STREET AND WAS GOING ABOUT 25 MPH. PROBLEM DIAGNOSED AS A DE-LINKING OF THE COMPUTER SYSTEMS. BRAKES FAILED AGAIN (THIRD TIME IN A MONTH). UNABLE TO REPLICATE. THERE IS NO WARNING. THE WARNING COMES ON AT THE SAME TIME AS THE FAILURE. BRAKES FAIL UNEXPECTEDLY IN A PARKING LOT. GOING ABOUT 2 MPH.. THIRD TIME CAR WAS IN A PARKING LOT. I FEEL FORTUNATE NOT TO HAVE CRASHED. I NO LONGER FEEL SAFE IN MY FORD ESCAPE.

NHTSA ODI #11111113

102,000 miles · Jan 27, 2017
Service Brakes

I WAS DRIVING IN MY WORK PARKING GARAGE WHEN I GOT A, "CHECK BRAKE SYSTEM" WARNING ON MY DASH, AND A COUPLE OF DASHBOARD LIGHTS LIT UP, INCLUDING THE EMERGENCY BRAKE LIGHT. I SUDDENLY REALIZED THAT I HAD NO BRAKES, AND I WAS PRESSING MY BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP THE CAR. LUCKILY I WAS GOING ABOUT 5-10 MPH AN…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING IN MY WORK PARKING GARAGE WHEN I GOT A, "CHECK BRAKE SYSTEM" WARNING ON MY DASH, AND A COUPLE OF DASHBOARD LIGHTS LIT UP, INCLUDING THE EMERGENCY BRAKE LIGHT. I SUDDENLY REALIZED THAT I HAD NO BRAKES, AND I WAS PRESSING MY BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP THE CAR. LUCKILY I WAS GOING ABOUT 5-10 MPH AND THERE WERE NO CARS OR PEOPLE IN FRONT OF ME. I WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE AROUND THE PARKING GARAGE UNTIL THE CAR SLOWED, THEN USED MY EMERGENCY BRAKE TO STOP THE CAR. I STARTED READING THE MANUAL TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT WENT WRONG, AND THAT DIDN'T HELP. I TURNED THE CAR BACK ON AND THERE WERE NO WARNINGS OR LIGHTS ON MY DASH, SO I TENTATIVELY MOVED THE CAR. THE BRAKES WORKED PERFECTLY. I DROVE IT TO A NEARBY MECHANIC SHOP TO HAVE IT LOOKED AT BEFORE IT ACTED UP AGAIN. THEY SAID I NEEDED TO TAKE IT TO A DEALERSHIP SINCE IT WAS A HYBRID AND THEY WERE GETTING HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY CODES THAT THEY WEREN'T EXPERIENCED WITH. THE DEALERSHIP MECHANICS SPEND THE NEXT 2 DAYS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE ISSUE AND RECREATE THE PROBLEM. THEY WERE FINALLY ABLE TO RECREATE IT AND TOLD ME THE ABS CONTROL MODULE HAD AN ELECTRICAL ISSUE AND NEEDS TO BE REPLACED, FOR APPROXIMATELY $2,000, DUE TO NO FAULT OF MY OWN. EVERYTHING ELSE ON THE CAR IS IN GREAT CONDITION, AND MY CAR ONLY HAS 100,000 MILES, SO I AM GOING TO FOOT THE BILL. *TR *CN

NHTSA ODI #10948024

124,000 miles · Sep 15, 2016
Service Brakes

BRAKES WEAK ON MANUAL MODE ALMOST NO STOPPING POWER, CODES C1320., HYDRAULIC TRAVEL SENSOR CIRCUIT, HCU, ABS LIGHT ON, SERVICE BRAKES LIGHTS ON, NO HCU COMPRESSOR COMING ON AT PRE START ANY MORE. SUGGESTED NEED NEW HCU, AT A PART COST OF $3889.00 PLUS 10 HOURS OF LABOR TO BLEED SYSTEM PUTTING REPAIR COST OVER $5K, CAR BLUE BOOKS…

Read full complaint

BRAKES WEAK ON MANUAL MODE ALMOST NO STOPPING POWER, CODES C1320., HYDRAULIC TRAVEL SENSOR CIRCUIT, HCU, ABS LIGHT ON, SERVICE BRAKES LIGHTS ON, NO HCU COMPRESSOR COMING ON AT PRE START ANY MORE. SUGGESTED NEED NEW HCU, AT A PART COST OF $3889.00 PLUS 10 HOURS OF LABOR TO BLEED SYSTEM PUTTING REPAIR COST OVER $5K, CAR BLUE BOOKS AT $3.5K, HOW CAN THIS BE FEASIBLE, THANKS FOR THE DISPOSABLE CAR FORD.!!!

NHTSA ODI #10906863

86,485 miles · Sep 11, 2016
Service Brakes

SUDDEN AND IMMEDIATE LOSS OF BRAKING SYSTEM WITHOUT ANY WARNING LIGHTS ETC. I HAD STARTED CAR, BACKED DOWN MY DRIVEWAY AND ENTERED ROADWAY WHEN ABS AND BRAKE WARNING LIGHTS APPEARED AND I HAD NO BRAKING SYSTEM OPERATING. I HAD TO BE TOWED TO A SERVICE STATION.

NHTSA ODI #10905581

58,600 miles · Jul 27, 2015
Service Brakes

THE INITIAL INCIDENT IN WHICH THE HYDRAULIC BRAKES FAILED IN MY 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID WAS IN EARLY JUNE 2015. THE VEHICLE WAS SERVICED AT THE DEALERSHIP ON JUNE 17, 2015 AT 57,164 MILES. THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE BRAKE FAILURE: WHERE HYDRAULIC BRAKES GO SOFT, MAKING IT VERY DIFFICULT TO STOP, AND THEN …

Read full complaint

THE INITIAL INCIDENT IN WHICH THE HYDRAULIC BRAKES FAILED IN MY 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID WAS IN EARLY JUNE 2015. THE VEHICLE WAS SERVICED AT THE DEALERSHIP ON JUNE 17, 2015 AT 57,164 MILES. THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE BRAKE FAILURE: WHERE HYDRAULIC BRAKES GO SOFT, MAKING IT VERY DIFFICULT TO STOP, AND THEN THE CHECK BRAKE SYSTEM LIGHT AND THE ABS LIGHT TURN ON. THE VEHICLE MUST BE TURNED OFF AND RESTARTED FOR THE SYSTEM TO RESET ITSELF. THE HYDRAULIC BRAKES FAILED AGAIN ON JULY 25, FOLLOWED BY TWO MORE FAILURES ON JULY 26, 2015. THE ONLY COMMON FACTORS THAT MAY BE LINKED TO MY BRAKE FAILURE INCIDENTS ARE USE OF POWER WINDOW AND TURNING AIRCONDITIONING ON/OFF MULTIPLE TIMES. THE VEHICLE SPENT A FULL DAY AT THE DEALERSHIP (JULY 27), AND BAFFLED SERVICE PERSONNEL ARE WAITING FOR FORD HOTLINE TO PROVIDE DIRECTION.

NHTSA ODI #10744022

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

3

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP15001 · Loss Of Power Steering While Driving

Opened Apr 1, 2015 · Closed Jun 14, 2018

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering:electric Power Assist System

On May 27, 2014, amended June 2, 2014, Ford Motor Company (Ford) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect that may result in a sudden loss of power steering assist while driving in approximately 746,067 model year (MY) 2008 through 2011 Ford Escape vehicles equipped with electric power assisted steering (NHTSA 14V-284, Ford 14S05). Ford's DIR described the defect condition as a poor signal to noise ratio [SNR] in the torque sensor within the Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) system [which] does not allow the PSCM to determine the driver's steering input. When the system detects this fault condition, it transitions the EPAS system to the fail-safe/manual steering mode.Ford's DIR indicates that loss of power steering assist while driving would require higher steering effort at lower vehicle speeds, which may result in an increased risk of a crash.Ford's remedy instructs dealers to check the Power Steering Control Module (PSCM) for Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) to determine the proper repair procedure. If no DTCs are present, dealers are to update the PSCM and instrument cluster module software. The updated PSCM software changes the torque sensor fault strategy so that the SNR condition does not result in a loss of power steering assist while driving.In addition, audible and visual warnings are provided for torque sensor faults.If DTCs indicating faults in the torque sensor, PSCM or Power Steering Motor (motor) are present in the initial recall inspection, the dealer performs the following repairs: 1) replaces the torque sensor for torque sensor faults (DTC B2278); or 2) replaces the steering column for faults related to the PSCM (DTC B1342) or motor (DTC B2277).Continued in attachment pages

DP12006 · Electronic Throttle Body Malfunction

Opened Oct 2, 2012 · Closed Feb 21, 2013

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine

In a letter dated August 30, 2012, The North Carolina Consumers Council (NCCC) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged electronic throttle body failures resulting in engine stall or surge while driving in model year (MY) 2005 through 2012 Ford Escape vehicles. On October 2, 2012 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Defect Petition DP12-006 to evaluate whether to grant or deny the petition. The petition is hereby granted on certain model years. The NCCC letter cites two complaints of stall while driving in MY 2009 Ford Escape vehicles that were diagnosed as failed throttle bodies with diagnostic trouble codes (DTC) P2111, Throttle Body Stuck Open, and P2112, Throttle Body Stuck Closed. The petitioner indicates that the owners of both vehicles reported experiencing repeated incidents of stalling and engine surging. According to Ford, Escape non-hybrid vehicles are equipped with Electronic Throttle Body (ETB) assemblies beginning with MY 2009. Vehicles manufactured between June 22, 2009 and October 15, 2009 may contain contaminated printed circuit boards (PCB) with plating variations. Plating variations could lead to a lack of continuity in the throttle position sensor circuit where P2111 and/or other DTCs would be generated and stored. Ford and its electronic throttle body supplier, Delphi, modified the PCB manufacturing process and issued a technical service bulletin (TSB) 09-23-5. Vehicles produced after October 15, 2009 incorporated ETBs manufactured with a PCB process that resolved this condition. ODI's analysis identified a total of 123 unique reports indicating allegations of reduced motive power or vehicle stall. Depending on the condition of throttle control system malfunction, a driver may experience varying levels of reduced engine performance associated with three limp home modes. In two limp modes, reduced engine performance may maintain vehicle speeds above 20mph while the third is a limited limp home mode with engine speeds limited to approximately 900 RPM. Allegations of stall appear to be related to the limited limp home mode. Vehicles are not likely to unexpectedly stall as a result of this condition, but drivers may characterize the reduced functionality as a stall, even though their vehicle may still has motive capability. Allegations of vehicle surge appear to be related to limp home mode operation. Complaints alleging surge are most likely related to engine RPM fluctuations at low vehicle speeds or idle as the control system engages to prevent engine stall. In limited limp mode, rough-idle conditions may exist while the control system attempts to modulate engine RPMs once the vehicle reaches a reduced speed to maintain approximately 900 RPM. Separately, ODI received 59 complaints alleging incidents of engine stall while driving in model year (MY) 2010-2011 Ford Fusion vehicles. Approximately 60 percent (36) of the incidents occurred at speeds of 40 miles per hour or more. Eighty percent of complaints (47) were received beginning March 2012 and 14 complaints reported that the throttle body was replaced or DTCs associated with limp home modes. Additionally, Ford issued TSB 10-21-6 addressing DTCs associated with idle speed drops and limited limp home mode. The petition is granted on certain model years.Preliminary Evaluation PE13-003 has been opened to assess the scope, frequency and potential safety consequences associated with the alleged defect.See full copy of the closing resume for this defect petition for list of the VOQs associated with the defect petition analysis.