← New search

2013 Ford Edge

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Edge years

Owner complaints for the 2013 Ford Edge are substantially higher than the model-year median of 724.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,793 reports with mileage · 651 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 854 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 529 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 300 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

33 crash reports7 fire reports24 injury reports

Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints

105 reports
Clear category filter
57,000 miles · Aug 3, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while her son was driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal was depressed and he experienced a spongy pedal. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, and the dealer replaced the brake master cylinder and brake booster. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure an…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while her son was driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal was depressed and he experienced a spongy pedal. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, and the dealer replaced the brake master cylinder and brake booster. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and advised the contact to file a complaint with NHTSA. The contact related the failure to Customer Satisfaction Program: 13N02 (Extended Warranty Coverage on Brake Booster) however, the VIN was not included. The failure mileage was approximately 57,000.

NHTSA ODI #11477316

92,000 miles · Jul 18, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 35 MPH and depressing the brake pedal, the contact heard air coming from the brake pedal. The contact contacted a certified mechanic who stated that the brake booster needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was contacte…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 35 MPH and depressing the brake pedal, the contact heard air coming from the brake pedal. The contact contacted a certified mechanic who stated that the brake booster needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was contacted and informed of the failure. The manufacturer stated that the VIN was not included in any recalls and referred the contact to the NHTSA. The failure mileage was 92,000.

NHTSA ODI #11474562

85,500 miles · Jul 15, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at 40 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed, and an abnormal noise was heard along with the brake pedal traveling to the floorboard. The contact stated that braking time was increased. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the failure was diag…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at 40 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed, and an abnormal noise was heard along with the brake pedal traveling to the floorboard. The contact stated that braking time was increased. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the failure was diagnosed as a faulty front driver's side brake booster that needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the vehicle was not included in an extended warranty coverage. The contact stated that the dealer and the manufacturer had offered no assistance. The approximate failure mileage was 85,500.

NHTSA ODI #11474124

63,000 miles · Jul 11, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while her husband was driving at 20-30 MPH and approaching a red traffic light, the brake pedal was depressed and failed to respond. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact depressed the brake pedal all the way to the floorboard and the vehicle responded. The…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while her husband was driving at 20-30 MPH and approaching a red traffic light, the brake pedal was depressed and failed to respond. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact depressed the brake pedal all the way to the floorboard and the vehicle responded. The contact stated that the failure had been reoccurring while driving. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the brake pads were replaced; however, the failure persisted. The vehicle was taken back to the independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the brake booster and master cylinder needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The dealer was not notified of the failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that they could not assist as the VIN was not included in recall associated to the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 63,000.

NHTSA ODI #11473390

84,000 miles · Jul 6, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 30 MPH and depressing the brake pedal however, the brake pedal went to the floorboard before the vehicle came to a complete stop. The vehicle was not diagnosed. The dealer and the manufacturer were contacted and stated that the VIN was not under recall. The cont…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 30 MPH and depressing the brake pedal however, the brake pedal went to the floorboard before the vehicle came to a complete stop. The vehicle was not diagnosed. The dealer and the manufacturer were contacted and stated that the VIN was not under recall. The contact was referred to the NHTSA for assistance. The failure mileage was 84,000.

NHTSA ODI #11472556

73,000 miles · Jun 14, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving approximately 30 MPH, the braking system malfunctioned and the vehicle did not immediately stop while pressing the brake pedal. The contact indicated that the brake pedal extended to the floorboard while depressed. The vehicle was towed to the local dealer …

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving approximately 30 MPH, the braking system malfunctioned and the vehicle did not immediately stop while pressing the brake pedal. The contact indicated that the brake pedal extended to the floorboard while depressed. The vehicle was towed to the local dealer who diagnosed that the brake booster had failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not yet repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure but no assistance was offered. The failure mileage was 73,000.

NHTSA ODI #11469214

124,000 miles · Jun 1, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 10 MPH and depressing the brake pedal; the brake pedal went to the floorboard. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 12…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 10 MPH and depressing the brake pedal; the brake pedal went to the floorboard. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 124,000.

NHTSA ODI #11466990

177,000 miles · Apr 6, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 20 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed but failed to respond. The contact then stood on the brake pedal. The brake pedal went all the way to the floorboard and the vehicle stopped abruptly. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated that the failu…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 20 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed but failed to respond. The contact then stood on the brake pedal. The brake pedal went all the way to the floorboard and the vehicle stopped abruptly. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated that the failure had been reoccurring increasingly while driving. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was diagnosed that the brake booster had failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the vehicle could not be repaired under an extended warranty due to the mileage. The failure mileage was approximately 177,000.

NHTSA ODI #11459869

133,000 miles · Apr 5, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 40 MPH, the brake pedal was hard to depress causing an increased stopping time. The contact stated no warning lights were illuminated. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer or independent mechanic for diagnoses or repairs. The dealer was contacted and informed…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 40 MPH, the brake pedal was hard to depress causing an increased stopping time. The contact stated no warning lights were illuminated. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer or independent mechanic for diagnoses or repairs. The dealer was contacted and informed the contact that the vehicle was out of warranty. The dealer advised the contact to call the manufacturer for assistance. The contact stated he had received a letter from the manufacturer several years ago extending the warranty for the brake booster. The contact stated that the warranty was 10/years or 150,000 miles from the date of being put in service. The contact stated that the vehicle was beyond 10 years by less than 30 days and inquired of the manufacturer to extend the warranty and cover the repairs. The contact stated that he called the manufacturer however, the call was transferred to NHTSA. The failure mileage was 133,000.

NHTSA ODI #11459691

82,700 miles · Feb 1, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 15 MPH and attempting to depress the brake pedal, the brake pedal went to the floorboard which resulted in no brake functionality. The contact was able to pull into his driveway and stop the vehicle. The contact stated no warning light was illumina…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 15 MPH and attempting to depress the brake pedal, the brake pedal went to the floorboard which resulted in no brake functionality. The contact was able to pull into his driveway and stop the vehicle. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was taken to a local dealer who informed the contact that the HCU valve needed to be replaced however, the vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 82,700.

NHTSA ODI #11449793

Official recalls

2

14V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft

Jul 2, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.

14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline

Jan 6, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Interior Lighting

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.