I went to apply my brake pedal and they went all the way to the floor of the truck. There were no warning lamps what so ever. My vehicle was not stopping as it should have and I almost crashed into the car ahead of me. The light turned green and I was able to pull into a parking lot and bump a crub.
2011 Ford Edge
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Edge years
Owner complaints for the 2011 Ford Edge are substantially higher than the model-year median of 724.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Edge years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
1,438 reports with mileage · 363 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Electrical System. Review the 686 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Structure. Review the 274 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes. Review the 261 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Service Brakes complaints
261 reportsON OR ABOUT APRIL 19, 2021, WITHOUT WARNING, THE VEHICLE'S BRAKING SYSTEM SIGNIFICANTLY FAILED. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO SLOW THE VEHICLE DOWN BY APPLYING THE BRAKES, THE BRAKE PEDAL HAD VERY LITTLE PRESSURE AND DIDN'T SLOW THE VEHICLE UNLESS DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL ALMOST TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE LOSS OF SUFFICIENT BRAKING COULD…
Read full complaint
ON OR ABOUT APRIL 19, 2021, WITHOUT WARNING, THE VEHICLE'S BRAKING SYSTEM SIGNIFICANTLY FAILED. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO SLOW THE VEHICLE DOWN BY APPLYING THE BRAKES, THE BRAKE PEDAL HAD VERY LITTLE PRESSURE AND DIDN'T SLOW THE VEHICLE UNLESS DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL ALMOST TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE LOSS OF SUFFICIENT BRAKING COULD HAVE RESULTED IN DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OR EVEN PERSONAL INJURY. THE VEHICLE WAS IMMEDIATELY TAKEN TO THE LOCAL FORD DEALERSHIP IN COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA WHEREBY THE TECHNICIAN REVIEWED THE VEHICLE AND DETERMINED THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM ("ABS") HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT FAILED WITH AN INTERNAL ISSUE. THE ABS AND/OR BRAKING SYSTEM ON A MODERN VEHICLE SHOULD NOT FAIL. THE COST TO REPAIR AND ADDRESS SAID ISSUE WAS $1,912.85. ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE IS AN INVOICE AND RECEIPT OF SAID REPAIR. THE SAME VEHICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY RECALLED FOR "BRAKE BOOSTER FAILURE." THIS VEHICLE SHOULD ALSO BE RECALLED FOR THE ABS HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT FAILING BEFORE SOMEONE GETS SERIOUSLY INJURED OR EVEN KILLED.
MUSSY BREAKS. CAR BRAKE PEDAL GOES ALL THE WAY TO FLOOR, CAUSING THE CAR TO TAKE LONGER TO STOP ON THE ROAD, HIGHWAY AND CITY STREET.
WHILE DRIVING ABS LIGHT CAME ON, THEN SERVICE ADVANCE TRAK. DID THIS INTERMITTENTLY. GOT ON RAMP, TURNING WHEEL RIGHT ANTI LOCK BRAKES KICKED IN FOR NO REASON. IT WASN'T RAINING, NOT ICY, ETC. PARKED. WHEN I STARTED MY CARD DROVE 15 MINUTES, ABS LIGHT CAME BACK ON- THEN KICKED IN, FOR NO REASON.
ABS HYDRAULIC MCU UNIT VALVES STICK OPEN AFTER TURNING AND GOING OVER A BUMP WITH THE BRAKES ON. OUT OF NOWHERE THE BAKE PEDDLE GOES ALMOST TO THE FLOOR AND DOES NOT RETURN TO NORMAL OPERATION. YOU ARE LEFT WITH A SPONGEY PEDDLE THAT WHEN PRESSED CONTINUES TO DEPRESS AS IF LEAKING UNTIL IT BOTTOMS OUT. UNLESS YOU PUMP IT UP. I …
Read full complaint
ABS HYDRAULIC MCU UNIT VALVES STICK OPEN AFTER TURNING AND GOING OVER A BUMP WITH THE BRAKES ON. OUT OF NOWHERE THE BAKE PEDDLE GOES ALMOST TO THE FLOOR AND DOES NOT RETURN TO NORMAL OPERATION. YOU ARE LEFT WITH A SPONGEY PEDDLE THAT WHEN PRESSED CONTINUES TO DEPRESS AS IF LEAKING UNTIL IT BOTTOMS OUT. UNLESS YOU PUMP IT UP. I HAVE HAD THE MCU CYCLED AT A GARAGE AND THEY HAVE GOTTEN THE VALVE TO BREAK FREE ONLY TO HAVE IT HAPPEN AGAIN. I SEE THEY HAVE RECALLED THE FUSION FOR A SIMILAR ISSUE.
FORD HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE BRAKE POWER BOOSTER IS DEFECTIVE AND WILL REPLACE IT UP TO 150,000 MILES. THEY WILL NOT REPLACE IT AT 151,000 MILES BUT IT IS JUST AS DANGEROUS AND DEFECTIVE. IT TRIPLES STOPPING DISTANCE AND DOES NOT HOLD ON A HILL
THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR BOARD BEFORE ANY BRAKING HAPPENS. THE BRAKING IS MINIMAL WHEN THIS HAPPENS. THIS HAS HAPPENED 4 TIMES AND IS STILL HAPPENING IN THE LAST YEAR STARTING IN 08/14/2020. THE PEDAL RETURNS TO THE REGULAR POSITION AND OPERATES NORMALLY AFTER THIS OCCURRENCE. I HAVE HAD 4 DIFFERENT MECHANICS TRY TO DI…
Read full complaint
THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR BOARD BEFORE ANY BRAKING HAPPENS. THE BRAKING IS MINIMAL WHEN THIS HAPPENS. THIS HAS HAPPENED 4 TIMES AND IS STILL HAPPENING IN THE LAST YEAR STARTING IN 08/14/2020. THE PEDAL RETURNS TO THE REGULAR POSITION AND OPERATES NORMALLY AFTER THIS OCCURRENCE. I HAVE HAD 4 DIFFERENT MECHANICS TRY TO DIAGNOSE THIS BRAKE FAILURE WITH NO SUCCESS. THIS A INTERMITTENT BRAKE FAILURE! BECAUSE IT IS A INTERMITTENT BRAKE FAILURE EVEN THE FORD DEALER CANNOT DUPLICATE THE FAILURE! NO REPAIRS EXPECT FOR A POWER BRAKE BLEEDING HAVE BEEN DONE. ONE OF THE MECHANICS I HAD LOOK AT THE CAR SAID HE FOUND AN EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR THIS FAILURE FORD SAID THEY COULD NOT FIND ONE FOR THIS FAILURE. I GOOGLED IT AND FOUND A COUPLE OF EXTENDED WARRANTIES FOR SIMILAR BRAKE FAILURES. IT IS A BIT TO TECHNICAL FOR MY TO UNDERSTAND FULLY. I HAVE GOOGLED 2011 FORD EDGE BRAKE FAILURES AND FOUND MANY OCCURRENCES OF THIS HAPPENING OTHER PEOPLE. PLEASE LET ME EMPHASIZE THAT THIS IS AN INTERMITTENT BRAKE FAILURE! IT ONLY THAT ONE TIME FOR BRAKES TO FAIL AND KILL A FAMILY! I HAVE READ ONLINE THAT PEOPLE BEING CHARGED $1000'S TO "FIX" THE PROBLEM ONLY TO HAVE IT HAPPEN AGAIN. THIS NEEDS TO CORRECTED BEFORE SOMEONE GETS KILLED! AND THAT SOMEONE COULD BE ME OR SOMEONE YOU LOVE!!
WHILE DRIVING IN THE CITY WAS BREAKING TO TURN AND THE PEDAL COMPRESSED ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR. NEW ROTATORS, BRAKE PADS AND TIRES ARE ON THE VEHICLE AND COULD HAVE CAUSED A MAJOR ACCIDENT. WHY HAS FORD NOT STEPPED UP AND MADE THIS RECALL? I'M SCARED TO DRIVE THIS VEHICLE OR EVEN PUT MY FAMILY IN IT. NOW IT JUST SITS PARKED.
MY 2011 FORD EDGE SEL WAS RECALLED FOR AN ISSUE WITH THE BRAKE BOOSTER SYSTEM. IT WAS TAKEN IN AND 'FIXED'. 3 YEARS LATER IT STARTED FAILING AGAIN AND WAS APPARENTLY FIXED. NOW 3 YEARS LATER IT'S FAILED AGAIN. THESE SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED TO LAST UP TO 150,000 MILES. I JUST HIT 100,000 AND WILL HAVE TO HAVE IT FIXED FIR THE 3RD T…
Read full complaint
MY 2011 FORD EDGE SEL WAS RECALLED FOR AN ISSUE WITH THE BRAKE BOOSTER SYSTEM. IT WAS TAKEN IN AND 'FIXED'. 3 YEARS LATER IT STARTED FAILING AGAIN AND WAS APPARENTLY FIXED. NOW 3 YEARS LATER IT'S FAILED AGAIN. THESE SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED TO LAST UP TO 150,000 MILES. I JUST HIT 100,000 AND WILL HAVE TO HAVE IT FIXED FIR THE 3RD TIME. ALSO BECAUSE OF THE FAULTY SYSTEM BRAKE FLUID HAS LEAKED ONTO THE SWAY BAR RESULTING IN DETERIORATION
2011 FORD EDGE LIMITED, INTERMITTENT PEDAL FADE. WHILE DEPRESSING BRAKE PEDAL, PEDAL WILL FADE TO THE FLOOR. EVENTUALLY PEDAL WILL RETURN TO NORMAL OPERATION OVER TIME. BRAKE BOOSTER AND MASTER HAVE BEEN REPLACED AND ARE FUNCTIONING NORMAL. THIS ISSUE IS INTERMITTENT AND EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. THIS ISS…
Read full complaint
2011 FORD EDGE LIMITED, INTERMITTENT PEDAL FADE. WHILE DEPRESSING BRAKE PEDAL, PEDAL WILL FADE TO THE FLOOR. EVENTUALLY PEDAL WILL RETURN TO NORMAL OPERATION OVER TIME. BRAKE BOOSTER AND MASTER HAVE BEEN REPLACED AND ARE FUNCTIONING NORMAL. THIS ISSUE IS INTERMITTENT AND EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. THIS ISSUE HAPPENS WHILE DRIVING, WIFE ALMOST HAD MULTIPLE ACCIDENTS DUE TO THE HCU VALVES STICKING OPEN ON ABS PUMP SIDE AND NOT CLOSING. EVENTS GET WORSE IN COLDER CONDITIONS. VEHICLE HAS BEEN IN THE SHOP MULTIPLE TIMES, FLUSHED WITH SPECIFIED BRAKE FLUID, BLED AND MECHANICALLY BLED. FORD DEALERSHIP STATED THAT THERE IS NOTHING ELSE THEY CAN DO FOR US. COST OF REPAIRS HAVE SURPASSED $2900 WORTH OF DIAGNOSTICS AND IS STILL NOT FIXED. VEHICLE IS LESS THAN 90K MILES ON IT AND IS CURRENTLY UNSAFE TO DRIVE.
Official recalls
311V128000 · Electrical System:software
Feb 24, 2011
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 FORD F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, EDGE, AND LINCOLN MKX TRUCKS MANUFACTURED FROM OCTOBER 25, 2010, THROUGH NOVEMBER 20, 2010. THESE VEHICLES WERE INSPECTED USING INTEGRATED DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM (IDS) THAT HAD A CUSTOM SOFTWARE ROUTINE TO READ THE SUSPECT BODY CONTROL MODULE (BCM) SERIAL NUMBER. BASED ON THE SERIAL NUMBER THE BCM WAS EITHER NOT AFFECTED OR REPLACED. THE CUSTOM SOFTWARE ROUTINE WAS NOT READING THE CORRECT SET OF CHARACTERS, AND WAS NOT ABLE TO IDENTIFY A BCM THAT REQUIRED REPLACEMENT AFFECTED BCMS MAY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR AN INTERNAL SHORT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF AN ELECTRICAL SHORT DEVELOPS, AN OVERHEATING CONDITION MAY OCCUR WHICH COULD RESULT IN A VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALER WILL INSPECT THE BODY CONTROL MODULE AND IF NECESSARY REPLACE IT FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 7, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP CENTER AT 1-866-436-7332.
10V659000 · Structure:body
Dec 29, 2010
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, EDGE AND LINCOLN MKX VEHICLES. DURING A SIX-DAY PRODUCTION PERIOD, THE SUPPLIER OF THE BODY CONTROL MODULE MANUFACTURED MODULES THAT MAY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR AN INTERNAL SHORT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF AN ELECTRICAL SHORT DEVELOPS, AN OVERHEATING CONDITION MAY OCCUR WHICH CAN RESULT IN AN UNATTENDED VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALER WILL REPLACE THE BODY CONTROL MODULE IF NECESSARY FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JANUARY 11, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
10V516000 · Latches/locks/linkages:hatchback/liftgate:lock
Oct 27, 2010
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 EDGE AND LINCOLN MKX VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM JULY 1, 2010, THROUGH OCTOBER 8, 2010. THESE VEHICLES WERE SHIPPED WITH INCORRECTLY CONFIGURED ELECTRONIC MODULE SETTINGS THAT DISABLE THE LOCKING FUNCTION OF THE LIFTGATE. ACCORDINGLY, THE VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 206, "DOOR LOCKS AND DOOR RETENTION COMPONENTS."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THE LIFTGATE LOCK MAY BE DISABLED AND THE DRIVER MAY NOT BE ABLE TO LOCK THE LIFTGATE USING INTERIOR LOCK SWITCHES OR REMOTE KEY FOB BUTTONS.
Remedy: FORD WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND DEALERS WILL HAVE THE AFFECTED CONTROL MODULES UPDATED FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 1, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On
Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Additional source detail variants (3)
Interior Lighting
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Illustration