I NEARLY REAR ENDED A SEMI TRUCK AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED DUE TO EXTREMELY WEAK BRAKE PRESSURE. HAD TO SWERVE OFF ROAD AND USE PARKING BRAKE TO STOP. FORD ISSUED RECALL 13N02 FOR THE BRAKE BOOSTER CLAIMING THAT A SYMPTOM OF A FAILED BOOSTER IS A 'SPONGY' BRAKE PEDAL. THE DEALER CONTRADICTS THIS BY SAYING A FAILED BOOSTER WOULD R…
Read full complaint
I NEARLY REAR ENDED A SEMI TRUCK AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED DUE TO EXTREMELY WEAK BRAKE PRESSURE. HAD TO SWERVE OFF ROAD AND USE PARKING BRAKE TO STOP. FORD ISSUED RECALL 13N02 FOR THE BRAKE BOOSTER CLAIMING THAT A SYMPTOM OF A FAILED BOOSTER IS A 'SPONGY' BRAKE PEDAL. THE DEALER CONTRADICTS THIS BY SAYING A FAILED BOOSTER WOULD RESULT IN A STIFF PEDAL. I HAD MY VEHICLE INSPECTED AT WRAY FORD IN BOSSIER CITY AND THEY ARE TELLING ME THAT IT'S THE MASTER CYLINDER AND HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT AND THAT IT'S NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL. AFTER DOING SOME RESEARCH THIS IS A VERY COMMON PROBLEM WITH THIS VEHICLE. IT SEEMS THAT FORD MAY HAVE GOTTEN THE ORIGINAL RECALL WRONG OR THEY NEED TO ISSUE A NEW RECALL FOR THE MASTER CYLINDER AND HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT.
NHTSA ODI #11144062
120,000 miles · Oct 9, 2018
Service Brakes
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD WHEN IT WAS DEPRESSED. THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THERE WAS NO WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO TUTTLE-CLICK FORD LINCOLN (949-472-5200, LOCATED AT 43 AUTO CENTER DR, IRVINE, CA 92618), BUT THE TE…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD WHEN IT WAS DEPRESSED. THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THERE WAS NO WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO TUTTLE-CLICK FORD LINCOLN (949-472-5200, LOCATED AT 43 AUTO CENTER DR, IRVINE, CA 92618), BUT THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO KEARNY PEARSON FORD (858-560-5544, LOCATED AT 7303 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD, SAN DIEGO, CA 92111) WHERE THE BRAKE BOOSTER WAS REPLACED. THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURES. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 120,000. THE VIN WAS NOT PROVIDED.
NHTSA ODI #11139330
91,000 miles · Oct 3, 2018
Service Brakes
DRIVING TO WORK ON STREETS AND CAME TO A STOP LIGHT ,HIT MY BRAKES AND THE DID NOT STOP. AFTER HITTING MY BRAKES A COUPLE MORE TIMES MY CAR STOPPED. MY BRAKES WERE DOWN AS FAR AS THEY COULD GO. TOOK CAR TO FORD DEALER AND WAS TOLD IT WAS A MODULAR THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED FOR $1400.00 .I THINK IS TO MUCH FOR A SENIOR CITIZEN TO …
Read full complaint
DRIVING TO WORK ON STREETS AND CAME TO A STOP LIGHT ,HIT MY BRAKES AND THE DID NOT STOP. AFTER HITTING MY BRAKES A COUPLE MORE TIMES MY CAR STOPPED. MY BRAKES WERE DOWN AS FAR AS THEY COULD GO. TOOK CAR TO FORD DEALER AND WAS TOLD IT WAS A MODULAR THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED FOR $1400.00 .I THINK IS TO MUCH FOR A SENIOR CITIZEN TO PAY.
NHTSA ODI #11133172
105,000 miles · Oct 2, 2018
Service Brakes
AFTER BREAKING SOMEWHAT HARD TO AVOID AN INCIDENT THE BREAK PEDAL WAS INCREDIBLY "SPONGY" AND WOULD NEED TO GO TO THE FLOOR TO ENGAGE THE BREAKS. TWO MECHANIC SHOPS, OTHER THAN THE DEALERSHIP, INSPECTED AND DETERMINED THAT THE POWER BOOSTER MAY BE THE ISSUE AN INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS A RECALL 13N02 FOR THIS VEHICLE. TOOK IT T…
Read full complaint
AFTER BREAKING SOMEWHAT HARD TO AVOID AN INCIDENT THE BREAK PEDAL WAS INCREDIBLY "SPONGY" AND WOULD NEED TO GO TO THE FLOOR TO ENGAGE THE BREAKS. TWO MECHANIC SHOPS, OTHER THAN THE DEALERSHIP, INSPECTED AND DETERMINED THAT THE POWER BOOSTER MAY BE THE ISSUE AN INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS A RECALL 13N02 FOR THIS VEHICLE. TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP WHERE THEY DETERMINED IT WAS THE MASTER CYLINDER AND NOT THE POWER BOOSTER. THEN THEY CLAIMED IT WAS THE HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT AND THAT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. OVER $1000 LATER THE PROBLEM WAS SOLVED. AFTER REVIEWING SEVERAL COMPLAINTS ONLINE ABOUT THE HCU IT APPEARS THAT THIS DEVICE IS FAULTY AND IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY FORD HOWEVER THEY HAVE FAILED TO ISSUE AN IMPORTANT RECALL. APPARENTLY THE ALGORITHM FOR A RECALL HAS NOT BEEN MET WITH FAULTY UNITS. THIS FAULTY DEVICE NEEDS TO HAVE A CLASS ACTION ESTABLISHED TO COVER THE FAULTY DEVICES AND FIX THE ISSUE AND NOT TO MENTION THE REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CONSUMER.
NHTSA ODI #11132837
83,000 miles · Aug 22, 2018
Service Brakes
MY WIFE WAS DRIVING THE VEHICLE AND WHEN SHE WENT TO STOP SHE PRESSED THE BRAKES THE PEDAL WENT COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP AND NEARLY COLLIDED WITH A ANOTHER VEHICLE. TOOK THE VEHICLE TO FORD AND FOUND THAT IT HAD A FAULTY ABS HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT THAT IS ALLOWING FLUID TO BY PASS THE…
Read full complaint
MY WIFE WAS DRIVING THE VEHICLE AND WHEN SHE WENT TO STOP SHE PRESSED THE BRAKES THE PEDAL WENT COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP AND NEARLY COLLIDED WITH A ANOTHER VEHICLE. TOOK THE VEHICLE TO FORD AND FOUND THAT IT HAD A FAULTY ABS HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT THAT IS ALLOWING FLUID TO BY PASS THE ABS AND NOT STOP THE VEHICLE. VEHICLE HAD BEEN SERVICED PREVIOUSLY IN 2016 FOR A SIMILAR BRAKE FAILURE ISSUE. (BETWEEN 50 AND 60 THOUSAND MILES) THAT TIME IT WAS A FAULTY BRAKE BOOSTER THAT PREVENTED THE VEHICLE FROM BEING ABLE TO STOP. THAT REPAIR WAS COVERED UNDER THE 13N02 EXTENDED WARRANTY 10 YEARS AND 150,000 MILES. THIS TIME FORD IS NOT STANDING BEHIND A PROBLEM THAT COULD HAVE RESULT IN A SERIOUS INJURY OR WORSE.
NHTSA ODI #11121702
107,890 miles · Aug 19, 2018
Service Brakes
LOST BRAKE PRESSURE WHILE DRIVING AND COULD NOT STOP WITH SIGNIFICANT PRESSURE ON THE PEDAL. DEALER WAS UNABLE TO FIND CAUSE DESPITE NUMEROUS EXAMPLES OF THE SAME PREVIOUSLY REPORTED BY OTHERS.
NHTSA ODI #11120957
65,480 miles · Aug 16, 2018
Service Brakes
BRAKE PEDAL GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR BEFORE STOPPING. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THE BRAKES HAVE FAILED IN TRAFFIC. BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER REPLACED AT 58K, BRAKE BOOSTER REPLACED AT 32K. CURRENT MILEAGE IS 65K. DEALERSHIP UNABLE TO FIND PROBLEM.
NHTSA ODI #11120242
74,423 miles · Aug 14, 2018
Service Brakes
I WAS DRIVING HOME ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN TRAFFIC CAME TO AN ABRUPT STOP. I WENT TO APPLY MY BRAKE BUT THE VEHICLE DID NOT SLOW. I HAD TO STOMP AS HARD AS I COULD ON THE BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP BEFORE ALMOST COLLIDING WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME. CAME WITHIN INCHES OF THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME. ONCE HOME, I PUT THE EDGE IN PAR…
Read full complaint
I WAS DRIVING HOME ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN TRAFFIC CAME TO AN ABRUPT STOP. I WENT TO APPLY MY BRAKE BUT THE VEHICLE DID NOT SLOW. I HAD TO STOMP AS HARD AS I COULD ON THE BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP BEFORE ALMOST COLLIDING WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME. CAME WITHIN INCHES OF THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME. ONCE HOME, I PUT THE EDGE IN PARK, I PUSHED THE PEDAL VERY HARD & HEARD A HIGH PITCHED SQUEALING NOISE. INFORMED BY FORD THIS WAS DUE TO THE BRAKE BOOSTER FAILING. I HAD THE BOOSTER REPLACED PREVIOUSLY IN 2016 WITH THE FIRST RECALL AND NOW 2 YEARS AND LESS THAN 15,000 MILES LATER, THE 2ND BOOSTER HAS FAILED. CURRENT MILEAGE IS 74,451 AND I AM NOW ABOUT TO BE ON MY 3 BOOSTER. FORD WILL NOT COVER ANOTHER BREAK BOOSTER EVEN THOUGH EACH SHOULD LAST SOMEWHERE AROUND 100,000 MILES. I SPOKE WITH SERVICE DEPT AND WAS ADVISED THE RECALL REPLACED BOOSTER IS ONLY GUARANTEED FOR 1 YEAR OR 12,000 MILES WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. SERVICE TECH SAID HE COULDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE ISSUE DUE TO FORD'S POLICY. SO GLAD THE SAFETY OF MY FAMILY'S LIFE IS GOOD FOR 1 YEAR/12,000 WITH MY 3RD BREAK BOOSTER BEING INSTALLED AT MY EXPENSE TODAY. NO WARNINGS NO NOTHING, EDGE JUST WOULDN'T STOP. NOT SURE HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO BE HURT BEFORE SOMEONE WILL DO SOMETHING. FORD IS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM BUT IT'S CHEAPER FOR THEM TO PAY A LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT THAN TO FIX THE ISSUE. I'M SO GLAD I BOUGHT A FORD SO THAT I CAN SHELL OUT $800+ EVERY 2 YEARS FOR ANOTHER BRAKE BOOSTER IF I'M LUCKY ENOUGH TO SURVIVE FINDING OUT IT'S FAILED AGAIN.
NHTSA ODI #11119870
127,000 miles · Aug 14, 2018
Service Brakes
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND AN ABNORMAL NOISE WAS HEARD. THE BRAKE PEDAL BECAME DIFFICULT TO DEPRESS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A DEALER TO BE DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATEL…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND AN ABNORMAL NOISE WAS HEARD. THE BRAKE PEDAL BECAME DIFFICULT TO DEPRESS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A DEALER TO BE DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 127,000.
NHTSA ODI #11119862
71,000 miles · Aug 13, 2018
Service Brakes
WHILE MOVING BRAKE PEDAL BECAME HARD AND WOULD NOT STOP VEHICLE FORD HAS A CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM NUMBER 13N02 FOR REPAIRS TO FAILING BRAKE BOOSTER FORD ALSO WILL NOT SUPPLY LOANER VEHICLE WHY HASN'T THERE BEEN A RECALL VEHICLE IS AT 71,000 MILES
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 FORD F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, EDGE, AND LINCOLN MKX TRUCKS MANUFACTURED FROM OCTOBER 25, 2010, THROUGH NOVEMBER 20, 2010. THESE VEHICLES WERE INSPECTED USING INTEGRATED DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM (IDS) THAT HAD A CUSTOM SOFTWARE ROUTINE TO READ THE SUSPECT BODY CONTROL MODULE (BCM) SERIAL NUMBER. BASED ON THE SERIAL NUMBER THE BCM WAS EITHER NOT AFFECTED OR REPLACED. THE CUSTOM SOFTWARE ROUTINE WAS NOT READING THE CORRECT SET OF CHARACTERS, AND WAS NOT ABLE TO IDENTIFY A BCM THAT REQUIRED REPLACEMENT AFFECTED BCMS MAY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR AN INTERNAL SHORT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF AN ELECTRICAL SHORT DEVELOPS, AN OVERHEATING CONDITION MAY OCCUR WHICH COULD RESULT IN A VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALER WILL INSPECT THE BODY CONTROL MODULE AND IF NECESSARY REPLACE IT FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 7, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP CENTER AT 1-866-436-7332.
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, EDGE AND LINCOLN MKX VEHICLES. DURING A SIX-DAY PRODUCTION PERIOD, THE SUPPLIER OF THE BODY CONTROL MODULE MANUFACTURED MODULES THAT MAY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR AN INTERNAL SHORT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF AN ELECTRICAL SHORT DEVELOPS, AN OVERHEATING CONDITION MAY OCCUR WHICH CAN RESULT IN AN UNATTENDED VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALER WILL REPLACE THE BODY CONTROL MODULE IF NECESSARY FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JANUARY 11, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 EDGE AND LINCOLN MKX VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM JULY 1, 2010, THROUGH OCTOBER 8, 2010. THESE VEHICLES WERE SHIPPED WITH INCORRECTLY CONFIGURED ELECTRONIC MODULE SETTINGS THAT DISABLE THE LOCKING FUNCTION OF THE LIFTGATE. ACCORDINGLY, THE VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 206, "DOOR LOCKS AND DOOR RETENTION COMPONENTS."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THE LIFTGATE LOCK MAY BE DISABLED AND THE DRIVER MAY NOT BE ABLE TO LOCK THE LIFTGATE USING INTERIOR LOCK SWITCHES OR REMOTE KEY FOB BUTTONS.
Remedy: FORD WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND DEALERS WILL HAVE THE AFFECTED CONTROL MODULES UPDATED FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 1, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Additional source detail variants (3)
Interior Lighting
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
2011 Ford Edge Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year
Illustration