← New search

2010 Dodge RAM 1500

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2010 Dodge RAM 1500 do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 520.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

354 reports with mileage · 132 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Power Train. Review the 229 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 71 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 61 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

26 crash reports3 fire reports10 injury reports

Power Train complaints

229 reports
Clear category filter
58,000 miles · Sep 12, 2013
Power Train

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH, THE DRIVE SHAFT COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM THE REAR AXLE WITH NO WARNING. THE CONTACT ALSO MENTIONED THAT BECAUSE OF THE FAILURE, MORE DAMAGE OCCURRED TO THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE MECHANIC STATED…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH, THE DRIVE SHAFT COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM THE REAR AXLE WITH NO WARNING. THE CONTACT ALSO MENTIONED THAT BECAUSE OF THE FAILURE, MORE DAMAGE OCCURRED TO THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE MECHANIC STATED THAT THE DRIVE SHAFT HAD TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 58,000.

NHTSA ODI #10543307

Mileage unknown · Sep 12, 2013
Power Train

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500. THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS A RECALL ASSOCIATED NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 13V038000 (POWER TRAIN) BUT THE PART WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO PROVIDE AN EXPECTED DATE FOR THE PART. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED ANY FAILURES.

NHTSA ODI #10543244

Mileage unknown · Sep 10, 2013
Power Train

I PURCHASED A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500(HEMI) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PULLING A TRAVEL TRAILER AFTER I RETIRED. APPROXIMATELY 4-5 MONTHS AGO I RECEIVED A "RECALL" DUE TO A PROBLEM IN ASSEMBLY WITH THE REAR AXLE PINION NUT BEING BUILT WITHOUT AN ADHESIVE PATCH ON THE PINION NUT THREADS. I AM NOW TOLD I CAN NOT PULL ANY TYPE OF TRAILER AND …

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500(HEMI) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PULLING A TRAVEL TRAILER AFTER I RETIRED. APPROXIMATELY 4-5 MONTHS AGO I RECEIVED A "RECALL" DUE TO A PROBLEM IN ASSEMBLY WITH THE REAR AXLE PINION NUT BEING BUILT WITHOUT AN ADHESIVE PATCH ON THE PINION NUT THREADS. I AM NOW TOLD I CAN NOT PULL ANY TYPE OF TRAILER AND THAT IT MAY BE MANY MONTHS BEFORE CHRYSLER/DODGE WILL HAVE THE PARTS TO CORRECT THIS PROBLEM. THE DEALER WHERE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE STATES THAT CHRYSLER IS NOT CONCERNED WITH CORRECTING THIS PROBLEM IN A TIMELY FASHION. I CONTACTED CHRYSLER AND RECEIVED AN ANSWER THAT IT WILL BE MONTHS BEFORE THE PARTS ARE AVAILABLE, "IF THEN." DUE TO THIS PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE, MY RETIREMENT TRAVEL PLANS HAVE BEEN PUT ON HOLD, WAITING ON CHRYSLER/DODGE TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE, WHICH I BOUGHT IN GOOD FAITH FROM A DEALER LOCALLY. THIS LACK OF CONCERN BY THE DEALERSHIP AND CHRYSLER/DODGE IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE. IT IS BEYOND COMPREHENSION WHY IT SHOULD TAKE "MANY MONTHS" TO OBTAIN AN "ADHESIVE PATCH" TO CORRECT THEIR ERROR IN MANUFACTURING THIS VEHICLE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10542829

63,000 miles · Sep 6, 2013
Power TrainWheels

M34 RECALL - WE BROUGHT THE CAR TO DEALER APRIL 2013 AND THEY COULD NOT FIX THE RECALL YET (WE HAVE THIS DOCUMENTED - "AS PER TECH NOT IN EFFECT YET"). ON 8/31 WE WERE ON NORTHERN STATE PARKWAY (EASTBOUND) AROUND 8PM WHEN THE CAR FAILED - VERY LOUD NOISE, LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, HIT A CURB AND BARELY EXITED THE PARKWAY AT ROUT…

Read full complaint

M34 RECALL - WE BROUGHT THE CAR TO DEALER APRIL 2013 AND THEY COULD NOT FIX THE RECALL YET (WE HAVE THIS DOCUMENTED - "AS PER TECH NOT IN EFFECT YET"). ON 8/31 WE WERE ON NORTHERN STATE PARKWAY (EASTBOUND) AROUND 8PM WHEN THE CAR FAILED - VERY LOUD NOISE, LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, HIT A CURB AND BARELY EXITED THE PARKWAY AT ROUTE 110 EXIT. VEHICLE COULD NOT MOVE AND REALIZED THE DRIVE SHAFT CAME OFF AND A PASSING CAR HIT THE DRIVE SHAFT, SEVERAL CARS HAD TO SWERVE AROUND IT, THE CAR FLUID LEAKING, ETC. WE HAD TO CALL AAA AND ARRANGE A TOW TRUCK ($181.95 PAID UP FRONT), ARRANGE TRANSPORTATION FOR OUR 12 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER WHO WAS IN THE CAR AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT AND MY WIFE AND I WERE TRANSPORTED BY THE TOW TRUCK. THIS ORDEAL TOOK 2 HOURS. WE ARRANGED FOR DEALER TO TOW THE CAR ON 9/4 - SMITH HAVEN CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE, SAINT JAMES, NY. THE DEALER HAS INFORMED US THAT CAN REPAIR THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE REAR LOCKING UP AND THE DRIVE SHAFT COMING LOSE, BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE THE PART TO FIX THE M34 RECALL. I OPENED CASE #23907979 WITH CHRYSLER 9/5. I AM GETTING CONFLICTING INFORMATION SINCE CHRYSLER REPRESENTATIVE INFORMS ME THAT THE PARTS ARE AVAILABLE CBAKM343AA, CBAKM344AA, CBAKM345AA, CBAKM346AA BUT WILL "TAKE A WHILE" TO GET AND THAT THE DEALER CAN ONLY ORDER/RECIEVE ONE OF THE FOUR PARTS AT A TIME. THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME. HOWEVER, THE SMITH HAVEN DEALER AND NHTSA RECORDS (REFERENCE # 565888) INDICATE THE PARTS TO FIX M34 ARE NOT AVAILABLE. THEREFORE, I AM GETTING CONFLICTING INFORMATION REGARDING THE ABILITY TO ADDRESS THE RECALL WHILE THE DEALER IS IN THE PROCESS OF REPAIRING THE DAMAGES AND RETURNING THE VEHICLE WITH THE RECALL ISSUE UNADDRESSED AND MY FAMILY AND I ARE FACING A REPEAT OF A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS FAILURE AT ANY TIME IN THE FUTURE.

NHTSA ODI #10542336

60,000 miles · Sep 3, 2013
Power TrainSteering

REAR AXLE PINION NUT RECALL - KNOWN TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS UPON FAILURE - 4 CASES ALREADY. MANUFACTURER ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAFETY RECALL IN JANUARY 2013 AND SENT OUT SAFETY RECALL NOTICES TO ALL CONSUMERS THAT THE RECALL AFFECTS. I HAVE CALLED THE LOCAL DEALERSHIPS NUMEROUS TIMES REGARDING THE RECALL AND THEY SIMPLY SAY THAT THE PAR…

Read full complaint

REAR AXLE PINION NUT RECALL - KNOWN TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS UPON FAILURE - 4 CASES ALREADY. MANUFACTURER ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAFETY RECALL IN JANUARY 2013 AND SENT OUT SAFETY RECALL NOTICES TO ALL CONSUMERS THAT THE RECALL AFFECTS. I HAVE CALLED THE LOCAL DEALERSHIPS NUMEROUS TIMES REGARDING THE RECALL AND THEY SIMPLY SAY THAT THE PARTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE. NINE MONTHS AFTER THE RECALL NOTICE DISTRIBUTION I CONTACTED DODGE CORPORATE TO FIND OUT WHY THE PARTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE AND THEY STATE THAT DODGE HAS FAILED TO SECURE A VENDOR TO SUPPLY THE PRODUCT. THIS CONCERNS ME A GREAT DEAL THAT DODGE PUTS THE CONSUMER IN DANGER BY NOT BEING RESPONSIBLE AND MAKING THE REPAIRS NEEDED. THIS RECALLED PART CAN CAUSE A DRIVER TO LOSE CONTROL OF THEIR VEHICLE AND INJURE THEMSELVES AS WELL AS OTHERS. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10538560

65,400 miles · Aug 29, 2013
Power Train

I WAS DRIVING DOWN A MAJOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY IN A CONSTRUCTION ZONE (DOWN TO 2 LANES, CONCRETE BARRICADES ON EITHER SIDE) WHEN I STARTED HEARING LOUD GRINDING NOISES COMING FROM UNDER MY TRUCK. I COULDN'T PULL OFF THE ROAD BECAUSE THERE WAS NO SHOULDER AND THE NEAREST EXIT WAS AT LEAST A QUARTER MILE AHEAD SO I WAS DRIVING TOW…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING DOWN A MAJOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY IN A CONSTRUCTION ZONE (DOWN TO 2 LANES, CONCRETE BARRICADES ON EITHER SIDE) WHEN I STARTED HEARING LOUD GRINDING NOISES COMING FROM UNDER MY TRUCK. I COULDN'T PULL OFF THE ROAD BECAUSE THERE WAS NO SHOULDER AND THE NEAREST EXIT WAS AT LEAST A QUARTER MILE AHEAD SO I WAS DRIVING TOWARD THE EXIT WHEN THERE WAS A LOUD POP, LOTS OF SMOKE, AND MY VEHICLE SKIDDED TO A STOP. NEARBY VEHICLES NARROWLY MISSED COLLIDING WITH ME DUE TO THE SMOKE AND THE SUDDEN STOP AND THE FACT THAT MY DRIVE SHAFT HAD COME FLYING OUT BEHIND ME. AS IT TURNS OUT THE REAR DIFFERENTIAL HAD COMPLETELY LOCKED UP (DUE TO N08 REAR AXLE PINION NUT ISSUE) AND THE TORQUE HAD POPPED MY DRIVE SHAFT COMPLETELY LOOSE AND LEFT A MASSIVE CRACK IN MY TRANSFER CASE. I HAD BEEN TO MY LOCAL DEALERSHIP LESS THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE INCIDENT BUT THEY DID NOT PROVIDE THE NECESSARY REPAIRS BECAUSE CHRYSLER HAS STILL NOT MADE THE CORRECT PARTS AVAILABLE. CHRYLER HAS BEEN AWARE OF THIS ISSUE FOR OVER A YEAR BUT STILL DOES NOT HAVE THE CORRECT PARTS AVAILABLE TO REMEDY THE PROBLEM, WHICH RESULTS IN CATASTROPHIC FAILURE AND LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL AT HIGH SPEEDS.

NHTSA ODI #10537856

Mileage unknown · Aug 28, 2013
Power Train

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500. THE CONTACT STATED THAT NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER 13V038000 (POWER TRAIN) HAD EXCEEDED A REASONABLE TIME FOR REPAIR. THE VEHICLE DID NOT EXPERIENCE THE FAILURE HOWEVER, THE RECALL LETTER WAS RECEIVED IN MAY 2013. THE DEALER ADVISED THAT THE PART WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR REPAIR. THE VEHICLE WA…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500. THE CONTACT STATED THAT NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER 13V038000 (POWER TRAIN) HAD EXCEEDED A REASONABLE TIME FOR REPAIR. THE VEHICLE DID NOT EXPERIENCE THE FAILURE HOWEVER, THE RECALL LETTER WAS RECEIVED IN MAY 2013. THE DEALER ADVISED THAT THE PART WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR REPAIR. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. ....UPDATED 10-21-13 *BF THE CONSUMER STATED AFTER SEVEN MONTHS, THE PARTS WERE STILL NOT AVAILABLE. UPDATE 10/23/13

NHTSA ODI #10537750

Mileage unknown · Aug 26, 2013
Power Train

WE RECEIVED A RE-CALL (N08/NHTSA 13V-038) ON OUR 2010 DODGE RAM 1500 TRUCK SEVERAL MONTHS AGO. EVERY TIME I CALL TO CHECK THE STATUS, I AM TOLD THAT THERE IS STILL NO REMEDY FOR THE SITUATION AND A FOLLOW-UP RE-CALL NOTICE WILL BE SENT WHEN A REMEDY IS AVAILABLE. THIS IS THE REAR AXLE PINION NUT AND I WON'T GO INTO DETAIL AS TO …

Read full complaint

WE RECEIVED A RE-CALL (N08/NHTSA 13V-038) ON OUR 2010 DODGE RAM 1500 TRUCK SEVERAL MONTHS AGO. EVERY TIME I CALL TO CHECK THE STATUS, I AM TOLD THAT THERE IS STILL NO REMEDY FOR THE SITUATION AND A FOLLOW-UP RE-CALL NOTICE WILL BE SENT WHEN A REMEDY IS AVAILABLE. THIS IS THE REAR AXLE PINION NUT AND I WON'T GO INTO DETAIL AS TO WHAT IS SAYS COULD HAPPEN AS I AM SURE YOU ARE WELL AWARE ALREADY. I BELIEVE THAT IF CUSTOMERS HAD TO BE GIVEN A SAFER VEHICLE TO DRIVE WHILE AWAITING REPAIRS FOR THE ONES THEY ARE PAYING FOR THAT A REMEDY WOULD PROBABLY COME A LOT QUICKER. I ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT DEALERS SHOULD BE MADE TO PROVIDE ALTERNATE TRANSPORTATION AT NO COST TO THE CONSUMER. I CANNOT FATHOM IT TAKING THIS LONG TO REMEDY THIS SITUATION KNOWING THE DAMAGE IT COULD CAUSE. SOMETHING REALLY SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT THE LENGTH OF TIME THIS IS TAKING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. I WOULD APPRECIATE ANY POSITIVE FEEDBACK ON THIS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10537329

Mileage unknown · Aug 24, 2013
Power Train

RECEIVED SAFETY RECALL N08/NHTSA 13V-038 IN EARLY SPRING 2013. PARTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE AND THE PROMISED FOLLOW-UP RECALL HAS YET TO BE RECEIVED. THE RECALL INDICATES FAILURE COULD RESULT IN A CRASH PUTTING MY FAMILY AT CONSTANT RISK. THIS IS ENTIRELY TOO LONG AND INDICATES CHRYSLERS APATHY TOWARDS THEIR CONSUMERS AND THEIR SAFE…

Read full complaint

RECEIVED SAFETY RECALL N08/NHTSA 13V-038 IN EARLY SPRING 2013. PARTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE AND THE PROMISED FOLLOW-UP RECALL HAS YET TO BE RECEIVED. THE RECALL INDICATES FAILURE COULD RESULT IN A CRASH PUTTING MY FAMILY AT CONSTANT RISK. THIS IS ENTIRELY TOO LONG AND INDICATES CHRYSLERS APATHY TOWARDS THEIR CONSUMERS AND THEIR SAFETY, REGARDLESS OF THE RHETORIC IN THEIR SAFETY RECALL NOTICES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10537044

24,000 miles · Aug 23, 2013
Power Train

I OWNS A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500. I HAVE ATTEMPTED TO HAVE THE VEHICLE REPAIRED UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 13V038000 (POWER TRAIN) BUT WAS INFORMED THAT THE PARTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE AND THAT HE WOULD BE CONTACTED WHEN THE PARTS WERE TO BECOME AVAILABLE. I FEEL THAT SINCE THE FAILURE WAS REPORTED IN FEBRUARY OF 2013, THERE SHOULD …

Read full complaint

I OWNS A 2010 DODGE RAM 1500. I HAVE ATTEMPTED TO HAVE THE VEHICLE REPAIRED UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 13V038000 (POWER TRAIN) BUT WAS INFORMED THAT THE PARTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE AND THAT HE WOULD BE CONTACTED WHEN THE PARTS WERE TO BECOME AVAILABLE. I FEEL THAT SINCE THE FAILURE WAS REPORTED IN FEBRUARY OF 2013, THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A REMEDY AVAILABLE. THE RECALL STATED THAT THE EXPECTED DATE TO BEGIN SERVICING VEHICLES WAS DURING MAY OF 2013 AND IT IS CURRENTLY LATE AUGUST OF 2013. THE CURRENT MILEAGE IS 24,000 AND I AM UNCOMFORTABLE DRIVING THE VEHICLE FOR ANY DISTANCE, BUT WILL BE FORCED TO TAKE IT CROSS COUNTRY IN THE NEAR FUTURE. I HAVE CALLED CHRYSLER REPEATEDLY AND HAVE BEEN TOLD IT'S A PARTS SUPPLIER PROBLEM, THEY ARE CHANGING SUPPLIERS, IT WILL NOW BE 3-4 WEEKS....ONE EXCUSE AFTER ANOTHER. YESTERDAY I CALLED AGAIN AND WAS ADVISED TO TAKE THE TRUCK TO A DEALER AND HAVE THEM CHECK THE PINION NUT TO SEE IF IT WAS LOOSE. I DID SO, IT WAS NOT LOOSE, AND I WAS TOLD "IT SHOULD BE OK" FOR THE TRIP, BUT NO GUARANTEE. THIS IS ROTTEN WAY TO DO BUSINESS. THERE IS NO FAILURE YET. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10536852

Official recalls

4

18V160000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:mounting

Mar 8, 2018

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain 2009-2012 Dodge Ram 1500 trucks currently, or ever registered, in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia. Exposure to environmental conditions such as water mixed with road salt may cause the front fuel tank strap frame "T-Slot" bracket to corrode, possibly causing the fuel tank to drop and make contact with the ground.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the fuel tank were to drop and contact the ground, a fuel leak may result. Additionally, in the event of a crash, the fuel tank may not remain secured to the vehicle, possibly causing a fuel leak. A fuel leak in the presence in an ignition source, can increase the risk of a fire.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners and dealers will bolt a bracket reinforcement to the frame, free of charge. The recall began May 2, 2018. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is U04.

17V821000 · Power Train:automatic Transmission:lever And Linkage:column Shift

Dec 20, 2017

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain 2016-2017 Ram 3500 Cab Chassis with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) of less than 10,000 lbs, 2011-2017 Ram 3500, 4500 and 5500 Cab Chassis vehicles, 2009-2017 Ram 1500 and 2010-2017 Ram 2500 and 3500 pickup trucks, all equipped with a column shifter. Pushing the brake pedal for prolonged periods when the vehicle is running and in PARK may cause the Brake Transmission Shift Interlock (BTSI) pin to stick in the open position. With the pin in the open position, the transmission can be shifted out of PARK into any gear without pushing the brake pedal or having the key in the ignition.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Being able to shift the transmission without pushing the brake pedal and/or without a key in the ignition can increase the risk of an unintended vehicle rollaway that may result in personal injury or a crash.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will update the vehicle software, inspect the BTSI, and, as necessary, replace it, free of charge. The recall began February 26, 2018. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is T79.

13V038000 · Power Train:driveline:differential Unit

Feb 6, 2013

Chrysler is recalling certain model year 2009-2012 Ram 1500 trucks manufactured from February 27, 2008, through June 30, 2009, and from December 1, 2009, through October 20, 2011; model year 2009-2011 Dodge Dakota trucks manufactured from February 27, 2007, through June 30, 2009, and from December 1, 2009, through September 30, 2011; model year 2009 Chrysler Aspen trucks manufactured from January 3, 2008, through December 18, 2008; and model year 2009 Dodge Durango trucks manufactured from January 3, 2008, through December 18, 2008. The rear axle pinion nut may loosen due to an undersized pinion spline that can allow relative motion between the nut and companion flange.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the rear axle pinion nut loosens, the axle can lock up and cause a loss of vehicle control and/or a vehicle crash with little warning.

Remedy: On November 7, 2013 Chrysler notified owners that dealers would install a pinion nut retainer, free of charge. In July 2015, and under a consent order with NHTSA, the company agreed to offer owners three options for remedying their vehicles: perform the original remedy, offer to repurchase the vehicle at the fair market value plus 10%, or offer an additional incentive offer towards the purchase of a new Dodge, Jeep, Chrysler, or Fiat vehicle. Chrysler will notify owners of the new recall options in a letter expected to be mailed on August 31, 2015. Owners may contact Chrysler at 1-800-247-9753. Chrysler's recall campaign number is N08.

12V474000 · Power Train:driveline:differential Unit

Oct 2, 2012

Chrysler is recalling certain model year 2009-2010, Ram 1500 and Dodge Dakota trucks, manufactured from July 1, 2009, through November 30, 2009, because the rear axle pinion nut may loosen due to a lack of adhesive.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the rear axle pinion nut loosens, the axle can lock up and cause a loss of vehicle control and/or a vehicle crash with little warning.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will install a pinion nut retainer, free of charge. The recall began on June 17, 2013. Owners may contact Chrysler at 1-800-247-9753.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA19001 · Electrical Overstress

Opened Apr 19, 2019 · Closed Sep 19, 2024

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags: Air Bag/restraint Control Module

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation to determine if the failure of airbags to deploy during severe crashes, in certain vehicles, was the result of a safety related defect.  During the investigation a complex failure was studied that can result in non-deployment of subject vehicle air bags and other restraint system devices in severe crash events. The subject vehicles may be equipped with an airbag control unit (ACU) for the supplemental restraint system (SRS) Electronic Control Unit (ECU) manufactured by ZF-TRW.  The ECU receives signals from crash sensors mounted in the vehicle and deploys the vehicle air bags and seat belt pretensioners in accordance with manufacturer design specifications.  The ECU in the subject vehicles contains a model DS84 application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) which controls the communication of the crash sensor signal, firing commands (i.e., when to deploy the airbag(s) and/or pretensioners), and fault information (e.g., diagnostic trouble codes). In September 2016, FCA announced recall 16V-668 for certain model year (MY) 2010 to 2014 Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep products manufactured with the subject ZF-TRW ACU.  In this recall, FCA discussed an EOS condition that resulted in a failure of the subject DS84 ASIC, which caused air bag non-deployment.  FCA noted that the defect condition had only been observed in vehicles equipped with sensor harnessing routed across the front of the vehicle.  Other FCA vehicles that also used the subject ACU, but were not equipped with cross-car harnessing, had not experienced EOS failures, despite similar time in service. During the course of this investigation, ODI sent two separate Information Request (IR) letters to six vehicle manufactures (including FCA, Hyundai, Honda, Kia, Mitsubishi, and Toyota) and one IR letter to ZF-TRW.  These IR letters resulted in ODI receiving comprehensive data from these manufacturers and suppliers. Studies of this data found that the DS84 ASIC does not have sufficient protection against negative electrical transients or electrical overstress (“EOS”) that can be generated in certain severe crashes.  An electrical transient occurs when the electrical power supplied to a circuit changes momentarily over a short duration of time.   In these severe crash cases, the crash sensors and other powered wiring can be damaged and short circuited so as to create a negative electrical transient of sufficient intensity and duration (that are outside the vehicle manufacturer's specification) to damage the ASIC before the restraint device deployment signal is received by the SRS ECU.  This damaged signal can lead to incomplete or nondeployment of the air bags and/or pretensioners.  Airbag non-deployment and/or lack of pretensioner operation can increase the risk or severity of injury in a crash.A total of 8 fatalities and 14 injuries were associated with known EOS events. The common element in all investigated manufacturers vehicles is the SRS ECU containing a DS84 ASIC manufactured by ZF-TRW.  The risk associated with the ASIC is equally shared among all OEMS involved in the investigation.  The actual real-world risk can be mitigated by other factors which were assessed by ODI during this investigation. The first mitigating factor involves protections built into the ACU design which protect the DS84 ASIC from damage.  There are multiple strategies and levels of protection employed by different OEMs that provide effective EOS mitigation.  The two most common strategies at the ACU level are circuit protection diodes on the remote senor signal lines, and current limiting resistors that protect critical components. The second mitigating factor is found at the vehicle level and involves the location and routing of the wires leading from the crash sensors to the SRS ECU.  If the wires are well protected in a crash and are not routed with other power wires carrying large currents, the risk for an EOS event is significantly reduced or eliminated. These design specific factors combine to produce a spectrum of risk for the vehicles equipped with ACUs using the DS84 ASIC.  Given the many of years of field exposure, it is possible to divide the subject population into two groups; vehicles which have experienced EOS events, and vehicles which have not experienced EOS field events. Four of the six OEMs involved in this investigation have experienced EOS field events on at least one of their models equipped with a DS84 ASIC.  All vehicle models (including the Toyota models identified in the Failure Report Summary of the opening resume for this investigation) with field events have been recalled.  In an abundance of caution, ODI kept this investigation open five years to monitor field performance and did not identify any field events on vehicles not included in existing safety recalls. Given the spectrum of risk identified in this investigation and that all vehicles with a demonstrated unreasonable risk have been recalled, ODI is closing this investigation. ODI is closing this investigation with the following manufacturer safety recalls: 16V-668, 18E-043, 18V-137, 18V-363, and 20V-024.  With the recall actions taken by the subject vehicle and equipment manufacturers, this investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exists on other model or model year vehicles outside of the recall scopes. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.