← New search

2010 Chevrolet Suburban 1500

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2010 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 53.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Suburban 1500 years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

37 reports with mileage · 16 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Air Bags. Review the 22 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 13 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 3 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports0 fire reports1 injury reports

Child Seat complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Aug 19, 2011
Child Seat

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500. THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 GRACO TURBO BOOSTER SEAT, MODEL NUMBER 1747302, MANUFACTURED ON JUNE 10, 2011. THE CONTACT STATED THE OWNER'S MANUAL DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF THE BOOSTER SEAT STRAP. THE SIZE OF THE HOLE THAT THE STRAP TRAVELS THROUGH…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500. THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 GRACO TURBO BOOSTER SEAT, MODEL NUMBER 1747302, MANUFACTURED ON JUNE 10, 2011. THE CONTACT STATED THE OWNER'S MANUAL DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF THE BOOSTER SEAT STRAP. THE SIZE OF THE HOLE THAT THE STRAP TRAVELS THROUGH WAS EXTREMELY NARROW; AND BOTH BOOSTER SEAT ARMS WERE POORLY DESIGNED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VIN AND FAILURE MILEAGE WERE UNAVAILABLE. UPDATED 9/20/11 *CN\ THE CONSUMER STATED SIGNIFICANT ASSEMBLY WAS REQUIRED, THE WRITTEN ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS WERE POOR, AND EVEN WITH PICTURES PROVIDED THEY WERE NOT ADEQUATE TO ENSURE SAFE INSTALLATION. IF THE SCREWS WERE NOT INSTALLED IN THE ARMS, THEY COULD EASILY DETACH FROM THE SEAT AND RELEASE THE SEAT BELT. THE ARMS OF THE BOOSTER SEAT WERE NOT SECURE ENOUGH OR STRONG ENOUGH TO RETAIN THE SHOULDER STRAP IN AN ACCIDENT. THE ARMS OF THE BOOSTER SEAT DOES NOT PREVENT A CHILD FROM REMOVING THE VEHICLE SHOULDER STRAP FROM ITS REQUIRED POSITION BELOW THE ARM REST. THE FIVE SLOTS ON THE BACK OF THE BOOSTER SEAT PRESENTED TOO MANY POSSIBLE ATTACHMENTS POINTS FOR THE STRAP THAT WAS PROVIDED WITH THE SEAT. THE THREE SLOTS ON THE BACK OF THE BOOSTER SEAT WERE TOO WEAK TO SECURE THE STRAP, BUT WAS THE ONLY LOCATION WHERE THE STRAP COULD EASILY BE INSTALLED. THE TWO CORNER SLOTS LOCATED ON THE OUTER EDGES OF THE SEAT WAS STRONG ENOUGH TO SECURE THE STRAPS, BUT THEY WERE TOO NARROW TO MAKE INSTALLATION OF THE STRAP EASY. THE SEAT BELT ATTACHMENT CLIP ON THE BOOSTER SEAT STRAP WAS SLOTTED AND COULD ALLOW THE VEHICLE SEAT BELT TO BECOME DETACHED IN A VIOLENT ACCIDENT OR BE REMOVED BY A DETERMINED CHILD. UPDATED 01/19/12

NHTSA ODI #10420750

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.