← New search

1996 Chevrolet K1500

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all K1500 years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 15 of 94 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Visibility. Review the 26 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 13 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Tires. Review the 10 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

7 crash reports2 fire reports3 injury reports

What owners actually said

94 reports
Mileage unknown · Oct 17, 2000
Visibility

WINDSHIELD WIPERS AND HORN WORK INTERMITTENTLY. SAFTEY ISSUE WHEN THE WIPERS WON'T WORK IN INCLEMENT WEATHER, AND HORN WON'T WHEN NEEDED. ALSO CRUISE CONTROL WORKS INTERMITTENTLY. ALL THREE HAVE WIRES GOING THROUGH THE STEERING COLUMN, POSSIBLY LINKING THE THREE INTO ONE BIGGER PROBLEM.*AK

NHTSA ODI #734562

Mileage unknown · Sep 30, 2000
Tires

AT ABOUT 50 TO 55 MPH, THE LEAST BIT OF ROAD ROUGHNESS STARTS THE TIRES HOPPING AND SENDING THE REAR OF THE TRUCK SIDEWAYS. THE TIRES DID NOT COME ON THE TRUCK, THEY WERE PURCHASED AS REPLACEMENTS FOR THE ORIGINAL TIRES WHICH POSED NO PROBLEMS. IT HAPPENS VERY QUICKLY AND HAS NEARLY CAUSED ME TO LOSE CONTROL SEVERAL TIMES. I BO…

Read full complaint

AT ABOUT 50 TO 55 MPH, THE LEAST BIT OF ROAD ROUGHNESS STARTS THE TIRES HOPPING AND SENDING THE REAR OF THE TRUCK SIDEWAYS. THE TIRES DID NOT COME ON THE TRUCK, THEY WERE PURCHASED AS REPLACEMENTS FOR THE ORIGINAL TIRES WHICH POSED NO PROBLEMS. IT HAPPENS VERY QUICKLY AND HAS NEARLY CAUSED ME TO LOSE CONTROL SEVERAL TIMES. I BOUGHT THE TIRES USED WITH ABOUT 5000 MILES ON THEM. I WOULD ASSUME THE PREVIOUS OWNER HAD THE SAME PROBLEM AND REPLACED THEM, WHICH I WILL HAVE TO DO TO.*AK (TIRESIZE: 265 75)( DOT NUMBER: TIRE SIZE: 265 75 )

NHTSA ODI #732901

Mileage unknown · Sep 12, 2000
Tires

TIRE TREAD SEPARATED ON FIRESTONE FIREHAWK TIRES. (CLAIM# 43-R514-616) *MW

NHTSA ODI #6900269

Mileage unknown · Aug 4, 2000
TiresCrashInjury

WHILE DRIVING ABOUT 74 MPH RIGHT REAR TIRE (FIRESTONE DUALER 256/16) EXPERIENCED TREAD SEPARATION, CAUSING CONSUMER TO LOSE CONTROL OF VEHICLE AND CRASH INTO GUARDRAIL HEAD ON, THE PASSENGER WAS THROWN INTO DRIVERS SIDE SUSTAINING INJURIE., THIS WAS THE THIRD TIRE THAT HAD PROBLEMS WITH. TIRE WAS TURNED OVER TO FIRESTONE FOR IN…

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING ABOUT 74 MPH RIGHT REAR TIRE (FIRESTONE DUALER 256/16) EXPERIENCED TREAD SEPARATION, CAUSING CONSUMER TO LOSE CONTROL OF VEHICLE AND CRASH INTO GUARDRAIL HEAD ON, THE PASSENGER WAS THROWN INTO DRIVERS SIDE SUSTAINING INJURIE., THIS WAS THE THIRD TIRE THAT HAD PROBLEMS WITH. TIRE WAS TURNED OVER TO FIRESTONE FOR INSPECTION CONTACT PERSON IS JAMES E CRAHAN P.O. BOX 18006, KANSAS CITY, MO 64133 PH-816-358-6111. *AK *MJS

NHTSA ODI #866888

Mileage unknown · Jun 20, 2000
Visibility

WINDSHIELD WIPERS STOPPED WHILE DRIVING IN RAIN. THIS COULD RESULT IN A DANGEROUS SITUATION. DEALER MENTIONED THAT THIS SAME PART WAS REPLACED ON VEHICLES THAT HAVE BEEN RECALLED. *AK *ML

NHTSA ODI #863860

Mileage unknown · Feb 15, 2000
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED, THE BRAKES BECOME WEAK, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING. DISTANCE, BRAKE SYSTEM IS WEAK, TOO MUCH PEDAL EFFORT. *AK

NHTSA ODI #856933

Mileage unknown · Feb 7, 2000
Power Train

WHILE DRIVING REAR END LOCKED UP, CAUSING THE DRIVER TO LOSE CONTROL OF VEHICLE. THIS WAS DUE TO A PIECE IN THE REAR AXLE BREAKING. DEARE HAS NOT SEEN VEHICLE. *AK

NHTSA ODI #856356

Mileage unknown · Feb 7, 2000
Engine And Engine Cooling

THIS FAILURE MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED A SAFETY DEFECT BUT IT IS SUCH A MAJOR FAILURE I BELIEVE IT WARRANTS AN INVESTIGATION. THE ENGINE IN THIS TRUCK HAS FAILED WITH ONLY 68,000 MILES ON THE ODOMETER DUE TO A SOMETHING THAT OCCURRED DURING THE ASSEMBLY OF THIS ENGINE AT THE FACTORY. GM HAS ISSUED A TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETIN DESC…

Read full complaint

THIS FAILURE MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED A SAFETY DEFECT BUT IT IS SUCH A MAJOR FAILURE I BELIEVE IT WARRANTS AN INVESTIGATION. THE ENGINE IN THIS TRUCK HAS FAILED WITH ONLY 68,000 MILES ON THE ODOMETER DUE TO A SOMETHING THAT OCCURRED DURING THE ASSEMBLY OF THIS ENGINE AT THE FACTORY. GM HAS ISSUED A TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETIN DESCRIBING THE PROBLEM (TSB # 99-06-01-003) AND CLEARLY THE FAULT IS WITH THE MANUFACTURERS LACK OF QUALITY CONTROL DURING THE ASSEMBLY PROCESS. THE TRUCK IS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY BUT WHEN A PROBLEM THIS MAJOR OCCURS AND IT IS CLEARLY THE MANUFACTURERS FAULT IT SEEMS THAT THEY SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR AN ENGINE FAILURE AT ONLY 68,000 MILES. ALSO, THIS APPEARS TO BE A FAIRLY COMMON PROBLEM WITH THIS ENGINE BECAUSE THE MECHANIC AT THE DEALERSHIP WHO DIAGNOSED THIS PROBLEM TOLD ME THAT HE HAD HEARD THIS ENGINE HAS HAD A HISTORY OF THIS PROBLEM. I HAVE SINCE TAKEN IT TO SEVERAL OTHER MECHANICS AND ATLEAST TWO OF THEM TOLD ME THE SAME THING; THAT THEY HAVE SEEN SEVERAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. AND THE MOST OBVIOUS PIECE OF EVEIDENCE THAT THERE IS A MANUFACTURING DEFECT IS GM'S OWN TSB WHERE THEY THEMSELVES DESCRIBE A CLEAR MISTAKE ON THEIR PART DURING THE ASSEMBLY OF THESE ENGINES. I UNDERSTAND THAT COMPANIES SUCH AS GM CAN'T BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DEFECTS AFTER THE WARRANTY PERIOD BUT SOMETHING THIS MAJOR IS INEXCUSABLE AND SHOULD BE THEIR RESPONSIBILITY. I HAVE ALREADY SPENT CLOSE TO $2000 ON OTHER UNRELATED REPAIRS TO THIS TRUCK SINCE THE WARRANTY EXPIRED AND NOW THE DEALERSHIP WANTS ANOTHER $3000 TO FIX A PROBLEM THAT ONLY EXISTS BECAUSE OF A MANUFACTURING FLAW. THIS IS NOT RIGHT AND GM SHOULD BE MADE TO CORRECT THESE ENGINES WHETHER THEY ARE STILL UNDER WARRANTY OR NOT! THE TRUCK JUST TURNED 4 YEARS OLD AND IT SITS IN MY DRIVEWAY COMPLETELY USELESS TO ME AND IT ISN'T EVEN PAID FOR YET. PLEASE ADVISE....*AK

NHTSA ODI #718429

Mileage unknown · Feb 1, 2000
Visibility

WIND WIPERS AND WASHERS DON'T WORK. *AK

NHTSA ODI #855941

Mileage unknown · Jan 27, 2000
Visibility

WINDSHIELD WIPER MOTOR MODULE FAILED. YH

NHTSA ODI #550567

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.