← New search

1992 Chevrolet Camaro

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 1992 Chevrolet Camaro do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 32.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Camaro years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 16 of 88 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Fuel System, Gasoline. Review the 21 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 18 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 9 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

13 crash reports3 fire reports8 injury reports

What owners actually said

88 reports
Mileage unknown · Sep 29, 1999
Engine And Engine Cooling

NO SUMMARY.

NHTSA ODI #712466

Mileage unknown · Sep 17, 1999
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

I JUST PAID FOR $653.93 WORTH OF SERVICE FROM AL SERRA CHEVROLET, WHICH INCLUDED AN ENGINE FLUSH. I DROVE IT AROUND THE BLOCK TO WORK AND AFTER WORK WENT TO THE STORE AND PURCHASE FOOD. WHEN I RETURNED TO THE CAR, I STARTED THE CAR AND BEFORE I PUT THE CAR IN GEAR, I STEPPED ON THE BRAKE. TO MY SURPRISE I GOT A LARGE VACUUM L…

Read full complaint

I JUST PAID FOR $653.93 WORTH OF SERVICE FROM AL SERRA CHEVROLET, WHICH INCLUDED AN ENGINE FLUSH. I DROVE IT AROUND THE BLOCK TO WORK AND AFTER WORK WENT TO THE STORE AND PURCHASE FOOD. WHEN I RETURNED TO THE CAR, I STARTED THE CAR AND BEFORE I PUT THE CAR IN GEAR, I STEPPED ON THE BRAKE. TO MY SURPRISE I GOT A LARGE VACUUM LEAK AND NO BRAKES. I HAD THE CAR TOWED TO AL SERRA CHEVROLET THAT NIGHT USING MY OWN ROADSIDE SERVICE. THE FINDINGS OF THE AL SERRA SERVICE DEPARTMENT WERE THAT THE BRAKE BOOSTER BURST INTERNALLY ON ITS OWN. THIS FINDING TOLD ME THAT THIS PART WAS DEFECTIVE. THE AL SERRA SERVICE DEPARTMENT CONCLUDED THAT NOTHING THEY DID CAUSE THE FAILURE AND THE INCIDENT WAS A COINCIDENCE. I WILL NOW HAVE TO PAY AN ADDITIONAL $375.50 TO REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE PART. I WILL MAKE INQUIRIES TO FIND THE FAILURE RATE OF THE BRAKE BOOSTERS ON CAMAROS. I REALIZE THE CAR IS SEVEN YEARS OLD (ONLY 41,028 ORIGINAL MILES), HOWEVER; A BRAKE BOOSTER FAILURE OF THIS MAGNITUDE COULD HAVE PUT MY LIFE IN JEOPARDY IF THE CAR HAD BEEN MOVING INSTEAD OF PARKED. THE CONCLUSION IS THAT THIS PART DEFECT REPRESENTS A SAFETY HAZARD THAT IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE. THE FACT THAT I AM HAVING TO REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE PART WITH MY OWN MONEY COMPOUNDS THE PROBLEM. IT IS MY BELIEF THAT SOMETHING BROKE LOOSE DURING THE ENGINE FLUSH THAT MADE ITS WAY THROUGH THE VACUUM LINE AND RUPTURED THE DIAPHRAGM IN THE BRAKE BOOSTER. SINCE THE DEALERSHIP WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY IN THE MATTER I WILL APPROACH THE MANUFACTURER AND THE PROPER SAFETY ORGANIZATION TO INSURE THAT NOTHING LIKE THIS HAPPENS TO SOMEONE ELSE.

NHTSA ODI #711503

Mileage unknown · Sep 2, 1999
Air Bags

WHILE DRIVING APPROX. 35-40 MPH , OVER NORMAL STREET BUMP DRIVER'S AIRBAG DEPLOYED WHICH COULD HAVE CAUSED INJURIES AND LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL. *AK

NHTSA ODI #846501

Mileage unknown · Jul 6, 1999
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

DRIVING IN STOP AND GO TRAFFIC TRY TO APPLY BRAKES NO BRAKES.

NHTSA ODI #843937

Mileage unknown · Apr 14, 1999
Fuel System, Gasoline

HAD RECEIVED RECALL NOTICE 94V077000 IN MAIL. CONTACTED DEALER. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER & HAD FUEL TANK CHECKED. NOTHING WAS WRONG & NO REPAIRS DONE. NOW FUEL TANK IS LEAKING. INFORMED BY MANUFACTURER THAT FUEL TANK WAS REPLACED & WILL NOT DO REPAIRS DUE TO AGE OF VEHICLE. OWNER TOLD MANUFACTURER TANK WAS NEVER REPLACED OR REPAI…

Read full complaint

HAD RECEIVED RECALL NOTICE 94V077000 IN MAIL. CONTACTED DEALER. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER & HAD FUEL TANK CHECKED. NOTHING WAS WRONG & NO REPAIRS DONE. NOW FUEL TANK IS LEAKING. INFORMED BY MANUFACTURER THAT FUEL TANK WAS REPLACED & WILL NOT DO REPAIRS DUE TO AGE OF VEHICLE. OWNER TOLD MANUFACTURER TANK WAS NEVER REPLACED OR REPAIRED. *AK

NHTSA ODI #836722

Mileage unknown · Feb 10, 1999
Visibility

WINDOW LID MOTOR FAILED.

NHTSA ODI #781952

Mileage unknown · Jan 20, 1999
Electrical SystemFire

FIRE IGNITED FROM STEREO WIRING.

NHTSA ODI #544764

Mileage unknown · Oct 23, 1998
Engine And Engine CoolingInjury

LEFT SIDE OF RADIATOR BUSTED WHEN DRIVER OPEN THE HOOD OF VEHICLE CAUSING SEVERE THIRD DEGREE BURNS ON LEFT SIDE OF BODY.

NHTSA ODI #542228

Mileage unknown · Jun 18, 1998
Structure

PAINT IS PEELING AROUND THE HOOD AND BACK QUARTER PANELS.

NHTSA ODI #537832

Mileage unknown · Feb 11, 1998
Fuel System, Gasoline

FUEL FILLER NECK JIONT WAS REPAIRED UNDER RECALL # 92C36. OWNER STATES THAT THERE IS FUEL VAPOR AND FUEL LEAKAGE AND . THE DEALER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED, AND IS UNABLE AND NOT WILLING TO REPAIR VEHICLE. *AK

NHTSA ODI #821452

Official recalls

2

94V077000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:filler Pipe And Cap

Apr 25, 1994

THE FUEL FILLER NECK SOLDER JOINT CAN DEVELOP CRACKS OR PIN HOLE LEAKS, WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FMVSS NO. 301, "FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY." THE CRACKS AND HOLES CAN ALLOW FUEL VAPOR AND FUEL LEAKAGE.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: CONSEQUENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: GASOLINE VAPORS AND FUEL LEAKS CAN RESULT IN A FIRE IF EXPOSED TO A SOURCE OF IGNITION.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE FUEL TANK ASSEMBLY AND REPLACE THOSE WHICH EXHIBIT THE CRACKS OR PIN HOLE LEAKS.

92V154000 · Power Train:automatic Transmission

Oct 23, 1992

THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION SHIFT CONTROL CABLE CAN SEPARATE.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: SEPARATION OF THE TRANSMISSION SHIFT CABLE CAN PREVENTTHE TRANSMISSION FROM BEING SHIFTED INTO THE PROPER POSITION. THIS CONDITION CANCAUSE UNEXPECTED VEHICLE MOVEMENT WHEN THE TRANSIMISSION INDICATOR IS IN PARK ORNEUTRAL POSITION AND THE TRANSMISSION IS IN A DRIVE MODE; THIS COULD RESULT INA VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.

Remedy: THE DEALER WILL REPLACE THE SHIFT CABLE.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE97008 · Inadvertent Air Bag Deployment

Opened Feb 3, 1997 · Closed Jun 30, 1997

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags

COMPLAINTS ALLEGE THAT THE DRIVER-SIDE AIR BAG DEPLOYED WHILE DRIVING WITHOUT ANY VEHICLE IMPACT.