1995 Chevrolet Blazer

THE ABS WARNING LIGHT CAME ON. OWNER APPLIED THE BRAKES, BUT THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP. OWNER APPLIED THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND THE VEHICLE CAME TO A STOP. OWNER PULLED THE BRAKE UP TO RELEASE THE EMERGENCY, BUT THE EMERGENCY BRAKE LIGHT STAYED ON. OWNER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER, AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE BRAKE HYDRAULIC WAS DEFECTIVE. *AK

CONSUMER COMPLAINT ABOUT 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER DESIGN FLAW. *BF THE TRANSMISSION WAS INSTALLED BUT THE SEAL WAS NOT REPLACED BECAUSE THE MANUAL DID NOT STATE TO DO SO. THE VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION. TRANSMISSION FLUID HAD GONE INTO THE TRANSFER CASE WHEN THE SEAL WAS NO GOOD THEN HAD GONE INTO THE VENT TUBE WAS DESIGNED, AND PLACED OVER THE HOT MANIFOLD AND EXHAUST SYSTEM WHICH CAUSED THE FIRE. *SC

WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE CAUGHT ON FIRE. INVESTIGATION SHOWED THAT FLUID WAS OVERFLOWING OUT OF THE TRANSFER CASE AND TRAVELING TO THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER AND EXHAUST SYSTEM.*AK THE FLUID OVERFLOWED TO THE HOT MANIFOLD AND EXHAUST SYSTEM CAUSING THE FIRE. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE TRANSMISSION WAS REPLACED AND THE SEAL THAT CONNECTS THE TRANSFER CASE WAS NOT REPLACED. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT WHEN THE FLAMMABLE LIQUID FROM THE TRANSMISSION WENT INTO THE TRANSFER CASE THE SEAL GAVE WAY. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE PLACEMENT OF THE VENT TUBE OVER THE HOT EXHAUST IS A DANGEROUS DESIGN FLAW AND SHOULD BE RECALLED DUE TO FIRE HAZARD. THE CONSUMER STATED THE SEAL WAS REPLACED AND SHE WAS OVERCHARGED. THE CONSUMER WOULD LIKE TO BE REIMBURSED FOR THE COST OF THE REPAIR. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT IF SHE DOES NOT HEAR THE PUBLIC ADDRESS OF THIS PROBLEM ON THE NEWS SHE WILL TAKE THE ISSUE TO THE NEWS WIRE PERSONALLY. *TC

PASSENGER SIDE MIRROR FELL OFF DOOR WHILE DRIVING, AND WAS HANGING BY THE ELECTRICAL WIRES. I AM AWARE OF ANOTHER NEWER MODEL BLAZER WHICH HAD THE SAME THING HAPPEN. I ALSO HAVE NOTICED SEVERAL BLAZERS IN MY AREA WITH NO MIRROR ON THE PASSENGER SIDE DOOR AND HAVE EVEN SEEN BOTH MIRRORS GONE. CURRENTLY I'M NOTICING THE DRIVER'S SIDE MIRROR BEGINNING TO SHAKE WHILE DRIVING. I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO INVESTIGATE AND WAS TOLD THERE WERE NO RECALLS OR RECORDED RELATED INCIDENTS. THAT SAME PERSON THEN TOLD ME A CALL JUST CAME IN PRIOR TO MINE ASKING ABOUT THE SAME PROBLEM.*AK

LOSS OF BRAKES AFTER HITTING A POTHOLE IN THE ROAD. VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP. ALSO ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS, GOING FROM GRASS TO DIRT ROAD IN 2 WHEEL DRIVE MODE, ABS TOOK OVER AND CAUSED SEVERE INCREASE IN BRAKING DISTANCE. 1995, CHEVROLET, BLAZER HAS A RECALL FOR THIS PROBLEM BUT GM SAID MY VIN# [XXX] WAS NOT ON THE RECALL LIST.*AK UPDATED 07/24/2012 *JS INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

CONSUMER COMPLAINED ABOUT A FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM PROBLEM. CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND RECEIVED MANY DIFFERENT STORIES OF REMEDY. CONSUMER ASKED THE DEALER TO CHECK THE FUEL TANK, AND THE DEALER REFUSED TO CHECK IT. THEN, CONSUMER CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER, AND WAS TOLD BY THE MANUFACTURER THAT DEALERSHIPS WERE INDEPENDENTLY OWNED, AND THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO. *AK

INTERMITTENTLY THE BRAKE PEDAL IS DEPRESSED, MOSTLY IN A PANIC SITUATION, BRAKE FEELS ENGAGED, BUT INSTEAD A MOANING NOISE OCCURS, FOLLOWED BY BRAKE FAILURE. VEHICLE LIKE IT'S SKIDDING ON ICE. WHEN THIS OCCURS CONSUMER HAS TO BUMP THE BRAKE PEDAL FOR THE BRAKES TO ENGAGE. THE ENTIRE BRAKING SYSTEM AND THE FRONT END WERE REPLACED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. ABS RECALL 99V193000 WAS ISSUED ON THIS PROBLEM, BUT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. *AK