Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
290–25K
8125–50K
9850–75K
3175–100K
7100–150K
2150K+
248 reports with mileage · 194 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Exterior Lighting. Review the 302 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Electrical System. Review the 44 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Suspension. Review the 29 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
12 crash reports3 fire reports10 injury reports
What owners actually said
442 reports
Mileage unknown · Feb 19, 2019
Unknown Or Other
2015 CADILLAC FRONT LIGHTS VERY POOR, DIM. TOOK TO DEALERSHIP, CHARGED US $188 TO "DIAGNOSE" WHEN THE PROBLEM WAS OBVIOUS, THEY WERE CLOUDY. THEN CHARGED US $1774 WE HAD NO CHOICE, LIGHTS WERE DISASSEMBLED, WE NEEDED TO SEE AT NIGHT! NOTE THERE WERE SEVERAL OTHERS GETTING SAME REPAIR RIGHT THERE AT SAME TIME. I WAS ANGRY, DEALER…
Read full complaint
2015 CADILLAC FRONT LIGHTS VERY POOR, DIM. TOOK TO DEALERSHIP, CHARGED US $188 TO "DIAGNOSE" WHEN THE PROBLEM WAS OBVIOUS, THEY WERE CLOUDY. THEN CHARGED US $1774 WE HAD NO CHOICE, LIGHTS WERE DISASSEMBLED, WE NEEDED TO SEE AT NIGHT! NOTE THERE WERE SEVERAL OTHERS GETTING SAME REPAIR RIGHT THERE AT SAME TIME. I WAS ANGRY, DEALERSHIP HAD A "BUTTON" BUILT IN ON COMPUTER TO GET FINANCIAL CREDIT FROM GM, OBVIOUSLY THIS HAPPENS OFTEN. THE CREDIT WAS $800 AUTOMATICALLY,(WE THEN PAID NET $974. )I WANT ALL TO BE REPLACED AND CREDITED. I CALLED GM, THEY ALLEGEDLY CONTACTED CADILLAC AND THEY SAID WOULD NOT HELP US. GM SENIOR REP ADMITTED THIS IS A PROBLEM, HAPPENS OFTEN 2015 MODEL. THIS WAS OBVIOUSLY IS A RECALL ISSUE!. THEY WERE GOING TO CHARGE US $188 (DIAGNOSE) AND NOT FIX IT, OR $1774 TO REPLACE/PUT BACK TOGETHER. GM SENIOR REP SAID WE SHOULDN'T HAVE PAID, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN EASIER TO GET IT SOLVED IF WE DIDNT PAY. WHAT? WE HAD TO SEE! THE LIGHTS WERE IN PIECES, WE HAD TO PAY $188 IF WE DIDNT REPLACE IT AND PAY FOR IT. WE HAD NO CHOICE. PLEASE HELP US GET FULL REIMBURSEMENT THIS IS VERY OBVIOUSLY A PROBLEM WITH MANY OF THESE 2015 SRX. THIS TREATMENT AND CHARGES TO REPLACE WAS OUTRAGEOUS. OUR CAR JUST GOT OUT OF WARRANTY BTW, AND ONLY HAS 47,600 MILES ON IT. WE HAVE ANOTHER CAR 11 YEARS OLD, LIGHTS ARE FINE, WE HAD ANOTHER CAR FOR 20 YEARS NEVER REPLACED FRONT LIGHTS. THEY ARE DEFECTIVE PURE AND SIMPLE, VERY UNSAFE. WE HAD TO USE BRIGHTS BEFORE REPLACE.
NHTSA ODI #11181022
65,000 miles · Feb 13, 2019
Exterior Lighting
THERE SEEMS TO BE NO FIX FOR LOW BEAMS ????
NHTSA ODI #11179795
39,000 miles · Feb 13, 2019
Exterior Lighting
I PURCHASED THIS VEHICLE USED IN NOVEMBER 2018 FROM THE LOCAL LEXUS DEALER. I DIDN'T DRIVE IT AT NIGHT PRIOR TO TAKING A TRIP IN DECEMBER 2018 WHEN I LEFT EARLY IN THE MORNING IN A RAINSTORM. I WAS SHOCKED THAT I COULDN'T SEE A THING AND THOUGHT IT WAS JUST THE RAIN. LATER I DISCOVERED IT WAS THE HEADLIGHTS THAT WERE EXTREMELY D…
Read full complaint
I PURCHASED THIS VEHICLE USED IN NOVEMBER 2018 FROM THE LOCAL LEXUS DEALER. I DIDN'T DRIVE IT AT NIGHT PRIOR TO TAKING A TRIP IN DECEMBER 2018 WHEN I LEFT EARLY IN THE MORNING IN A RAINSTORM. I WAS SHOCKED THAT I COULDN'T SEE A THING AND THOUGHT IT WAS JUST THE RAIN. LATER I DISCOVERED IT WAS THE HEADLIGHTS THAT WERE EXTREMELY DIM. I CONTACTED THE LOCAL CADILLAC DEALER WHO KNEW ABOUT THE PROBLEM AFFECTING THIS YEAR AND OTHER SRX MODELS. THEY SAID THEY COULD REPLACE THE ENTIRE HOUSING, ETC BUT THAT THE PROBLEM COMES BACK. THEY SAID THEY COULD NOT REPLACE WITH HALOGEN OR OTHER AFTER MARKET PARTS SINCE THEY ARE NOT CADILLAC PARTS. THEY ASKED THAT I LET THEM KNOW IF HALOGEN LIGHTS WOULD FIX THE PROBLEM IF I GO THAT ROUTE. HOW ON EARTH COULD THIS CAR NOT BE RECALLED TO FIX THE PROBLEM? THIS SITUATION IS JUST PLAIN DANGEROUS AND CANNOT BE SAFELY DRIVEN AT NIGHT WHEN LIGHTS ARE NEEDED!!
NHTSA ODI #11179756
Mileage unknown · Feb 9, 2019
Exterior Lighting
LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM THAT IT IS DANGEROUS TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. GM CADILLAC SRX 2010-2016 HAS HAD THIS PROBLEM AND GM WILL NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. DEALERSHIP ALSO WAS NO HELP
NHTSA ODI #11175946
49,083 miles · Feb 2, 2019
Exterior Lighting
THE LOW BEAMS ON THIS VEHICLE CREATE A DRIVING HAZARD AT NIGHT. THERE LITERALLY ARE HUNDREDS OF COMPLAINTS JUST BY DOING A GOOGLE SEARCH. SEE ALSO CARPROBLEMZOO.COM GM/CADILLAC HAS NO FIX. THE LIGHTS DO NOT PROJECT PROPERLY AND IN DARK AREAS YOU CAN'T TELL AT TIMES THAT THE LIGHTS ARE WORKING. GM SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO FIX THIS I…
Read full complaint
THE LOW BEAMS ON THIS VEHICLE CREATE A DRIVING HAZARD AT NIGHT. THERE LITERALLY ARE HUNDREDS OF COMPLAINTS JUST BY DOING A GOOGLE SEARCH. SEE ALSO CARPROBLEMZOO.COM GM/CADILLAC HAS NO FIX. THE LIGHTS DO NOT PROJECT PROPERLY AND IN DARK AREAS YOU CAN'T TELL AT TIMES THAT THE LIGHTS ARE WORKING. GM SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO FIX THIS ISSUE. I REPLACED THE HALOGEN LIGHTS WITH NEW HALOGENS AND NO DIFFERENCE. I THEN UPGRADED HALOGENS TO LED BULBS WITH A MINIMAL FIX. PLEASE TAKE THESE ISSUES SERIOUSLY. PEOPLE HAVE WRITTEN ONLINE THAT THEY CANNOT DRIVE THE VEHICLE AT NIGHT. THE ONLY SAFE MEASURE IS TO DRIVE WITH HIGH BEAMS, WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE. THIS PROBLEM IS SYSTEMIC WITH THE LUXURY EDITION CADILLAC SRX. I THINK IT'S THE LENS OR ELECTRICAL. I THINK THIS IS THE REASON THAT THE 2016 SRX HAS HID HEADLIGHTS. NUMEROUS WEBSITES INDICATE COMPLAINTS FROM DRIVERS WHO SAY THAT THE CADILLAC DEALERSHIPS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ISSUE BUT ALSO SAY THAT GM HAS NOT ISSUED A FIX. DEALERSHIPS WANT HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS UP TO OVER A THOUSAND DOLLARS TO FIX IT, BUT THEY ALSO STATE THAT THE FIX MIGHT NOT WORK. PLEASE INVESTIGATE THIS. IT IS TRULY A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE. PLEASE HOLD GM ACCOUNTABLE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION. THIS PROBLEM OCCURS WHEN DRIVING. IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO SEE THE ROAD AND TO SEE PEOPLE WALKING ACROSS THE STREET AND TO SEE PAINT LINES. THE LIGHTS DO NOT PROJECT SOLIDLY AND WIDELY AS DO OTHER MAKES OF VEHICLES ON THE ROAD. I AM TAKING MY CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP ON 2/2/19 TO ASK THEM TO ASSESS THE SITUATION.
NHTSA ODI #11173639
33,000 miles · Jan 29, 2019
Exterior Lighting
PURCHASED FACTORY CERTIFIED 2015 CADILLAC SRX 11/2018. IN 12/2018 ONE DIM HEADLIGHT STOPPED WORKING. IN 1/2018 2ND DIM HEADLIGHT QUIT WORKING MAKIN IT DIFFICULT TO SEE WITHOUT BRIGHT LIGHTS. FOG LAMPS ALSO STOPPED WORKING. TRULY A SAFETY MATTER. SEARCH OF INTERNET SHOWS MANY OTHER SRX'S WITH SAME PROBLEM WITH NO FACTORY FIX. C…
Read full complaint
PURCHASED FACTORY CERTIFIED 2015 CADILLAC SRX 11/2018. IN 12/2018 ONE DIM HEADLIGHT STOPPED WORKING. IN 1/2018 2ND DIM HEADLIGHT QUIT WORKING MAKIN IT DIFFICULT TO SEE WITHOUT BRIGHT LIGHTS. FOG LAMPS ALSO STOPPED WORKING. TRULY A SAFETY MATTER. SEARCH OF INTERNET SHOWS MANY OTHER SRX'S WITH SAME PROBLEM WITH NO FACTORY FIX. CLASS ACTION SUIT FILED IN CALIFORNIA ONLY. PROBLEM IS MOISTURE ENTERING HOUSING WHERE BULBS ARE MOUNTED. CADILLAC DEALER COULD NOT STATE WHY DIM HEADLIGHTS AND FOG LIGHTS DON'T WORK. MAKES DRIVING HAZARDOUS WHEN BRIGHT HEADLIGHTS CAN'T BE USED. DIM HEADLIGHTS AND FOG LIGHTS DO NOT WORK AT ALL.
NHTSA ODI #11172958
Mileage unknown · Jan 29, 2019
Exterior Lighting
I RECENTLY PURCHASED A 2015 CADILLAC SRX LUXURY CROSSOVER SUV (50,000 MILES). I NOTICED WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT, THAT THE HEADLIGHTS BARELY ILLUMINATE THE ROAD. I CONTACTED MY LOCAL CADILLAC DEALERSHIP AND SPOKE WITH SERVICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL THAT INFORMED ME THAT THIS ISSUE WAS SYSTEMIC THROUGHOUT THE 2010-2015 YEAR SRX MODEL…
Read full complaint
I RECENTLY PURCHASED A 2015 CADILLAC SRX LUXURY CROSSOVER SUV (50,000 MILES). I NOTICED WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT, THAT THE HEADLIGHTS BARELY ILLUMINATE THE ROAD. I CONTACTED MY LOCAL CADILLAC DEALERSHIP AND SPOKE WITH SERVICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL THAT INFORMED ME THAT THIS ISSUE WAS SYSTEMIC THROUGHOUT THE 2010-2015 YEAR SRX MODELS. THIS PROBLEM IS SO CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT SUCH SIMILAR MODELS, AND YET I AM SUPPOSE TO SHELL OUT $1300 TO FIX A KNOWN ISSUE? I AM WILLING TO PAY TO REPLACE THE LAMPS BUT GM NEEDS TO DO THEIR PART AND FIX THE FAULTY COMPONENT (THAT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY) THAT IS CAUSING DANGEROUS DRIVING CONDITIONS AND CONSTANT ISSUES WITH THE VEHICLE.
NHTSA ODI #11172867
Mileage unknown · Jan 26, 2019
Exterior Lighting
TAKATA RECALL. LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM THAT IT IS DANGEROUS TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. GM CADILLAC SRX 2010-2016 HAS HAD THIS PROBLEM AND GM WILL NOT FIX THE PROBLEM.
NHTSA ODI #11172279
83,000 miles · Jan 23, 2019
Exterior Lighting
PURCHASED FROM A DEALERSHIP IN GA FRONT HEADLIGHTS SEEMED TO BE WORKING AT NIGHT, NOTICED THEY WERE VERY DIM, BUT CONTINUED TO DRIVE AT NIGHT ALTERNATING BRIGHTS. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALERSHIP RECENTLY AFTER ALMOST BEING HIT AT NIGHT AND ONCE IN THE RAIN, A CAR TURNED IN FRONT OF ME TWICE AT NIGHT LIKE THEY DIDN'T EVEN SEE ME BECAU…
Read full complaint
PURCHASED FROM A DEALERSHIP IN GA FRONT HEADLIGHTS SEEMED TO BE WORKING AT NIGHT, NOTICED THEY WERE VERY DIM, BUT CONTINUED TO DRIVE AT NIGHT ALTERNATING BRIGHTS. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALERSHIP RECENTLY AFTER ALMOST BEING HIT AT NIGHT AND ONCE IN THE RAIN, A CAR TURNED IN FRONT OF ME TWICE AT NIGHT LIKE THEY DIDN'T EVEN SEE ME BECAUSE NOW I REALIZE THEY COULDN'T! I WAS TOLD WHOLE SYSTEM WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED BEFORE MECHANIC EVEN LOOKED AT VEHICLE. GOOGLED SRX HEADLIGHT ISSUE AND CAME UP WITH LAWSUIT INFO BECAUSE OF THIS SAME SITUATION. I CANNOT DRIVE THIS VEHICLE AT NIGHT IT IS A SAFETY HAZARD AND MUST USE MY BRIGHT LIGHTS, WHICH CAUSES OTHER CARS NOT TO BE ABLE TO SEE. THE DEALER GAVE ME A QUOTE FOR 1400 DOLLARS FOR REPAIR WHICH I REFUSE TO PAY.
NHTSA ODI #11171559
52,400 miles · Jan 22, 2019
Exterior Lighting
THE HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AFRAID TO DRIVE AT NIGHT BECAUSE I CAN'T SEE AROUND OR IN FRONT OF ME WITHOUT USING MY HIGH BEAMS, ITS VERY DANGEROUS. I FEEL THAT ITS A SAFETY ISSUE. I HAVE ALSO READ THAT OTHERS HAVE THE SAME ISSUES AND CADILLAC HAS NOT CORRECTED THE PROBLEM, I ALSO READ THAT THERE WAS CLASS ACTION SUITS IN FL…
Read full complaint
THE HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AFRAID TO DRIVE AT NIGHT BECAUSE I CAN'T SEE AROUND OR IN FRONT OF ME WITHOUT USING MY HIGH BEAMS, ITS VERY DANGEROUS. I FEEL THAT ITS A SAFETY ISSUE. I HAVE ALSO READ THAT OTHERS HAVE THE SAME ISSUES AND CADILLAC HAS NOT CORRECTED THE PROBLEM, I ALSO READ THAT THERE WAS CLASS ACTION SUITS IN FLORDIA AND CALIFORNIA BECAUSE OF THIS PROBLEM.
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2015 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, XTS, 2015-2016 Cadillac ATS, CTS, and SRX vehicles. The front-driver air bag inflator may rupture during deployment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants, resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Dealers will replace the front-driver air bag module, free of charge. Interim letters notifying owners of the safety risk were mailed June 19, 2026. Additional letters will be mailed once the remedy is available. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. The manufacturer's number for this recall is N262555870. Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) involved in this recall became searchable on NHTSA.gov on May 21, 2026.
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured November 11, 2014, to December 3, 2014. The front driver's seat may have been built with an incorrect seat track bracket. Drivers' seats with this condition may not be properly attached to the seat track.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: The front outboard seat bracket may become disengaged during a vehicle crash, increasing the risk of personal injury.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace affected seat track hook brackets, free of charge. The recall began on February 5, 2015. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac). GM's number for this recall is 14863.
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1
PE20019 · Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation
Opened Nov 6, 2020 · Closed Dec 23, 2021
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:rear
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Suspension
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Suspension:rear
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
2015 Cadillac Srx Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year