HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM I CANNOT SEE THE ROAD AT NIGHT. I TRIED TO REPLACE THE ORIGINAL BULBS WITH LED LIGHTS AND WHILE IT HELPED A LITTLE I STILL CANNOT SEE.
2015 Cadillac Srx
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Srx years
Owner complaints for the 2015 Cadillac Srx are substantially higher than the model-year median of 192.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Srx years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
248 reports with mileage · 194 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Exterior Lighting. Review the 302 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 44 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Suspension. Review the 29 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
442 reportsI NOTICED THAT THE HEADLIGHTS ON MY 2015 CADILLAC SRX BECAME EXTREMELY DIM AROUND JULY OF 2018. IT IS VERY HARD TO SEE WELL WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT, AND IT IS A HAZARD!! I MENTIONED THE PROBLEM WITH THE LIGHTS BEING DIM WHEN I WENT IN FOR AN OIL CHANGE AT THE DEALERSHIP, BUT I WAS TOLD THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO TO FIX THE…
Read full complaint
I NOTICED THAT THE HEADLIGHTS ON MY 2015 CADILLAC SRX BECAME EXTREMELY DIM AROUND JULY OF 2018. IT IS VERY HARD TO SEE WELL WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT, AND IT IS A HAZARD!! I MENTIONED THE PROBLEM WITH THE LIGHTS BEING DIM WHEN I WENT IN FOR AN OIL CHANGE AT THE DEALERSHIP, BUT I WAS TOLD THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO TO FIX THE PROBLEM. AT THE NEXT OIL CHANGE, I AGAIN COMPLAINED ABOUT THE DIM LIGHT PROBLEM. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE HEADLIGHTS WITH NEW CADILLAC BULBS (UNDER WARRANTY), BUT THAT DID NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. THEN, ATER MORE COMPLAINING TO THE DEALERSHIP, I CONTACTED CADILLAC. CADILLAC SUGGESTED THAT THE DEALERSHIP CHANGE THE CADILLAC BULBS (NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY) WITH AFTER MARKET BULBS. THOSE BULBS ALSO DID NOT FIX THE PROBLEM!!! I AM VERY UNHAPPY, AND AM STILL DRIVING AROUND WITH DANGEROUSLY DIM LIGHTS!!!
LOW BEAM LIGHTING GIVES YOU NO VISIBILITY WHILE DRIVING IN THE DARK. I HAVE TO USE THE HIGH BEAMS AND BLIND THE ONCOMING TRAFFIC. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE FOR BOTH ME AND ONCOMING DRIVERS. ME, BECAUSE I WOULD WRECK USING MY LOW BEAMS AND ONCOMING VEHICLES COULD WRECK WHEN I USE MY HIGH BEAMS BLINDING THEM. I AM TOLD THIS IS BECAUS…
Read full complaint
LOW BEAM LIGHTING GIVES YOU NO VISIBILITY WHILE DRIVING IN THE DARK. I HAVE TO USE THE HIGH BEAMS AND BLIND THE ONCOMING TRAFFIC. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE FOR BOTH ME AND ONCOMING DRIVERS. ME, BECAUSE I WOULD WRECK USING MY LOW BEAMS AND ONCOMING VEHICLES COULD WRECK WHEN I USE MY HIGH BEAMS BLINDING THEM. I AM TOLD THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE MALFUNCTION OF THE SEAL AROUND THE LIGHTS.....IT LETS MOISTURE IN. I HAVE HAD THE BULBS REPLACED, BUT IT DID NOT HELP THE SITUATION. PLEASE DO A RECALL NATION WIDE FOR THIS, NOT JUST FOR FLORIDA OR NEW YORK, BEFORE SOMEONE IS BADLY HURT OR KILLED AND A LAWSUIT IS FILED.
2015 CADILLAC HEAD LIGHTS ON DIM IS WHERE I AM UNABLE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THEY ARE VERY DIM AND AFTER TAKING TO DEALER WHEN IT WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY THERE WAS NOTHING THAT THEY COULD DO. THIS NEEDS TO BE A RECALL ON GMC. IF ANYTHING SHOULD HAPPEN TO ME WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT, GMC WILL BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY INJURIES OR DEAT…
Read full complaint
2015 CADILLAC HEAD LIGHTS ON DIM IS WHERE I AM UNABLE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THEY ARE VERY DIM AND AFTER TAKING TO DEALER WHEN IT WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY THERE WAS NOTHING THAT THEY COULD DO. THIS NEEDS TO BE A RECALL ON GMC. IF ANYTHING SHOULD HAPPEN TO ME WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT, GMC WILL BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY INJURIES OR DEATHS. I HAVE THREE TIMES WHERE A CAR HAS PULLED OUT IN FRONT ON ME AND WE ALMOST COLLIDED. PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS COMPLAINT WITH THE LATEST NEWS ON THIS PROBLEM.
"TAKATA RECALL" WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT THE HEADLIGHTS STARTING TO BE DIM. I THOUGHT IT WAS MY EYE SITE AT FIRST. LAST FRIDAY MARCH 1, 2019 MY HUSBAND WAS WITH ME DRIVING IN RISING SUN MARYLAND AND IT GOT REAL SCARY AS WE WERE DRIVING AND THEY WENT ALMOST TOTALLY DARK. I SLOWED TO A CRAWL AND HIT MY HIGH BEAMS JUST A SECOND BEF…
Read full complaint
"TAKATA RECALL" WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT THE HEADLIGHTS STARTING TO BE DIM. I THOUGHT IT WAS MY EYE SITE AT FIRST. LAST FRIDAY MARCH 1, 2019 MY HUSBAND WAS WITH ME DRIVING IN RISING SUN MARYLAND AND IT GOT REAL SCARY AS WE WERE DRIVING AND THEY WENT ALMOST TOTALLY DARK. I SLOWED TO A CRAWL AND HIT MY HIGH BEAMS JUST A SECOND BEFORE I HIT THE ONCOMING CAR FROM THE OTHER DIRECTION. I WAS ALREADY ACROSS THE LINE AND GOING TO HIT THE CAR. MY HIGH BEAMS BLINDED THE CAR COMING TOWARD ME AND THEY WERE SCREAMING AT ME. IT WAS LIKE DRIVING ON A BACK ROAD IN A SNOW STORM WITH NO VISIBILITY. MY HUSBAND WOULD NOT LET ME DRIVE BACK FROM DINNER AFTER BEING SO UPSET. HE DROVE AND HAD TO USE THE HIGH BEAMS, HE SAID I HAVE TO TELL YOU THAT WAS A VERY SCARY SITUATION. WHEN WE PARKED FOR DINNER THE HEADLIGHTS TURNED A CLOUDY RAINBOW COLOR. WE HAD THE LIGHT BULBS REPLACED AND THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE. THE DEALER WANTS $1,000 TO REPLACE THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY TO FIX THE PROBLEM. THIS CAR IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION , WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO PAY $1,000 TO REPLACE THIS. I HAVE SEEN THE COMPLAINT SITES AND THERE SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVING THIS ISSUE. THIS IS NOT SAFE AND YOU CAN NOT DRIVE AT NIGHT UNLESS YOU WANT TO TAKE YOUR LIFE IN YOUR HANDS OR THE LIFE OF OTHERS WHEN YOU HAVE TO DRIVE WITH HIGH BEAMS. PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY WHEN YOU DO THAT AND THAT COULD CAUSE ROAD RAGE ISSUES. THIS CAR IS NOT SAFE AT NIGHT, PLEASE CONSIDER DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS. I WILL NOT PUT MY GRANDKIDS IN THIS CAR AS I AM TOO SCARED.
THE NEXT AREA OF CONCERN WAS ENTERING THE CAR DEALERSHIP (TRAPP CADILLAC IN HOUMA, LOUISIANA) ON 12/28/2018 TO HAVE THE HEADLIGHTS CHANGED. THE COST OF THIS CHANGE/REPLACEMENT WAS $942.94 FOR THE LABOR. THE DEALERSHIP DID, HOWEVER, WARRANTY THE HEADLIGHTS. MADE THE HEADLAMPS GOOD, BUT REFUSE TO HONOR THE LABOR(SEE ATTACHED) WHE…
Read full complaint
THE NEXT AREA OF CONCERN WAS ENTERING THE CAR DEALERSHIP (TRAPP CADILLAC IN HOUMA, LOUISIANA) ON 12/28/2018 TO HAVE THE HEADLIGHTS CHANGED. THE COST OF THIS CHANGE/REPLACEMENT WAS $942.94 FOR THE LABOR. THE DEALERSHIP DID, HOWEVER, WARRANTY THE HEADLIGHTS. MADE THE HEADLAMPS GOOD, BUT REFUSE TO HONOR THE LABOR(SEE ATTACHED) WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT/RAINING DAYS THE LIGHTS WERE SO DIM VISIBILITY WAS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE FOR SAFE DRIVING. THERE WAS A SERIOUS PROBLEM WITH THE HEADLIGHTS ON MY CADILLAC. I CHOSE FOR THE SAFETY OF MY FAMILY AND OTHERS THIS PROBLEM MUST BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY BY PROFESSIONALS.
LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM AND VIRTUALLY WORTHLESS AT NIGHT. THE ROUND CENTER LENS LOOKS CLOUDY. THE PROBLEM IS NOT WITH THE CLEAR OUTER PLASTIC COVERING.
MICHELIN PREMIER LTX TIRE TREAD IS SEPARATING FROM THE TIRE AT 21000 MILES. PART #31741, GM PART #22996332
FRONT HEADLIGHTS ARE DIMMING OUT. HEADLIGHTS ARE NOT GIVING SUFFICIENT ENOUGH LIGHTING FOR DRIVING AT NIGHT. HEADLIGHTS OUTPUT IS POOR. I HAVE EXPERIENCED NEAR ACCIDENTS WITH OTHER VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS AT NIGHT BECAUSE OF I CAN'T SEE THE LANE DIVIDING LINES ON HIGHWAYS AND STREETS WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT BECAUSE OF THE FACTOR…
Read full complaint
FRONT HEADLIGHTS ARE DIMMING OUT. HEADLIGHTS ARE NOT GIVING SUFFICIENT ENOUGH LIGHTING FOR DRIVING AT NIGHT. HEADLIGHTS OUTPUT IS POOR. I HAVE EXPERIENCED NEAR ACCIDENTS WITH OTHER VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS AT NIGHT BECAUSE OF I CAN'T SEE THE LANE DIVIDING LINES ON HIGHWAYS AND STREETS WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT BECAUSE OF THE FACTORY HEADLIGHTS DIMMING. THE HEADLIGHTS DOESN'T EVEN LIGHT UP INSIDE OF MY GARAGE WHEN PROJECTED AT IN CLOSE RANGE. (I HAVE INCLUDED A PHOTO)
JUST BOUGHT A 2015 SRX CADILLAC ON FEB 16, 2019. TEST DROVE DURING THE DAY, BUT BY THE TIME ALL WAS DONE IT WAS NIGHT. DRIVING HOME AND 1/10 OF A MILE OUT, I PULLED OVER TO SEE IF THE LIGHTS WERE ON. THEY WERE, SO I CONTINUED TO DRIVE. ALL ALONG CONVINCING MYSELF IT MUST BE BECAUSE I WENT FROM A CAR TO SUV AND IT WAS MY PERCEPTI…
Read full complaint
JUST BOUGHT A 2015 SRX CADILLAC ON FEB 16, 2019. TEST DROVE DURING THE DAY, BUT BY THE TIME ALL WAS DONE IT WAS NIGHT. DRIVING HOME AND 1/10 OF A MILE OUT, I PULLED OVER TO SEE IF THE LIGHTS WERE ON. THEY WERE, SO I CONTINUED TO DRIVE. ALL ALONG CONVINCING MYSELF IT MUST BE BECAUSE I WENT FROM A CAR TO SUV AND IT WAS MY PERCEPTION OF SITTING UP HIGHER. I BELIEVE I WAS SO HOPING SINCE I HAD JUST SIGNED A 'NO WAITING TIME' AND ' AS IS' CONTRACT PLUS PURCHASING GAP AND EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR OVER $3000 MORE! WELL, IT IS NOT MY PERCEPTION FROM A DIFFERENT LEVEL! I DROVE AGAIN AND NOT ONLY ARE THE BULBS PROJECTING DIFFERENT LEVEL OF BRIGHTNESS( IF U CALL IT 'BRIGHT') BUT NEITHER MAKES IT WHERE THE ROAD IS SAFELY VISIBLE. I HAD IT IN THE DEALERSHIP SHOP THREE DAYS AFTER PURCHASE TO FIX THE CUE PROBLEM (DEALERSHIP TAKING CARE OF THAT) AND ASKED TO CHECK HEADLIGHTS. I THOUGHT THEY CHANGED BULBS AND ALL WAS WELL SINCE IVWAS TOLD THEY CHECKED THEM AND ALL WAS GOOD TO GO. NOT. I HAVE WRITTEN CADILLAC VIA EMAIL AND I HAVE NOTIFIED THE BUICK DEALER WHERE I BOUGHT THE VEHICLE. AFTER PURCHASING (BIG MISTAKE I'VE LEARNED THE HARD WAY) AND THIS PROBLEM EMERGED, I SEARCHED INTERNET AND THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM. I'M HOPING CADILLAC OR THE BUICK DEALERSHIP WILL HELP RESOLVE THIS UNSAFE ISSUE. IF NOT, NOT SURE WHAT I WILL DO WITHOUT HAVING TO TRADE IT IN AND PROBABLY LOSE $$ GO WITH A DIFFERENT BRAND OF CAR!! HEADLIGHTS (LOW BEAMS) ARE TOO DIM TO SEE THE ROAD!
Official recalls
426V329000 · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
May 21, 2026
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2015 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, XTS, 2015-2016 Cadillac ATS, CTS, and SRX vehicles. The front-driver air bag inflator may rupture during deployment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants, resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Dealers will replace the front-driver air bag module, free of charge. Interim letters notifying owners of the safety risk were mailed June 19, 2026. Additional letters will be mailed once the remedy is available. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. The manufacturer's number for this recall is N262555870. Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) involved in this recall became searchable on NHTSA.gov on May 21, 2026.
21V473000 · Suspension:rear
Jun 24, 2021
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.
14V804000 · Seats
Dec 19, 2014
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured November 11, 2014, to December 3, 2014. The front driver's seat may have been built with an incorrect seat track bracket. Drivers' seats with this condition may not be properly attached to the seat track.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: The front outboard seat bracket may become disengaged during a vehicle crash, increasing the risk of personal injury.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace affected seat track hook brackets, free of charge. The recall began on February 5, 2015. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac). GM's number for this recall is 14863.
14V571000 · Suspension:rear
Sep 19, 2014
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1PE20019 · Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation
Opened Nov 6, 2020 · Closed Dec 23, 2021
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:rear
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Suspension
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Suspension:rear
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Illustration