← New search

2013 Cadillac Srx

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Srx years

Owner complaints for the 2013 Cadillac Srx are substantially higher than the model-year median of 192.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

242 reports with mileage · 151 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 217 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 52 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 31 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

15 crash reports5 fire reports10 injury reports

What owners actually said

393 reports
65,000 miles · Nov 28, 2018
Exterior Lighting

THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ON OUR 2013 CADILLAC SRX, WHICH WE PURCHASED NEW IN NOVEMBER, 2012, ARE PRACTICALLY UNUSABLE FOR NIGHT TIME DRIVING. THE LIGHT OUTPUT IS EXTREMELY LOW EVEN AFTER REPLACING THE BULBS WITH SYLVANIA ZXE BULBS AND THEN, AFTER THESE WERE INEFFECTIVE, LED REPLACEMENTS. DRIVING THIS VEHICLE IN LOW LIGHT CONDIT…

Read full complaint

THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ON OUR 2013 CADILLAC SRX, WHICH WE PURCHASED NEW IN NOVEMBER, 2012, ARE PRACTICALLY UNUSABLE FOR NIGHT TIME DRIVING. THE LIGHT OUTPUT IS EXTREMELY LOW EVEN AFTER REPLACING THE BULBS WITH SYLVANIA ZXE BULBS AND THEN, AFTER THESE WERE INEFFECTIVE, LED REPLACEMENTS. DRIVING THIS VEHICLE IN LOW LIGHT CONDITIONS IS COMPLETELY UNSAFE UNLESS THE HIGH BEAMS ARE USED, WHICH THEN CAUSES ISSUES TO ONCOMING TRAFFIC. THERE ARE NUMEROUS SIMILAR OCCURRENCES READILY FINDABLE THROUGH INTERNET SEARCHES. IT APPEARS THAT GM SHOULD DETERMINE AND PROVIDE A LONG TERM SOLUTION TO THIS SAFETY ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN A NOTICEABLE ISSUE WITH OUR VEHICLE FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS.

NHTSA ODI #11154514

64,000 miles · Nov 28, 2018
Exterior Lighting

MY CADILLAC SRX MODEL YEAR 2013 IS EQUIPPED WITH FAULTY HEADLIGHTS THAT ARE SO DIM I CAN NOT SEE THE LINES ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. ON BACK ROADS YOU CAN'T SEE NOTHINGS TO SEPARATE THE ROAD FROM THE LAND. I AM AFRAID TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. I HAVE JUST MISSED SEVERAL ACCIDENTS. I HAVE A GREAT EXTENDED WARRANTY THRU 2022, BU…

Read full complaint

MY CADILLAC SRX MODEL YEAR 2013 IS EQUIPPED WITH FAULTY HEADLIGHTS THAT ARE SO DIM I CAN NOT SEE THE LINES ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. ON BACK ROADS YOU CAN'T SEE NOTHINGS TO SEPARATE THE ROAD FROM THE LAND. I AM AFRAID TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. I HAVE JUST MISSED SEVERAL ACCIDENTS. I HAVE A GREAT EXTENDED WARRANTY THRU 2022, BUT THEY WILL NOT COVER BECAUSE OF GM STANCE. WARRANTY SOLUTIONS GM HAS FAILED TO PROPERLY ADDRESS THIS ISSUE WITH NOTIFICATION TO CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE CADILLAC OWNERS. THE COMPANY HAS ALSO ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO OFFER A FIX FOR THE DEFECT UNDER ITS OWN BUMPER-TO-BUMPER WARRANTY. A RECALL WOULD BE TOO EXPENSIVE. COMMON TO OTHER GM MODELS. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 2 CLASS ACTION LAW SUITS FLORIDA AND CALIFORNIA. HELP! [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ODI #11154422

Mileage unknown · Nov 26, 2018
Exterior Lighting

THE LOW LIGHTS ARE SO LOW THAT YOU CAN NOT SEE AT NIGHT. THE BRIGHTS ARE FINE. I REPLACED THE FILAMENTS AND PUT IN STRONGER BLUBS, BUT THE LOW LIGHTS ARE STILL NOT ADEQUATE FOR NIGHT DRIVING. THIS STARTED IN JUNE 2016.

NHTSA ODI #11154038

108,000 miles · Nov 23, 2018
Exterior Lighting

THE LOW HEADLIGHT BEAMS ARE SO DIM YOU CAN NOT SEE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. IT HAS BECOME VERY FRIGHTENING TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. VEHICLE WAS BROUGHT TO DEALER WHO STATED HE HAS SEEN THIS ISSUE BUT NOTHING HE CAN DO . CADILLAC WAS CONTACTED AS WELL. THEY STATED THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO EITHER.

NHTSA ODI #11153337

15,000 miles · Nov 16, 2018
Exterior Lighting

MY LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS HAVE BECOME VERY VERY DIM. HAVE HAD TO REPLACE THE BULBS TWICE. I HAVE TO DRIVE WITH HIGH BEAMS IN ORDER TO SEE SAFELY AT NIGHT. THIS IS A KNOWN DEFECT IN THESE CARS, BUT CADILLAC HAS NOT ISSUED A RECALL.

NHTSA ODI #11151998

Mileage unknown · Nov 14, 2018
Exterior LightingVisibility/wiper

HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM, YOU CAN NOT SEE AT NIGHT AT ALL. ITS VERY DANGEROUS TO DRIVE AT NIGHT IN THIS CAR. THERE HAS TO BE A RESOLUTION TO THIS.

NHTSA ODI #11151449

120,000 miles · Nov 12, 2018
Exterior Lighting

MY HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM. I HAVE HAD BOTH BULBS REPLACED BUT MY LOW BEAMS ARE STILL TO DIM. THIS MAKES IT EXTREMELY HARD TO SEE WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. TONIGHT, I ALMOST HIT A DEER AND ANOTHER CAR BECAUSE OF THIS ISSUE. OFTEN, I HAVE TO DRIVE WITH MY HIGH-BEAMS ON TO BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY SEE THE ROAD. I HAVE RESEARCHED T…

Read full complaint

MY HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM. I HAVE HAD BOTH BULBS REPLACED BUT MY LOW BEAMS ARE STILL TO DIM. THIS MAKES IT EXTREMELY HARD TO SEE WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. TONIGHT, I ALMOST HIT A DEER AND ANOTHER CAR BECAUSE OF THIS ISSUE. OFTEN, I HAVE TO DRIVE WITH MY HIGH-BEAMS ON TO BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY SEE THE ROAD. I HAVE RESEARCHED THIS ISSUE AND THERE ARE CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS IN OTHER STATES REGARDING THIS PROBLEM. THIS ISSUE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE ADEQUATELY PUTS MYSELF AND OTHERS IN DANGER.

NHTSA ODI #11151113

81,000 miles · Nov 8, 2018
Exterior Lighting

THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM. WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT I HAVE TO USE THE HIGH BEAMS, ALTHOUGH CAUTIOUSLY, SO AS NOT TO BLIND ONCOMING DRIVERS. IF THERE IS A CAR BEHIND ME, I CANNOT SEE THE ROAD IN FRONT OF MY CAR AT ALL; IN FACT, I SEE THE SHADOW OF MY CAR IN FRONT OF ME. THIS IS EXTREMELY UNSAFE AND HAS NOT BEEN R…

Read full complaint

THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM. WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT I HAVE TO USE THE HIGH BEAMS, ALTHOUGH CAUTIOUSLY, SO AS NOT TO BLIND ONCOMING DRIVERS. IF THERE IS A CAR BEHIND ME, I CANNOT SEE THE ROAD IN FRONT OF MY CAR AT ALL; IN FACT, I SEE THE SHADOW OF MY CAR IN FRONT OF ME. THIS IS EXTREMELY UNSAFE AND HAS NOT BEEN RECALLED BY CADILLAC. TO REPLACE THE HEADLIGHTS IS ABOUT $1500 AND IS NOT GUARANTEED TO IMPROVE THE DIM LIGHT SITUATION. I HAVE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT AND IT'S FRIGHTENING. WHY IS NOTHING BEING DONE ABOUT THIS? THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF COMPLAINTS LOGGED ON THE INTERNET. IS THE GOVERNMENT GOING TO INTERVENE ON OUR BEHALF? WHAT RECOURSE DO WE HAVE? AT THIS POINT, I DON'T BELIEVE IT SHOULD BE UP TO INDIVIDUAL OWNERS TO PURSUE RESTITUTION. PLEASE STEP IN AND DO SOMETHING! I BOUGHT THIS CAR FROM A CADILLAC DEALER IN APRIL OF 2017.

NHTSA ODI #11150144

75,000 miles · Nov 8, 2018
Exterior Lighting

FRONT HEADLIGHTS SO DIM CANNOT SEE AT NIGHT WITHOUT USE OF HIGH BEAMS. TOOK TO DEALER TOLD LIGHT HOUSING HAD OXIDIZED FROM THE INSIDE AND WOULD NEED REPLACED. DEALERSHIP STATED CHANGING BULBS WILL NOT HELP NOR COULD LENSES BE CLEANED THAT IT WAS A MANUFACTURER FLAW. $1055 TO FIX WITH NO GUARANTEE THEY WONT NEED REPLACED AGAIN IN…

Read full complaint

FRONT HEADLIGHTS SO DIM CANNOT SEE AT NIGHT WITHOUT USE OF HIGH BEAMS. TOOK TO DEALER TOLD LIGHT HOUSING HAD OXIDIZED FROM THE INSIDE AND WOULD NEED REPLACED. DEALERSHIP STATED CHANGING BULBS WILL NOT HELP NOR COULD LENSES BE CLEANED THAT IT WAS A MANUFACTURER FLAW. $1055 TO FIX WITH NO GUARANTEE THEY WONT NEED REPLACED AGAIN IN 5 YEARS OR LESS.

NHTSA ODI #11150099

50,000 miles · Nov 4, 2018
Unknown Or Other

2013 CADILLAC SRX FRONT HEADLAMPS DO NOT PUT OUT LIGHT. CANT DRIVE IT AT NIGHT. CADILLAC SUGGESTED AFTER MARKET BULBS, ALSO DIDN'T WORK. HAVE NOW INSTALLED FLOOD LIGHTS TO USE FOR DRIVING. HAVE SPENT OVER $600. CADILLAC SAYS THEY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THIS HAPPENING. CAN'T GUARANTEE PUTTING NEW ONES IN WILL HELP AND IT COULD …

Read full complaint

2013 CADILLAC SRX FRONT HEADLAMPS DO NOT PUT OUT LIGHT. CANT DRIVE IT AT NIGHT. CADILLAC SUGGESTED AFTER MARKET BULBS, ALSO DIDN'T WORK. HAVE NOW INSTALLED FLOOD LIGHTS TO USE FOR DRIVING. HAVE SPENT OVER $600. CADILLAC SAYS THEY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THIS HAPPENING. CAN'T GUARANTEE PUTTING NEW ONES IN WILL HELP AND IT COULD HAPPEN AGAIN. HOW CAN CADILLAC SELL CARS WITHOUT EFFECTIVE LIGHTS? TERRIBLE SAFETY HAZARD. GOT NO SATISFACTION FROM DEALER OR CADILLAC.

NHTSA ODI #11145231

Official recalls

5

21V473000 · Suspension:rear

Jun 24, 2021

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.

14V571000 · Suspension:rear

Sep 19, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.

14V212000 · Power Train:automatic Transmission:control Module (tcm/pcm/tecm)

Apr 25, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured May 29, 2012, through June 26, 2013, and equipped with 3.6L engines. In the affected vehicles, in certain driving situations, there may be a three to four second lag in acceleration due to the transmission control module (TCM) programming.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A three to four second lag in acceleration may increase the risk of crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the transmission control module, free of charge. The recall began on June 3, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006. General Motors' number for this recall is 14132.

13V202000 · Wheels:lugs/nuts/bolts/studs

May 16, 2013

General Motors (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles, manufactured January 31, 2012, through March 18, 2013, and equipped with 18 inch wheels. On the affected vehicles, the wheel lug nuts may loosen.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the lug nuts loosen, they may fall off or cause the wheel studs to fracture. Either condition would allow the wheel to separate from the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will remove and reinstall the wheel nuts by performing a tire rotation, free of charge. The recall began on June 3, 2013. Owners may contact GM at 1-800-521-7300. GM's recall campaign number is 13116.

13V097000 · Electrical System:software; Power Train:automatic Transmission; Power Train:automatic Transmission:control Module (tcm/pcm/tecm)

Mar 15, 2013

General Motors (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Buick LaCrosse vehicles, manufactured between April 25, 2012, through March 6, 2013, and model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles, manufactured between May 29, 2012, through February 18, 2013 for failing to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 102, "Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect." A software problem may cause the transmission to inadvertently shift to Sport mode removing any transmission-related engine braking effect.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If engine braking is unexpectedly removed, it may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the transmission control module free of charge. The recall began on April 3, 2013. Cadillac owners may call 1-866-982-2339. Buick owners may call 1-866-694-6546.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Electrical System:software

General Motors (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Buick LaCrosse vehicles, manufactured between April 25, 2012, through March 6, 2013, and model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles, manufactured between May 29, 2012, through February 18, 2013 for failing to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 102, "Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect." A software problem may cause the transmission to inadvertently shift to Sport mode removing any transmission-related engine braking effect.

Consequence: If engine braking is unexpectedly removed, it may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the transmission control module free of charge. The recall began on April 3, 2013. Cadillac owners may call 1-866-982-2339. Buick owners may call 1-866-694-6546.

Power Train:automatic Transmission:control Module (tcm/pcm/tecm)

General Motors (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Buick LaCrosse vehicles, manufactured between April 25, 2012, through March 6, 2013, and model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles, manufactured between May 29, 2012, through February 18, 2013 for failing to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 102, "Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect." A software problem may cause the transmission to inadvertently shift to Sport mode removing any transmission-related engine braking effect.

Consequence: If engine braking is unexpectedly removed, it may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the transmission control module free of charge. The recall began on April 3, 2013. Cadillac owners may call 1-866-982-2339. Buick owners may call 1-866-694-6546.

Power Train:automatic Transmission

General Motors (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Buick LaCrosse vehicles, manufactured between April 25, 2012, through March 6, 2013, and model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles, manufactured between May 29, 2012, through February 18, 2013 for failing to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 102, "Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect." A software problem may cause the transmission to inadvertently shift to Sport mode removing any transmission-related engine braking effect.

Consequence: If engine braking is unexpectedly removed, it may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the transmission control module free of charge. The recall began on April 3, 2013. Cadillac owners may call 1-866-982-2339. Buick owners may call 1-866-694-6546.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE20019 · Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation

Opened Nov 6, 2020 · Closed Dec 23, 2021

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Suspension

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.