← New search

2015 Toyota Prius

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2015 Toyota Prius do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 164.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

71 reports with mileage · 93 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes. Review the 87 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 27 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 13 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

29 crash reports1 fire reports12 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

87 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · May 6, 2026
Service Brakes

On 4/16/26, while driving my 2015 Toyota Prius (approximately 87,000 miles) on the freeway, I applied the brakes while transitioning from the [XXX] onto the [XXX] . As I veered right on the curved onramp, the brakes failed to engage properly, causing the vehicle to spin out of control and collide with the side railing. There w…

Read full complaint

On 4/16/26, while driving my 2015 Toyota Prius (approximately 87,000 miles) on the freeway, I applied the brakes while transitioning from the [XXX] onto the [XXX] . As I veered right on the curved onramp, the brakes failed to engage properly, causing the vehicle to spin out of control and collide with the side railing. There were fortunately no nearby vehicles on the 2-lane onramp at the time. Under slightly different circumstances, this incident could easily have resulted in serious injury or death to myself and/or others. No airbags deployed. Although I was physically unharmed, I was extremely shaken by the incident. Immediately after the collision, the brake warning light, ABS warning light, and another warning indicator illuminated on the dashboard. Prior to the incident, I had not experienced braking problems severe enough to suggest imminent failure. On 4/17/26, I brought the vehicle to Toyota of Cerritos for diagnostic evaluation. I was informed that the brake booster was the issue and that the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The vehicle was towed to a collision repair center affiliated with my insurance company. After repairing the external collision damage, the collision center informed me that the brake booster malfunction that caused the incident could not be repaired there and would require dealership service. External repair alone: $3706, in addition to increased automobile insurance premiums expected over the next 3 years. I also contacted Toyota Motor Corporation regarding Customer Support Program coverage related to brake booster issues and was informed that the program expired in 2025 and no assistance would be provided. I am submitting this report because this brake booster malfunction created a serious and unexpected safety hazard resulting in loss of vehicle control on a freeway interchange. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA ODI #11736160

Mileage unknown · Mar 20, 2026
Service Brakes

My brake actuator and brake booster are failing. All of my dashboard lights have come on (brake, ABS, Traction Control, brake system warning light). Unfortunately, I am over 10 years and Toyota is saying that I need to pay out of pocket for the repairs. This is a known problem and should be covered. I was unaware of the known is…

Read full complaint

My brake actuator and brake booster are failing. All of my dashboard lights have come on (brake, ABS, Traction Control, brake system warning light). Unfortunately, I am over 10 years and Toyota is saying that I need to pay out of pocket for the repairs. This is a known problem and should be covered. I was unaware of the known issue and my car didn't start having problems until after the 10 year mark. I am under 150,000 miles.

NHTSA ODI #11725978

Mileage unknown · Mar 20, 2026
Service Brakes

Brake Booster and ABS, Brake Master Cylinder went out in car without any lights or warning while driving the vehicle at a moderate speed on Freeway. I was able to avoid an accident and take the car to a repair shop in which at 119K miles and just at 10.5 yrs old the entire brake system had to be replaced/repaired.

NHTSA ODI #11725935

Mileage unknown · Mar 20, 2026
Forward Collision AvoidanceService Brakes

In June 2025, while driving on the highway, the vehicle suddenly displayed multiple brake warning lights and warning messages, including the red brake warning light, ABS light, brake system warning light, and traction/slip indicator. At the same time, the brake pedal became stiff and braking effort increased suddenly, creating a…

Read full complaint

In June 2025, while driving on the highway, the vehicle suddenly displayed multiple brake warning lights and warning messages, including the red brake warning light, ABS light, brake system warning light, and traction/slip indicator. At the same time, the brake pedal became stiff and braking effort increased suddenly, creating a near-crash situation because the vehicle did not slow normally. Before that incident, the vehicle had already been making abnormal brake-related noises, including a humming/pumping noise when the brake pedal was applied, and there were intermittent episodes where braking felt abnormal. In June 2025, the vehicle was taken to a Toyota dealership during Toyota’s brake booster support program period. The dealership documented customer complaints of “humming noise in cabin when holding foot on the brakes,” a request to “scan for codes for ZJB enhancement,” and that the “vehicle hard to accelerate and brakes got stiff,” but stated that no qualifying ABS codes were present at that time. In March 2026, the same condition returned and worsened. The vehicle again displayed the red brake warning light, ABS light, brake system warning light, and traction/slip light, and braking performance was reduced. An OBD scan of the ABS control unit showed code C1391, which is associated with brake booster / ABS actuator failure. The Toyota dealership has now diagnosed the vehicle with ABS actuator and brake booster failure and quoted repair. This is a serious safety issue because braking became more difficult while driving, including on the highway, with sudden warning lights and degraded stopping ability. The failed components are available for inspection. The problem has now been confirmed by a Toyota dealership. The issue was reported to a Toyota dealership during the prior support-program period but was not confirmed then.

NHTSA ODI #11725874

Mileage unknown · Mar 13, 2026
Service Brakes

TOYOTA PRIUS ABS BRAKE PUMP ACTUATOR BOOSTER FAILING Making hissing noises and warning icon at only 10 years 9 month, 85,000 miles. Toyota extended warranty is NOT covering.

NHTSA ODI #11724157

Mileage unknown · Feb 21, 2026
Service Brakes

On Feb. 19, 2026, I went to an auto repair store to change oil. I was told that I need to have rear brake pad and rotor replacement service because my car does not have it. The mechanic showed me and said that I only have the front brake work and it can cause safety issue.

NHTSA ODI #11719651

Mileage unknown · Feb 19, 2026
Service Brakes

Inferior brake system on 2015 Prius master brake cylinder and vacuum booster. Extended warranty issues identified by Toyota for 10 years or 150, 000 miles. I bought my Prius used in 2021 with 92,000 miles at age [XXX] old intending it to last as long as I did. I am now [XXX] old and essentially totally independent. The above m…

Read full complaint

Inferior brake system on 2015 Prius master brake cylinder and vacuum booster. Extended warranty issues identified by Toyota for 10 years or 150, 000 miles. I bought my Prius used in 2021 with 92,000 miles at age [XXX] old intending it to last as long as I did. I am now [XXX] old and essentially totally independent. The above mentioned parts were identified as not functioning properly on 2/3/2026 (mileage 139, 106). On 2/6/26, I took it to Goettle Toyota, Ocala FL (mileage. 139,160) knowing there was an extended warranty program available that was admitting the parts were defective but not worthy of recall. I was advised the warranty for my vehicle expired 10/26/2025 (3 months and 8 days prior) and was now invalid. Brake replacement cost is $3675.00 + tax🥴. I was provided warranty information and instructed to call Toyota. I called, spoke with Brook and was advised the warranty was invalid due to date even though the car has less than the 150, 000 mile covered and nothing could be done. I was never notified of this issue so I could monitor for problems before the expiration. Average life for these items on a Prius is 250,000 miles, not 139, 000. I am on limited, fixed income and cannot afford this unnecessary repair. I am already gladly driving a 10 year old car to be independent. Loss of transportation changes my entire lifestyle. I cannot afford another car (if I could, I would be fixing this one). I would be reliant FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE, on others for all needs outside of my home. I live in a very rural area. I feel since I was NEVER notified of any issues and the car is LOW mileage and there should be another 100,000 miles on this car (I have driven it less than 50,000 miles in 5 years) that Toyota should honor the extended warranty based on the proximity of the malfunction to the ending of the warranty period and the LOW MILEAGE of the vehicle. This amount of money is NOTHING to Toyota but it is LIFE CHANGING to this, up until now, independent woma INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFOR

NHTSA ODI #11719106

Mileage unknown · Feb 9, 2026
Service Brakes

The brake booster suddenly fails at 54k mile. Brake responds slower and need to push the brake pedal all the way It seems a lot of 2010-2015 Prius are facing this problem ABS light, skid light, and brake light was on when it happened, first appeared on Feb 6, 2026 Have to replace brake boost for ~$1500

NHTSA ODI #11716793

Mileage unknown · Jan 30, 2026
Service Brakes

ABS break actuator and abs pump failed while driving losing loss of breaking. Toyota is aware of this problem but refuse to fix this notorious and dangerous problem they have with multiple model years. I was not informed of the limited service campaign. This should be recalled as a safety to the public.

NHTSA ODI #11714486

Mileage unknown · Jan 16, 2026
Service Brakes

Defected brake booster hard brake suddenly car less than 100 000 miles many vehicles with the problem

NHTSA ODI #11711545

Official recalls

1

20V369000 · Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Jun 24, 2020

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2013-2015 Prius and 2014-2017 Prius V vehicles not included in recall 18V-684. Excessive voltage in the Intelligent Power Module (IPM) within the inverter may cause the hybrid system to shut down, causing the vehicle to stall while being driven.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An unexpected hybrid power system shut down may increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will perform a software update for the hybrid system. If the vehicle has experienced an inverter failure with certain hybrid system faults related to this condition, the inverter assembly will be repaired or replaced, prior to software update. All repairs will be performed free of charge. This recall began July 24, 2020. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371. Toyota's number for this recall is 20TB10 / 20TA10.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

3

DP23005 · Brake Actuator Valve Wear

Opened Nov 22, 2023 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additional related complaints and crashes via a new defect petition The petition and related materials can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI number:11553736.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additional related complaints and crashes via a new defect petition The petition and related materials can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI number:11553736.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additional related complaints and crashes via a new defect petition The petition and related materials can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI number:11553736.

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP19004 · Brake Actuator Valve Wear

Opened Sep 30, 2019 · Closed Jan 21, 2021

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist

On September 19, 2019, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a defect petition from Mr. Roger Hogan requesting that the Agency investigate and recall certain Toyota Prius, Prius PHV, Camry Hybrid and Avalon Hybrid vehicles for a brake actuator valve wear condition covered under Toyota Customer Support Programs ZJB and ZKK (subject CSP?s). In support of his request, the petitioner identified 117 NHTSA complaints allegedly related to the subject CSP condition, including 60 reporting crashes. On September 30, 2019, ODI opened Defect Petition DP19-004 to evaluate the petitioner?s request for an investigation. In August 2020, the petitioner notified the Agency that he was withdrawing his petition. Because the petitioner has withdrawn the petition, we are denying the petition as moot and no further analysis of this petition is necessary.NHTSA is authorized to issue an order requiring notification and remedy of a defect if the Agency?s investigation shows a defect in the design, construction, or performance of a motor vehicle that presents an unreasonable risk to safety. 49 U.S.C. ?? 30102(a)(9), 30118. Because the petitioner has with withdrawn the petition, the petition is denied as moot. This action does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency notes that it is not required to receive a defect petition prior to opening a defect investigation and will take further action if warranted by future circumstances.