← New search

2008 Toyota Prius

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Prius years

Owner complaints for the 2008 Toyota Prius are substantially higher than the model-year median of 164.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,248 reports with mileage · 249 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 579 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 235 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 171 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

152 crash reports6 fire reports50 injury reports

Vehicle Speed Control complaints

156 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Nov 9, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

NEEDING MAXIMUM ACCELERATION TO AVOID BEING STRUCK FROM BEHIND, I THRUST THE ACCELERATOR TO THE FLOOR IN MY '08 PRIUS. SAFELY AVOIDING A POSSIBLE COLLISION, MY AUTO CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE. THE ACCELERATOR WAS STUCK IN THE FULL DOWN POSITION AND COULD NOT BE BUDGED EITHER BY HAND OR BY REPEATED STOMPING TO RELEASE IT. I MADE…

Read full complaint

NEEDING MAXIMUM ACCELERATION TO AVOID BEING STRUCK FROM BEHIND, I THRUST THE ACCELERATOR TO THE FLOOR IN MY '08 PRIUS. SAFELY AVOIDING A POSSIBLE COLLISION, MY AUTO CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE. THE ACCELERATOR WAS STUCK IN THE FULL DOWN POSITION AND COULD NOT BE BUDGED EITHER BY HAND OR BY REPEATED STOMPING TO RELEASE IT. I MADE SURE THE FLOOR MAT WAS NOT INTERFERING WITH THE ACCELERATOR, WHICH IT WASN'T. I BRAKED HARD AND TURNED OFF THE 4 LANE STREET TO THE RIGHT AND WAS ABOUT TO TURN OFF THE ENGINE WHEN IT RELEASED AS RAPIDLY AS IT BEGAN. I REPORTED IT TO TOYOTA AT MY NEXT OIL SERVICE - BUT THEY HAD NO PRIOR EXPERIENCE OF THIS TYPE OF COMPLAINT. I HAVE SINCE REFRAINED MAXIMUM ACCELERATION - BUT AM AFRAID TO LET ANYONE ELSE DRIVE MY AUTO. NOW THAT I AM AWARE THAT THERE IS NO DIRECT MECHANICAL CONNECTION TO TO INVESTIGATE OR CORRECT IN THE FUEL SYSTEM, BUT INSTEAD AN ELECTRONIC ONE, ("FLY BY WIRE" LIKE THE NEW COMMERCIAL JETS), I AM EVEN MORE ON EDGE. THANK GOD, THE PRIUS IS UNDERPOWERED. IN A MORE POWERFUL AUTO, THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE OVERPOWERED THE BRAKES AND LED TO A POSSIBLE DISASTER. ELECTRONICS MALFUNCTION SPORADICALLY! PLEASE INVESTIGATE!!!*TR

NHTSA ODI #10291515

500 miles · Nov 9, 2009
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. IN APRIL OF 2008, 4 MONTHS AFTER I BOUGHT THE VEHICLE, I WAS PULLING INTO A SPOT IN THE PARKING STRUCTURE AT WORK. ALL OF A SUDDEN THE ENGINE GUNNED AND THE CAR LURCHED FORWARD, WENT OVER THE BUMPER GUARD IN THE SPOT, AND WAS STOPPED BY THE CONCRETE OVERHANG, WHICH TOTALLY CRUNCHED THE HOOD. AT THE …

Read full complaint

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. IN APRIL OF 2008, 4 MONTHS AFTER I BOUGHT THE VEHICLE, I WAS PULLING INTO A SPOT IN THE PARKING STRUCTURE AT WORK. ALL OF A SUDDEN THE ENGINE GUNNED AND THE CAR LURCHED FORWARD, WENT OVER THE BUMPER GUARD IN THE SPOT, AND WAS STOPPED BY THE CONCRETE OVERHANG, WHICH TOTALLY CRUNCHED THE HOOD. AT THE TIME, I SAID TO MYSELF, "WHY AREN'T THE BRAKES WORKING?" I THINK THIS PROBLEM MAY BE RELATED TO THE GAS PEDAL PROBLEMS CURRENTLY BEING REPORTED CONCERNING THE TOYOTAS. THANKS FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10291422

10,000 miles · Nov 5, 2009
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS THAT HAS AN ACCELERATION PROBLEM WHICH IS NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE FLOOR MAT. I ALSO HAD A 2004 TOYOTA PRIUS WITH THE SAME PROBLEM THAT RESULTED IN A COLLISION THAT TOTALED THE VEHICLE. THE 2008 PRIUS WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR THE ACCELERATION PROBLEM BUT THEY CAN NOT REPRODUCE IT. THE 2004 PRIUS…

Read full complaint

I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS THAT HAS AN ACCELERATION PROBLEM WHICH IS NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE FLOOR MAT. I ALSO HAD A 2004 TOYOTA PRIUS WITH THE SAME PROBLEM THAT RESULTED IN A COLLISION THAT TOTALED THE VEHICLE. THE 2008 PRIUS WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR THE ACCELERATION PROBLEM BUT THEY CAN NOT REPRODUCE IT. THE 2004 PRIUS WAS TOTALED IN A COLLISION WHERE THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10291088

30,000 miles · Nov 3, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

WHILE DRIVING MY EMPLOYER'S 2008 (OR 2009) TOYOTA PRIUS SEVERAL TIMES IN SUMMER OF 2009, I PRESSED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL TO THE FLOOR TO PASS, AND THE PEDAL STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION. THIS HAPPENED SEVERAL SEPARATE TIMES DURING THE SUMMER OF 2009. THE CAR WAS SENT TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP, WHERE IT WAS SUPPOSEDLY FIXED…

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING MY EMPLOYER'S 2008 (OR 2009) TOYOTA PRIUS SEVERAL TIMES IN SUMMER OF 2009, I PRESSED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL TO THE FLOOR TO PASS, AND THE PEDAL STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION. THIS HAPPENED SEVERAL SEPARATE TIMES DURING THE SUMMER OF 2009. THE CAR WAS SENT TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP, WHERE IT WAS SUPPOSEDLY FIXED, HOWEVER IT STUCK SEVERAL TIMES AGAIN AFTER REPAIR? THIS PROBLEM HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH FLOORMATS. THIS HAPPENED TO OTHER DRIVERS AT WORK OF THIS SAME CAR TOO. I AM A PROFESSIONAL DRIVER WITH 40 YEARS OF DRIVING EXPERIENCE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10290766

13,051 miles · Oct 26, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

I AM NOT BEING MELODRAMATIC WHEN I SAY THAT I THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO DIE TODAY. MY 2008 PRIUS ACCELERATED ALMOST OUT OF CONTROL. I WAS MERGING ONTO AN EXPRESSWAY WHEN THE ACCELERATOR SEEMED TO HAVE A LIFE OF ITS OWN AND TOOK OFF AT AN INCREDIBLY HIGH RATE OF SPEED. IT WOULD NOT STOP, KEPT GETTING FASTER AND FASTER. I MANAGE…

Read full complaint

I AM NOT BEING MELODRAMATIC WHEN I SAY THAT I THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO DIE TODAY. MY 2008 PRIUS ACCELERATED ALMOST OUT OF CONTROL. I WAS MERGING ONTO AN EXPRESSWAY WHEN THE ACCELERATOR SEEMED TO HAVE A LIFE OF ITS OWN AND TOOK OFF AT AN INCREDIBLY HIGH RATE OF SPEED. IT WOULD NOT STOP, KEPT GETTING FASTER AND FASTER. I MANAGED TO SLOW DOWN THE VEHICLE. IT WAS FINE FOR THE 20 MINUTE DRIVE DOWN THAT EXPRESSWAY. AFTER GETTING OFF AND GETTING INTO CITY TRAFFIC I WAS STOPPED AT A RED LIGHT. WHEN THE CAR LUNGED FORWARD. THANK GOD I HAD MY FOOT HARD ON THE BRAKE. IT DID NOT BRAKE AWAY ONLY LUNGED 6 - 12 INCHES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10289907

39,000 miles · Oct 7, 2009
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS HYBRID. WHILE ENTERING THE PARKING GARAGE THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED WITHOUT INTENTION. AS A CONSEQUENCE THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A PARKED VEHICLE. PRIOR TO THE FAILURE HE NOTICED THAT THE ELECTRIC POWER "OFF" SWITCH WAS ENGAGED. THE ESTIMATED COST FOR DAMAGES FOR EACH VEHICLE WAS $1,000. …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS HYBRID. WHILE ENTERING THE PARKING GARAGE THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED WITHOUT INTENTION. AS A CONSEQUENCE THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A PARKED VEHICLE. PRIOR TO THE FAILURE HE NOTICED THAT THE ELECTRIC POWER "OFF" SWITCH WAS ENGAGED. THE ESTIMATED COST FOR DAMAGES FOR EACH VEHICLE WAS $1,000. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 39,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 40,000.

NHTSA ODI #10286665

38 miles · Sep 21, 2009
Service Brakes, ElectricVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

DRIVING ON PCH IN CORONA DEL MAR, CA AT A SPEED OF APPROX. 25 MPH. TRYING TO BRAKE AT A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK WHERE A CAR WAS ALREADY STOPPED IN FRONT OF THE PRIUS. CAR DID NOT BRAKE, INSTEAD IT ACCELERATED AND THE CAR THAT WAS ALREADY STOPPED AT THE CROSSWALK WAS REARENDED. DRIVER OF PRIUS INJURED ANKLE. PRIUS IS TOTALED. POLICE…

Read full complaint

DRIVING ON PCH IN CORONA DEL MAR, CA AT A SPEED OF APPROX. 25 MPH. TRYING TO BRAKE AT A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK WHERE A CAR WAS ALREADY STOPPED IN FRONT OF THE PRIUS. CAR DID NOT BRAKE, INSTEAD IT ACCELERATED AND THE CAR THAT WAS ALREADY STOPPED AT THE CROSSWALK WAS REARENDED. DRIVER OF PRIUS INJURED ANKLE. PRIUS IS TOTALED. POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10284812

20,000 miles · Aug 18, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

WAS STOPPED IN TRAFFIC, AT A LIGHT. LIGHT CHANGED TO GREEN. CAR AHEAD OF PULLED FORWARD. I MOVED FORWARD, ~15-20MPH. CAR AHEAD STOPPED. I RELEASED ACCELERATOR AND PRESSED ON BRAKE PEDAL. CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN, KEPT MOVING FORWARD AS IF ACCELERATOR WAS PRESSED. BRAKE PEDAL FELT 'HARD', IT DID NOT MOVE DOWN. I KEPT PRESSING …

Read full complaint

WAS STOPPED IN TRAFFIC, AT A LIGHT. LIGHT CHANGED TO GREEN. CAR AHEAD OF PULLED FORWARD. I MOVED FORWARD, ~15-20MPH. CAR AHEAD STOPPED. I RELEASED ACCELERATOR AND PRESSED ON BRAKE PEDAL. CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN, KEPT MOVING FORWARD AS IF ACCELERATOR WAS PRESSED. BRAKE PEDAL FELT 'HARD', IT DID NOT MOVE DOWN. I KEPT PRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL. BRAKES FINALLY TOOK HOLD AND CAR STOPPED. LUCKILY I DID NOT HIT THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10280896

4,200 miles · Jul 13, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE DRIVING 60 MPH, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED UNEXPECTEDLY. THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT THE VEHICLE DID NOT STOP ACCELERATING. THE VEHICLE WAS LITERALLY IN A "RUNAWAY" MODE AND THE ENGINE HAD TO BE TURNED OFF IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE HAS OCCURRED AT LEA…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE DRIVING 60 MPH, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED UNEXPECTEDLY. THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT THE VEHICLE DID NOT STOP ACCELERATING. THE VEHICLE WAS LITERALLY IN A "RUNAWAY" MODE AND THE ENGINE HAD TO BE TURNED OFF IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE HAS OCCURRED AT LEAST 12 TIMES IN THE PAST YEAR. TOYOTA CLAIMS TO BE UNAWARE OF THIS FAILURE AND REFUSES TO INVESTIGATE THE COMPLAINTS. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 4,200.

NHTSA ODI #10276554

18,800 miles · Jul 13, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. ON 12JUL2008 I WAS RETURNING HOME AND DRIVING ON HWY 70 EAST,NEAR GOLDSBORO, NC. I WAS TRAVELING AT A SPEED OF APPROX 55-60 MPH. THE VEHICLE WAS IN CRUISE CONTROL. THE TRAFFIC WAS GETTING HEAVY AND I HAD TO SLOW DOWN. SO I PUT ON THE BRAKES AND THE CRUISE CONTROL DID NOT RESPOND OR DISENGAGE AT THAT T…

Read full complaint

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. ON 12JUL2008 I WAS RETURNING HOME AND DRIVING ON HWY 70 EAST,NEAR GOLDSBORO, NC. I WAS TRAVELING AT A SPEED OF APPROX 55-60 MPH. THE VEHICLE WAS IN CRUISE CONTROL. THE TRAFFIC WAS GETTING HEAVY AND I HAD TO SLOW DOWN. SO I PUT ON THE BRAKES AND THE CRUISE CONTROL DID NOT RESPOND OR DISENGAGE AT THAT TIME. SO I KEPT APPLYING PRESSURE ON THE BRAKE PEDAL AND PULLED OFF OF THE ROADWAY. WHEN I LIFTED MY FOOT OFF OF THE BRAKE PEDAL THE VEHICLE AGAIN WANTED TO ACCELERATE. I HAD TO TURN THE IGNITION SYSTEM OFF AND WAIT A SHORT TIME. I RE-STARTED THE VEHICLE AND EVERY SEEM TO BE OK. ON 13JUL09 I HAD THE VEHICLE CHECKED OUT BY A TOYOTA OF NEW BERN, AND THEY COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE VEHICLE. THEY STATED THEY WOULD OPEN A CASE ON IT AND NOTIFY THERE COMPANY. I JUST WANTED TO WRITE THIS NOTICE IN CASE IT HAPPENS AGAIN TO ME OR SOMEONE ELSE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10276530

Official recalls

4

12V536000 · Engine And Engine Cooling; Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Engine And Engine Cooling

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

12V537000 · Steering; Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Steering

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

10V036000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.

09V388000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Oct 5, 2009

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP13001 · Intermediate Steering Shaft Separation

Opened Feb 21, 2013 · Closed Apr 8, 2020

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:column; Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Additional source detail variants (3)

Steering:column

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606