NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Vehicle Speed Control complaints
156 reportsClear category filter8,000 miles · Mar 9, 2010
Fuel System, OtherVehicle Speed ControlCrash
DRIVING HOME FROM CHURCH JULY 5, 2009 THE BEACH TRAFFIC WAS BUMPER TO BUMPER. STOP AND GO TRAFFIC. I WAS STOPPED BEHIND AN SUV. THE TRAFFIC STARTED TO MOVE AND MY PRIUS BOLTED FORWARD INTO THE SUV WHICH IN TURN PUSHED IT INTO ANOTHER SUV. MY CAR WAS TOTALED. THE ENGINE WAS PUSHED ALL THE WAY BACK INTO THE FRONT SEAT. THIS S…
Read full complaint
DRIVING HOME FROM CHURCH JULY 5, 2009 THE BEACH TRAFFIC WAS BUMPER TO BUMPER. STOP AND GO TRAFFIC. I WAS STOPPED BEHIND AN SUV. THE TRAFFIC STARTED TO MOVE AND MY PRIUS BOLTED FORWARD INTO THE SUV WHICH IN TURN PUSHED IT INTO ANOTHER SUV. MY CAR WAS TOTALED. THE ENGINE WAS PUSHED ALL THE WAY BACK INTO THE FRONT SEAT. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN JUST A FENDER BENDER. NO ONE WAS INJURED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10318208
40,000 miles · Mar 9, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 30 MPH THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING. IN ORDER TO STOP THE ACCELERATION THE CONTACT HAD TO PHYSICALLY PULL THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL UP FROM THE FLOOR. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALERSHIP. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 30 MPH THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING. IN ORDER TO STOP THE ACCELERATION THE CONTACT HAD TO PHYSICALLY PULL THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL UP FROM THE FLOOR. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALERSHIP. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 40000. UPDATED 05/10/10 *BF UPDATED 05/1010*JB UPDATED 05/13/10.8JB
NHTSA ODI #10318194
24,700 miles · Mar 8, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
DEC 1 2008 PRIUS - UNEXPECTED ACCELERATION IN STOP AND GO TRAFFIC AND WITH FOOT ON THE BRAKE, THE CAR SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND HIT THE CAR IN FROM OF ME ... APPROXIMATELY A CAR LENGTH OR SO AWAY. THE MOTOR RACED HIGH AND I WAS UNABLE TO GET THE ENGINE TO SHUT DOWN UNTIL I HELD ON THE POWER BUTTON FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME…
Read full complaint
DEC 1 2008 PRIUS - UNEXPECTED ACCELERATION IN STOP AND GO TRAFFIC AND WITH FOOT ON THE BRAKE, THE CAR SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND HIT THE CAR IN FROM OF ME ... APPROXIMATELY A CAR LENGTH OR SO AWAY. THE MOTOR RACED HIGH AND I WAS UNABLE TO GET THE ENGINE TO SHUT DOWN UNTIL I HELD ON THE POWER BUTTON FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME WAS PUSHED INTO THE CAR AHEAD OF THEM IT TOOK TOYOTA OVER A MONTH TO INSPECT THE CAR (THEIR LEGAL FOLKS SET IT UP) AND WE WERE TOLD WE COULD BE PRESENT WHEN IT HAPPENED, BUT THEY DIDN'T LET US KNOW. OVER 5 WEEKS AFTER THE ACCIDENT WE RECEIVED A FORM LETTER FROM TOYOTA STATING THEY FOUND NOTHING WRONG. WITH TOYOTA'S DELAY, WE ENDED UP WAITING OVER 8 WEEKS TO GET THE CAR BACK, AT A COST OF $15,000 .... FOR A COLLISION WHERE THE TRAFFIC WAS MOVING 1-4 MILES PER HOUR. THE CAR IS KNOW UNSAFE AND WE CANNOT DRIVE IT. OFFERS FROM 2 TOYOTA DEALERSHIPS ARE UP TO $3K UNDER KELLY BLUE BOOK TRADE IN VALUE FOR A REPLACE CAR (NON PRIUS). DRIVER OF PRIUS HAS A RECORD OF DRIVING OVER 30 YEARS WITH NO ACCIDENTS. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10317638
Mileage unknown · Mar 5, 2010
Electrical SystemVehicle Speed Control
2008 PRIUS REGULARLY THRUSTS FORWARD AFTER ABOUT 30 SECONDS FROM STARTING THE CAR. THEN, CAR LOOMS BACK INTO POSITION. IT HAS ALWAYS SCARED ME AND MAKES ME INSECURE TO DRIVE THE CAR. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE I BOUGHT THE CAR IN DECEMBER 2007, SO THE DATE OF THE INCIDENT BELOW IS INACCURATE. I FELT I SHOULD REPORT TH…
Read full complaint
2008 PRIUS REGULARLY THRUSTS FORWARD AFTER ABOUT 30 SECONDS FROM STARTING THE CAR. THEN, CAR LOOMS BACK INTO POSITION. IT HAS ALWAYS SCARED ME AND MAKES ME INSECURE TO DRIVE THE CAR. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE I BOUGHT THE CAR IN DECEMBER 2007, SO THE DATE OF THE INCIDENT BELOW IS INACCURATE. I FELT I SHOULD REPORT THIS IN LIGHT OF THE RECENT REPORTS OF DEFECTS, ETC. THANK YOU. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10317044
Mileage unknown · Mar 3, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
LTR FWD ON BEHALF OF (MI) RE TOYOTA BRAKING PROBLEM IN HER 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS, REPLY TO LANSING, MI OFC. *TGW THE CONSUMER WAS INVOLVED IN ACCIDENT. THE CONSUMER WAS STOPPED AT A STOP SIGN BEHIND TWO VEHICLES GOING SOUTH AT AN INTERSECTION, WAITING TO TURN RIGHT. THE CONSUMER STATED HER FIRST PRACTICE IN DRIVING THE VEHICLE, WH…
Read full complaint
LTR FWD ON BEHALF OF (MI) RE TOYOTA BRAKING PROBLEM IN HER 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS, REPLY TO LANSING, MI OFC. *TGW THE CONSUMER WAS INVOLVED IN ACCIDENT. THE CONSUMER WAS STOPPED AT A STOP SIGN BEHIND TWO VEHICLES GOING SOUTH AT AN INTERSECTION, WAITING TO TURN RIGHT. THE CONSUMER STATED HER FIRST PRACTICE IN DRIVING THE VEHICLE, WHEN STARTING FROM A STOP IS TO SIMPLY TAKE HER FOOT OFF THE BRAKE PEDAL AND ALLOW IT TO START MOVING WITHOUT PUTTING HER FOOT ON THE GAS PEDAL, TO MAXIMIZE FUEL EFFICIENCY. AS SHE MOVED HER FOOT TOWARD THE GAS PEDAL, BUT NOT QUITE ON THE PEDAL, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY LURCHED AT A VERY HIGH RPM AND HIT THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF HER, WHICH WAS ABOUT 3 FEET. SHE APPLIED THE BRAKES AGAIN, AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE CONSUMER STATED THE DAMAGE TO BOTH VEHICLES WERE MINIMAL. THE CONSUMER STATED THE INCIDENT HAPPENED AGAIN, BUT WITHOUT INCIDENT. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10316477
185,000 miles · Mar 3, 2010
Service Brakes, HydraulicVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury
SECOND ACCIDENT CAUSED BY BRAKE FAILURE WITH ACCELERATION. 2008 PRIUS IN STOP AND GO TRAFFIC DRIVING IN BATTERY (BRAKE)MODE ABOUT 10-15 MPH. CAR IN FRONT SLOWED DOWN, I HIT THE BRAKE AND THE CAR ACCELERATED SLIGHTLY. I LOOK TO BE SURE MY FOOT WAS ON THE BRAKE PEDAL AND IT WAS AND THEN REAR ENDED THE CAR IN FRONT. CAR IN FRONT MO…
Read full complaint
SECOND ACCIDENT CAUSED BY BRAKE FAILURE WITH ACCELERATION. 2008 PRIUS IN STOP AND GO TRAFFIC DRIVING IN BATTERY (BRAKE)MODE ABOUT 10-15 MPH. CAR IN FRONT SLOWED DOWN, I HIT THE BRAKE AND THE CAR ACCELERATED SLIGHTLY. I LOOK TO BE SURE MY FOOT WAS ON THE BRAKE PEDAL AND IT WAS AND THEN REAR ENDED THE CAR IN FRONT. CAR IN FRONT MOVE FORWARD BUT PRIUS WOULDN'T STOP AND STARTED TO ACCELERATE AGAIN SO I PUSHED ON THE PARKING BRAKE WITH MY LEFT FOOT AND SLOWED IT DOWN FOR THE SECOND IMPACT. CAR IN FRONT THEN DROVE SLOWLY TO A PARKING LOT AND THE PRIUS KEPT MOVING SO I DROVE IT INTO THE PARKING LOT AND WHEN IT SLOWED GOING UP THE RAMP I PUSHED THE PARKING BUTTON STOPPING THE CAR. I THEN RESTARTED IT AND RELEASED THE PARKING BRAKE TO MOVE FURTHER INTO THE PARKING LOT. 4 PEOPLE INJURED, 3 SERIOUSLY. A SIMILAR INCIDENT OCCURRED 29 SEPTEMBER 2008 WHEN DRIVING ON CRUISE CONTROL AT 26 MPH THE PRIUS SUDDENLY TURNED LEFT HITTING A PARKED CAR. THE VIDEO SHOWS I WAS TRYING TO COUNTER STEER HARD RIGHT. SKID MARKS SHOWED THE LEFT FRONT WHEEL STOPPED AND THE CAR PIVOTED ON IT WITH ACCELERATION MARKS FROM THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10316352
33,000 miles · Mar 3, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
ON 2/24/2010 I WAS DRIVING MY 2008 PRIUS, SLOWING TO STOP FOR A RED ARROW SIGNAL. WHEN I WAS AT ABOUT 2MPH, THE CAR REVVED, SHOOTING FORWARD INTO THE CAR AHEAD OF MINE. MY FOOT WAS ON THE BRAKE, I WAS NOT ON THE PHONE OR DISTRACTED WITH ANY OTHER ACTIVITY. AS A RESULT, MY CAR SUFFERED MINOR DAMAGE, AND THERE WAS LITTLE TO NO DAM…
Read full complaint
ON 2/24/2010 I WAS DRIVING MY 2008 PRIUS, SLOWING TO STOP FOR A RED ARROW SIGNAL. WHEN I WAS AT ABOUT 2MPH, THE CAR REVVED, SHOOTING FORWARD INTO THE CAR AHEAD OF MINE. MY FOOT WAS ON THE BRAKE, I WAS NOT ON THE PHONE OR DISTRACTED WITH ANY OTHER ACTIVITY. AS A RESULT, MY CAR SUFFERED MINOR DAMAGE, AND THERE WAS LITTLE TO NO DAMAGE TO THE OTHER VEHICLE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES AND NO POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. IT WAS RAINING. THE ACCIDENT OCCURRED IN ROSEVILLE, CA. MY CAR WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN RECALLED FOR THE FLOORMAT, BUT THE DEALER IN MY AREA SENT A LETTER STATING NOT TO COME TO THE DEALER FOR THE FIX UNTIL THEY CONTACTED ME. THE NEVER HAVE, AND AFTER THIS INCIDENT DID NOT ASK ME TO BRING THE CAR IN TO FIX THAT ISSUE. ON 3/2/2010, WHEN TRYING TO START THE CAR, I WAS DEPRESSING THE BRAKE AND HIT THE START BUTTON, HOWEVER, ONLY THE ELECTRICAL POWER CAME ON, NOT THE ENGINE. DEPRESSING THE BRAKE AND PRESSING THE BUTTON AGAIN STARTED THE ENGINE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10316332
400 miles · Mar 2, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control
I BOUGHT A TOYOTA PRIUS 2008 AND WITHIN 2 MONTHS OF PURCHASE I EXPERIENCED SUDDEN ACCELERATION TWICE. I MENTIONED THE ISSUE TO A TOYOTA DEALER SERVICE AGENTS, BUT HE TOOK IT NO FURTHER NOR DID I. IT HAS NEVER HAPPENED AGAIN. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10315878
30,800 miles · Mar 1, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control
I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WHICH HAS A SURGE PROBLEM UPON START-UP. MY WIFE AND I ARE CONCERNED BECAUSE THIS HAS OCCURRED SEVERAL TIMES IN THE PAST. WE HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT THE PROBLEM LYE`S IN THE COMPUTER AND NOT IN THE GAS PEDAL GETTING STUCK, DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE DO NOT HAVE TO COMPRESS THE PEDAL ON START-UP. IN FACT, WE…
Read full complaint
I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WHICH HAS A SURGE PROBLEM UPON START-UP. MY WIFE AND I ARE CONCERNED BECAUSE THIS HAS OCCURRED SEVERAL TIMES IN THE PAST. WE HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT THE PROBLEM LYE`S IN THE COMPUTER AND NOT IN THE GAS PEDAL GETTING STUCK, DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE DO NOT HAVE TO COMPRESS THE PEDAL ON START-UP. IN FACT, WE USUALLY KEEP OUR FOOT ON THE BRAKE IN CASE IT LUNGES AGAIN. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10315274
11,500 miles · Feb 25, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
TOYOTA 2008 PRIUS SUDDEN ACCELERATION, REMOVED THE MATS PRIOR TO THE RECALL, AS WE FIGURED OUT BY LOOKING AT OTHER CARS CLEARANCE BELOW THE GAS PEDAL. I ACCELERATED BACKWARDS WHEN TRYING TO PARK MY CAR. HIT A PARKED CAR. AFTER REMOVAL OF THE MATS, MY CAR HAS ACCELERATED ON TWO OTHER OCCASIONS. I TURNED THE CAR OFF AFTER STOMPING…
Read full complaint
TOYOTA 2008 PRIUS SUDDEN ACCELERATION, REMOVED THE MATS PRIOR TO THE RECALL, AS WE FIGURED OUT BY LOOKING AT OTHER CARS CLEARANCE BELOW THE GAS PEDAL. I ACCELERATED BACKWARDS WHEN TRYING TO PARK MY CAR. HIT A PARKED CAR. AFTER REMOVAL OF THE MATS, MY CAR HAS ACCELERATED ON TWO OTHER OCCASIONS. I TURNED THE CAR OFF AFTER STOMPING ON BRAKE AND APPLYING PARKING BRAKE. I INFORMED JOHN ELLWAY TOYOTA DEALERSHIP IN MANHATTAN BEACH CA AND THEY WERE DISMISSIVE. THIS HAPPENED LONG BEFORE SUDDEN ACCELERATION WAS IN THE MEDIA. THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH MY CAR AND THEY REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE IT. THE FIRST TIME IT HAPPENED, MY MOTHER WATCHED ME ZOOM DOWN OUR ALLEY IN REVERSE AS I WAS ATTEMPTING TO PARK MY CAR. I HAVE A WITNESS. ONE TWO OTHER OCCASIONS THIS HAS HAPPENED, THE DEALER SAYS THAT MY CAR IS NOT EFFECTED BY THE RECALL. I HAD THE ALL WEATHER CAR MATS IN MY CAR THAT I PURCHASED AT THE DEALER. I REMOVED THEM, BUT THIS STILL HAS HAPPENED. IF SOMETHING HAPPENS TO ME I WANT THIS TO BE A RECORD OF MY COMPLAINT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10314411
Official recalls
4Nov 14, 2012
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.
Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.
Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.
Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.
Engine And Engine Cooling
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.
Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.
Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.
Nov 14, 2012
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.
Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.
Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.
Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.
Steering
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.
Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.
Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.
Feb 3, 2010
SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.
Oct 5, 2009
TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.
Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds
Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.
DP13001 · Intermediate Steering Shaft Separation
Opened Feb 21, 2013 · Closed Apr 8, 2020
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:column; Steering:linkages
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606
Additional source detail variants (3)
Steering:column
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606
Steering:linkages
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606
Steering
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606
Illustration