← New search

2010 Toyota Matrix

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2010 Toyota Matrix do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 70.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Matrix years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 19 of 45 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Air Bags. Review the 27 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 4 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Steering. Review the 3 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

5 crash reports0 fire reports1 injury reports

What owners actually said

45 reports
42,000 miles · Feb 17, 2016
Service BrakesVehicle Speed ControlCrash

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. WHILE EXITING THE FREEWAY, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING. THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR, BUT THE BRAKES FAILED TO STOP THE VEHICLE. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE CONTACT'S RES…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. WHILE EXITING THE FREEWAY, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING. THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR, BUT THE BRAKES FAILED TO STOP THE VEHICLE. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE CONTACT'S RESIDENCE AND THEN TO A COLLISION LOT. THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 42,000.

NHTSA ODI #10836755

40,000 miles · Jul 22, 2015
Seats

WHILE MAKING A SHARP MANUEVER FELT A 'POP' UNDER THE DRIVER'S SEAT. SEAT THEN HAD A SLIGHT ROCKING MOVEMENT, AS IF LOSE FROM THE FLOOR (E.G. A SMALL AMOUNT OF 'PLAY' WHERE THERE SHOULD BE NOTHING BUT A SOLID CONNECTION).. WHEN DUE FOR INSPECTION THE VEHICLE WAS FAILED DUE TO VA REQUIREMENTS. OWNER (SELF) DETERMINED THE 'PL…

Read full complaint

WHILE MAKING A SHARP MANUEVER FELT A 'POP' UNDER THE DRIVER'S SEAT. SEAT THEN HAD A SLIGHT ROCKING MOVEMENT, AS IF LOSE FROM THE FLOOR (E.G. A SMALL AMOUNT OF 'PLAY' WHERE THERE SHOULD BE NOTHING BUT A SOLID CONNECTION).. WHEN DUE FOR INSPECTION THE VEHICLE WAS FAILED DUE TO VA REQUIREMENTS. OWNER (SELF) DETERMINED THE 'PLAY' WAS BETWEEN THE SEAT PROPER AND THE SLIDING BRACKET TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. HE THEN THE PARTIALLY REMOVED PLASTIC COVER FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE OF THE SEAT AND TIGHTENED A LARGE-HEADED SCREW (ABOUT 1/2 INCH) WITH A TORX HEAD USING THE APPROPRIATE BIT MOUNTED IN A SCREW-DRIVER HANDLE. THE SCREW GOT TO NEARLY THE POINT OF BEING 'TIGHT' WHEN IT ABRUPTLY BECAME LOOSE AGAIN AS IF IT WAS 'STRIPPED'. IT WAS THEN TIGHTENED LESS FIRMLY AND THE VEHICLE WAS RE-INSPECTED AND PASSED. ABOUT 2 WEEKS LATER THE 'POP' SENSATION REOCCURRED AND THE 'PLAY' RETURNED. ON 7/19/2015 THE SERVICE MANAGER ON DUTY TOLD ME THERE WAS NO SERVICE BULLETIN ABOUT SEATS FOR THE 2010 MATRIX, THOUGH HE SEEMED TO IMPLY THERE WAS FOR SOME OTHER TOYOTA VEHICLES.

NHTSA ODI #10735895

Mileage unknown · Feb 9, 2015
Suspension

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AN UNKNOWN SOUND EMITTED FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.

NHTSA ODI #10682354

77,000 miles · Dec 12, 2014
Air BagsCrash

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. AFTER THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE, THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED AND NO INJURIES WERE SUSTAINED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC; HOWEVER, IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE A…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. AFTER THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE, THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED AND NO INJURIES WERE SUSTAINED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC; HOWEVER, IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 77,000.

NHTSA ODI #10663937

80,000 miles · Sep 12, 2014
Seat Belts

I OWN A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE DRIVER'S SEAT BELT BUCKLE DOES NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY, AND OFTEN DOESN'T ALLOW THE LOCKING/CLOSING OF THE BUCKLE AND BELT. THAT IS, THE BUCKLE DOESN'T ALLOW FOR SAFE, COMPLETE USE. I CONTACTED THE LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP IN VENTURA APPROX. 2 WEEKS AGO, AND THE TOYOTA OF AMERICA CORPORATION ON SEPT.…

Read full complaint

I OWN A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE DRIVER'S SEAT BELT BUCKLE DOES NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY, AND OFTEN DOESN'T ALLOW THE LOCKING/CLOSING OF THE BUCKLE AND BELT. THAT IS, THE BUCKLE DOESN'T ALLOW FOR SAFE, COMPLETE USE. I CONTACTED THE LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP IN VENTURA APPROX. 2 WEEKS AGO, AND THE TOYOTA OF AMERICA CORPORATION ON SEPT. 12, 2014, BUT BOTH REFUSE TO REPLACE THE BROKEN BUCKLE FOR FREE BECAUSE THEY SAY IT'S NOT A RECALL ITEM. I THINK THIS SHOULD BE RECALL ITEM BECAUSE IT POSES A SAFETY HAZARD. PLEASE MAKE THIS A SAFETY RECALL ITEM AS IT POSES A RISK OF INJURY OR DEATH, AND PLEASE ASSIST ME IN GETTING IT REPLACED AND FIXED WITHOUT MY INCURRING A FEE. THANK YOU. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10632753

18,700 miles · Nov 1, 2013
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, HE HEARD A LOUD NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE BRAKES, AND ROTORS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE W…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, HE HEARD A LOUD NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE BRAKES, AND ROTORS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 18,700 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 18,775.

NHTSA ODI #10550535

1 miles · Aug 16, 2012
Structure

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MOLDING AROUND THE DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR FRAME SLOWLY BECAME DETACHED FROM THE VEHICLE, LEAVING THE JAGGED METAL CLIPS EXPOSED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKING TO THE DEALER TWICE FOR THE MOLDING TO BE RE ATTACHED HOWEVER, THE FAILURE CONTINUED TO RECUR. THE CONTACT WAS …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MOLDING AROUND THE DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR FRAME SLOWLY BECAME DETACHED FROM THE VEHICLE, LEAVING THE JAGGED METAL CLIPS EXPOSED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKING TO THE DEALER TWICE FOR THE MOLDING TO BE RE ATTACHED HOWEVER, THE FAILURE CONTINUED TO RECUR. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT HE NEEDED TO ADJUST HOW HE ENTERED THE VEHICLE AND THAT THE ONLY THING THAT COULD BE DONE WAS TO JUST RE-ATTACH THE MOLDING WHENEVER IT CAME UNDONE. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 1 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 12,050.

NHTSA ODI #10471194

39,000 miles · May 9, 2012
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

BRAKE PEDAL SUDDENLY FELT SOFT AS IF THERE WAS AIR IN THE BRAKE LINE. BRAKE ONLY WORKED WHEN YOU PUMPED FAST. OTHERWISE THE PEDAL WOULD GO DOWN TO THE FLOOR. I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP, THEY VERIFIED THE COMPLAINT, AND FIXED THE PROBLEM FOR FREE. THEY REPLACED THE MASTER CYLINDER AND FLUID. BRAKES WERE FINE UNTIL 3 WEEKS …

Read full complaint

BRAKE PEDAL SUDDENLY FELT SOFT AS IF THERE WAS AIR IN THE BRAKE LINE. BRAKE ONLY WORKED WHEN YOU PUMPED FAST. OTHERWISE THE PEDAL WOULD GO DOWN TO THE FLOOR. I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP, THEY VERIFIED THE COMPLAINT, AND FIXED THE PROBLEM FOR FREE. THEY REPLACED THE MASTER CYLINDER AND FLUID. BRAKES WERE FINE UNTIL 3 WEEKS AGO, APRIL 23, 2012. EXACTLY THE SAME HAPPENED, THANK GOODNESS AS I WAS DRIVING SLOWLY. TOOK THE CAR BACK IN AND THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THE PROBLEM. THEY CONCLUDED IT WAS A FAULTY PART. THEY REPLACED THE MASTER CYLINDER AGAIN (COVERED BY WARRANTY) AND THE BRAKES WERE FINE AGAIN. THEN TODAY, MAY 9, 2012, THE BRAKES FAILED AGAIN, EXACTLY THE SAME PROBLEM, THANK GOD NO ACCIDENT. MY CAR IS IN THE SHOP AGAIN SO I DON'T KNOW YET WHAT THEIR CONCLUSION IS. THE SCARY THING HERE IS THAT THIS IS THE THIRD TIME THE BRAKES FAILED WITHIN 6 MONTHS. HAVE YOU HAD COMPLAINTS LIKE THIS BEFORE? HAS THERE BEEN A RECALL? I APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION AND LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR RESPONSE. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10457946

5,800 miles · Jan 6, 2012
Vehicle Speed Control

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE STOPPED AT A TRAFFIC STOP, THE VEHICLE EXHIBITED AN ABNORMAL INCREASE IN ENGINE RPMS. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING WHERE THE DEALER COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED AND THE FAILURE PERSIS…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE STOPPED AT A TRAFFIC STOP, THE VEHICLE EXHIBITED AN ABNORMAL INCREASE IN ENGINE RPMS. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING WHERE THE DEALER COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED AND THE FAILURE PERSISTED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 5,800.

NHTSA ODI #10442672

Mileage unknown · Oct 29, 2010
Unknown Or Other

2010 TOYOTA MATRIX. S10 APPROPRIATE LETTER FROM REGARDING TOYOTA PROBLEMS *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED HE REQUESTED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS TO HAVE THE BRAKE OVERRIDE INSTALLED IN HIS VEHICLE, BUT TOYOTA DECLINED HIS REQUEST. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10363332

Official recalls

4

16V340000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

May 23, 2016

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2008-2011 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2009-2011 Toyota Corolla and Corolla Matrix, 2006-2011 Toyota Yaris, Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350, 2010-2011 Toyota 4Runner, Lexus IS250C, Lexus IS350C and Lexus GX460, 2011 Sienna, 2007-2011 Lexus ES350, and 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2007-2008 Toyota Yaris, 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350 and 2007-2008 Lexus ES350 vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Vehicles of these model years and models that were not originally sold or ever registered in either Zones A or B are not subject to this safety recall. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules, and used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the front air bags, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on December 6, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for interim notification for this campaign are G1P (Toyota Zone A), G1R (Toyota Zone B), G2G (Lexus Zone A), and G2H (Lexus Zone B). Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), GLG (Lexus Zone A), and GLH (Lexus Zone B).

10V035000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

GULF STATES TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2010 VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 AND JUNE 2, 2008 WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. DEALERS WILL ALSO CORRECT THE OWNER'S MANUAL. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT GULF STATES TOYOTA AT 713-580-3300.

10V036000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.

10V023000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Jan 27, 2010

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008-2010 HIGHLANDER, MODEL YEAR 2009-2010 COROLLA, VENZA AND MATRIX PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT. THIS RECALL IS AN EXPANSION OF A CAMPAIGN OF 3.8 MILLION OTHER TOYOTA VEHICLES ANNOUNCED IN 2009 FOR THE SAME ISSUE (SEE 09V-388).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA WILL MODIFY OR REPLACE THE ACCELERATOR PEDALS ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES. FLOOR SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ARE ALSO BEING CONSIDERED AND WILL BE INCLUDED FOR ANY MODEL FOR WHICH IT IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. INITIALLY, DEALERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED ON HOW TO RESHAPE THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL FOR THE REPAIR. AS REPLACEMENT PARTS WITH THE SAME SHAPE AS THE MODIFIED PEDAL BECOME AVAILABLE, THEY WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE DEALERS FOR THE REPAIR. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD THE PEDAL RESHAPE REMEDY COMPLETED WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE A NEW PEDAL IF THEY DESIRE, AFTER REPLACEMENT PEDALS BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ADDITION, TOYOTA WILL REPLACE ANY TOYOTA ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT IN A SUBJECT VEHICLE WITH A NEWLY DESIGNED MAT, FREE OF CHARGE. FOR THOSE CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT BUT DO NOT NEED OR WANT THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT, TOYOTA WILL RECOVER THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT AND REIMBURSE ITS PRICE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN MARCH 30, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.