2013 Subaru Impreza

AFTER 3,000-5,000 MILES ENGINE OIL LIGHT CAME ON. I WENT TO A MECHANIC AND THEY SAID IT WAS DOWN 1 QUART OF OIL. I ASKED SURPRISINGLY, " HOW CAN THIS BE?" " I JUST HAD MY OIL CHANGED AND IT'S A NEW CAR." AFTER ADDING A QUART (AND KEEPING AN EYE ON) THE SAME THING HAPPENED AGAIN 3,000 MILES AFTER MY NEXT OIL CHANGE. THIS CAN'T BE RIGHT. I HAVE NEVER OWNED A CAR THAT BURNS THAT MUCH OIL, UNLESS THERE IS A PROBLEM. I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS THE CASE, AND SUBARU IS COVERING THEIR TAIL BY STATING THAT ITS NORMAL FOR THE AUTOMOBILE TO "CONSUME" THAT AMOUNT OF OIL. " JUST LOOK IN YOUR USERS MANUAL." I DON'T BELIEVE SO. I THINK THEY NEED TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE IF THEY ARE TO CONTINUE CLAIMING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. I AM ONE WHO IS FAR FROM IT! *TR

DECEMBER 19, 2013, I PURCHASED A SUBARU IMPREZA FROM KOEPPEL SUBARU IN LONG ISLAND CITY, N.Y. THE DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THE CAR WAS "BRAND NEW" AND USED ONLY FOR TEST DRIVES. AFTER 5 MONTHS OF DRIVING THE CAR, THE CAR BEGAN TO HAVE PROBLEMS TO START. PUTTING THE KEY IN THE IGNITION, THERE WAS NO RESPONSE. THE CAR DOOR HAD TO BE OPENED MANUALLY. THE AIRBAG WARNING LIGHT ON THE PASSENGER SIDE WOULD NOT GO OFF REGARDLESS OF THE SEAT BEING EMPTY OR OCCUPIED. SOMEONE GAVE ME A "BOOST" WHICH STARTED THE CAR. I WAS ABLE TO DRIVE AND THEN PARKED THE CAR. I WENT ON VACATION FOR TWO WEEKS. AFTER THE CAR BEING UNUSED FOR TWO WEEKS, AGAIN THE CAR WOULD NOT START. I INFORMED THE DEALERSHIP OF THIS PROBLEM AND WAS ADVISED BY THEM TO HAVE THE CAR TOWED TO ANY SUBARU DEALERSHIP FOR REPAIR. THE CAR WAS TOWED TO BAYRIDGE SUBARU WHICH EVALUATED THE CAR AND SAID THAT THE CAR HAD A DEAD CELL IN THE BATTERY. SUBARU DEALERS WERE INFORMED IN APRIL OF 2013 THAT IMPREZA HAD A DEFECT WHICH CAUSE ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS IN THE CAR LEADING TO THE BATTERY DYING AND ENGINE PROBLEMS. KOEPPEL SUBARU DID NOT INFORM ME OF THIS RECALL BEFORE I PURCHASED THE CAR IN DECEMBER OF 2013. THEY ALSO DID NOT INFORM ME THAT THE CAR WAS PREVIOUSLY CORPORATE OWNED. I BELIEVE THAT KOEPPEL SHOULD HAVE INFORMED ME ABOUT THE RECALL AS WELL AS THE FACT THAT IT WAS USED AS A "LOANER" BEFORE I PURCHASED THE CAR. I BELIEVE KOEPPEL SUBARU COMMITTED CONSUMER FRAUD BY NOT INFORMING ME OF THE RECALL AND THE CAR'S HISTORY BEFORE PURCHASE. I DO NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING THE CAR AND SIMPLY WANT A REFUND OF MY DOWN PAYMENT ($5,000) AND CAR PAYMENTS MADE UP TO CURRENT DATE. KOEPELL SUBARU SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR THEIR PRACTICES IN SELLING USED CARS. I REFUSE TO PAY BAYRIDGE SUBARU $35/DAY FOR STORAGE OF THIS UNSAFE CAR. KOEPPEL SUBARU IS IN VIOLATION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW.

THERE IS AN INTERMITTENT ISSUE WHERE THE "PASSENGER AIR BAG OFF" LIGHT ERRATICALLY COMES ON WHEN AN OCCUPANT IS SEATED IN THE PASSENGER SEAT, AND THEN THE RED DASH LIGHT LOOKING LIKE A BALLOON WILL COME ON. NEITHER THE WEIGHT/POSITIONING OF THE OCCUPANT NOR RESTARTING THE VEHICLE CHANGE WHETHER THE PASSENGER AIR BIG OFF LIGHT WILL TURN ON OR OFF. *TR

I HAVE HAD MY 2013 SUBARU IMPREZA FOR ABOUT A YEAR WHEN I STARTED ENDURING MULTIPLE VISITS TO THE DEALER FOR LOW OIL. I AM BEING TOLD BY THE SERVICE MANAGER THAT MY OIL ISSUE IS NORMAL. I HAVE NEVER OWNED A BRAND NEW VEHICLE THAT HAD TO BE TAKE TO THE DEALER AS MUCH AS MY SUBARU. I AM HAVING MY OIL CHANGES DONE EVERY 3-4 MONTHS AND HAVING TO TAKE IT IN 1-2 TIMES IN BETWEEN TO HAVE OIL ADDED. EVERY TIME I SHOW UP FOR THE OIL CONSUMPTION TEST I AM ABOUT 1-1/2 QTS LOW ON OIL. I PURCHASED A SUBARU BECAUSE THEY TALKED ABOUT HOW EFFICIENT AND RELIABLE THEY ARE. NOW, I WAS TOLD THAT I JUST NEED TO CARRY OIL IN MY CAR AT ALL TIMES. I COULD UNDERSTAND IF THIS WAS A USED CAR OFF OF A LOT, THIS WAS NOT. THIS HAS BEEN THE BIGGEST PAIN OF A CAR AND I WILL BE TRADING IT IN AND NEVER BUYING ANOTHER SUBARU. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 SUBARU IMPREZA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 4 MPH IN REVERSE, THE VEHICLE RAPIDLY ACCELERATED IN REVERSE. THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE, AS IT PROCEEDED TO CRASH INTO A BOULDER FOLLOWED BY A TREE. THE REAR BUMPER WAS DAMAGED HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO INJURIES AND A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FAILURE OCCURRED TWICE, INITIALLY IN NOVEMBER 2013 AND AGAIN IN FEBRUARY 2014 WHILE IN REVERSE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE WITH REPAIRING THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 6,300 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 7,000.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 SUBARA IMPREZA. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 30 MPH, THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKES FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION WHERE MASTER CYLINDER WAS REPLACED HOWEVER THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE ISSUE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 7,000.

BRAKE FAILURE AT LOW SPEED COMING TO STOP AT TRAFFIC LIGHT, TRACTION CONTROL LIGHT CAME ON,BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON AND CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ON. RETURNED TO DEALER TO REPAIR. DEALER TOOK 2 DAYS TO REPAIR . AT WITCH IT LASTED TILL TODAY(12/30/2013). THE SAME THING HAS HAPPENED AGAIN. VERY SCARY YOU WONDER IF THE CAR IS RELIABLE AND ALWAYS AFRAID TO TRAVEL NOW. HAVE GRANDCHILDREN AND CANNOT TRUST THIS CAR. I HOPE SOMEONE CAN HELP. HAVE TO RETURN TO DEALER (AGAIN) TO HAVE THEM LOOK AT IT (AGAIN). WONDER IF THEY KNOW HOW TO FIX IT. *TR

I WAS DRIVING INTO WORK IN THE MORNING AND AS I ENTERED THE PARKING AREA I NOTICED MY OIL LIGHT COME ON. I PARKED THE CAR AND CHECKED THE OIL, AND TO MY SURPRISE THERE WAS NOTHING ON THE STICK. I HAD JUST CHANGED THE OIL LESS THAN 2000 MILES PRIOR TO THIS AND I WAS CONCERNED. I PROCEEDED TO CHECK FOR LEAKS AND FOUND NONE. I TOOK THE CAR IN TO THE DEALER AND WAS INFORMED THAT MY ENGINE IS A QUART LOW ON MOTOR OIL (0W20), AND THAT THIS IS NORMAL BECAUSE 2.0I FB ENGINES BURN A QUART OF OIL EVERY 1200 MILES AT THE MOST. THIS IS ABSURD, I AM A FORMER ASE CERTIFIED MECHANIC AND THIS WAS NOT SOMETHING I THOUGHT TO BE NORMAL. THIS CARS IS RATED TO GO 7500 MILES BETWEEN OIL CHANGES, AND IF I AM BURNING A QRT OF OIL EVERY 1200 MILE THEN I AM ESSENTIALLY CHANGING THE OIL IN BETWEEN OIL CHANGES. TO CALL THIS A COMMON/NORMAL OCCURRENCE IS LIKE SAYING THAT THEY CARE NOTHING ABOUT THERE CUSTOMERS. THE DEALER ESSENTIALLY TOPED OFF MY OIL, PUT A STICKER IN THE WINDOW AND SAID IN 1200 MILE COME BACK AND WE WILL START AN OIL CONSUMPTION TEST, BUT NOT AT THE COST OF THE DEALER OR SUBARU. THIS INITIAL COST WOULD BE CHARGED TO ME THE CUSTOMER AT A COST OF ALMOST $100.00 DOLLARS WHICH I FIND RIDICULOUS SINCE THE CAR IS UNDER WARRANTY AND THIS IS A DIAGNOSTIC OF A FAILURE NOT A NORMAL OIL CHANGE. WHEN I CONTACTED SUBARU OF NORTH AMERICA I STILL GOT THE RUN AROUND, AND I FEEL AS IF THEY ARE HIDING THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE A WHOLE FLEET OF VEHICLES OUT ON THE ROAD READY TO BLOW ENGINES AND THEY ARE GOING TO DO THE SAME THING THEY DID IN THE PAST WITH THE 2.5 AND BLAME THE CUSTOMER. *TR